Literature DB >> 31553100

Characterization of disease resistance genes in the Brassica napus pangenome reveals significant structural variation.

Aria Dolatabadian1, Philipp E Bayer1, Soodeh Tirnaz1, Bhavna Hurgobin1, David Edwards1, Jacqueline Batley1.   

Abstract

Methods based on single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), copy number variation (CNV) and presence/absence variation (PAV) discovery provide a valuable resource to study gene structure and evolution. However, as a result of these structural variations, a single reference genome is unable to cover the entire gene content of a species. Therefore, pangenomics analysis is needed to ensure that the genomic diversity within a species is fully represented. Brassica napus is one of the most important oilseed crops in the world and exhibits variability in its resistance genes across different cultivars. Here, we characterized resistance gene distribution across 50 B. napus lines. We identified a total of 1749 resistance gene analogs (RGAs), of which 996 are core and 753 are variable, 368 of which are not present in the reference genome (cv. Darmor-bzh). In addition, a total of 15 318 SNPs were predicted within 1030 of the RGAs. The results showed that core R-genes harbour more SNPs than variable genes. More nucleotide binding site-leucine-rich repeat (NBS-LRR) genes were located in clusters than as singletons, with variable genes more likely to be found in clusters. We identified 106 RGA candidates linked to blackleg resistance quantitative trait locus (QTL). This study provides a better understanding of resistance genes to target for genomics-based improvement and improved disease resistance.
© 2019 The Authors. Plant Biotechnology Journal published by Society for Experimental Biology and The Association of Applied Biologists and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Brassica napuszzm321990; RGAugury; pangenome; presence/absence variation; resistance gene

Year:  2019        PMID: 31553100      PMCID: PMC7061875          DOI: 10.1111/pbi.13262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J        ISSN: 1467-7644            Impact factor:   9.803


Introduction

Brassica napus (canola/rapeseed/oilseed rape), belonging to the Brassicaceae family, is one of the three allotetraploid species in the triangle of U (UN, 1935) (AACC, n = 19). The species was formed ~7500 years ago through interspecific hybridization between the diploids B. rapa (Asian cabbage, turnip, AA genome) and B. oleracea (cabbage, cauliflower, Brussel sprouts, CC genome; Chalhoub et al., 2014). Canola is one of the most economically important oilseed crops in the world, grown mainly for its seeds, which yield between 35% and 45% edible oil. With the advent of reference genome sequences, genomic approaches can be used to discover specific genes and subsequent association of candidate genes with heritable traits (Edwards et al., 2011; Qiu et al., 2013). However, a single reference genome cannot cover the entire gene content of a species due to structural variations, such as gene presence/absence variations (PAVs) or copy number variations (CNVs) (Gan et al., 2011; Golicz et al., 2016a; Hurgobin and Edwards, 2017). To address this issue, pangenomes have been constructed for a number of plant species, including maize, soya bean, rice, wheat and Brassica species (Golicz et al., 2016b; Hirsch et al., 2014; Hurgobin et al., 2018; Li et al., 2014; Lin et al., 2014; Montenegro et al., 2017; Yao et al., 2015). The term ‘pangenome’ includes the complete and non‐redundant set of genes in the entire species; it is composed of core genes, which are present in all individuals, and variable genes, which are present only in some individuals (Golicz et al., 2016a; Hurgobin and Edwards, 2017). Variable genes can be split into two groups: CNVs, in which the number of copies of a gene differs between individuals, and PAVs, an extreme form of CNV in which a gene is present in some individuals but absent in others (Golicz et al., 2016a; Saxena et al., 2014). Golicz et al. (2016b) reported that in the B. oleracea pangenome, nearly 20% of genes are affected by presence/absence variation. The Glycine soja pangenome was analysed by Li et al. (2014) who identified 80% of the pangenome was present in all G. soja accessions, whereas the remainder was dispensable and displayed greater variation than the core genome. Therefore, the pangenome could serve as a valuable resource for scientists involved in crop genomics and breeding for understanding the diversity of genes and variations, for association with agronomic traits, including disease resistance, flowering time and yield. To date, numerous resistance genes (R‐genes) have been discovered from many plant species. These plant resistance genes play specific roles in pathogen resistance. Resistance gene analogs (RGAs) can be grouped as either nucleotide binding site‐leucine‐rich repeats (NBS‐LRRs) or transmembrane leucine‐rich repeats (TM‐LRRs) (Sekhwal et al., 2015). NBS‐LRR domain‐containing proteins are the largest family of R‐proteins (Dangl and Jones, 2001) and can be subdivided further into the TIR‐NBS‐LRR (TNL) and the non‐TIR‐NBS‐LRR (nTNL), which are distinguished by the presence of a Toll/Interleukin‐1 receptor (TIR) domain in the protein amino terminus (Shao et al., 2016; Zhou et al., 2004). Because most nTNL genes encode a coiled‐coil (CC) domain at the N terminus, the nTNL genes often are called CC‐NBS‐LRR (CNL) genes (Ameline‐Torregrosa et al., 2008; Shao et al., 2019). Likewise, TM‐LRRs can be subdivided into two classes: surface‐localized receptor‐like protein kinases (RLKs) and membrane‐associated receptor‐like proteins (RLPs) (Hammond‐Kosack and Jones, 1997). RLKs and RLPs are a large group of proteins that are necessary not only for regular plant development (Morris and Walker, 2003) but also for plant disease resistance (Kruijt et al., 2005). RLKs carry a cytoplasmic kinase domain, while RLPs carry a short cytoplasmic tail. Sequencing of Brassica genomes has resulted in reference genome sequences for B. napus (Bayer et al., 2017; Chalhoub et al., 2014; Sun et al., 2018), B. rapa (Cai et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2011), B. oleracea (Liu et al., 2014; Parkin et al., 2014), B. juncea (Yang et al., 2016) and B. nigra (Yang et al., 2016), permitting a comprehensive study of R‐genes in these Brassica species. For example, Alamery et al. (2017) found 641, 443 and 249 NBS‐LRR genes in B. napus, B. oleracea and B. rapa, respectively, while Yu et al. (2014) identified 157, 206 and 167 NBS‐LRR genes in B. oleracea, B. rapa and A. thaliana, respectively, which may be due to using different approaches. Moreover, a total of 1989 RGA candidates were identified in the B. oleracea pangenome by Bayer et al. (2018). The first objective of the current study was to identify RGAs in B. napus on a pangenome‐wide scale, to detect presence/absence variation. The second objective was to find morphotype‐specific RGAs and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the R‐genes to better understand the features of RGAs, such as numbers, distribution, variation, and physical locations in B. napus. Finally, the last objective was to find out whether the NBS genes differ among B. napus morphotypes. We also investigated whether genes in clusters are more likely to be lost or conserved. This work illustrates the value of pangenomes in disease resistance studies and identification of R‐genes. In addition, since only two R‐genes have been cloned in B. napus so far, this study may provide a platform to search for candidate R‐genes associated with disease resistance in this important crop.

