Literature DB >> 31561282

Standardised Ki-67 proliferation index assessment in early-stage laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma in relation to local control and survival after primary radiotherapy.

Emiel Kop1, Geertruida H de Bock2, Maartje G Noordhuis1, Lorian Slagter-Menkema1, Bernard F A M van der Laan1, Johannes A Langendijk3, Ed Schuuring4, Bert van der Vegt4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Ambiguous results have been reported on the predictive value of the Ki-67 proliferation index (Ki-67 PI) regarding local control (LC) and survival after primary radiotherapy (RT) in early-stage laryngeal squamous cell cancer (LSCC). Small study size, heterogenic inclusion, variations in immunostaining and cut-off values are attributing factors. Our aim was to elucidate the predictive value of the Ki-67 PI for LC and disease-specific survival (DSS) using a well-defined series of T1-T2 LSCC, standardised automatic immunostaining and digital image analysis (DIA).
METHODS: A consecutive and well-defined cohort of 208 patients with T1-T2 LSCC treated with primary RT was selected. The Ki-67 PI was determined using DIA. Mann-Whitney U-tests, logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed to assess associations between Ki-67 PI, clinicopathological variables, LC and DSS.
RESULTS: In multivariate Cox regression analysis, poor tumour differentiation (HR 2.20; 95% CI 1.06-4.59, P = .04) and alcohol use (HR 2.84, 95% CI 1.20-6.71; P = .02) were independent predictors for LC. Lymph node positivity was an independent predictor for DSS (HR 3.16, 95% CI 1.16-8.64; P = .03). Ki-67 PI was not associated with LC (HR 1.59; 95% CI 0.89-2.81; P = .11) or DSS (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.57-1.66; P = .97). In addition, continuous Ki-67 PI was not associated with LC (HR 2.03; 95% CI 0.37-11.14, P = .42) or DSS (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.05-8.28; P = .72).
CONCLUSION: The Ki-67 PI was not found to be a predictor for LC or DSS and therefore should not be incorporated in treatment-related decision-making for LSCC.
© 2019 The Authors. Clinical Otolaryngology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ki-67; disease-specific survival; head and neck cancer; laryngeal carcinoma; local control; proliferation; radiotherapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31561282      PMCID: PMC6973088          DOI: 10.1111/coa.13449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1749-4478            Impact factor:   2.597


Ambiguous results regarding the predictive value of the Ki‐67 proliferation index regarding local control and survival after primary radiotherapy have been reported in early‐stage laryngeal squamous cell cancer. Small study size, heterogeneous inclusion, variations in immunostaining and cut‐off values are factors attributing to these contradictory results. We used a well‐defined series of T1‐T2 laryngeal tumours treated with radiotherapy, standardised automatic immunostaining and automatic digital scoring. Standardised and automated staining minimises variable staining intensity and improves reproducibility. Automated digital scoring eliminates interobserver variability. The Ki‐67 proliferation index was not a predictor for local control or disease‐specific survival and therefore should not be incorporated in treatment‐related decision‐making for early‐stage laryngeal squamous cell cancer.

INTRODUCTION

Over the years, many studies have been conducted to identify prognostic and predictive markers for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).1 To date, prognostic markers such as age, TNM‐stage and histological type determine decision‐making regarding the most optimal treatment strategy. In oncogenesis, cell proliferation is one of the most essential biological processes and may therefore be a strong predictive and prognostic marker.2 Ki‐67 is a nuclear marker that is present in all phases of the cell cycle but absent in resting cells (G0 phase).3 Therefore, Ki‐67 is an ideal marker to quantify the relative amount of proliferative neoplastic cells within tumour tissue, defined as the Ki‐67 proliferation index (Ki‐67 PI). However, the results of earlier studies investigating the relationship between the Ki‐67 PI, local control (LC) and survival after primary RT in laryngeal squamous cell cancer (LSCC) are not unambiguous, as shown in Table 1.4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 Possible explanations for these differences are variations in patient group factors, immunostaining and scoring‐related factors.15, 16, 17
Table 1

