| Literature DB >> 31558689 |
Soo Hyun Joo1,2, Changtae Hahn3,2, Hyun Kook Lim4,2, Kee Dong Yoon5,2, Shin Hee Yoon6,2, Chang Uk Lee1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Cyanidin-3-glucoside (C3G), is a component of anthocyanin, have been considered to positively influence cognition and be beneficial for the prevention and treatment of dementia. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of cyanidin-3-glucoside-rich Oryza sativa L. (black rice) extract on cognitive function.Entities:
Keywords: Cognitive function; Cyanidin-3-glucoside; Oryza sativa L; Safety
Year: 2019 PMID: 31558689 PMCID: PMC6801312 DOI: 10.30773/pi.2019.06.17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychiatry Investig ISSN: 1738-3684 Impact factor: 2.505
Figure 1.Flow diagram of the progress through the phases of a parallel randomized trial of two groups (that is, enrollment, intervention allocation, follow-up, and data analysis).
Baseline characteristics of participants by group
| All (N=48) | Placebo group (N=23) | Intervention group (N=25) | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 63.88 (7.59) | 62.70 (6.84) | 64.96 (8.20) | 0.31 |
| Sex (female) (%) | 32 (66.67) | 15 (65.22) | 17 (68.0) | 0.84 |
| Weight (kg) | 62.51(9.09) | 64.20 (11.43) | 60.96 (6.08) | 0.22 |
| Education (years) | 10.56 (3.75) | 11.17 (4.08) | 10.00 (3.42) | 0.28 |
| Family history of dementia (%) | 8 (16.67) | 6 (26.09) | 2 (8.0) | 0.13 |
| APOE4 gene (%) | 5 (10.42) | 2 (8.70) | 3 (12.0) | 1.00 |
Data are presented as the means (SD) or numbers (%)
Lipid profiles and blood pressure (BP) by group at baseline and 12 weeks
| Baseline | 12 weeks | p value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Intervention | Placebo | Intervention | ||
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 177.30 (32.48) | 182.48 (24.07) | 173.30 (37.95) | 174.60 (29.16) | 0.60 |
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | 144.87 (83.24) | 128.12 (58.01) | 150.87 (78.74) | 145.92 (82.54) | 0.62 |
| HDL (mg/dL) | 51.30 (12.69) | 53.31 (13.54) | 49.82 (12.11) | 52.41 (12.58) | 0.84 |
| LDL (mg/dL) | 104.52 (36.09) | 108.64 (21.80) | 100.74 (32.05) | 105.04 (28.13) | 0.98 |
| Diastolic BP (mm/Hg) | 73.43 (8.72) | 77.60 (6.87) | 70.13 (8.31) | 73.36 (10.31) | 0.91 |
| Systolic BP (mm/Hg) | 132.30 (15.69) | 128.16 (10.55) | 124.61 (12.76) | 127.00 (16.25) | 0.10 |
Data are presented as the mean (SD)
Neuropsychological test scores by group at baseline and 12 weeks
| Baseline | 12 weeks | p value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Intervention | Placebo | Intervention | ||
| ADAS-cog | 12.48 (3.07) | 12.96 (3.50) | 11.70 (3.34) | 11.20 (3.62) | 0.27 |
| CERAD-K total score | 66.39 (7.14) | 64.56 (8.78) | 74.13 (7.03) | 71.40 (10.44) | 0.59 |
| Verbal Fluency (VF) | 13.35 (3.21) | 12.80 (3.35) | 14.48 (3.13) | 13.52 (4.09) | 0.63 |
| 15-item Boston Naming Test (BNT) | 11.57 (1.70) | 11.52 (2.45) | 12.52 (1.59) | 12.52 (1.98) | 0.90 |
| Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) | 26.04 (1.87) | 25.80 (2.65) | 26.26 (2.60) | 25.32 (3.00) | 0.26 |
| Word List Memory (WLM) | 17.39 (2.62) | 16.88 (2.70) | 20.65 (3.10) | 19.60 (4.45) | 0.57 |
| Constructional Praxis (CP) | 10.13 (1.22) | 9.48 (1.50) | 10.26 (1.36) | 9.76 (1.42) | 0.69 |
| Word List Recall (WLR) | 5.30 (0.93) | 5.28 (1.60) | 6.78 (1.28) | 6.60 (1.76) | 0.72 |
| Word List Recognition (WLRc) | 8.65 (1.50) | 8.60 (1.50) | 9.43 (0.66) | 9.40 (0.87) | 0.96 |
| Constructional Recall (CR) | 6.48 (2.45) | 6.04 (2.56) | 8.39 (1.92) | 7.88 (2.30) | 0.92 |
| Trail making A (seconds) | 54.91 (17.33) | 63.44 (24.24) | 46.52 (17.55) | 61.88 (31.05) | 0.24 |
| Trail making B (seconds) | 186.17 (83.04) | 215.13 (86.89) | 159.52 (84.79) | 194.58 (91.27) | 0.77 |
| SMCQ | 5.57 (3.75) | 6.00 (2.77) | 4.83 (3.55) | 4.24 (2.40) | 0.04 |
Data are presented as the mean (SD). CERAD-K total score=VF+BNT+WLM+CP+WLR+WLRc. ADAS-cog: Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale, CERAD-K: Korean version of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s disease
Figure 2.ADAS-cog score changes. A: A trend for improvement in ADAS-cog score (placebo: 12.48→11.70, intervention group: 12.96→11.20, p=0.266, N=48). B: After excluding participant with APOE4 gene (N=5), the trend for improvement in ADAS-cog score (placebo: 12.38→11.67, intervention group: 13.00→11.00, p=0.172, N=43). ADAS-cog: Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale.
Figure 3.Subjective Memory Complaints Questionnaire (SMCQ) score changes. Statistical significant improvement on SMCQ score in intervention group (p=0.043).