Results

Genome‐wide analysis of RGAs

A total of 1749 RGAs were identified in the B. napus pangenome, comprising 503 NBS‐encoding genes and TX, 148 RLPs and 1098 RLKs. Of these 1749 genes, 996 (56.95%) were core (present in all lines) and 753 (43.05%) were variable. A total of 644 RGAs were on the A genome (493 core and 151 variable genes), 700 were on the C genome (484 core and 216 variable genes), 368 RGAs (all variable) were found in the pangenome additional contigs, and 37 RGAs were identified on the reference genome unplaced contigs (19 core and 18 variable; Table 1).
Table 1

The number of different RGA candidates and subfamilies found on the reference genomes, pangenome additional contigs and reference genome unplaced contigs

RGAsReference genomePangenome additional contigsReference genome unplaced contigsPangenome
A genomeC genomeA and C
CN13 (4–9)* 5 (2–3)18 (6–12)10 (0–10)1 (1–0)29 (7–22)
CNL3 (2–1)10 (8–2)13 (10–3)17 (0–17)0 (0–0)30 (10–20)
NBS10 (5–5)20 (10–10)30 (15–15)43 (0–43)2 (0–2)75 (15–60)
NL34 (19–15)34 (20–14)68 (39–29)76 (0–76)2 (2–0)146 (41–105)
OTHER7 (5–2)12 (7–5)19 (12–7)6 (0–6)2 (1–1)27 (13–14)
RN2 (2–0)1 (0–1)3 (2–1)2 (0–2)0 (0–0)5 (2–3)
RNL4 (3–1)3 (0–3)7 (3–4)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)7 (3–4)
TN8 (8–0)7 (4–3)15 (12–3)12 (0–12)0 (0–0)27 (12–15)
TNL12 (6–6)18 (8–10)30 (14–16)13 (0–13)0 (0–0)43 (14–29)
TX29 (12–17)51 (25–26)80 (37–43)31 (0–31)3 (0–3)114 (37–77)
Total122 (66–56)161 (84–77)283 (150–133)210 (0–210)10 (4–6)503 (154–349)
RLP37 (34–3)39 (28–11)76 (62–14)70 (0–70)2 (1–1)148 (63–85)
RLK485 (393–92)500 (372–128)985 (765–220)88 (0–88)25 (14–11)1098 (779–319)
Total522 (427–95)539 (400–139)1061 (827–234)158 (0–158)27 (15–12)1246 (842–404)
Grand total644 (493–151)700 (484–216)1344 (977–367)368 (0–368)37 (19–18)1749 (996–753)

The numbers in parentheses represent the number of core and variable genes, respectively.

The number of different RGA candidates and subfamilies found on the reference genomes, pangenome additional contigs and reference genome unplaced contigs The numbers in parentheses represent the number of core and variable genes, respectively. The numbers of different RGA candidates and subfamilies found on the reference genome, pangenome additional contigs and unplaced contigs are given in Table 1. In general, the NL and TX (TIR domain with unknown domain) subfamilies had the most members (146 and 114, respectively), while the RN and RNL subfamilies had the fewest members (Table 1). Of the 1344 RGAs identified on the reference genome, 283 were NBS‐encoding and TX genes (150 core and 133 variable genes), 76 were RLPs (62 core and 14 variable genes), and 985 were RLKs (765 core and 220 variable genes; Table 1). A total of 368 R‐genes were not present in the reference genome assembly, including 210 NBS‐encoding and TX genes, 70 RLPs and 88 RLKs (Table 1). The majority were in the NL and NBS subfamilies (76 and 43, respectively), and the RN subfamily had the fewest members (2). No RNL genes were found in the pangenome additional contigs. There were also 25 RLKs, 2 RLPs and 10 NBS‐encoding and TX genes on the reference genome unplaced contigs (Table 1). In the pangenome, 73 270 RGAs were predicted across the 50 lines, 44 957 were found in the non‐synthetic, and 28,313 were found in the synthetic lines (Table 2).
Table 2

The total number of RGAs across the 50 lines on the reference genome, pangenome additional contigs and reference genome unplaced contigs

