Non-coding RNAs, originally considered junk gene products, have taken center stage in view of their significant involvement in a spectrum of biological processes during human development, thereby offering novel therapeutic targets for improvement of treatment options. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated non-coding RNA dysfunction across various human cancers. In particular, microRNAs have emerged as key regulatory molecules in cancer biology. MicroRNAs are noninvasive, readily accessible biomarkers that can be effectively applied for diagnosis and prognosis of different tumor types, including colon cancer. In this study, we reanalyzed the available data with bioinformatics tools to identify differentially expressed microRNAs in colon cancer cells. The top 3 upregulated microRNAs (miR-10, miR-199, and miR-122) in colon cancer cells were further validated in tissues of clinical patients via reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Our results showed that miR-122 significantly promotes the proliferation and invasion ability of SW480 and SW620 cells through inhibition of Aldolase, Fructose-Bisphosphate A (ALDOA) expression. We further summarized recent advances in our understanding of the functional relevance of microRNAs in cancer development and discussed the possible implications of specific microRNAs in colon cancer. This study extends our knowledge of microRNA involvement in colon cancer biology and presents novel candidates for the development of attractive therapeutic strategies.
Non-coding RNAs, originally considered junk gene products, have taken center stage in view of their significant involvement in a spectrum of biological processes during human development, thereby offering novel therapeutic targets for improvement of treatment options. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated non-coding RNA dysfunction across various humancancers. In particular, microRNAs have emerged as key regulatory molecules in cancer biology. MicroRNAs are noninvasive, readily accessible biomarkers that can be effectively applied for diagnosis and prognosis of different tumor types, including colon cancer. In this study, we reanalyzed the available data with bioinformatics tools to identify differentially expressed microRNAs in colon cancer cells. The top 3 upregulated microRNAs (miR-10, miR-199, and miR-122) in colon cancer cells were further validated in tissues of clinicalpatients via reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Our results showed that miR-122 significantly promotes the proliferation and invasion ability of SW480 and SW620 cells through inhibition of Aldolase, Fructose-Bisphosphate A (ALDOA) expression. We further summarized recent advances in our understanding of the functional relevance of microRNAs in cancer development and discussed the possible implications of specific microRNAs in colon cancer. This study extends our knowledge of microRNA involvement in colon cancer biology and presents novel candidates for the development of attractive therapeutic strategies.
Cancer, a disease initiated by mutations in critical genes that result in
uncontrolled proliferation and inappropriate survival of damaged cells, is a leading
cause of death worldwide.[1] Early diagnosis should facilitate timely treatment and reduce recurrent
events as well as morbidity and mortality.[2] Under normal conditions, cells exert several safeguarding measures to ensure
that division, differentiation, and death take place at the expected times. Several
regulatory factors function to switch on or off genes that guide cellular
proliferation and differentiation.[3,4] Aberrant regulation of these tumor suppressors or oncogenes has been linked
to a plethora of diseases, including cancer.[2,5] Therefore, the identification of noninvasive and highly sensitive biomarkers
providing a detailed and accurate fingerprint of specific diseases remains an urgent
clinical requirement. Such biomarkers provide useful information to diagnose and
monitor disease conditions and effectively establish prognosis and appropriate
treatments. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated the functional relevance of novel
non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) with altered expression patterns in tumorigenesis in
multiple tumor types, supporting their utility in diagnostic and prognostic
applications as well as therapeutic targets for cancer.[2,6]About >75% of the human genome is transcribed (only 2% into protein-coding RNAs[7]), with increasing evidence of crucial roles of ncRNAs in disease development,
particularly cancer.[8] Based on a length threshold, ncRNAs are categorized into 2 subgroups: short
ncRNAs (<200 nucleotides), including piRNAs, microRNAs (miRNAs), and certain
circRNAs, and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs >200 nucleotides).[9] Non-coding RNAs act as transcriptional or post-transcriptional regulators
whose aberrant expression or impaired functional processes are highly correlated
