| Literature DB >> 31560341 |
Audrey Milon1, Marc Polivka2, Fréderique Larousserie3, Guillaume Lot4, Jean-Marc Ziza5, Jean-Denis Laredo1.
Abstract
We report the case of a 30-year-old woman with histologically proven monostotic fibrous dysplasia of C2 revealed by a pathological fracture of the odontoid process. Radiological investigations showed a ground-glass mineralization of the vertebral body, a centimetric lytic area with poorly defined margins involving the inferior part of the vertebral body and inferior endplate and a fracture through an osteolytic area in the base of the odontoid process. Owing to the vertebral instability, a surgical procedure combining C0-C5 fixation and posterior bone grafting was performed. The surgical biopsy was inconclusive and pathological confirmation was finally obtained through a percutaneous needle biopsy under fluoroscopic guidance. At 26-month follow-up, the patient still experienced mild persistent cervical posterior neck pain and stiffness possibly related to a C5-6 laxity below the intervertebral fixation. This case combines three radiological findings, which are unusual in fibrous dysplasia: monostotic presentation involving the spine, some aggressive radiographic features, and a pathological fracture.Entities:
Keywords: Aggressive; Cervical spine; Monostotic fibrous dysplasia; Pathological fracture
Year: 2019 PMID: 31560341 PMCID: PMC6764256 DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2019024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: SICOT J ISSN: 2426-8887
Figure 1(a) Sagittal, (b) coronal and (c) axial CT-scan reformations of the upper cervical spine in a 30-year-old woman, showing the mixed appearance of the C2 vertebral body with a ground-glass appearance and osteolytic areas in the base of the odontoid process with a pathologic fracture (thin arrow) and in the inferior part of the vertebral body with partial destruction of the inferior endplate (thick arrow).
Figure 2T2-weighted, T1-weighted, T1-weighted with intra-venous contrast administration midline sagittal MR images of the cervical spine showing the low signal intensity of the C2 vertebral body and odontoid process (a, b), with enhancement after contrast administration (c), and a solution at the junction between the odontoid process and vertebral body (a–c).
Figure 3Percutaneous needle biopsy of C2 under fluoroscopic guidance with an anterolateral approach.
Reported cases of cervical spine fibrous dysplasia presenting with a pathological fracture.
| Report | Sex | Age | Neurological symptoms | Location | Monostotic/polyostotic | Treatment | Follow-up (month) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Our case | F | 31 | No | C2 | Monostotic | Bone graft; posterior fixation | Asymptomatic at 18 months follow-up |
| Wu et al. [ | M | 48 | No | C2–C3 | Monostotic (non-segmentation of C2–C3) | Curettage; posterior fixation | Asymptomatic at 34-month follow-up |
| M | 28 | No | C2 | Monostotic | Curettage; anterior fixation | Asymptomatic at 33-month follow-up | |
| M | 53 | Yes | C7 | Polyostotic | Excision; anterior and posterior fixation | Asymptomatic at 42-month follow-up | |
| M | 17 | Yes | C2 | Polyostotic | Posterior fixation | Asymptomatic at 28-month follow-up | |
| Lee et al. [ | M | 63 | Yes | C4 | Polyostotic | Corporectomy; allograft; posterior fixation | No follow-up |
| Dang et al. [ | M | 35 | Yes | C2/C3 | Polyostotic | Percutaneous vertebroplasty | Stable pain relief and neurologic improvement at 12-month follow-up |
| Marshmann et al. [ | M | 35 | No | C3 | Monostotic | Corpectomy; fixation | Asymptomatic at 18-month follow-up |
| Medow et al. [ | F | 40 | No | C3 | Polyostotic | Synthetic bone graft; posterior fixation | Asymptomatic at 25-month follow-up |
| Mezzadri et al. [ | F | 35 | No | C5 | Not stated | Corporectomy; synthetic graft; posterior fixation | Asymptomatic at 36-month follow-up |
| Stompro et al. [ | M | 26 | Not stated | C2 | Polyostotic | Immobilizer brace | No follow-up |