RGAsReference genomesPangenome additional contigsReference genome unplaced contigsPangenome
A genomeC genomeA and C
CN602241843156501049
CNL1454986431640807
NBS4559191374635942103
NL15811611319211471004439
OTHER33256389519991013
RN10049149310180
RNL19914234100341
TN4003197191240843
TNL544836138012901509
TX1374233237062971434146
Total5732751013 242270248616 430
RLP1823192837511380985229
RLK23 98924 66248 6511748121251 611
Total25 81226 59052 4023128131056 840
Grand total31 54434 10065 6445830179673 270
Non‐synthetics19 72721 25640 9832848112644 957
Synthetics11 81712 84424 661298267028 313
The total number of RGAs across the 50 lines on the reference genome, pangenome additional contigs and reference genome unplaced contigs Within the reference genome, the 50 lines contained a total of 65 644 RGAs (40 983 in non‐synthetic lines with an average of 1322.03 RGAs per line and 24 661 in synthetic lines with an average of 1297.94 RGAs per line) with an average of 1312.88 RGAs per line, ranging from 1270 RGAs in H165 and R53 (both synthetic) to 1344 RGAs in Darmor (non‐synthetic; Table 2). The synthetic lines lost more RGAs (875 RGAs, with an average of 46.05 lost genes per line) than non‐synthetic lines (681 RGAs, with an average of 21.96 lost genes per line). The maximum (4.62%) and minimum (0.34%) gene losses were observed on chromosome A08 and chromosome C08, respectively (Table S1). Within the reference genome unplaced contigs, there were 1796 RGAs, 1126 in non‐synthetic and 670 in synthetic lines (Table 2), ranging from 32 RGAs in G50 to 37 RGAs in S_39 (both synthetic lines). There were 54 RGAs (21 in non‐synthetic and 33 in synthetic lines) lost within the reference genome unplaced contigs. Similarly, the synthetic lines lost more RGAs than non‐synthetic lines (Table S1). The total numbers of different RGAs across the 50 lines on the chromosomes and reference genome unplaced contigs are presented in Table 2. Within the pangenome additional contigs, the 50 lines contained a total of 5830 RGAs (2848 in non‐synthetic lines, with an average of 91.87 RGAs per line, and 2982 RGAs in synthetic lines, with an average of 156.94 RGAs per line), with an average of 116.6 RGAs per line, ranging from 24 RGAs in Darmor (non‐synthetic) to 209 RGAs in Cry_1 (synthetic) (Table 2 and Table S1). There were 21, 25 and 21 genes only identified in one, two and three lines, respectively. The total numbers of different RGAs across the 50 lines in the pangenome are given in Table 2. The distribution of different RGAs is given in Figure 1.
Figure 1

The distribution of variable genes and RLP, RLK and NBS domains across the reference genomes. These densities were normalized by the genome‐wide maximum of each measurement so that they peak at 1.

The distribution of variable genes and RLP, RLK and NBS domains across the reference genomes. These densities were normalized by the genome‐wide maximum of each measurement so that they peak at 1. More TM‐LRR genes (78.94%) were predicted than NBS‐LRR and TX genes (21.06%). The numbers of different RGA candidates and subfamilies found on the reference genome are presented in Table 3. Out of the 1344 RGAs, 50 (3.72%) genes were typical or regular NBS‐LRR genes, with 30 TNLs (14 core and 16 variable), 13 CNLs (10 core and 3 variable) and 7 RNLs (3 core and 4 variable). The remaining 1294 RGAs (96.28%), known as non‐regular genes because of the lack of specific domains, were classified in nine groups of RLK (985), RN (3), RLP (76), TX (80), NL (68), NBS (30), CN (18), TN (15) and OTHER (19). RLKs and RLPs accounted for 73.29 and 5.65% of RGAs in the genome, respectively. The rest of the RGAs represented 17.85% (Tables 1 and 3).
Table 3