with cancerous pathophysiology.[10]MicroRNAs, a conserved class of endogenous short ncRNAs 18 to 25 nucleotides in
length that regulate target genes by inducing degradation or suppressing translation
of target messenger RNAs (mRNAs) after transcription, have been actively
investigated as anticancer therapy in recent years.[11] Unlike other ncRNA types, miRNAs interact with the Ago subfamily of the
Argonaute family. Each miRNA has the potential to target multiple genes (∼500 for
each miRNA family) that often involve similar pathways.[12,13]Over 50% miRNAs are located in fragile sites and cancer-associated genomic regions,
supporting crucial roles in tumorigenesis. MicroRNAs are reported to regulate
numerous oncogenes or tumor suppressors and consequently modulate tumorigenesis.[14] For example, miR-34c-5p downregulates the amphiregulin (AREG)-epidermal
growth factor receptor (EGFR)-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway
and subsequently hampers ovarian cancer stemness and drug resistance.[15] MicroRNA-151-3p inhibits migration of breast cancer cells by targeting TWIST1,[16] while miR-106b and miR-93 promote tumor cell progression by targeting
Phosphatase And Tensin Homolog (PTEN) and subsequently activating the PI3K/Akt
pathway in breast cancer.[17]Colon cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-induced mortality worldwide, with
about 1 million new cases diagnosed annually.[18] Increasing age, male gender, and alcohol have been identified as risk factors
for colorectal cancer development. Colon cancer is triggered by mutations in tumor
suppressor or DNA repair genes.[19] A number of miRNAs with essential roles in colon cancer progression have been
identified to date. For example, miR-193a-3p promotes carcinogenesis via
upregulating IL17RD expression. Knockdown of miR-193b suppresses colon cancer cell
growth via activation of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and the small mothers
against decapentaplegic (SMAD)3 pathway.[20]Although numerous miRNA regulators of colon cancer have been identified, effective
clinical applications are yet to be developed. Among the deaths caused by colon
cancer, more than 50% cases showed evidence of liver metastasis, one of the major
causes of mortality.[21] However, the underlying molecular mechanisms that mediate colorectal cancer
metastasis to the liver have not been systemically characterized to date.To further elucidate the roles of miRNAs in colon cancer development, bioinformatics
tools were applied to analyze the miRNA-seq data from published data sets to obtain
differentially expressed miRNAs between colon cancer and paired adjacent normal
tissues. Along with a number of other miRNAs, miR-122, miR-10, and miR-199 were
differentially expressed in colon cancer tissue. Comparison of expression patterns
between in situ and liver metastatic colon cancer revealed higher
expression of miR-122 in liver metastatic colon cancer samples. Among the predicted
targets of miR-122, we identified ALDOA that participates in colon cancer
metastasis. Our data suggest that miR-122 serves as an ncRNA regulator of colon
cancer development by targeting ALDOA and potentially other cancer-related
genes.
Method
Clinical Samples
Three adults with colon cancer voluntarily participated in our study. Tumor
tissues were derived from initial surgery without either preoperative
chemotherapy or radiotherapy at the hospital. Tissues were collected immediately
after surgical removal and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen until further use.
Identification of Differentially Expressed miRNAs
We performed miRNA microarray analysis using the interactive web tool, GEO2R,
with the available GEO data (Accession: GSE48267). GEO2R was an interactive web
tool that allows users to compare 2 or more groups of samples in a GEO Series in
order to identify genes that are differentially expressed across experimental
conditions (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/info/geo2r.html). All the 122
samples downloaded were classified into 2 groups, including colon cancer and
adjacent normal colon tissue, which were used for subsequent analysis of miRNA quantification.[22] Raw probe-level intensity data were processed according to the procedure
of Li et al.[22] After obtaining normalized miRNA, we used default parameters of the
significance analysis of microarrays method[23] to perform differential miRNA expression analysis. Differentially
expressed miRNAs were identified based on a significant threshold
P value <.05.
Cell Culture, Transfection, and Dual-luciferase Reporter Assays
SW480 and SW620 cells were cultured in high-glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s
medium (DMEM; HyClone, Logan, Utah) with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS;
Gibco, Grand Island, New York) at 5% CO2 and 37°C. MicroRNA-122 mimic
and inhibitor (complementary sequences of miR-122) and corresponding negative
control (random sequences) were purchased from GenePharma (Shanghai, China).