Patients and disease characteristics related to local recurrence after radiotherapy

First author yearMethodCut‐offNStageSideLocal control, definitionTreatment

Univariate HR/OR

(95% CI)

Kropveld et al4

1998

IHCContinuous36T2N0‐2LarynxLRRT

Sakata et al5

2000

IHC≥50%

130

51

79

T1‐2N0GlotticLRRT & ART

2.66 (1.17‐6.08)a

=1.32 (0.40‐4.38)a

5.11 (1.53‐17.04)a

Motamed et al6

2001

IHCContinuous28T1aN0GlotticRadioresistance, n.s.n.s. =

Condon et al7

2002

IHC>20%21T1‐2N0GlotticLR < 12 moRT =1.94 (0.32‐11.8)a

Cho et al8

2004

IHC‐TMA≥10%123T1‐2N0LarynxTime to LR < 5 yRT =0.47 (0.18 −1.23)a

Ahmed et al9

2008

IHC>10% Continuous24T1‐2GlotticLR or persistenceRT , =

Rafferty et al10

2008

IHC>50% Continuous50T2N0LarynxLRHRT , =

Wildeman et a11

2009

IHC‐TMAContinuous59T1‐3N0‐3LarynxLR < 2 yRT =0.71 (0.44‐1.15)

Nichols et al12

2012

IHC>10%75T1‐2GlotticTime to LRRT 3.37 (1.14‐9.86)

Rademakers et al13

2015

IHC>10%128T2‐4N0‐+LarynxTime to LRART =

Kwon et al14

2015

IHC>50%42T1‐2LarynxResidual tumour < 6 moRT =2.16 (0.40‐11.80)

Kop et al 2018

(this study)

IHC≥50%208T1‐2N0‐3LarynxLR < 2 yRT =1.58 (0.89‐2.79)

Abbreviations: ART, accelerated radiotherapy; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; HRT, hypofractionated radiotherapy; IHC, immunohistochemistry; LR, local recurrence; mo, months; n.s., not specified; OR, odds ratio; RT, conventional radiotherapy; TMA, tissue microarray; yrs, years.

(Subgroup) analysis performed by authors of this article.

High Ki‐67 associated with poor local control.

High Ki‐67 associated with good local control.

No relation with local control.

Patients and disease characteristics related to local recurrence after radiotherapy Univariate HR/OR (95% CI) Kropveld et al4 1998 Sakata et al5 2000 130 51 79 ↓2.66 (1.17‐6.08)a =1.32 (0.40‐4.38)a ↓5.11 (1.53‐17.04)a Motamed et al6 2001 Condon et al7 2002 Cho et al8 2004 Ahmed et al9 2008 Rafferty et al10 2008 Wildeman et a11 2009 Nichols et al12 2012 Rademakers et al13 2015 Kwon et al14 2015 Kop et al 2018 (this study) Abbreviations: ART, accelerated radiotherapy; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; HRT, hypofractionated radiotherapy; IHC, immunohistochemistry; LR, local recurrence; mo, months; n.s., not specified; OR, odds ratio; RT, conventional radiotherapy; TMA, tissue microarray; yrs, years. (Subgroup) analysis performed by authors of this article. High Ki‐67 associated with poor local control. High Ki‐67 associated with good local control. No relation with local control. The aim of this study was to assess the value of Ki‐67 PI in predicting LC and disease‐specific survival (DSS) after primary RT in a well‐defined consecutive series of patients with early‐stage (T1‐T2) LSCC. By using standardised and automated immunohistochemistry along with digital image analysis (DIA) to assess the Ki‐67 PI, we reduced staining and scoring variability.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients

