| Literature DB >> 31555055 |
R T Sutherland1, R Srinivas2,3, S C Burd2,3, D Leibfried2, A C Wilson2, D J Wineland2,3,4, D T C Allcock2,3,4, D H Slichter2, S B Libby1.
Abstract
We present a general theory for laser-free entangling gates with trapped-ion hyperfine qubits, using either static or oscillating magnetic-field gradients combined with a pair of uniform microwave fields symmetrically detuned about the qubit frequency. By transforming into a 'bichromatic' interaction picture, we show that either σ ^ ϕ ⊗ σ ^ ϕ or σ ^ z ⊗ σ ^ z geometric phase gates can be performed. The gate basis is determined by selecting the microwave detuning. The driving parameters can be tuned to provide intrinsic dynamical decoupling from qubit frequency fluctuations. The σ ^ z ⊗ σ ^ z gates can be implemented in a novel manner which eases experimental constraints. We present numerical simulations of gate fidelities assuming realistic parameters.Entities:
Keywords: atomic physics; geometric phase gates; quantum computing; quantum gates; quantum logic; quantum physics; trapped-ions
Year: 2019 PMID: 31555055 PMCID: PMC6759860 DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/ab0be5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: New J Phys ISSN: 1367-2630 Impact factor: 3.729
Figure 1.Relative strengths of the gate Rabi frequencies versus 4Ω/δ for the first three resonances in the bichromatic interaction picture when the microwave field term (∝Ŝ does not commute with the gradient term (∝Ŝ in the Hamiltonian. Note that at the point where intrinsic dynamical decoupling occurs (dotted line), the values of the J1,2 Rabi frequencies are near their maximum values.
Figure 2.Numerical simulation of the fidelity of the maximally entangled Bell state of equation (30) versus time (normalized to t), for the gate described in this section. In both panels, the high frequency blue line corresponds to equation (26), i.e. the ion frame Hamiltonian, and the the orange line corresponds to equation (28), i.e. the bichromatic interaction picture Hamiltonian. Panel (a) shows a gate with no pulse shaping, where large-amplitude oscillations at δ make the ion frame gate fidelity highly sensitive to the exact value of t. Panel (b) shows the same gate operation including a τ = 10 μs Blackman envelope at the beginning and the end of the gate sequence; the ion frame fidelity smoothly approaches the interaction picture fidelity at the end of the gate.
Figure 3.(a) Fidelity of the gate operation creating the maximally entangled Bell state of equation (30) versus static qubit frequency shift ε normalized to gradient strength Ω. Data in both panels are calculated by numerical integration of the full ion frame Hamiltonian given by equation (26). Here, Ŝ = Ŝ Ŝ = Ŝ Ω/2π = 1 kHz, and δ/2π = 1.5 MHz (chosen to be experimentally realistic), with varying values of Ω. Fidelities are plotted for the intrinsically dynamically decoupled gate (4Ω/δ ≃ 2.405, black solid line), the fastest gate (4Ω/δ ≃ 1.841, red dashed line), the gate shown in figure 2 (4Ω/δ ≃ 1.333, orange solid line), as well as the fastest gate with a spin-echo (4Ω/δ ≃ 3.054, green dotted line) described in section 4.2. (b) Infidelity of the gate versus the frequency ω at which the qubit shift ε oscillates, for the intrinsically dynamically decoupled gate (solid black) and the fastest gate (red dashed), for a particular value of ε0 = Ω. This value of ε0 represents a significantly larger qubit shift than is typically seen experimentally, where ∣ε0∣ ≪ Ω [16]. The gray lines show the effect of ±1% relative changes in the ratio 4Ω/δ for the intrinsically dynamically decoupled gate.
Figure 4.Infidelity of the gate versus the frequency ω at which the qubit shift ε oscillates, for the intrinsically dynamically decoupled gate (solid black) and the fastest gate (red dashed), for a particular value of ε0 = Ω. This value of ε0 represents a significantly larger qubit shift than is typically seen experimentally, where ∣ε0∣ ≪ Ω [16]. The gray lines show the effect of ±1% relative changes in the ratio 4Ω/δ for the intrinsically dynamically decoupled gate. Data are calculated by numerical integration of the full ion frame Hamiltonian given by equation (26).