Cells were transfected with the miR-122 mimic, negative control (NC), miR-122
inhibitor or inhibitor NC (GenePharma) using Lipofectamine 2000 transfection
reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California). Opti-MEM I Reduced Serum Medium
(Gibco) was used to dilute Lipofectamine 2000 and nucleic acids. Cells were
collected after 48 hours transfection for subsequent analyses. For luciferase
assays, ALDOA-3′UTR or ALDOA-3′UTR-Mut was
transfected at a concentration of 500 ng together with miR-122 mimics. After 24
hours transfection, luciferase activities were measured with a PerkinElmer 2030
Multilabel Reader (PerkinElmer, Waltham, Massachusetts). The detailed sequence
information is presented in Supplementary Table S1.
Reverse Transcription-quantitative PCR
Total RNA was extracted from SW480 cells with the HP Total RNA Kit (Omega
Bio-tek, Norcross, Georgia) and treated with DNase I (Thermo Scientific,
Waltham, Massachusetts). The concentration and quality of RNA were assessed with
a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific) and agarose gel
electrophoresis. Total RNA was reverse-transcribed using the Revert Aid First
Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Scientific). For miR-10, miR-199, and miR-122
quantification, stem-loop RT-PCR was executed with U6 small nuclear RNA as an
internal control. All primers were designed based on miR-10, miR-199, and
miR-122 sequences collected from miRBase release 21 (http://www.mirbase.org/). Primers used for qRT-PCR are shown in
Supplementary Table S1. Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain
reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed in triplicate using iQ SYBR green Supermix
(Bio-Rad, Hercules, California) and the LightCycler®480 (Roche
Applied Science, Penzberg, Upper Bavaria, Germany).
Western Blot Analysis
Cellular protein lysates were generated using RIPA Lysis Buffer (Beyotime,
Shanghai, China) and extracted 48 hours after transfection. Proteins were
separated via sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and a
Mini Trans-Blot Cell (Bio-Rad) used to transfer protein onto polyvinylidene
fluoride membranes (Millipore, Billerica, Massachusetts). Primary antibodies
specific for ALDOA (ab169554, 1:5000; Abcam, Cambridge, Massachusetts) and
β-actin (ab8226, 1:2000; Abcam) were used for immunoblot experiments. Protein
expression was detected using an Image Quant LAS4000 mini instrument (GE
Healthcare Life Sciences, Piscataway, New Jersey).
MTT Assay
All cells were maintained in low serum, containing 2% FBS (Invitrogen) with
starvation for 10 hours before the experiments were performed. An aliquot of
cells (1 × 103 cells/well) was seeded in a 96-well plate with 2% FBS
and serum-starved for 10 hours, transfected with corresponding vector or siRNA
and cultured in normal medium. At 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after transfection,
MTT (3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide) solution
(5 mg/mL, 20 μL) was added to each well. After incubation for 4 hours, the
medium was removed and 100 μL dimethyl sulfoxide was added to each well. The
relative number of surviving cells was assessed by measuring the optical density
of cell lysates at 570 nm. All assays were performed 5 times.
Cell Transwell Assay
The cell transwell assay was performed using 24-well transwell chambers and
polycarbonate membranes with a pore size of 8 µm (Corning Incorporated, Corning,
New York). Briefly, 5 × 104 transfected cells were seeded into the
upper transwell chambers coated with Matrigel (BD Biosciences, Bedford,
Massachusetts) in serum-free medium, and the lower chambers were filled with
DMEM containing 10% FBS. After incubation at 37°C for 24 hours, noninvading
cells on the upper membrane surface were removed with cotton swabs, whereas
cells that migrated onto the lower surface were fixed with 100% methanol and
stained with 0.1% crystal violet. Images of cells on the lower surface were
obtained and quantified by counting from 5 random fields in each well at a
magnification of 200× under a microscope (Olympus, szx16, Japan).