The number of different RGA candidates and subfamilies on the reference genome

ClassA01A02A03A04A05A06A07A08A09A10C01C02C03C04C05C06C07C08C09 Total
RLK44 (23–21)* 50 (36–14)65 (60–5)41 (29–12)35 (29–6)64 (56–8)54 (48–6)32 (30–2)55 (42–13)45 (40–5)43 (17–26)60 (26–34)87 (69–18)55 (47–8)35 (32–3)60 (53–7)60 (56–4)35 (29–6)65 (43–22)985 (765–220)
RLP5 (5–0)3 (3–0)5 (4–1)1 (0–1)3 (3–0)2 (2–0)3 (3–0)7 (7–0)5 (4–1)3 (3–0)2 (2–0)7 (4–3)7 (4–3)3 (2–1)6 (5–1)1 (1–0)2 (2–0)7 (5–2)4 (3–1)76 (62–14)
RN1 (1–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)1 (1–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)1 (0–1)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)3 (2–1)
TNL2 (0–2)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)2 (0–2)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)3 (1–2)5 (5–0)0 (0–0)(1–0)3 (1–2)7 (2–5)0 (0–0)2 (2–0)0 (0–0)2 (1–1)0 (0–0)3 (1–2)30 (14–16)
RNL0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)2 (2–0)1 (1–0)0 (0–0)1 (0–1)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)1 (0–1)0 (0–0)2 (0–2)7 (3–4)
NL3 (0–3)12 (8–4)4 (3–1)0 (0–0)4 (4–0)1 (1–0)2 (0–2)3 (1–2)5 (2–3)0 (0–0)5 (1–4)2 (1–1)6 (4–2)0 (0–0)1 (1–0)1 (0–1)8 (7–1)4 (3–1)7 (3–4)68 (39–29)
NBS2 (0–2)2 (1–1)1 (1–0)0 (0–0)1 (0–1)1 (1–0)0 (0–0)1 (1–0)1 (0–1)1 (1–0)2 (1–1)5 (1–4)4 (2–2)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)1 (1–0)2 (2–0)2 (1–1)4 (2–2)30 (15–15)
CN2 (0–2)3 (2–1)1 (0–1)0 (0–0)4 (1–3)2 (0–2)0 (0–0)1 (1–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)2 (0–2)1 (1–0)2 (1–1)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)18 (6–12)
CNL1 (0–1)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)1 (1–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)1 (1–0)0 (0–0)2 (1–1)0 (0–0)2 (2–0)1 (1–0)1 (1–0)0 (0–0)2 (2–0)1 (1–0)1 (0–1)13 (10–3)
TN0 (0–0)1 (1–0)1 (1–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)1 (1–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)3 (3–0)2 (2–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)1 (0–1)0 (0–0)2 (1–1)2 (2–0)1 (1–0)1 (0–1)15 (12–3)
OTHER0 (0–0)0 (0–0)1 (0–1)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)2 (1–1)0 (0–0)1 (1–0)2 (2–0)1 (1–0)0 (0–0)2 (1–1)2 (0–2)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)6 (4–2)1 (1–0)1 (1–0)19 (12–7)
TX6 (2–4)8 (3–5)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)3 (1–2)2 (2–0)2 (0–2)6 (4–2)2 (0–2)7 (2–5)11 (1–10)5 (2–3)1 (0–1)3 (3–0)7 (3–4)8 (7–1)1 (1–0)8 (6–2)80 (37–43)
Core31546929386455436347253686504459834259977
Variable352591312138820839553611413111037367
Core (%)46.9768.3588.4669.0576.0083.1287.3084.3175.9085.4539.0639.5670.4981.9791.6781.9488.3080.7761.4672.69
Variable (%)53.0331.6511.5430.9524.0016.8812.7015.6924.1014.5560.9460.4429.5118.038.3318.0611.7019.2338.5427.31
Total6679784250776351835564911226148729452961344

The numbers in parentheses represent the number of core and variable genes, respectively.

The number of different RGA candidates and subfamilies on the reference genome The numbers in parentheses represent the number of core and variable genes, respectively. The chromosomes C03 and A04 showed the maximum (122) and minimum (42) RGA numbers, respectively, whereas C07 contained the widest variety of RGA classes (11) and C04 showed the minimum (2) (Table 3). On average, there were 70.73 RGAs on each chromosome. No NBS‐encoding genes were identified on chromosome A04 in this study; there were only 41 RLKs and 1 RLP on chromosome A04. The absolute number of RGAs on chromosomes is illustrated in Figure S1. The B. napus morphotype/lines that harbour at least one RGA of each class in the pangenome are presented in Table S2. TX, CNL and TN are not present in some non‐synthetic lines (Table S2). The class OTHER was only found in one non‐synthetic line (Nunsdale), showing that the class OTHER was more frequent in synthetic than non‐synthetic lines. The frequency of the RN across the synthetic and non‐synthetic lines was almost the same. There were no RNLs in the pangenome additional contigs. The non‐synthetic lines had less RGAs (2848 RGAs with an average of 91.87 RGAs per line) than synthetic lines (2982 RGAs with an average of 156.94 RGAs per line). A total of 12 570 RGAs were lost (8560 in non‐synthetics and 4010 in synthetic lines) across 50 lines within the pangenome additional contigs, with an average of 251.4 genes less per line, ranging from 159 in Cry_1 (synthetic) to 344 in Darmor (non‐synthetic) (Table S3). The non‐synthetic lines lost more RGAs (75.03%, average of 276.12 genes less per line) compared to the synthetics (57.35%, average of 211.05 genes less per line). There were 101 genes that were only found in synthetic lines and 3 genes that were only found in non‐synthetics. Only eight RGAs were present in all 50 lines (Table S1).

SNP analysis

A total of 15 318 SNPs were identified within 1030 R‐genes: 10 584 SNPs within 731 core genes (70.97%) and 4734 SNPs within 299 variable genes (29.03%), with 719 R‐genes (265 core and 454 variable) containing no SNPs (Table S4). Out of the 1030 R‐genes carrying SNPs, 971 were on the reference genome (505 R‐genes on A genome, 396 core and 109 variable and 466 R‐genes on C genome, 324 core and 142 variable), 37 in the pangenome additional contigs (all variable) and 22 on reference genome unplaced contigs (11 core and 11 variable; Table S4). Out of the 15 318 SNPs, 14 467 (94.44%) were in the reference genome (7793 SNPs (50.87%) on the A genome and 6674 SNPs (43.56%) on the C genome), 594 (3.87%) were in the pangenome additional contigs, and 257 (1.67%) were on the reference genome unplaced contigs (Table S4). The maximum SNP number per gene was 131, with an average of 14.87 SNPs per gene carrying SNPs. The core R‐genes harboured more SNPs than variable genes. A total of 4943 SNPs were synonymous and 10 375 were non‐synonymous (Table 4). There were 1386 and 3557 synonymous SNPs and 3348 and 7027 non‐synonymous SNPs on variable and core R‐genes, respectively (Table S5).
Table 4

The number of SNPs and their effects in the reference genome, pangenome additional contigs and reference genome unplaced contigs

