| Literature DB >> 31569214 |
Mi Ah Han1, Dena Zeraatkar2, Gordon H Guyatt2, Robin W M Vernooij3, Regina El Dib4, Ying Zhang5, Abdullah Algarni6, Gareth Leung2, Dawid Storman7, Claudia Valli8, Montserrat Rabassa8, Nadia Rehman2, Michael K Parvizian2, Max Zworth2, Jessica J Bartoszko2, Luciane Cruz Lopes9, Daegan Sit10, Malgorzata M Bala11, Pablo Alonso-Coello12, Bradley C Johnston13.
Abstract
This article has been corrected. The original version (PDF) is appended to this article as a Supplement. Background: Cancer incidence has continuously increased over the past few centuries and represents a major health burden worldwide. Purpose: To evaluate the possible causal relationship between intake of red and processed meat and cancer mortality and incidence. Data Sources: Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, CINAHL, and ProQuest from inception until July 2018 and MEDLINE from inception until April 2019 without language restrictions. Study Selection: Cohort studies that included more than 1000 adults and reported the association between consumption of unprocessed red and processed meat and cancer mortality and incidence. Data Extraction: Teams of 2 reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias; 1 reviewer evaluated the certainty of evidence, which was confirmed or revised by the senior reviewer. Data Synthesis: Of 118 articles (56 cohorts) with more than 6 million participants, 73 articles were eligible for the dose-response meta-analyses, 30 addressed cancer mortality, and 80 reported cancer incidence. Low-certainty evidence suggested that an intake reduction of 3 servings of unprocessed meat per week was associated with a very small reduction in overall cancer mortality over a lifetime. Evidence of low to very low certainty suggested that each intake reduction of 3 servings of processed meat per week was associated with very small decreases in overall cancer mortality over a lifetime; prostate cancer mortality; and incidence of esophageal, colorectal, and breast cancer. Limitation: Limited causal inferences due to residual confounding in observational studies, risk of bias due to limitations in diet assessment and adjustment for confounders, recall bias in dietary assessment, and insufficient data for planned subgroup analyses.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31569214 DOI: 10.7326/M19-0699
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Intern Med ISSN: 0003-4819 Impact factor: 25.391