Statistical Analysis
Data were presented as means ± standard deviation from 3 independent experiments
and analyzed via the Student t test to calculate the
significant differences between cancer and normal groups using GraphPad Prism
5.0 software (San Diego, California). The results were considered statistically
significant at *P < .05, **P < .01,
***P < .001, and ****P < .0001 (n.s.
represents nonsignificant).
Results
Differentially Expressed miRNAs in Colon Cancer
Based on the available microarray data comparing the miRNA expression profiles
between colon cancer and adjacent normal colon tissue,[22] we downloaded and reanalyzed data from the GEO database using GEO2R
software to identify differentially expressed miRNAs that may serve as
therapeutic targets for colon cancer (Table 1). Overall, 17 differentially
expressed miRNAs were identified, with P < .05 as the
threshold of statistical significance. Overall, we observed 11 miRNAs that were
downregulated in cancer tissue (Table 1). Among the top 3 miRNAs,
miR-122 was upregulated while the abundance of miR-10 and miR-199 declined to a
significant extent (Table
1). To validate the results, the top 3 differentially expressed
miRNAs, miR-10, miR-199, and miR-122 were selected for subsequent analyses.
Table 1.
List of Differentially Expressed miRNAs.
miRNA_ID
Log (Fold Change)
P Value
hsa-miR-199b-5p
−2.349
.000
hsa-miR-122
4.233
.001
hsa-miR-10b
−4.404
.002
hsa-let-7i
−0.927
.007
hsa-miR-885-5p
3.337
.009
hsa-miR-766
−2.296
.016
hsa-miR-143
−0.987
.018
hsa-miR-515-5p
2.133
.020
hsa-miR-145
−1.202
.022
hsa-miR-1253
1.829
.025
hsa-miR-144
−1.335
.026
hsa-miR-548h
2.715
0.032
hsa-miR-520e
−2.252
0.038
hsa-miR-1
−2.589
.039
hsa-miR-451
−1.801
.043
hsa-miR-589
1.398
.047
hsa-miR-544
−4.761
.049
List of Differentially Expressed miRNAs.The miR-199 is of considerable interest in cancer therapy based on its observed
association with various tumor types.[24,25] This miRNA is reported to delay progression from chronic hepatitis to
hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The miR199-a/b-5p suppresses its target gene,
Rho-associated coiled-coil kinase 1 (ROCK1), leading to inhibition of ROCK1/MLC
and PI3K/Akt signaling and subsequently, HCC metastasis.[25] In the present study, we observed downregulation of miRNA-199 in colon
tumor tissue, highlighting its potential role as a promising biomarker for
clinical diagnosis and prognosis of colon cancer.The miR-10 family members are encoded in evolutionarily conserved loci within the
homeobox (Hox) gene clusters and play crucial roles in cell proliferation and apoptosis.[26] Both miR-10a and miR-10b compromise human granulosa cell development
during folliculogenesis by targeting brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF),
leading to suppression of the TGF-β pathway.[17] Downregulation of miRNA-10 is further suggestive of specific roles in
colon cancer development.Previous studies have shown that miR-122 functions as a tumor suppressor and
undergoes downregulation in several cancer types, such as HCC, bladder cancer,
and breast cancer.[27-29] MicroRNA-122 is also reported to hamper glioma cell invasion via
inactivation of the Wnt/b-catenin signaling pathway through targeting of WNT1.[30] Conversely, the significant upregulation of miRNA-122 observed in this
study supports potential roles in tumorigenesis or progression of colon cancer
(Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Relative expression of miR-122, miR-10, and miR-199. Reverse
transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was
performed with 3 replicates to determine the relative expression levels
of miR-122 (A), miR-10 (B), and miR-199 (C) in colon and metastatic
liver tissues. Three colon cancer and metastatic liver tissue samples
were used for the experiment.
Relative expression of miR-122, miR-10, and miR-199. Reverse
transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was
performed with 3 replicates to determine the relative expression levels
of miR-122 (A), miR-10 (B), and miR-199 (C) in colon and metastatic
liver tissues. Three colon cancer and metastatic liver tissue samples
were used for the experiment.