Patients treated for LSCC at our institution are included in a database by the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) by using the results of the nationwide network and registry of histo‐ and cytopathology in the Netherlands (PALGA). Retrospectively, data from the hospital consisting of date of birth, sex, tumour site, TNM status, tumour classification and therapy modality are collected.18, 19 From this database, a consecutive series of patients was included in the current study who were (a) diagnosed between 1990 and 2012; (b) with a primary T1‐T2 biopsy‐proven LSCC; (c) had received and completed primary RT with curative intent; (d) had a minimum follow‐up of 5 years (if not deceased); and (e) had biopsy tissue available in the biobank at the Department of Pathology of our institution. Patients who had a coincidental lung carcinoma, multiple HNSCC or previous radiation or surgery of the head and neck region were excluded. Additional clinical, histopathological and follow‐up data were retrospectively collected. Initially, 317 patients could be included. Sufficient biopsy material was available in 238 cases. After Haematoxylin and Eosin (HE) staining and reviewing by a head & neck pathologist, 30 biopsy specimens were additionally excluded because of insufficient invasive tumour tissue within the biopsy material. This resulted in a cohort of 208 patients. The majority of included patients were used in previous studies regarding the evaluation of other biomarkers.20, 21, 22

Ethical considerations

According to the Central Committee on Research involving Human Subjects (CCMO), this type of study did not require approval from an ethics committee in the Netherlands. This study was approved by the Privacy Review Board of the NCR by following “The Code of Conduct for the Use of Data in Health Research” of the CCMO.23

Treatment

All patients were treated by a multidisciplinary head & neck team. Patients received primary RT with curative intent using 6MV linear accelerator equipment as previously described.20, 21, 22 In short, T1 tumours received 2 Gy fractions five times weekly with a total dose of 66 Gy. T2 tumours were treated with six fractions weekly to a total dose of 70 Gy. In case of lymph node metastasis, a total dose of 46 Gy was electively delivered to the primary planning target volume together with an additional boost of 70 Gy to the primary tumour and pathologic lymph nodes. From the year 2000 onwards, planning of field arrangements was performed by using contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (CT). Before 2000, this was calculated by direct simulation (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Examples of nucleus detection with positive (green) and negative (blue) marked tumour cells for nuclear Ki‐67 staining. Ki‐67 expression: (A, B) low (C, D) intermediate (E, F) high

Examples of nucleus detection with positive (green) and negative (blue) marked tumour cells for nuclear Ki‐67 staining. Ki‐67 expression: (A, B) low (C, D) intermediate (E, F) high

Follow‐up

All patients had standardised follow‐up after completing RT in accordance with the Dutch Working Party on Head and Neck Tumours (NWHHT) guidelines.24 For the first 2 years, the otorhinolaryngology and radiotherapy department alternately performed physical examination with laryngoscopy every 3 months. After 2 years, this was alternately performed every 6 months up till 5 years after completing radiation treatment. Patients were discharged from follow‐up after 5 years if no evidence of disease was found.

Immunohistochemistry

All tumour material was formalin‐fixed and paraffin‐embedded. Using a standard microtome, 3 µm sections were cut from the tumour paraffin blocks. Immunohistochemistry for Ki‐67 (CONFIRM® anti‐Ki‐67 [30‐9] Rabbit Monoclonal Primary Antibody, Ventana Medical Systems) was performed using the automated Benchmark® platform (Ventana Medical Systems) according to the manufacturer's recommendations and protocol. The antibody was pre‐diluted by the supplier.

Evaluation of immunohistochemical staining

A whole tumour slide was analysed in order to reduce sampling error. All glass slides digitized using the Hamamatsu Nanozoomer HT 2.0 (Hamamatsu Photonics KK, 325‐6). For semi‐automated DIA, Definiens Tissue Studio 3.6 (Definiens AG) was used. Images were processed in one batch automatically for identification and calculation of nuclear staining. Twenty random cases were selected and manually counted by the head & neck pathologist to validate the image analysis algorithm. All slides contained at least 500 countable cells (median 7308, range 509‐121.847).