 VariantsReference genomeA and CPangenome additional contigsReference genome unplaced contigsTotal number
A genomeC genome
Non‐synonymousVariants_impact_HIGH3382115133131
Variants_impact_LOW296321145077174805331
Variants_impact_MODERATE201525554570245984913
Sum 50114751976243218110 375
Total non‐synonymous    10 375 (7027–3348) [Link]
SynonymousVariants_effect_synonymous_variant278219234705162764943
Total synonymous    4943 (3557–1386)
Total SNPs     15 318 (10 584–4734)
Mis‐senseVariants_effect_mis‐sense_variant201525554570245984913
Total mis‐sense     4913 (3099–1814)
Non‐senseVariants_effect_stop_gained1846645170
Variants_effect_stop_lost4593113
Variants_effect_stop_retained_variant213003
Sum   768286
Total non‐sense    86 (48–38)
Other effectsVariants_effect_5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain_variant000000
Variants_effect_initiator_codon_variant123003
Variants_effect_splice_acceptor_variant118192122
Variants_effect_splice_donor_variant811192021
Variants_effect_splice_region_variant237268505277539
Variants_effect_start_lost224105
Sum   550328590
Total     590 (422–168)

The numbers in parentheses represent the number of SNPs on core and variable genes, respectively.

The number of SNPs and their effects in the reference genome, pangenome additional contigs and reference genome unplaced contigs The numbers in parentheses represent the number of SNPs on core and variable genes, respectively. Of the non‐synonymous SNPs positioned within RGA candidates, 131 were predicted to be high impact (e.g. start or stop codon lost/gained), 5331 low impact (synonymous variant), and 4913 moderate impact (e.g. mis‐sense variant; Table 4). Of the high‐impact SNPs, 115 were in the reference genome (33 high impact on the A genome and 82 high impact on the C genome), 13 were in the pangenome additional contigs, and 3 were on the reference genome unplaced contigs. There were 5077 low‐impact SNPs in the reference genome (2963 low impact on the A genome and 2114 low impact on the C genome), 174 were in the pangenome additional contigs, and 80 were on the reference genome unplaced contigs (Table 4). Out of 4913 moderate‐impact SNPs, 4570 were in the reference genome (2015 moderate impact on the A genome and 2555 moderate impact on the C genome), 245 were in the pangenome additional contigs, and 98 were on the reference genome unplaced contigs (Table 4). Out of the 10 375 non‐synonymous SNPs, 5711 SNPs (55.04%) were transitions and 4,570 (44.04%) were transversions. There were 47 (0.45%) triallelic SNPs. A total of 4913 variants were annotated as mis‐sense variants (3099 on core genes and 1814 on variable genes). In addition, 86 non‐sense variants (70 stop_gained, 13 stop_lost and 3 stop_retained_variant) were predicted on 73 genes (22 on A genome, 43 on C genome, 7 in the pangenome additional contigs and 1 on the reference genome unplaced contigs, within 40 core and 33 variable genes; Table 4). A total of 3441 non‐sense variants (2825 stop_gained, 487 stop_lost and 129 stop_retained_variant) were detected across the 50 lines with an average of 68.82 non‐sense variants per line. The non‐synthetic lines contain 2233 non‐sense variants with an average of 72.03 per line, whereas synthetic lines contain 1208 with an average of 63.57 per line. The maximum (78) and minimum (49) non‐sense variant numbers were in Alaska (non‐synthetic) and MOY_4 (synthetic) lines, respectively. The distribution of non‐sense variants across the lines is illustrated in Figure S2. In summary, out of the 15 318 SNPs, 11 283 were in the TM‐LRR genes and 4035 were in the NBS‐LRR and TX genes (Table S6). Among the NBS‐LRR genes, NL and RN contained the maximum and minimum number of SNPs, respectively. RLKs harboured more SNPs than RLPs. All the RGA candidates were found to have more non‐synonymous SNPs than synonymous SNPs (Table S6). Also, variable R‐genes had a lower number of synonymous and non‐synonymous SNPs compared to core genes. However, the average SNP number per gene in variable genes was higher than core genes (15.83 vs. 14.47). The density of NBS genes vs. variable NBS genes vs. STOP, synonymous and non‐synonymous SNPs is illustrated in Figure 2.
Figure 2

The density of NBS genes vs. variable NBS genes vs. STOP, synonymous and non‐synonymous SNPs across the reference genomes. These densities were normalized by the genome‐wide maximum of each measurement so that they peak at 1.

The density of NBS genes vs. variable NBS genes vs. STOP, synonymous and non‐synonymous SNPs across the reference genomes. These densities were normalized by the genome‐wide maximum of each measurement so that they peak at 1.

RGA clustering

NBS‐LRR clustering

NBS clustering analysis showed that 193 NBS‐encoding and TX genes (100 variable and 93 core genes) occurred within 62 clusters and 100 genes (39 variable and 61 core genes) were not clustered (Figures S3 and S4). Out of these 193 clustered NBS and TX genes, 39 genes harboured 622 SNPs (15.94 SNPs per gene; 6.44 SNPs per 1 kb). Also, out of 100 singletons, 66 genes carried 753 SNPs (11.40 SNPs per gene; 4.62 SNPs per 1 kb). Thus, genes in cluster showed more SNPs than singletons. In the A genome, 77 genes were clustered in 24 clusters, and in the C genome, 112 genes were clustered in 36 clusters. Four unplaced genes were in 2 clusters. The average number of genes contained in a cluster in the genome was 3.1 genes, where the average in the A genome (3.2 genes) was found to be slightly larger than in the C genome (3.1 genes). The highest number of 7 clusters was found on chromosome C03, followed by 6 clusters on chromosomes C02, C07 and C09. The highest cluster number on the A genome was on chromosome A09 (5 clusters). No clusters were found on chromosome C04 (Figure S3). The highest gene number in a cluster was found on chromosome A02 with 12 genes, followed by chromosome C09 with 9 genes and chromosome A02 with 8 genes. There were more TNL clusters (6 clusters across the A genome and 12 clusters on the C genome) than CNL clusters (2 clusters on the A genome and 3 clusters on the C genome; Figures S3 and S4). There were no mixed clusters of TNLs and CNLs on the genome (Figures S3 and S4). A chi‐square test was performed to see whether ‘in cluster’ is dependent on ‘PAV’. With a P‐value of 0.04, the null hypothesis (saying two categories are independent) was rejected, so the two categories were found to be dependent; in other words, PAV and physical clustering of RGAs are linked. In general, variable genes were more likely to be found in clusters.