MicroRNA-122 Promotes Proliferation and Metastasis of Colon Cancer Cell
Lines
Based on the above analysis, we further explored variations in these 3 miRNAs in
colon cancer and metastatic cancer tissue in liver. To this end, tumor tissues
were collected from colon and liver immediately after surgical removal. Reverse
transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays revealed dramatic
repression of miRNA-199 and miRNA-10 in metastasis liver tissue along with
upregulation of miR-122 (Figure
1), indicating contributory effects of miRNA-122 to progression and
metastasis of colon cancer. To examine this hypothesis, the functional relevance
of miRNA-122 in the migration ability of SW480colon cancer cells was explored
with the aid of the cell transwell assay. Cell migration of SW480 was promoted
upon overexpression of miR-122, compared to that of the control group, while
inhibition of miR-122 expression reversed this trend (Figure 2A). Similar cell migration
abilities were observed for SW620 cells under comparable experimental conditions
(Figure 2B). These
results clearly indicate that miR-122 stimulates the migration ability of colon
cancer cells.
Figure 2.
Overexpression of miR-122 promotes migration and proliferation in SW480
and SW620 cells. (A) SW480 cells were transfected with miR-122 mimic,
negative control (NC), miR-122 inhibitor or Inhibitor NC. The transwell
chamber assay was performed to determine SW480 cell migration. (B) The
same experiments as (A) were performed using SW620 cells. (C) Bar plot
showing that miR-122 promotes colon cancer SW480 cell proliferation. (D)
Bar plot showing that miR-122 promotes colon cancer SW620 cell
proliferation. Three and 5 replicate experiments were performed for the
transwell chamber and MTT assay, respectively.
Overexpression of miR-122 promotes migration and proliferation in SW480
and SW620 cells. (A) SW480 cells were transfected with miR-122 mimic,
negative control (NC), miR-122 inhibitor or Inhibitor NC. The transwell
chamber assay was performed to determine SW480 cell migration. (B) The
same experiments as (A) were performed using SW620 cells. (C) Bar plot
showing that miR-122 promotes colon cancerSW480 cell proliferation. (D)
Bar plot showing that miR-122 promotes colon cancerSW620 cell
proliferation. Three and 5 replicate experiments were performed for the
transwell chamber and MTT assay, respectively.To further explore the function of miR-122 in colon cancer, expression levels
were regulated with the aid of an miR-122 mimic or inhibitor and the MTT assay
subsequently performed to assess cell proliferation. After 24, 48, and 72 hours,
increased miR-122 levels induced a significant increase in proliferation of
SW480 cells while knockdown of miR-122 led to a significant decrease in
proliferation. Meanwhile, no marked differences were evident between mimic NC
and normal (NC) cells (Figure
2C). Analogous results were obtained for SW620 cells (Figure 2D), clearly
supporting a stimulatory effect of miR-122 on proliferation of colon cancer
cells.
Targets Analysis of MicroRNA-122
Prediction of the binding targets of miRNAs is a key step in exploring their
biological functions in living cells. Accordingly, we applied TargetScan
(version 7.2) software[31] to predict the potential target transcripts of miR-122 with default
parameters. In total, 226 transcripts were determined as miR-122 targets
(Supplementary Table S2). To further explore the function of miR-122, enriched
Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway
analyses of target transcripts were conducted. GO analysis revealed that the
majority of the target genes are involved in cell growth, including negative
regulation of GTPase activity, regulation of cell differentiation, and
multicellular organism growth and nucleus (cellular component). Interestingly,
negative regulation of GTPase activity, which is important for cell migration
and invasion, was similarly enriched among the GO terms (Figure 3A). Moreover, target genes of
miR-122 were involved in pathways related to biosynthesis and metabolism,
including metabolic pathways, gluconeogenesis, and the citrate cycle
(tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle; Figure 3B).
Figure 3.
Functional analysis of miR-122 target genes. (A) The top 10 enriched GO
terms for target genes of miR-122. (B) The top 10 enriched KEGG pathways
for target genes of miR-122. The X-axis number
represents the enriched P value of each GO term or KEGG
pathway. The numbers of each bar represent the target or background gene
number of each term or pathway.