Definitions

LC was defined as local tumour recurrence at the primary tumour site within 2 years after RT and was calculated from the date of diagnosis until the date of recurrence. After this period of 2 years, any local recurrence was defined as a second primary tumour. DSS was defined as the date of diagnosis until the date of death by disease or last date of follow‐up within 5 years. In the analyses, Ki‐67 PI was considered both as a continuous and a dichotomous variable. For dichotimisation, the cut‐off value for high vs low Ki‐67 PI was set to 50%, which was defined by the median Ki‐67 expression in our cohort. In addition, we also tried to compare our data with previously published studies, which used cut‐off values of 10% and 20%.7, 8, 9, 12, 13 Alcohol use was defined as drinking one or more units per day either in the past or at date of diagnosis. The same was applied for tobacco use with smoking one or more cigarettes or sigars per day.

Statistical analysis

Patients were dichotomised based on their Ki‐67 PI, and for correlations between patient and tumour characteristics, univariate logistic regression was used. In this way, odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated for a high Ki‐67 PI. When the Ki‐67 PI was considered as a continuous variable, Mann‐Whitney U‐tests were performed. The correlation between the Ki‐67 PI and clinicopathological characteristics was evaluated for LC and DSS by using univariate Cox regression analyses estimating hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI. All statistical tests were two‐sided and a P‐value ≤ .05 was considered to be statistically significant. For multivariate analysis, factors with a P‐value of > .15 were excluded in a stepwise manner; factors with a P‐value of ≤ .05 were included in the final step. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (IBM Corp. Released 2015. IBM spss Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0: IBM Corp).

RESULTS

Patient and tumour characteristics are described in Table 2. The majority of tumours were of glottic origin, had a T2 status, did not have lymph node metastasis and were moderately differentiated. Most patients were male and median age was 64.4 years.
Table 2

Pre‐treatment Clinical and Tumour Characteristics (N (%), unless specified otherwise) Characteristics

 

Total

n = 208

Age, years
Median (range)64.4 (33‐96)
<64110 (52.9)
≥6498 (47.1)
Gender
Female22 (10.6)
Male186 (89.4)
Alcohol use
No57 (27.4)
Yes (≥1 units/d)135 (64.9)
Unknown16 (7.7)
Tobacco use
No26 (12.5)
Yes (≥1 cig/d)176 (84.6)
Unknown6 (2.9)
Subsite
Glottic146 (70.2)
Supragottic62 (29.8)
cT‐status
T184 (40.4)
T2124 (59.6)
cN‐status
N0188 (90.4)
N+20 (9.6)
113
26
31
Differentiation
Well26 (12.5)
Moderate160 (76.9)
Poor22 (10.6)
Pre‐treatment Clinical and Tumour Characteristics (N (%), unless specified otherwise) Characteristics Total n = 208 At the date of analysis, median follow‐up time was 65.2 months (range 4‐236). Local recurrence occurred in 48 patients, of which 40 patients underwent a total laryngectomy with or without additional neck dissection. Eight patients received palliative treatment. The median time to local recurrence was 9.6 months (range 5‐21). After 5 years, 152 patients were still alive, 21 patients died from disease, 26 patients died unrelated to disease and nine patients died from unknown causes. Specific nuclear Ki‐67 staining was present and DIA could be performed in all cases (Figure 1). Median Ki‐67 PI was 49% (range 4%‐89%). As this approached the 50% cut‐off used in other studies, we also used a 50% cut‐off between high and low Ki‐67 PI for comparability. Using a 10% and 20% cut‐off, a high Ki‐67 PI was found in 207 cases (99.5%) and 199 cases (95.7%), respectively. As the low Ki‐67 PI group was too small for both cut‐offs (one and nine cases respectively), no further statistical analyses were performed using these cut‐offs. In the univariate regression analysis using a 50% cut‐off for the Ki‐67 PI, no significant associations between clinicopathological variables and Ki‐67 PI were found (Table 3). When treated as a continuous variable, no significant associations between Ki‐67 PI and the evaluated variables were found (Table 3).
Table 3

