| Literature DB >> 31569480 |
Vincenzo Cavalieri1, Giuseppe Altamura1, Giulio Fumarola2, Michele di Carolo2, Maria Saponari1, Daniele Cornara3, Domenico Bosco4, Crescenza Dongiovanni5.
Abstract
Diseases associated with Xylella fastidiosa have been described mostly in North and South America. However, during the last five years, widespread X. fastidiosa infections have been reported in a constrained area of the Apulia region (southern Italy), in olives trees suffering a severe disease, denoted as Olive Quick Decline Syndrome (OQDS). Because many xylem sap-feeding insects can function as vectors for the transmission of this exotic pathogen in EU, several research programs are ongoing to assess the role of candidate vectors in the spread of the infections. Initial investigations identified Philaenus spumarius (L.) as the predominant vector species in the olive orchards affected by the OQDS. Additional experiments have been carried out during 2016 and 2017 to assess the role of other species. More specifically, adults of the spittlebugs Philaenus italosignus Drosopolous and Remane, Neophilaenus campestris (Fallen) and of the planthopper Latilica tunetana (Matsumura) (Issidae) have been tested in transmission experiments to assess their ability to acquire the bacterium from infected olives and to infect different susceptible hosts (olives, almond, myrtle -leaf milkwort, periwinkle). Acquisition rates determined by testing individual insects in quantitative PCR assays, ranging from 5.6% in N. campestris to 22.2% in P. italosignus, whereas no acquisition was recorded for L. tunetana. Successful transmissions were detected in the recipient plants exposed to P. italosignus and N. campestris, whereas no trasmissions occurred with L. tunetana. The known vector Philaenus spumarius has been included in all the experiments for validation. The systematic surveys conducted in 2016 and 2017 provided further evidence on the population dynamics and seasonal abundance of the spittlebug populations in the olive groves.Entities:
Keywords: almond; bacterium; cherry; myrtle –leaf milkwort; olive; periwinkle; spittlebugs; vectors
Year: 2019 PMID: 31569480 PMCID: PMC6835679 DOI: 10.3390/insects10100324
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Insects ISSN: 2075-4450 Impact factor: 2.769
Data collected from the six transmission experiments carried out in 2016 using specimens of different insect species caged for an acquisition access period of 96 h on Xylella fastidiosa infected olive trees. Number of insects and recipient olive plants used for the inoculation access period (IAP) are indicated.
| Insect Species | N. of Insects | N. of Recipient Plants | E b | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Used for IAP | Alive after IAP (% a) | Total | Infected after IAP (%) | ||
|
| |||||
|
| 150 | 105 (88.23) | 30 | 8 (26.66) | 0.061 |
|
| 100 | 40 (58.82) | 20 | 1 (5) | 0.010 |
|
| 145 | 100 (83.33) | 29 | 2 (6.89) | 0.014 |
|
| 85 | 21 (28.76) | 17 | 0 | 0 |
a The percentage is calculated based on the total insects found in the cages after the IAP. b Formula of Swallow (1985): Estimated probability of transmission for single insect E = 1 − (1 − p)1/k, in which p = proportion of infected plants and K = number of individuals used per tested plants.
Figure 1Survival (%) recorded in 2016 and 2017 upon four days of acquisition access period on olives for Philaenus spumarius, P. italosignus, Neophilaenus campestris and Latilica tunetana. * not done in 2016.
Data collected from the six transmission experiments carried out in 2017 using specimens of different insect species caged for an acquisition access period of 96 h on Xylella fastidiosa infected olive trees. Number of insects and recipient plants of the different host species used for the inoculation access period (IAP) are indicated.
| Insect Species | N. of Insects | N. of Recipient Plants | E b | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Used for IAP | Alive after IAP (% a) | Total | Infected after IAP (%) | ||
|
| |||||
|
| 75 | 51 (80.95) | 15 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 70 | 53 (79.10) | 14 | 1 (7.14) | 0.015 |
|
| |||||
|
| 75 | 56 (88.88) | 15 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 35 | 33 (94.28) | 7 | 0 | 0 |
|
| |||||
|
| 80 | 62 (93.93) | 16 | 5 (31.25) | 0.072 |
|
| 55 | 39 (86.66) | 11 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 65 | 46 (79.31) | 13 | 1 (7.69) | 0.016 |
|
| 25 | 9 (39.13) | 5 | 0 | 0 |
|
| |||||
|
| 25 | 22 (91.67) | 5 | 3 (60) | 0.167 |
|
| 105 | 66 (81.48) | 21 | 2 (9.5) | 0.020 |
|
| 45 | 34 (89.47) | 9 | 3 (33.33) | 0.078 |
|
| 15 | 6 (85.7) | 10 | 0 | 0 |
|
| |||||
|
| 25 | 19 (90.47) | 5 | 3 (60) | 0.167 |
|
| 80 | 26 (50.98) | 16 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 50 | 21 (52.5) | 10 | 0 | 0 |
a The percentage is calculated based on the total insects found in the cages after the IAP. b Formula of Swallow (1985): Estimated probability of transmission for single insect E = 1 − (1 − p)1/k, in which p = proportion of infected plants and K = number of individuals used per tested plants.
Figure 2Population abundance of Philaenus spumarius and Neophilaenus campestris in the infected olive groves monitored in 2016 and 2017.
Figure 3Occurrence of Xylella-positive individuals of Philaenus spumarius and Neophilaenus campestris on infected olive canopies, ground vegetation and border plants, over the two years of surveys.