Functional analysis of miR-122 target genes. (A) The top 10 enriched GO
terms for target genes of miR-122. (B) The top 10 enriched KEGG pathways
for target genes of miR-122. The X-axis number
represents the enriched P value of each GO term or KEGG
pathway. The numbers of each bar represent the target or background gene
number of each term or pathway.Aldolase, fructose-bisphosphate A (ALDOA) was one of the
predicted targets of miR-122 (Supplementary Table S2). Previous studies have
shown that ALDOA colocalizes with proliferation cell nuclear
antigen (PCNA) in the cytoplasm and is involved in cell growth pathways,[32] and disruption of this gene contributes to the progression of multiple
cancer types.[33] Accordingly, ALDOA was selected as a candidate gene to
further explore the function of miR-122. The dual-luciferase reporter system was
applied to validate the interactions between miR-122 and ALDOA
transcripts. Upon co-transfection of miR-122 mimics with a luciferase reporter
vector containing ALDOA-3′UTR (ALDOA-3′UTR)
into SW480 cells, luciferase activity was significantly suppressed (Figure 4A). In contrast,
luciferase activity remained unchanged upon co-transfection of miR-122 mimics
with ALDOA-3′UTR-Mut luciferase reporters (Figure 4A), implying physical
interactions between miR-122 and ALDOA. Reverse
transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction and western blot findings
additionally revealed significant suppression of mRNA and protein expression of
ALDOA following transfection of miR-122 mimics into SW480
cells (Figure 4B and C).
Inhibition of miR-122 led to a significant increase in ALDOA
mRNA and protein expression (Figure 4B and C).
Figure 4.
Identification of ALDOA as a direct target of miR-122 in
SW480 cells. (A) Luciferase activity was analyzed 24 hours after
co-transfection of SW480 cells with ALDOA-3′UTR or
ALDOA-3′UTR-Mut and miR-122 mimic or mimic NC. (B)
Endogenous ALDOA mRNA levels were detected 24 hours
after transfection of SW480 cells with miR-122 mimic, mimic NC, miR-122
inhibitor, or Inhibitor NC. (C)Western blot was applied to detect
endogenous ALDOA protein expression 48 hours after
transfection of SW480 cells with miR-122 mimic, mimic NC, miR-122
inhibitor, or Inhibitor NC (*P < .05,
**P < .01).
Identification of ALDOA as a direct target of miR-122 in
SW480 cells. (A) Luciferase activity was analyzed 24 hours after
co-transfection of SW480 cells with ALDOA-3′UTR or
ALDOA-3′UTR-Mut and miR-122 mimic or mimic NC. (B)
Endogenous ALDOA mRNA levels were detected 24 hours
after transfection of SW480 cells with miR-122 mimic, mimic NC, miR-122
inhibitor, or Inhibitor NC. (C)Western blot was applied to detect
endogenous ALDOA protein expression 48 hours after
transfection of SW480 cells with miR-122 mimic, mimic NC, miR-122
inhibitor, or Inhibitor NC (*P < .05,
**P < .01).To explore the functions of ALDOA in colon cancer cells, its expression was
suppressed using si-ALDOA and conversely increased by transferring pcALDOA into
SW480 and SW620 cells, and the transwell assay was performed. Cell migration
ability was enhanced upon repression of ALODA, compared to the control group
(Figure 5A-B), which
was reversed upon ALDOA overexpression (Figure 5A-B). Data from the MTT assay
showed that overexpression of ALDOA induced significant repression of SW480 cell
proliferation while inhibition of its expression led to a significant increase
in proliferation (Figure 5C and
D). These results suggest that miR-122 interacts directly with
ALDOA, which may be involved in the progression of liver
metastases of colon cancer and could therefore serve as an attractive
therapeutic target for this cancer type.
Figure 5.
Downregulation of ALDOA promotes migration of SW480 and SW620 cells. (A)
SW480 cells were transfected with pcALDOA, negative control (pcDNA3.1),
si-ALDOA and si-NC, and the transwell chamber assay performed to
determine SW480 cell migration. (B) The same experiments as (A) were
performed using SW620 cells. (C) Bar plot showing that downregulation of
ALDOA promotes colon cancer SW480 cell proliferation. (D) Bar plot
showing that miR-122 promotes colon cancer SW620 cell proliferation.