Patient and tumour characteristics related to high (≥50%) Ki‐67 PI (univariate logistic regression analyses) and continuous Ki‐67 values (Mann‐Whitney U‐Test)

CharacteristicsTotalHigh Ki‐67 PIContinuous Ki‐67 PI
OR (95% CI) P value P valuea
Age (continuous)2081.01 (0.99‐1.04).32n/a
Age, years    
<64981  
≥641101.27 (0.73‐2.20).39.74
Gender    
Female221  
Male1860.75 (0.31‐1.82).52.20
Alcohol    
No571  
Yes (≥1 units/d)1351.15 (0.62‐2.15).65.86
Tobacco use    
No261  
Yes (≥1 cig/d)1760.91 (0.40‐2.08).83.44
Subsite    
Glottic1461  
Supraglottic621.77 (0.97‐3.24).62.10
cT‐status    
T1841  
T21241.03 (0.59‐1.80).93.26
cN‐status    
N01881  
N+202.16 (0.82‐5.65).12.12
Differentiation    
Well/moderate1861  
Poor221.34 (0.55‐3.25).52.66

Abbreviations: 95% CI, 95% Confidence Interval; Ki‐67 PI, Ki‐67 proliferation index; n/a, not applicable; OR, Odds Ratio.

Mann‐Whitney U Test.

Patient and tumour characteristics related to high (≥50%) Ki‐67 PI (univariate logistic regression analyses) and continuous Ki‐67 values (Mann‐Whitney U‐Test) Abbreviations: 95% CI, 95% Confidence Interval; Ki‐67 PI, Ki‐67 proliferation index; n/a, not applicable; OR, Odds Ratio. Mann‐Whitney U Test. A significant negative association between LC and poor tumour differentiation (HR 2.18; 95% CI 1.06‐4.50, P = .04), alcohol use (HR 2.94, 95% CI 1.24‐6.95; P = .01) and tobacco use (HR 7.59; 95% CI 1.05‐55.02, P = .045) was found. In stepwise multivariate Cox regression analysis, alcohol use (HR 2.84, 95% CI 1.20‐6.71; P = .02) and poor differentiation (HR 2.20; 95% CI 1.06‐4.59, P = .04) were independent predictors for worse LC. No associations between high Ki‐67 PI and LC (HR 1.59; 95% CI 0.89‐2.81; P = .11) or KI67 PI as a continuous variable and LC (HR 2.03; 95% CI 0.37‐11.14; P = .42) were found (Figure S1A, Table 4).
Table 4

Patient and tumour characteristics related to local control (univariate and multivariate cox regression analyses)

CharacteristicsTotalLC (univariate)LC (multivariate)
HR (95% CI) P valueHR (95% CI) P value
Age (continuous)2080.99 (0.97‐1.02).71 a  
Gender
Female221   
Male1861.29 (0.46‐3.60).62 a  
Alcohol use
No57 1    
Yes (≥1 units/d)135 2.94 (1.24‐6.95) .01 2.84 (1.20‐6.71) .02
Tobacco use
No26 1    
Yes (≥1 cig/d)176 7.59 (1.05‐55.02) .045 6.78 (0.93‐49.25).06
Subsite
Glottic1461   
Supraglottic621.21 (0.66‐2.20).54 a  
cT‐status
T1841   
T21241.43 (0.78‐2.61).24 a  
cN‐status
N01881   
N+201.68 (0.75‐3.75).20 a  
Differentiation
Well/moderate186 1    
Poor22 2.18 (1.06‐4.50) .04 2.20 (1.06‐4.59) .04
Ki‐67 PI
Low1081   
High1001.59 (0.89‐2.81).12 b  
Ki‐67 PI (continuous)2082.03 (0.37‐11.14).42 a  

Abbreviations: 95% CI, 95% Confidence Interval; HR, Hazard Ratio; Ki‐67 PI, Ki‐67 proliferation index; LC, Local control.

Significant results are shown in bold.

Not included in multivariate analysis.

Not included in final step of multivariate analysis.

