Literature DB >> 31564154

Periprosthetic atypical femoral fractures exist and are associated with duration of bisphosphonate therapy.

Samuel A MacKenzie1, Richard T Ng2, Gorden Snowden1, Matilda F R Powell-Bowns1, Andrew D Duckworth1, Chloe E H Scott1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Currently, periprosthetic fractures are excluded from the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) definition of atypical femoral fracture (AFFs). This study aims to report on a series of periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) that otherwise meet the criteria for AFFs. Secondary aims were to identify predictors of periprosthetic atypical femoral fractures (PAFFs) and quantify the complications of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective case control study of consecutive patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures between 2007 and 2017. Two observers identified 16 PAFF cases (mean age 73.9 years (44 to 88), 14 female patients) and 17 typical periprosthetic fractures in patients on bisphosphonate therapy as controls (mean age 80.7 years (60 to 86, 13 female patients). Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of PAFF. Management and complications were recorded.
RESULTS: Interobserver agreement for the PAFF classification was excellent (kappa = 0.944; p < 0.001). On univariate analysis compared with controls, patients with PAFFs had higher mean body mass indices (28.6 kg/m2 (sd 8.9) vs 21.5 kg/m2 (sd 3.3); p = 0.009), longer durations of bisphosphonate therapy (median 5.5 years (IQR 3.2 to 10.6) vs 2.4 years (IQR 1.0 to 6.4); p = 0.04), and were less likely to be on alendronate (50% vs 94%; p = 0.02) with an indication of secondary osteoporosis (19% vs 0%; p = 0.049). Duration of bisphosphonate therapy was an independent predictor of PAFF on multivariate analysis (R2 = 0.733; p = 0.05). Following primary fracture management, complication rates were higher in PAFFs (9/16, 56%) than controls (5/17, 29%; p = 0.178) with a relative risk of any complication following PAFF of 1.71 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77 to 3.8) and of reoperation 2.56 (95% CI 1.3 to 5.2).
CONCLUSION: AFFs do occur in association with prostheses. Longer duration of bisphosphonate therapy is an independent predictor of PAFF. Complication rates are higher following PAFFs compared with typical PFFs, particularly of reoperation and infection. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1285-1291.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atypical femoral fracture; Bisphosphonate; Periprosthetic femoral fracture

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31564154     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B10.BJJ-2019-0599.R2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  12 in total

1.  Contemporaneous Insufficiency Fractures of Bilateral Femoral Necks in an Older Patient Taking Bisphosphonate: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Hiroaki Tagomori; Nobuhiro Kaku; Shota Sato; Tsuguaki Hosoyama; Hiroshi Tsumura
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2022-04-29

2.  Comment on "The efficiency of risedronate in reducing bone resorption after total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials at a minimum of 6 months' follow-up".

Authors:  M M Kai Huang; M M Gang Wang; M D Yi Zeng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  Valgus osteotomy for atypical interprosthetic femoral fracture with lateral bowing of the femur.

Authors:  Sammy Banno; Tomonori Baba; Hiroki Tanabe; Seiya Ishii; Yuta Jinnai; Yasuhiro Homma; Taiji Watari; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  Trauma Case Rep       Date:  2020-12-10

4.  Atypical periprosthetic femur fracture on an underestimated atypical femoral pattern. A case report.

Authors:  Gaetano Caruso; Nicola Corradi; Tommaso Amoroso; Ilaria Martini; Vincenzo Lorusso; Leo Massari
Journal:  Trauma Case Rep       Date:  2021-02-10

5.  Surveillance of atypical femoral fractures in a nationwide fracture register.

Authors:  Hans Peter Bögl; Georg Zdolsek; Lukas Barnisin; Michael Möller; Jörg Schilcher
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Atypical Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture Associated With Prolonged Bisphosphonate Therapy: A Two-Centered Retrospective Case Series and Literature Review.

Authors:  Konlawat Sabsuantang; Thanainit Chotanaphuti; Siwadol Wongsak; Paphon Sa-Ngasoongsong; Saradej Khuangsirikul; Kulapat Chulsomlee; Noratep Kulachote
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-26

7.  Surgical and Pharmacological Management of Periprosthetic Atypical Femoral Fractures: A Narrative Literature Review.

Authors:  Elisa Troiano; Tiziano Giacché; Andrea Facchini; Nicholas Crippa Orlandi; Matteo Cacioppo; Marco Saviori; Vanna Bottai; Francesco Muratori; Nicola Mondanelli; Stefano Giannotti
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2022-04-11

8.  Current Incidence and Future Projection of Periprosthetic Fractures in South Korea: A Study Based on National Claim Database.

Authors:  Jung-Wee Park; Seok-Hyung Won; Hong-Seok Kim; Samuel Jaeyoon Won; Young-Kyun Lee; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 2.071

9.  Atypical periprosthetic femoral fracture associated with long-term bisphosphonate therapy.

Authors:  Dávid Dózsai; Tamás Ecseri; István Csonka; István Gárgyán; Péter Doró; Ákos Csonka
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Atypical periprosthetic femoral fractures after arthroplasty for fracture are at high risk of complications.

Authors:  Tomonori Baba; Masataka Uchino; Hironori Ochi; Takuya Ikuta; Yoshitomo Saita; Hiroshi Hagino; Hiroaki Nonomiya; Seiya Jingushi; Takayuki Nakajima; Yasuhisa Ueda; Kaneko Kazuo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.