Grégoire Leon1, Nicolas Szabla1, Romain Boissier2, Marc Gigante3, Kevin Caillet4, Gregory Verhoest5, Xavier Tillou6. 1. CHU de Caen, Urology and Transplantation, Caen, France. 2. Hôpital de la Conception, Urology and Transplantation, Marseille, France. 3. CHU Saint Denis, Saint Denis La Réunion, France. 4. CHU d'Amiens, Urology and Transplantation, Amiens, France. 5. CHU de Rennes, Urology and Transplantation, Rennes, France. 6. CHU de Caen, Urology and Transplantation, Caen, France. Electronic address: xavillou@gmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To calculate the incidence of renal graft urothelial carcinoma in renal transplant recipients in a national large retrospective cohort and to analyze circumstances of diagnosis, treatment and outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a national retrospective, multicenter study. Thirty two transplant centers were asked to report its cases of kidney graft tumors and the number of kidney transplantations performed since the beginning of their transplantation activity. RESULTS: Between January 1988 and December 2018, 56,806 patients were transplanted in the 32 centers participating in this study. Among this cohort, 107 renal graft tumors (excluding lymphoma) were diagnosed among them 11 renal transplant recipients were diagnosed with an urothelial carcinoma in the kidney graft. The calculated incidence was 0.019%. The median patient age at the time of diagnosis was 56.7 years (49.8-60.9) and 51.4 years (47-55.7) at the time of transplantation. The median time between transplantation and diagnosis was 66.6 months (14.3-97). Before treatment, 3 patients had graft tumor biopsies revealing urothelial carcinomas, 3 patients had endoscopic retrograde uretero-pyelography showing lacunary images. Two patients had a diagnostic flexible ureteroscopy with biopsies. Total nephrectomy was performed in all cases. CONCLUSION: Even though occurring in the context of immune suppression, most of these tumors seemed to have a relatively good prognosis. With regards to functional outcomes histological diagnosis should always be sought for before radical treatment of these tumors. Treatment should be a transplant nephrectomy including all the ureter with a bladder cuff to ensure optimal carcinologic control.
OBJECTIVE: To calculate the incidence of renal graft urothelial carcinoma in renal transplant recipients in a national large retrospective cohort and to analyze circumstances of diagnosis, treatment and outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a national retrospective, multicenter study. Thirty two transplant centers were asked to report its cases of kidney graft tumors and the number of kidney transplantations performed since the beginning of their transplantation activity. RESULTS: Between January 1988 and December 2018, 56,806 patients were transplanted in the 32 centers participating in this study. Among this cohort, 107 renal graft tumors (excluding lymphoma) were diagnosed among them 11 renal transplant recipients were diagnosed with an urothelial carcinoma in the kidney graft. The calculated incidence was 0.019%. The median patient age at the time of diagnosis was 56.7 years (49.8-60.9) and 51.4 years (47-55.7) at the time of transplantation. The median time between transplantation and diagnosis was 66.6 months (14.3-97). Before treatment, 3 patients had graft tumor biopsies revealing urothelial carcinomas, 3 patients had endoscopic retrograde uretero-pyelography showing lacunary images. Two patients had a diagnostic flexible ureteroscopy with biopsies. Total nephrectomy was performed in all cases. CONCLUSION: Even though occurring in the context of immune suppression, most of these tumors seemed to have a relatively good prognosis. With regards to functional outcomes histological diagnosis should always be sought for before radical treatment of these tumors. Treatment should be a transplant nephrectomy including all the ureter with a bladder cuff to ensure optimal carcinologic control.
Authors: Cristian Axel Hernández-Gaytán; Francisco Rodríguez-Covarrubias; Ricardo A Castillejos-Molina; Andrés Hernández-Porras; Ignacio Tobia; Justin M Dubin; Ana María Autrán-Gómez Journal: Curr Urol Rep Date: 2021-12-16 Impact factor: 3.092