Patient and tumour characteristics related to local control (univariate and multivariate cox regression analyses) Abbreviations: 95% CI, 95% Confidence Interval; HR, Hazard Ratio; Ki‐67 PI, Ki‐67 proliferation index; LC, Local control. Significant results are shown in bold. Not included in multivariate analysis. Not included in final step of multivariate analysis. In univariate and stepwise multivariate Cox regression analysis, a significant negative association was found between lymph node positivity and DSS (HR 3.16, 95% CI 1.16‐8.64; P = .03). No associations were found between Ki‐67 PI and DSS (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.57‐1.66; P = .97) or KI67 PI as a continuous variable and DSS (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.05‐8.28; P = .72) (Figure S1B, Table 5).
Table 5

Patient and tumour characteristics related to disease‐specific survival (univariate cox regression analyses)

CharacteristicsDSS
TotalHR (95% CI) P value
Age (continuous)2080.97 (0.93‐1.01).16a
Gender
Female221 
Male1861.16 (0.27‐4.97).84a
Alcohol use   
No571 
Yes (≥1 units/d)1352.51 (0.74‐8.57).14b
Tobacco use
No261 
Yes (≥1 cig/d)1763.18 (0.43‐23.71).26a
Subsite
Glottic1461 
Supraglottic621.49 (0.62‐3.58).38a
cT‐status
T1841 
T21240.93 (0.39‐2.21).87a
cN‐status
N0188 1  
N+20 3.16 (1.16‐8.64) .03
Differentiation
Well/moderate1861 
Poor222.49 (0.91‐6.79).08b
Ki‐67 PI
Low1081 
High1000.99 (0.42‐2.32).97a
Ki‐67 PI (continuous)2080.62 (0.05‐8.28).72a

Abbreviations: 95% CI, 95% Confidence Interval; DSS, Disease‐Specific Survival; HR, Hazard Ratio; Ki‐67 PI, Ki‐67 proliferation index.

Significant results are shown in bold.

Not included in multivariate analysis.

Not included in final step of multivariate analysis.

Patient and tumour characteristics related to disease‐specific survival (univariate cox regression analyses) Abbreviations: 95% CI, 95% Confidence Interval; DSS, Disease‐Specific Survival; HR, Hazard Ratio; Ki‐67 PI, Ki‐67 proliferation index. Significant results are shown in bold. Not included in multivariate analysis. Not included in final step of multivariate analysis.