TM‐LRR clustering

When RLKs and RLPs were included, clustering analysis indicated that 640 genes (436 core genes and 204 variable genes) were clustered in 228 clusters, with an average of 2.80 genes per cluster (Figures S5 and S6). Out of these 640 clustered genes, 442 genes harboured 4873 SNPs (11.02 SNPs per gene; 4.38 SNPs per 1 kb). In the A genome, 291 genes were clustered in 103 clusters, and in the C genome, 341 genes were clustered in 122 clusters. The average number of genes in a cluster in the C genome (2.79 genes) was found to be smaller than in the A genome (average 2.82 genes). Out of 228 clusters, the highest number was 28 clusters found on C03 followed by 16 clusters on C02 and C09 (Figures S5 and S6). The highest gene number in a cluster was found on A02 with 13 genes followed by C02 with 9 genes and C09 with 9 genes (Figures S5 and S6). There were 90 and 13 clusters on the A genome containing RLK and RLP genes, respectively. Furthermore, there were 12, 5, 96 and 15 clusters on the C genome carrying TNL, CNL, RLK and RLP genes, respectively (Figures S5 and S6). Overall, there were more RLK clusters (186) than RLP (28), TNL (18) and CNL (7) clusters in the genome.

Linking known QTL and R‐genes

The RGA candidate positions were compared with known quantitative trait loci (QTL) for blackleg resistance to identify possible candidate genes. Positions were predicted for 32 QTL markers (Table S7) from genetic mapping of seven loci; LepR1 (A02), LepR2 (A10), Rlm1, Rlm3, Rlm4, Rlm7 and Rlm9 (A07) in the Darmor‐bzh v 8.1 assembly. For each locus, if there was more than one known QTL, the QTL were combined to create a single region, the QTL name and references are shown in Table S7. Rlm1 was localized within an interval of approximately 4.94 Mbp containing 18 RGAs. The mapping of Rlm3 and Rlm4 placed these R loci within intervals of 16.79 Mb (46 genes) and 26.69 Mbp (60 genes), respectively. Rlm7 and Rlm9 loci were localized within 16.02 (46 genes) and 5.35 Mbp (17 genes), respectively. The A02 (LepR1) and A10 (LepR2) R‐genes were localized to regions 10.41 (14 genes) and 13.95 Mbp (32 genes). Rlm1 and Rlm9 were in the narrowest QTL, which covered 18 (16 core and 2 variable) and 17 (all core) genes, respectively (Table S7). Overlapping Rlm1, Rlm3, Rlm4, Rlm7 and Rlm9 were combined into single, contiguous non‐redundant regions. Figure S7 provides an illustration of how these QTL were combined. There were 60 (53 core and 7 variable) RGAs within Rlm1, Rlm3, Rlm4, Rlm7 and Rlm9 on chromosome A07, 14 (12 core and 2 variable) RGAs within LepR1 on chromosome A02 and 32 (28 core and 4 variable) RGAs within LepR2 on chromosome A10 (Table S7). We identified 688 SNPs in these 106 RGAs (70 within LepR1, 180 within LepR2 and 438 within Rlm1, Rlm3, Rlm4, Rlm7 and Rlm9). The RGA classes showed different levels of variability; for example, on chromosome A07, out of 60 RGAs within the QTL, only 5 RLKs and 2 NL were variable. Also, on chromosome A02, out of 14 RGAs, only 2 RLKs were variable, while on chromosome A10, 4 variable RLKs were found out of 29 RLKs (Table S7). A waterfall plot of the blackleg resistance‐linked QTL (Rlm4 locus) was produced to show the mutational load of RGA candidates located within the QTL candidate region in all the individuals (Figure 3). CRY_1 showed the highest mutational load followed by HIY_1. Three genes (BnaA07g34310D2, BnaA07g25600D2 and BnaA07g33860D2) were lost in five individuals (HIY_1, R76, RS_4_6, S_39 and sensation). Also, the maximum and minimum mutation percentages were related to BnaA07g25910D2 and BnaA07g25020D2 genes, respectively. Only BnaA07g24060D2 showed a splice region variant and coding sequence variant in two individuals (Palu and H165). A splice acceptor variant was only observed in the individuals HIY_1, CRY_1 and MOY_4 in the gene BnaA07g25230D2. The coding sequence variant was the only mutation that was detected in all individuals.
Figure 3

Waterfall plot of the blackleg‐linked QTL (Rlm4 locus). Gene order is determined by the position in the reference assembly.

Waterfall plot of the blackleg‐linked QTL (Rlm4 locus). Gene order is determined by the position in the reference assembly.

