Brittany Wilbourn1, Tyriesa Howard Howell1,2, Amanda D Castel1, Lawrence D'Angelo3, Connie Trexler3, Rashida Carr3, Daniel Greenberg4. 1. Department of Epidemiology, The Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia. 2. George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri. 3. Burgess Clinic, Children's National Health System, Washington, District of Columbia. 4. Media Rez, Washington, District of Columbia.
Abstract
Objective: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) account for >20% of new HIV diagnoses in the United States, yet >50% are unaware of their infection. Digital gaming is widespread among youth and has proven efficacious in other disease areas; thus, we sought to determine whether a life-and-dating simulation game to increase HIV testing would be acceptable among AYAs. Materials and Methods: Focus groups and surveys were administered to health care providers and AYAs in Washington, DC. AYAs were shown a life-and-dating simulation game that incorporated the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Risk Estimator tool to demonstrate the potential HIV risk of selected behaviors and a zipcode-level HIV testing locator. Thematic analysis was used to identify general gaming themes and game acceptance. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize response frequencies and Likert scales were used to evaluate game acceptability. Results: Providers, some of whom (38%, n = 5/13) had significant experience caring for youth living with or at increased risk for HIV, advised against the game forcing youth to disclose sexual identity or labeling youth "at risk." AYAs (n = 46) found the initial and revised versions of the game to be highly acceptable: youth thought the game was interesting [mean (standard deviation, SD) = 4.8/5 (0.4)]; liked playing games about HIV-related behaviors [mean (SD) = 4.8/5 (0.5)]; and would share the game to help friends get tested for HIV [mean = 4.6/5 (0.8)]. Conclusions: This study suggests that a digital game to improve HIV testing is acceptable among youth. An efficacy trial is planned to determine the impact of the game on improving HIV testing.
Objective: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) account for >20% of new HIV diagnoses in the United States, yet >50% are unaware of their infection. Digital gaming is widespread among youth and has proven efficacious in other disease areas; thus, we sought to determine whether a life-and-dating simulation game to increase HIV testing would be acceptable among AYAs. Materials and Methods: Focus groups and surveys were administered to health care providers and AYAs in Washington, DC. AYAs were shown a life-and-dating simulation game that incorporated the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Risk Estimator tool to demonstrate the potential HIV risk of selected behaviors and a zipcode-level HIV testing locator. Thematic analysis was used to identify general gaming themes and game acceptance. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize response frequencies and Likert scales were used to evaluate game acceptability. Results: Providers, some of whom (38%, n = 5/13) had significant experience caring for youth living with or at increased risk for HIV, advised against the game forcing youth to disclose sexual identity or labeling youth "at risk." AYAs (n = 46) found the initial and revised versions of the game to be highly acceptable: youth thought the game was interesting [mean (standard deviation, SD) = 4.8/5 (0.4)]; liked playing games about HIV-related behaviors [mean (SD) = 4.8/5 (0.5)]; and would share the game to help friends get tested for HIV [mean = 4.6/5 (0.8)]. Conclusions: This study suggests that a digital game to improve HIV testing is acceptable among youth. An efficacy trial is planned to determine the impact of the game on improving HIV testing.
Authors: Lisa B Hightow-Weidman; Kathryn E Muessig; José A Bauermeister; Sara LeGrand; Lynn E Fiellin Journal: Curr Opin HIV AIDS Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 4.283
Authors: Robert Garofalo; Amy K Johnson; Lisa M Kuhns; Christopher Cotten; Heather Joseph; Andrew Margolis Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Timothy D Minniear; Barry Gilmore; Sandra R Arnold; Patricia M Flynn; Katherine M Knapp; Aditya H Gaur Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2009-09-14 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Ann E Kurth; Michelle A Lally; Augustine T Choko; Irene W Inwani; J Dennis Fortenberry Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: Christopher M Mejia; Daniel Acland; Raluca Buzdugan; Reva Grimball; Lauren Natoli; Mark R McGrath; Jeffrey D Klausner; Sandra I McCoy Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2017-07-17