Literature DB >> 31558639

Complete Genome Sequence of Xanthomonas Phage Pagan.

Maximilian Russo1, Tram Le1, Russell Moreland1, Carlos F Gonzalez1, Mei Liu1, Jolene Ramsey2.   

Abstract

The T7-like podophage Pagan infects Xanthomonas sp. strain ATCC PTA-13101, which was isolated from rice. The 44-kbp Pagan genome contains direct terminal repeats and contains 59 genes, 27 of which have a predicted function. Pagan is most closely related to Xanthomonas phage phi Xc10 and Xylella phage Prado.
Copyright © 2019 Russo et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31558639      PMCID: PMC6763654          DOI: 10.1128/MRA.01031-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc        ISSN: 2576-098X


ANNOUNCEMENT

The genus Xanthomonas consists of many diverse species of Gram-negative, rod-shaped phytopathogenic gammaproteobacteria (1). Members of the genus Xanthomonas are ubiquitous and cause a variety of diseases in many plants, including bacterial spot disease of tomatoes and peppers and bacterial leaf blight of rice (2, 3). The resulting diseased crop is unusable, which leads to economically important crop yield loss, which is as high as 50% in rice cultivation (2). Xanthomonas and Xylella are closely related genera, and Xylella fastidiosa causes Pierce’s disease of grapevines (4). Phage-based therapeutics utilizing isolated virulent Xylella phages have exhibited significant potential for treating Pierce’s disease (5). Phage Pagan was isolated from filtered (pore size, 0.2 μm), mixed freshwater collected in Vidor, TX, and infects the rice-associated Xanthomonas sp. strain ATCC PTA-13101. The host was grown aerobically at 28°C in tryptone nutrient broth/agar (BD), and phages were propagated via the soft agar overlay method described previously (6, 7). Full genomic DNA was purified following the shotgun library preparation protocol described by Summer (8), prepared as Illumina TruSeq libraries with the Nano low-throughput kit, and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq instrument with paired-end 250-bp reads using v2 500-cycle chemistry. The quality of the 28,419 total sequence reads from the index containing the phage genome was evaluated using FastQC (www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc). Sequence reads were then trimmed using the FASTX-Toolkit v0.0.14 (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/). The genome was assembled through SPAdes v3.5.0 (using default parameters) with a sequencing coverage of 6.3-fold (9). Next, the genome was closed by PCR amplification off the contig ends (forward primer, 5′-GGTAGGTGATGTGGCAGTC-3′; reverse primer, 5′-GTGTTCAACGTAGGTGAGAAGG-3′) and subsequent Sanger sequencing. Genome annotation and bioinformatic analysis were conducted through software tools available in the Center for Phage Technology Galaxy and Web Apollo instances (https://cpt.tamu.edu/galaxy-pub/) (10, 11). Structural annotation of the genome was accomplished using Glimmer v3.0 and MetaGeneAnnotator v1.0 and with ARAGORN v2.36 for tRNAs (12–14). Gene function was then predicted using default settings for conserved domain searches with InterProScan v5.33-72 and sequence similarity searches of the NCBI nonredundant or UniProtKB Swiss-Prot/TrEMBL databases with BLAST v2.2.31 at a 0.001 maximum expectation value (15–17). Likely transmembrane domains were identified by TMHMM v2.0, and lipoboxes were identified by LipoP v1.0 (18, 19). Rho-independent termination sites were annotated with TransTermHP v2.09 (20). progressiveMauve v2.4.0 was used to calculate genome-wide DNA sequence similarity (21). Phage morphology was assessed by negatively staining samples with 2% (wt/vol) uranyl acetate and viewing through transmission electron microscopy at the Texas A&M Microscopy and Imaging Center (22). The 44,448-bp podophage Pagan genome has a coding density of 96.95% and contains 59 predicted genes but no tRNAs. The genome of Pagan displayed a G+C content of 62.3%, near the host Xanthomonas genome average of 64% G+C content (4). The contig was reopened at the direct terminal repeat boundary predicted by PhageTerm and that is syntenic with T7-like phages (23). Pagan is most closely related to Xanthomonas phage phi Xc10 (GenBank accession number MF375456) and Xylella phage Prado (accession number KF626667), with 93.46% and 69.55% nucleotide sequence identity and 53 and 48 shared proteins, respectively (24). These similarities contributed to lysis gene identification, including that of a class II pinholin, signal-arrest-release (SAR) endolysin, and overlapping spanin genes.

Data availability.

The genome sequence and associated data for phage Pagan were deposited under GenBank accession number MK903278, BioProject accession number PRJNA222858, SRA accession number SRR8892144, and BioSample accession number SAMN11408680.
  23 in total

1.  Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER.

Authors:  A L Delcher; D Harmon; S Kasif; O White; S L Salzberg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Xylella and Xanthomonas Mobil'omics.

Authors:  Claudia B Monteiro-Vitorello; Mariana C de Oliveira; Marcelo M Zerillo; Alessandro M Varani; Edwin Civerolo; Marie-Anne Van Sluys
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2005

3.  Preparation of a phage DNA fragment library for whole genome shotgun sequencing.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Summer
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009

4.  Synopsis on the taxonomy of the genus xanthomonas.

Authors:  L Vauterin; J Rademaker; J Swings
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.025

5.  Regulation of glutamine synthetase. XII. Electron microscopy of the enzyme from Escherichia coli.

Authors:  R C Valentine; B M Shapiro; E R Stadtman
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1968-06       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement.

Authors:  Aaron E Darling; Bob Mau; Nicole T Perna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Rapid, accurate, computational discovery of Rho-independent transcription terminators illuminates their relationship to DNA uptake.

Authors:  Carleton L Kingsford; Kunmi Ayanbule; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification.

Authors:  Philip Jones; David Binns; Hsin-Yu Chang; Matthew Fraser; Weizhong Li; Craig McAnulla; Hamish McWilliam; John Maslen; Alex Mitchell; Gift Nuka; Sebastien Pesseat; Antony F Quinn; Amaia Sangrador-Vegas; Maxim Scheremetjew; Siew-Yit Yong; Rodrigo Lopez; Sarah Hunter
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase.

Authors:  The UniProt Consortium
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update.

Authors:  Enis Afgan; Dannon Baker; Bérénice Batut; Marius van den Beek; Dave Bouvier; Martin Cech; John Chilton; Dave Clements; Nate Coraor; Björn A Grüning; Aysam Guerler; Jennifer Hillman-Jackson; Saskia Hiltemann; Vahid Jalili; Helena Rasche; Nicola Soranzo; Jeremy Goecks; James Taylor; Anton Nekrutenko; Daniel Blankenberg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Xanthomonas bacteriophages: a review of their biology and biocontrol applications in agriculture.

Authors:  Ritah Nakayinga; Angela Makumi; Venansio Tumuhaise; William Tinzaara
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 3.605

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.