Discussion

The sequencing and assembly of Brassica genomes have allowed tremendous progress in genotyping and gene identification; however, to date, only two R‐genes have been cloned in B. napus despite extensive work. Therefore, there is a need to perform analyses to overcome this limitation. As a sequenced reference cultivar does not contain all B. napus genes due to gene presence/absence or copy number variation between individuals, we used the B. napus pangenome for the identification and characterization of RGA candidates (NBS‐LRR and TM‐LRR), which are not present in the single reference assembly, to examine their distribution, domain structure, clustering, presence/absence and SNPs. Our results show that a pangenome is essential to identify candidate genes for breeding of improved cultivars. The findings can be exploited to further characterize the relationships between candidate R‐genes and resistance/susceptibility among cultivars. In general, the results demonstrated that the RGAs were unevenly distributed across the genomes. This observation has also been noted in other species, where an uneven distribution of RGAs on chromosomes appears to be common in plants (Kohler et al., 2008; Meyers et al., 2003; Porter et al., 2009; Yang et al., 2008; Zhou et al., 2004). This uneven distribution might be due to recent tandem gene amplifications, segmental duplications (Rice Chromosomes 11 and 12 Sequencing Consortia, 2005) and dosage compensation (Zhu et al., 2018). Gene dosage balance is critical for development and phenotypic characteristics, especially in synthetic B. napus individuals at initial generations (Xiong et al., 2011). The results suggest that gene order and proximity are important for the functional nature of these genes (Singh et al., 2015). TNLs were found to be more abundant than CNLs. The greater number of TNLs compared with CNLs has been previously reported in B. napus (Alamery, 2015; Alamery et al., 2017), B. rapa, Arabidopsis (Meyers et al., 2003; Mun et al., 2009; Yu et al., 2014) and Linum usitatissimum (linseed) (Kale et al., 2013). It has been reported that the TIR domain is an important component of innate immunity across species through self‐association and ligand‐specific protein–protein interactions (Ve et al., 2015). Leister (2004) stated that the over‐representation of one of these families could reflect the adaptation of the R‐genes to the predominant pathogens. The variation in NBS‐LRR gene content between individuals has been assumed to play an important role in the resistance or susceptibility of crops to disease (Tollenaere et al., 2012; Wu et al., 2014). Furthermore, we found that the largest class of RGA candidates were RLKs, which has been previously reported in other plants, such as wild strawberry and cotton (Chen et al., 2015; Li et al., 2017). This frequency might be due to a greater diversity of roles of RLK than RLP and NBS‐LRR genes. The core R‐genes not only had more total SNPs than variable R‐genes, but also had a higher number of synonymous and non‐synonymous SNPs. In a previous study, Bayer et al. (2018) reported that in B. oleracea, core genes had more low‐ and moderate‐impact SNPs than variable genes, while core genes and variable genes showed almost identical numbers of high‐impact SNPs. Our result is different from that previously reported in soya bean, where the variable genes in the soya bean pangenome have a higher proportion of SNPs (Li et al., 2014). It has been reported that a higher proportion of non‐synonymous SNPs in the variable genes suggest a higher evolutionary rate of variable genes (Li et al., 2014). In the present study, out of 9762 non‐synonymous SNPs detected in RGAs on the reference genomes, 5,011 were on the A genome and 4,751 were on the C genome. Similar results were found by Huang et al. (2013) who identified 55% of SNPs on the A genome and 45% of SNPs on the C genome. Similarly, Bancroft et al. (2011) identified 15 559 SNPs on the A genome and 5675 SNPs on the C genome. Uneven distribution of SNPs throughout the Brassica species genome is a common phenomenon and has also been reported in A. thaliana (Feltus et al., 2004). For instance, in Arabidopsis, R‐genes are known to accumulate large numbers of non‐synonymous SNPs, producing new allelic variants of R‐genes (Bakker et al., 2006). A higher proportion of non‐synonymous SNPs have been reported in other plants, for instance 56% non‐synonymous SNPs in oil palm (Pootakham et al., 2015), 57% in sorghum (Zheng et al., 2011) and 54%–57% in rice (Jeong et al., 2013; Subbaiyan et al., 2012). Among the R‐genes, transition substitutions were more predominant than transversions. The increased frequency of transition substitutions in coding regions is likely due to the structure of the genetic code and selective constraints (Wondji et al., 2007). In addition, the higher frequency of transition SNPs may be partly related to 5‐methylcytosine deamination reactions that frequently occur, particularly at CpG dinucleotides (Holliday and Grigg, 1993). Among the 12 RGA subfamilies, all had SNPs, suggesting that SNPs in the RGAs may alter protein interactions. It should be noted that SNPs located in different domains could be responsible for the differences in blackleg resistance. For example, SNPs might affect nucleotide binding in the NBS‐LRR domains and thus gene regulation and R‐protein function. Therefore, these RGAs can be selected as candidate genes for further characterization of RGA functional involvement in resistance to diseases and the development of molecular markers. Many R‐genes often cluster in the genome (Hulbert et al., 2001). Previous studies have revealed that the majority of NSB‐LRR genes are present in gene clusters in plant genomes (Hulbert et al., 2001) conferring different resistance specificities (Leister, 2004). For example, in rice and Arabidopsis, 71% and 76% of NBS‐LRR genes were located within RGA gene‐rich clusters, respectively (Guo et al., 2011; Zhou et al., 2004). In addition, Yr genes responsible for resistance against wheat yellow rust were found to be clustered (Marchal et al., 2018). NBS‐LRR‐encoding genes are frequently clustered in the genome, as a result of both segmental and tandem duplications (Leister, 2004). It has been reported that R‐genes within a cluster can have different rates and patterns of variation, leading to the discrimination of two types of R‐genes based on their modes of evolution (Kuang et al., 2004). The maize Rp1 cluster (∼1–52 homologs per haplotype (Smith et al., 2004)) and the lettuce Dm3 (aka RGC2) cluster (∼12–32 homologs per haplotype (Kuang et al., 2004)) are among the largest R‐gene clusters. The role of R‐gene clusters in R‐gene evolution is often conceptualized in terms of a gene‐for‐gene model (Friedman and Baker, 2007). Individual clusters may also confer specific resistance to a wide range of different pathogens (van der Vossen et al., 2000). No mixed clusters of TNLs and CNLs were found in the B. napus pangenome. The separate clustering of TIR and non‐TIR‐NBS‐LRR sequences may be contributed to the ancient divergence of these two subfamilies, for example, by restricting locally acting mechanisms for sequence homogenization such as unequal crossing over (Zhu et al., 2002). The current results revealed that the NBS‐LRR and TM‐LRR classes are abundant and widely distributed throughout the genome and NBS‐LRR variable genes were more likely to be found in clusters. Thus, gene clustering may be a crucial attribute of the generation of novel resistance specificities through gene duplication or recombination (Meyers et al., 2003). Brassica napus synthetic lines can be produced through crossing between parental species (B. rapa and B. oleracea) followed by embryo rescue and chromosome doubling. The performance and disease resistance of synthesized lines can be compared with non‐synthetic or parental lines. It has been shown that synthesized lines, especially early generations, are specifically prone to homoeologous rearrangements, including deletions, duplications and translocations (Gaeta et al., 2007; Hurgobin et al., 2018; Szadkowski et al., 2010; Xiong et al., 2011), also aneuploidy, gross chromosomal rearrangements and dosage balance mechanisms that enforce chromosome number stability (Xiong et al., 2011). Several studies have indicated that genetic changes caused by homoeologous chromosome rearrangement are common in newly resynthesized B. napus allotetraploids (Gaeta et al., 2007; Song et al., 1995). In this study, the synthetic lines were shown to exhibit more RGAs than non‐synthetic lines, whereas non‐synthetics lines have lost more RGAs, making them an interesting model to study the impact of polyploidization on genome structure, disease resistance genes and their potential associated with agronomic traits. Greater genetic diversity in synthetic B. napus lines compared with non‐synthetic lines has previously been reported (Golicz et al., 2016b; Hurgobin et al., 2018; Li et al., 2014). This difference has been attributed to the incorporation of novel alleles from diverse progenitor genomes and highlights the potential of using synthetic B. napus accessions as a source of novel genetic structural variation for breeding improved varieties (Hurgobin et al., 2018). Several QTL responsible for quantitative resistance have been identified in B. napus cultivars (Huang et al., 2016; Jestin et al., 2011; Larkan et al., 2016; Raman et al., 2012b). We identified 106 RGA candidates and 688 SNPs within QTL regions associated with blackleg resistance. However, these were the larger QTL regions that could be narrowed in future analysis. Identification of RGA candidates within QTL may inform future breeding efforts in B. napus through providing a basis for mapping candidate genes, as markers linked to resistance are useful for understanding mechanisms of resistance and immediate breeding applications. The finding of both core and variable genes within these regions highlights the requirement of pangenomics in these efforts.

