Literature DB >> 31566869

Trisomy 13 and 18-Prevalence and mortality-A multi-registry population based analysis.

Nitin Goel1,2, Joan K Morris3, David Tucker2, Hermien E K de Walle4, Marian K Bakker4, Vijaya Kancherla5, Lisa Marengo6, Mark A Canfield6, Karin Kallen7, Nathalie Lelong8, Jorge L Camelo9, Erin B Stallings10,11, Abbey M Jones10, Amy Nance12, My-Phuong Huynh12, Maria-Luisa Martínez-Fernández13, Antonin Sipek14, Anna Pierini15, Wendy N Nembhard16, Dorit Goetz17, Anke Rissmann17, Boris Groisman18, Leonora Luna-Muñoz19, Elena Szabova20, Serhiy Lapchenko21, Ignacio Zarante22, Paula Hurtado-Villa23, Laura E Martinez24, Giovanna Tagliabue25, Danielle Landau26, Miriam Gatt27, Saeed Dastgiri28, Margery Morgan2.   

Abstract

The aim of the study is to determine the prevalence, outcomes, and survival (among live births [LB]), in pregnancies diagnosed with trisomy 13 (T13) and 18 (T18), by congenital anomaly register and region. Twenty-four population- and hospital-based birth defects surveillance registers from 18 countries, contributed data on T13 and T18 between 1974 and 2014 using a common data-reporting protocol. The mean total birth prevalence (i.e., LB, stillbirths, and elective termination of pregnancy for fetal anomalies [ETOPFA]) in the registers with ETOPFA (n = 15) for T13 was 1.68 (95% CI 1.3-2.06), and for T18 was 4.08 (95% CI 3.01-5.15), per 10,000 births. The prevalence varied among the various registers. The mean prevalence among LB in all registers for T13 was 0.55 (95%CI 0.38-0.72), and for T18 was 1.07 (95% CI 0.77-1.38), per 10,000 births. The median mortality in the first week of life was 48% for T13 and 42% for T18, across all registers, half of which occurred on the first day of life. Across 16 registers with complete 1-year follow-up, mortality in first year of life was 87% for T13 and 88% for T18. This study provides an international perspective on prevalence and mortality of T13 and T18. Overall outcomes and survival among LB were poor with about half of live born infants not surviving first week of life; nevertheless about 10% survived the first year of life. Prevalence and outcomes varied by country and termination policies. The study highlights the variation in screening, data collection, and reporting practices for these conditions.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Edwards syndrome; Patau syndrome; congenital anomaly register; trisomies; trisomy 13; trisomy 18

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31566869      PMCID: PMC6848757          DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.61365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  22 in total

1.  Survival in trisomy 13 and trisomy 18 cases ascertained from population based registers.

Authors:  C M Brewer; S H Holloway; D H Stone; A D Carothers; D R FitzPatrick
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Twenty-year trends in the prevalence of Down syndrome and other trisomies in Europe: impact of maternal age and prenatal screening.

Authors:  Maria Loane; Joan K Morris; Marie-Claude Addor; Larraitz Arriola; Judith Budd; Berenice Doray; Ester Garne; Miriam Gatt; Martin Haeusler; Babak Khoshnood; Kari Klungsøyr Melve; Anna Latos-Bielenska; Bob McDonnell; Carmel Mullaney; Mary O'Mahony; Annette Queisser-Wahrendorf; Judith Rankin; Anke Rissmann; Catherine Rounding; Joaquin Salvador; David Tucker; Diana Wellesley; Lyubov Yevtushok; Helen Dolk
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Changes in fetal prevalence and outcome for trisomies 13 and 18: a population-based study over 23 years.

Authors:  Claire Irving; Sam Richmond; Christoper Wren; Caitlin Longster; Nicholas D Embleton
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2010-04-12

4.  Congenital malformations among liveborn infants with trisomies 18 and 13.

Authors:  Stephen J Pont; James M Robbins; T M Bird; James B Gibson; Mario A Cleves; John M Tilford; Mary E Aitken
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  The experience of families with children with trisomy 13 and 18 in social networks.

Authors:  Annie Janvier; Barbara Farlow; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Trisomies 18 and 13: trends in prevalence and prenatal diagnosis - population based study.