DISCUSSION

In a well‐defined series of patients diagnosed with T1‐T2 LSCC and treated with primary RT, Ki‐67 PI was determined using standardised automated immunohistochemistry and DIA. No statistically significant associations between high (≥50%) or continuous Ki‐67 PI and clinicopathological characteristics, LC or DSS were found. From the eleven previously conducted studies, 15 (sub)analyses were reported or could be calculated using the data and cut‐off values provided in the papers (Table 1). Of those, nine did not find a significant association between Ki‐67 PI and LC after RT.6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 Two subgroup analyses in one study showed a negative association between high Ki‐67 and LC in both a cohort treated with accelerated RT (ART) and in a combined cohort treated with either ART or conventional RT (HR 2.66; 95% CI 1.17‐6.08 and HR 5.11; 95% CI 1.53‐17.06 respectively).5 Nichols et al found a worse local, regional or distant control in patients with high Ki‐67 tumours.12 Three studies showed a significant positive association between high Ki‐67 and LC after RT using continuous values, and one study showed a positive association using a 50% cut‐off (no HR or 95% CI was given or could be calculated).4, 9, 10 However, selection bias may have influenced the outcome of these studies as in one of the studies 36 patients were randomly selected from a larger cohort of 128 patients,9 another study included only 24 patients with a glottic carcinoma involving the anterior commissure in a 10‐year period. The study of Rafferty et al only describes 50 patients from a prospective database, which included patients since 1960.15 Moreover, no multivariate analyses to correct for possible confounding factors were conducted to verify their significant associations in univariate analyses. The results of the current study are in line with results of earlier studies that included larger study groups. Cho et al concluded that Ki‐67 was not predictive for LC after primary RT treatment in a series of 123 T1‐T2N0 LSCC.8 A similar conclusion was drawn by Rademakers et al who also used DIA to assess Ki‐67 in 128 patients.13 From five subanalyses of the four studies that assessed the association between Ki‐67 and survival, none found a difference in OS,5, 8 DSS5, 13 or survival (not otherwise specified).10 In one paper, worse regional control and metastasis‐free survival were reported.13 A confounder for this result might be the inclusion of advanced LSCC, which has a much higher tendency to metastasise (regionally). Our study only consisted of early‐stage LSCC. The role of Ki‐67 in advanced tumours could be the subject of a follow‐up study. Consensus on Ki‐67 staining protocols, Ki‐67 antibodies and scoring methods is still lacking. The published cut‐offs for high vs low Ki‐67 PI varied between 10%, 20% and 50%, along with continuous values. We believe tumour markers without pre‐set cut‐off value (ie continuous values) are deemed less fit as diagnostic biomarker for decision‐making regarding different therapeutic modalities. Various definitions regarding LC after radiotherapy make it even more difficult to compare study results. A global definition for LC is needed in order to have better comparability across studies. Despite this lack of consensus, this seems not to be explanatory for the different outcomes. In our cohort, we found a relatively high Ki‐67 PI compared with other studies. One of the explanations might be that we used marked HE slides to accurately determine and select neoplastic regions within the digitised Ki‐67 slide. Our digital image algorithm solely selected neoplastic cells and excluded non‐tumour cells resulting in an accurate calculation of the Ki‐67 PI. Rademakers et al who also used DIA on whole tumour section slides do not explicitly state they adjusted scoring for non‐neoplastic regions; which could have led to a lower ratio of Ki‐67 positive cells.13 Also, intratumour heterogeneity may lead to lower Ki‐67 PI if the incorrect region within the tumour is counted. Others studies predominately used manual counting. Most studies, if reported, counted smaller regions of the whole tumour, which could lead to selection bias by sampling error and interobserver variability.5, 6, 8, 9, 10 For breast carcinoma, Dowsett et al recommend counting at least 500‐1000 cells in order to compensate for intratumour proliferation heterogeneity.15 With our automated analysis, a median of 7308 cells (ranging 509‐121.847) was counted in a standardised, fast, reliable and reproducible manner. We previously validated the use of DIA for Ki‐67 in breast carcinoma and found a high interobserver agreement between manual and automated Ki‐67 scoring.25 Manual immunohistochemical staining is a time‐consuming process and leads to variable staining intensity. Interlaboratory variety is clearly illustrated in the study of Polley et al, were they investigated the interlaboratory reproducibility for Ki‐67 staining in breast cancer cases among eight North American and European laboratories.26 A moderate reproducibility across the laboratories was found when they used their own scoring methodology on sections stained in a central laboratory. This reproducibility declined even further when both staining and scoring were done locally. By using a standardised and automated staining platform with a pre‐diluted antibody by the supplier, we minimised this problem and improved reproducibility, enabling future interlaboratory comparison.

CONCLUSION

In this well‐defined consecutive series of T1‐T2 LSCC treated with primary RT, the clinicopathological characteristics alcohol use and poor tumour differentiation were independent predictors for worse LC. Lymph node positivity was a negative predictor for DSS. The Ki‐67 PI however did not predict outcome regarding LC or DSS after treatment. Therefore, the Ki‐67 PI should not be incorporated in treatment‐related decision‐making for LSCC.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None to declare. Click here for additional data file.
  24 in total

Review 1.  Proliferation markers in tumours: interpretation and clinical value.

