Literature DB >> 31564760

Inverse probability weighted estimation of risk under representative interventions in observational studies.

Jessica G Young1, Roger W Logan2, James M Robins3, Miguel A Hernán4.   

Abstract

Researchers are often interested in using observational data to estimate the effect on a health outcome of maintaining a continuous treatment within a pre-specified range over time; e.g. "always exercise at least 30 minutes per day". There may be many precise interventions that could achieve this range. In this paper we consider representative interventions. These are special cases of random dynamic interventions; interventions under which treatment at each time is assigned according to a random draw from a distribution that may depend on a subject's measured past. Estimators of risk under representative interventions on a time-varying treatment have previously been described based on g-estimation of structural nested cumulative failure time models. In this paper, we consider an alternative approach based on inverse probability weighting (IPW) of marginal structural models. In particular, we show that the risk under a representative intervention on a time-varying continuous treatment can be consistently estimated via computationally simple IPW methods traditionally used for deterministic static (i.e. "nonrandom" and "nondynamic") interventions for binary treatments. We present an application of IPW in this setting to estimate the 28-year risk of coronary heart disease under various representative interventions on lifestyle behaviors in the Nurses Health Study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  causal inference; g-formula; longitudinal data; marginal structural models; survival analysis

Year:  2018        PMID: 31564760      PMCID: PMC6764781          DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2018.1469993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  22 in total

1.  Dynamic regime marginal structural mean models for estimation of optimal dynamic treatment regimes, Part I: main content.

Authors:  Liliana Orellana; Andrea Rotnitzky; James M Robins
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  Diagnosing and responding to violations in the positivity assumption.

Authors:  Maya L Petersen; Kristin E Porter; Susan Gruber; Yue Wang; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models.

Authors:  Heejung Bang; James M Robins
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Targeted minimum loss based estimation of causal effects of multiple time point interventions.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Susan Gruber
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 0.968

5.  Estimation of the effect of interventions that modify the received treatment.

Authors:  S Haneuse; A Rotnitzky
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Comments on 'An information criterion for marginal structural models' by R. W. Platt, M. A. Brookhart, S. R. Cole, D. Westreich, and E. F. Schisterman.

Authors:  Masataka Taguri; Yutaka Matsuyama
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Population intervention causal effects based on stochastic interventions.

Authors:  Iván Díaz Muñoz; Mark van der Laan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Compound treatments and transportability of causal inference.

Authors:  Miguel A Hernán; Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.822

9.  Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Structural Nested Cumulative Failure Time Models to Estimate the Effects of Interventions.

Authors:  Sally Picciotto; Miguel A Hernán; John H Page; Jessica G Young; James M Robins
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 5.033

View more
  6 in total

1.  A causal framework for classical statistical estimands in failure-time settings with competing events.

Authors:  Jessica G Young; Mats J Stensrud; Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Effects of intergenerational exposure interventions on adolescent outcomes: An application of inverse probability weighting to longitudinal pre-birth cohort data.

Authors:  Yu-Han Chiu; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Ken Kleinman; Emily Oken; Jessica G Young
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.980

3.  Early life exposure to greenness and executive function and behavior: An application of inverse probability weighting of marginal structural models.

Authors:  Marcia P Jimenez; Izzuddin M Aris; Sheryl Rifas-Shiman; Jessica Young; Henning Tiemeier; Marie-France Hivert; Emily Oken; Peter James
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 9.988

4.  gfoRmula: An R Package for Estimating the Effects of Sustained Treatment Strategies via the Parametric g-formula.

Authors:  Sean McGrath; Victoria Lin; Zilu Zhang; Lucia C Petito; Roger W Logan; Miguel A Hernán; Jessica G Young
Journal:  Patterns (N Y)       Date:  2020-05-18

5.  Separating Algorithms From Questions and Causal Inference With Unmeasured Exposures: An Application to Birth Cohort Studies of Early Body Mass Index Rebound.

Authors:  Izzuddin M Aris; Aaron L Sarvet; Mats J Stensrud; Romain Neugebauer; Ling-Jun Li; Marie-France Hivert; Emily Oken; Jessica G Young
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Formulating causal questions and principled statistical answers.

Authors:  Els Goetghebeur; Saskia le Cessie; Bianca De Stavola; Erica Em Moodie; Ingeborg Waernbaum
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.497

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.