Three and 5 replicate experiments were performed for transwell and MTT
assays, respectively. (E) Proposed working model of the involvement of
miR-122, ALDOA and other potential mRNA targets in the development of
colon cancer.
Downregulation of ALDOA promotes migration of SW480 and SW620 cells. (A)
SW480 cells were transfected with pcALDOA, negative control (pcDNA3.1),
si-ALDOA and si-NC, and the transwell chamber assay performed to
determine SW480 cell migration. (B) The same experiments as (A) were
performed using SW620 cells. (C) Bar plot showing that downregulation of
ALDOA promotes colon cancerSW480 cell proliferation. (D) Bar plot
showing that miR-122 promotes colon cancerSW620 cell proliferation.
Three and 5 replicate experiments were performed for transwell and MTT
assays, respectively. (E) Proposed working model of the involvement of
miR-122, ALDOA and other potential mRNA targets in the development of
colon cancer.
Discussion
Dysregulation of ncRNAs is involved in the progression of a variety of cancers.
Detailed characterization of the ncRNA transcriptome and enhanced understanding of
their features and therapeutic applications as well as the mechanisms by which they
control tumorigenesis should facilitate the development of more effective treatment
strategies. Emerging evidence has demonstrated that piRNAs, circRNAs, and miRNAs,
which are promising biomarkers, display strong diagnostic and prognostic value in
cancer treatment.The well-established roles of miRNAs have aided in significant advancements in ncRNA
research. Aberrant expression of miRNAs is strongly implicated in multiple cancers
and specific miRNAs serve as crucial factors related to proliferation, apoptosis,
and metastasis in colon cancer, making them valuable therapeutic agents.[34] The unique and conserved biogenesis of miRNAs mainly involves 3 steps:
transcription, endonucleolytic processing in the nucleus and cytoplasm, and merging
into the RNA-induced silencing complex.[35,36] Carcinogenesis is driven by molecular alterations leading to the activation
of pro-survival, pro-proliferative, and metastatic signaling, such as WNT, TGF-β,
and EGFR signaling pathways.[37] Overexpression of miR-195 hampers colorectal cancer cell proliferation
through targeting fibroblast growth factor 2 and blocking Wnt/β-catenin pathways.[38] Upon deletion of miR-574-5p, cell proliferation, migration, and invasion are
suppressed via targeting Qki6/7 to inactivate β-catenin/Wnt signaling in colorectal cancer.[39] MicroRNA-21, activated by the WNT signaling pathway, induces stemness through
inactivation of TGFBR2 signaling in colon cancer.[40]Cell invasion is the first step of cancer progression that involves tumor cells
translocating from their primary site and metastasizing to distant organs.[41] Metastases are responsible for the majority of cancer deaths, in particular,
metastatic liver disease. Therefore, early detection of liver metastasis is of
utmost priority to allow radical surgery intervention and long-term survival.[42] Numerous studies have shown that miRNAs affect the expression of genes and
pathways involved in cancer pathogenesis from initiation to metastasis.[43] MicroRNA-122 was initially reported as a highly expressed miRNA in liver that
plays important roles in liver cancer development.[44,45] Moreover, miR-122 is associated with the development of different cancer
types, including breast cancer,[46] renal cancer,[47] cholangiocarcinoma,[48] bile duct carcinoma cells,[49] and colorectal cancer.[50] Considering the altered expression of miR-122 in our experimental samples and
the finding that its overexpression promotes SW480 cell invasion, we speculate that
upregulation of miR-122 facilitates the metastatic progression of colon cancer in
the liver through activating the WNT, TGF-β, or EGFR signaling pathway. One possible