Authors:  P J van Diest; G Brugal; J P Baak
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  MIB-1 and p53 expression in radiotherapy-resistant T1aN0M0 glottic squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  M Motamed; A R Banerjee; P J Bradley; D Powe
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  2001-06

3.  Prognostic significance of HIF-1a, CA-IX, and OPN in T1-T2 laryngeal carcinoma treated with radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jan E Wachters; Michiel L Schrijvers; Lorian Slagter-Menkema; Mirjam Mastik; Geertruida H de Bock; Johannes A Langendijk; Philip M Kluin; Ed Schuuring; Bernard F A M van der Laan; Jacqueline E van der Wal
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Phosphorylated FADD is not prognostic for local control in T1-T2 supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma treated with radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jan E Wachters; Michiel L Schrijvers; Lorian Slagter-Menkema; Mirjam Mastik; Johannes A Langendijk; Geertruida H de Bock; Jan L Roodenburg; Bernard F A M van der Laan; Jacqueline E van der Wal; Ed Schuuring
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Tissue microarray analysis reveals prognostic significance of COX-2 expression for local relapse in T1-2N0 larynx cancer treated with primary radiation therapy.

Authors:  Edward I Cho; Diane P Kowalski; Clarence T Sasaki; Bruce G Haffty
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Cell membrane reactivity of MIB-1 antibody to Ki67 in human tumors: fact or artifact?

Authors:  Eugenio Leonardo; Marco Volante; Mattia Barbareschi; Alberto Cavazza; Angelo Paolo Dei Tos; Gianni Bussolati; Mauro Papotti
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2007-06

7.  Ki-67 expression predicts radiotherapy failure in early glottic cancer.

Authors:  Anthony C Nichols; Fiona Whelan; John Basmaji; Sandeep Dhaliwal; Samuel Dowthwaite; Corina Chapeskie; Nancy Read; David A Palma; Kevin Fung; Varagur Venkatesan; J Alex Hammond; Jason H Franklin; Iram Siddiqui; Bret Wehrli; Keith Kwan; James Koropatnick; Joe S Mymryk; John W Barrett; John Yoo
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-04

8.  Radiotherapy in laryngeal carcinoma: can a panel of 13 markers predict response?

Authors:  Maarten A M Wildeman; Johan H Gibcus; Michael Hauptmann; Adrian C Begg; Marie Louise F van Velthuysen; Frank J Hoebers; Mirjam F Mastik; Ed Schuuring; Jacqueline E van der Wal; Michiel W M van den Brekel
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Assessment of Ki67 in breast cancer: recommendations from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer working group.

Authors:  Mitch Dowsett; Torsten O Nielsen; Roger A'Hern; John Bartlett; R Charles Coombes; Jack Cuzick; Matthew Ellis; N Lynn Henry; Judith C Hugh; Tracy Lively; Lisa McShane; Soon Paik; Frederique Penault-Llorca; Ljudmila Prudkin; Meredith Regan; Janine Salter; Christos Sotiriou; Ian E Smith; Giuseppe Viale; Jo Anne Zujewski; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  An international Ki67 reproducibility study.

Authors:  Mei-Yin C Polley; Samuel C Y Leung; Lisa M McShane; Dongxia Gao; Judith C Hugh; Mauro G Mastropasqua; Giuseppe Viale; Lila A Zabaglo; Frédérique Penault-Llorca; John M S Bartlett; Allen M Gown; W Fraser Symmans; Tammy Piper; Erika Mehl; Rebecca A Enos; Daniel F Hayes; Mitch Dowsett; Torsten O Nielsen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  2 in total

1.  Loss of E-Cadherin Expression Correlates With Ki-67 in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Cristina Stefania Dumitru; Amalia Raluca Ceausu; Serban Comsa; Marius Raica
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  Standardised Ki-67 proliferation index assessment in early-stage laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma in relation to local control and survival after primary radiotherapy.

Authors:  Emiel Kop; Geertruida H de Bock; Maartje G Noordhuis; Lorian Slagter-Menkema; Bernard F A M van der Laan; Johannes A Langendijk; Ed Schuuring; Bert van der Vegt
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 2.597

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.