| Literature DB >> 35098681 |
Jung-Wee Park1, Seok-Hyung Won1, Hong-Seok Kim1, Samuel Jaeyoon Won1, Young-Kyun Lee1, Kyung-Hoi Koo1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the current incidence and economic cost and to estimate the future burden of periprosthetic fracture (PF) after joint arthroplasties in South Korea.Entities:
Keywords: Arthroplasty; Epidemiology; Incidence; Periprosthetic fractures; Republic of Korea
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35098681 PMCID: PMC8927022 DOI: 10.1111/os.13219
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orthop Surg ISSN: 1757-7853 Impact factor: 2.071
Number of patients who had periprosthetic fractures in South Korea from 2010 to 2017
| Cost | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of periprosthetic fractures | 1,322 | 1,425 | 1,391 | 1,414 | 1,727 | 2,059 | 2,482 | 2,636 |
| Total cost (USD) | 779,533 | 992,309 | 1,218,582 | 1,435,815 | 2,133,629 | 2,765,132 | 3,630,445 | 3,888,402 |
| Personal cost (USD) | 589.7 | 696.4 | 876 | 1015.4 | 1235.5 | 1342.9 | 1462.7 | 1475.1 |
Demographic characteristics of patients who had periprosthetic fractures in South Korea from 2010 to 2017
| Periprosthetic fractures | Total cost (USD) | Personal cost (USD) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 14,456 | 16,843,846 | 1165.2 |
| Gender | |||
| Female | 9,752 | 11,267,075 | 1155.4 |
| Male | 4,704 | 5,576,772 | 1185.5 |
| Age (years) | |||
| 10–19 | 87 | 74,012 | 850.7 |
| 20–29 | 152 | 129,301 | 850.7 |
| 30–39 | 220 | 176,673 | 803.1 |
| 40–49 | 384 | 428,843 | 1,116.8 |
| 50–59 | 1,130 | 833,660 | 737.8 |
| 60–69 | 2,934 | 2,762,124 | 941.4 |
| 70–79 | 5,994 | 6,701,578 | 1,118 |
| ≧80 | 3,555 | 5,737,656 | 1,614 |
Fig. 1Number of patients with periprosthetic fracture in South Korea from 2010 to 2017.
Fig. 2(A) Total cost of treatment for periprosthetic fracture in South Korea from 2010 to 2017. (B) Personal cost of treatment for periprosthetic fracture in South Korea from 2010 to 2017.
Fig. 3Number of patients with periprosthetic fractures stratified by age group from 2010 to 2017.
Fig. 4Number of patients who had periprosthetic fracture in each age group in 2017.
Fig. 5Projected number of patients who have periprosthetic fracture.
Fig. 6Projected total cost of treatment for periprosthetic fracture.
Periprosthetic fractures in previous studies
| Authors | Country | Study period | Number of PF | Economic cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cox | USA | 2006–2010 | Stationary | Increased |
| Meek | Scotland | 1997–2008 | Stable | NA |
| Sarvilinna | Finland | 1990–1999 | Decreased | NA |
| Thien | Norway | 1995–2009 | Increased | NA |
| Lindahl | Sweden | 1979–2000 | Increased | NA |
Abbreviations: NA, not applicable; PF, periprosthetic fracture.