mechanism is that miR-122 promotes invasion of colon cancer by regulating the
expression of ALDOA. Disruption of ALDOA plays a role in the progression of multiple
cancer types, and aldolase has been validated as an independent clinical prognostic
marker of humancancers.[51] Accordingly, we put forward the theory of a relationship between aberrant
ALDOA expression and colon cancer invasion through miR-122 regulation. Functional
analyses of all miR-122 targets showed that glycolysis/gluconeogenesis is the most
enriched KEGG pathway, from which genes are extensively regulated in more than 20
cancer classes.[52] Our data imply that miR-122 promotes colon cancer invasion by regulating
other target genes (Figure
5E).Cancer progression can be prevented using several strategies including inhibition of
oncogenic miRNAs, induction of tumor suppressor miRNAs, and decaying miRNA
expression through epigenetic factors, such as promoter methylation.[43] The 3 miRNAs identified in this study (miR-122, miR-10, and miR-199) present
potential attractive diagnostic and prognostic markers of liver metastasis of colon
cancer and provide guidance for further development of miRNA-based therapeutic
strategies against colon cancer.Click here for additional data file.Supplemental Material, Supplementary_Table_S1 for MiR-122 Promotes the
Development of Colon Cancer by Targeting ALDOA In Vitro by Hong
Li, Xinhua Zhang, Zhao Jin, Tao Yin, Chuanyi Duan, Junwei Sun, Rui Xiong and
Zilin Li in Technology in Cancer Research & TreatmentClick here for additional data file.Supplemental Material, Supplementary_Table_S2_miR-122_predicted_targets for
MiR-122 Promotes the Development of Colon Cancer by Targeting ALDOA In
Vitro by Hong Li, Xinhua Zhang, Zhao Jin, Tao Yin, Chuanyi Duan,
Junwei Sun, Rui Xiong and Zilin Li in Technology in Cancer Research &
Treatment
Authors: Joseph M Luna; Juan M Barajas; Kun-Yu Teng; Hui-Lung Sun; Michael J Moore; Charles M Rice; Robert B Darnell; Kalpana Ghoshal Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: George Adrian Calin; Cinzia Sevignani; Calin Dan Dumitru; Terry Hyslop; Evan Noch; Sai Yendamuri; Masayoshi Shimizu; Sashi Rattan; Florencia Bullrich; Massimo Negrini; Carlo M Croce Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-02-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Mohammed L Abba; Nitin Patil; Jörg H Leupold; Marcin Moniuszko; Jochen Utikal; Jacek Niklinski; Heike Allgayer Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: Sarah Djebali; Carrie A Davis; Angelika Merkel; Alex Dobin; Timo Lassmann; Ali Mortazavi; Andrea Tanzer; Julien Lagarde; Wei Lin; Felix Schlesinger; Chenghai Xue; Georgi K Marinov; Jainab Khatun; Brian A Williams; Chris Zaleski; Joel Rozowsky; Maik Röder; Felix Kokocinski; Rehab F Abdelhamid; Tyler Alioto; Igor Antoshechkin; Michael T Baer; Nadav S Bar; Philippe Batut; Kimberly Bell; Ian Bell; Sudipto Chakrabortty; Xian Chen; Jacqueline Chrast; Joao Curado; Thomas Derrien; Jorg Drenkow; Erica Dumais; Jacqueline Dumais; Radha Duttagupta; Emilie Falconnet; Meagan Fastuca; Kata Fejes-Toth; Pedro Ferreira; Sylvain Foissac; Melissa J Fullwood; Hui Gao; David Gonzalez; Assaf Gordon; Harsha Gunawardena; Cedric Howald; Sonali Jha; Rory Johnson; Philipp Kapranov; Brandon King; Colin Kingswood; Oscar J Luo; Eddie Park; Kimberly Persaud; Jonathan B Preall; Paolo Ribeca; Brian Risk; Daniel Robyr; Michael Sammeth; Lorian Schaffer; Lei-Hoon See; Atif Shahab; Jorgen Skancke; Ana Maria Suzuki; Hazuki Takahashi; Hagen Tilgner; Diane Trout; Nathalie Walters; Huaien Wang; John Wrobel; Yanbao Yu; Xiaoan Ruan; Yoshihide Hayashizaki; Jennifer Harrow; Mark Gerstein; Tim Hubbard; Alexandre Reymond; Stylianos E Antonarakis; Gregory Hannon; Morgan C Giddings; Yijun Ruan; Barbara Wold; Piero Carninci; Roderic Guigó; Thomas R Gingeras Journal: Nature Date: 2012-09-06 Impact factor: 49.962