Kathleen H Hong1, Jason M Franasiak2, Marie M Werner1, George Patounakis3, Caroline R Juneau4, Eric J Forman5, Richard T Scott1. 1. Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey, Basking Ridge, New Jersey; Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 2. Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey, Basking Ridge, New Jersey; Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: jfranasiak@ivirma.com. 3. Reproductive Medicine Associates of Florida, Lake Mary, Florida. 4. Audubon Fertility, New Orleans, Louisiana. 5. Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine if natural selection and follicular stimulation produces a lower risk for embryonic aneuploidy than that attained following superovulation with exogenous gonadotropins. DESIGN: Prospective observational with historical control group. SETTING: Large academically affiliated private practice. PATIENT(S): All patients presenting for their evaluation for infertility were offered participation in the study. INTERVENTION(S): All participants in the natural cycle group underwent an unstimulated in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle. A subsequent frozen embryo transfer was performed if a euploid blastocyst was attained. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Rates of embryonic aneuploidy attained in unstimulated IVF cycles were compared to those observed in age-controlled historical cohort undergoing conventional stimulated IVF cycles with exogenous gonadotropins. RESULT(S): Aneuploidy rates were equivalent in unstimulated and stimulated IVF cycles. The prevalence of aneuploidy in natural cycles increased with the age of the female partner in a manner identical to that seen in stimulated IVF cycles. Finally, sustained implantation rates of euploid blastocysts were equivalent in natural and stimulated IVF cycles. CONCLUSION(S): Rates of embryonic aneuploidy are not impacted by follicular stimulation with exogenous gonadotropins. Prior concerns of inducing a higher risk of embryonic aneuploidy are not supported by this data. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01866618.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if natural selection and follicular stimulation produces a lower risk for embryonic aneuploidy than that attained following superovulation with exogenous gonadotropins. DESIGN: Prospective observational with historical control group. SETTING: Large academically affiliated private practice. PATIENT(S): All patients presenting for their evaluation for infertility were offered participation in the study. INTERVENTION(S): All participants in the natural cycle group underwent an unstimulated in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle. A subsequent frozen embryo transfer was performed if a euploid blastocyst was attained. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Rates of embryonic aneuploidy attained in unstimulated IVF cycles were compared to those observed in age-controlled historical cohort undergoing conventional stimulated IVF cycles with exogenous gonadotropins. RESULT(S): Aneuploidy rates were equivalent in unstimulated and stimulated IVF cycles. The prevalence of aneuploidy in natural cycles increased with the age of the female partner in a manner identical to that seen in stimulated IVF cycles. Finally, sustained implantation rates of euploid blastocysts were equivalent in natural and stimulated IVF cycles. CONCLUSION(S): Rates of embryonic aneuploidy are not impacted by follicular stimulation with exogenous gonadotropins. Prior concerns of inducing a higher risk of embryonic aneuploidy are not supported by this data. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01866618.
Authors: Luis R Hoyos; Connie Y Cheng; Kathleen Brennan; Gary Hubert; Brandon Wang; Richard P Buyalos; Molly Quinn; Mousa Shamonki Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2020-01-18 Impact factor: 3.412