Authors:  A M Tonks; A S Gornall; S A Larkins; J O Gardosi
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Natural history and parental experience of children with trisomy 18 based on a questionnaire given to a Japanese trisomy 18 parental support group.

Authors:  Tomoki Kosho; Hideo Kuniba; Yuko Tanikawa; Yoko Hashimoto; Hiroko Sakurai
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Survival of children with trisomy 13 and trisomy 18: A multi-state population-based study.

Authors:  Robert E Meyer; Gang Liu; Suzanne M Gilboa; Mary K Ethen; Arthur S Aylsworth; Cynthia M Powell; Timothy J Flood; Cara T Mai; Ying Wang; Mark A Canfield
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  Congenital anomalies associated with trisomy 18 or trisomy 13: A registry-based study in 16 European countries, 2000-2011.

Authors:  Anna Springett; Diana Wellesley; Ruth Greenlees; Maria Loane; Marie-Claude Addor; Larraitz Arriola; Jorieke Bergman; Clara Cavero-Carbonell; Melinda Csaky-Szunyogh; Elizabeth S Draper; Ester Garne; Miriam Gatt; Martin Haeusler; Babak Khoshnood; Kari Klungsoyr; Catherine Lynch; Carlos Matias Dias; Robert McDonnell; Vera Nelen; Mary O'Mahony; Anna Pierini; Annette Queisser-Luft; Judith Rankin; Anke Rissmann; Catherine Rounding; Sylvia Stoianova; David Tuckerz; Natalya Zymak-Zakutnia; Joan K Morris
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  Better prognosis in newborns with trisomy 13 who received intensive treatments: a retrospective study of 16 patients.

Authors:  Keiko Tsukada; George Imataka; Hiroshi Suzumura; Osamu Arisaka
Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.194

View more
  8 in total

1.  A visual tool inclusive of fetal ultrasound and autopsy findings to reach a balanced approach to counseling on trisomy 18 in early second trimester.

Authors:  Stefania Triunfo; Marta Bonollo; Priska Gaffuri; Manuela Viviano; Daniele Satta; Manuela Bergmann
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Extensive protein dosage compensation in aneuploid human cancers.

Authors:  Klaske M Schukken; Jason M Sheltzer
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 9.438

3.  A dPCR-NIPT assay for detections of trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in a single-tube reaction-could it replace serum biochemical tests as a primary maternal plasma screening tool?

Authors:  Peng Dai; Yanfeng Yang; Ganye Zhao; Zhiqiang Gu; Huanan Ren; Shuang Hu; Ning Liu; Weimeng Jiao; Jinfang Li; Xiangdong Kong
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 8.440

Review 4.  Future Perspectives in Oxidative Stress in Trisomy 13 and 18 Evaluation.

Authors:  Angelika Buczyńska; Iwona Sidorkiewicz; Ahsan Hameed; Adam Jacek Krętowski; Monika Zbucka-Krętowska
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Outcome after Prenatal Diagnosis of Trisomy 13, 18, and 21 in Fetuses with Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Stephanie Springer; Eva Karner; Christof Worda; Maria Magdalena Grabner; Elisabeth Seidl-Mlczoch; Franco Laccone; Jürgen Neesen; Anke Scharrer; Barbara Ulm
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-12

6.  Misdiagnosis of trisomy 13 and trisomy 18 is more common than anticipated.

Authors:  Gabrielle C Geddes; Niloufar Hafezi; Brian W Gray
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 2.578

7.  Single-cell chromatin accessibility landscape of human umbilical cord blood in trisomy 18 syndrome.

Authors:  Xiaofen Qiu; Haiyan Yu; Hongwei Wu; Zhiyang Hu; Jun Zhou; Hua Lin; Wen Xue; Wanxia Cai; Jiejing Chen; Qiang Yan; Weier Dai; Ming Yang; Donge Tang; Yong Dai
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.639

Review 8.  Applications of Genome Editing Technology in Research on Chromosome Aneuploidy Disorders.

Authors:  Silvia Natsuko Akutsu; Kazumasa Fujita; Keita Tomioka; Tatsuo Miyamoto; Shinya Matsuura
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 6.600

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.