Conclusion

In this study, we analysed RGAs in a B. napus pangenome using a single reference and whole‐genome sequencing data from 50 lines. We found that the presence of RGA candidates varies between lines and suggest that in B. napus, SNPs and presence/absence variation drive RGA diversity. Also, the results demonstrated chromosome imbalance in terms of PAV and SNPs. A genome contained less RGAs but more SNPs compared with C genome. This study emphasizes the value of analysing the pangenome in finding novel RGAs not contained within a single reference. Our results also highlight the potential of variable genes and synthetic lines to be used in genetic structural variation studies for future breeding programmes. Overall, the findings can be exploited to further characterize the relationships between RGAs and resistance/susceptibility among B. napus lines.

Experimental procedures

Pangenome

The B. napus pangenome, consisting of 31 non‐synthetic (3 fodders, 2 swedes, 2 vegetables and 24 oilseeds) and 19 synthetic accessions, was described in Hurgobin et al. (2018). The pangenome size was 1044 Mbp and contained 1749 predicted R‐genes. Gene PAV discovery was performed using the SGSGeneLoss package (Golicz et al., 2015) as described in Hurgobin et al. (2018) and Bayer et al. (2018).

Identification of candidate R‐genes

The RGAugury pipeline (v 2017‐10‐21; Li et al., 2016) was used to automate RGA (NBS, RLK and RLP candidate genes) prediction in the B. napus Darmor‐bzh v8.1 annotation, downloaded from http://brassicagenome.net. The RGA candidates were classified into 12 subfamilies. The TM‐LRR was divided into RLP and RLK, and the NBS‐LRR candidates were divided based on the presence or absence of specific domains: Proteins carrying only an NB‐ARC domain were classified as NBS, proteins carrying TIR, NB‐ARC and leucine‐rich repeat domains were classified as TNLs, or TN if the leucine‐rich repeat domain was missing. Proteins carrying coils, NB‐ARC and leucine‐rich repeat domains were classified as CNLs, or CN if the leucine‐rich repeat domain was missing, or NL if the coils domain was missing. Proteins carrying a TIR domain with additionally unknown domains were classified as TX (The TX genes do no encode NBS domain and not all TX genes are derived from TNL genes). Proteins with NL genes with an RPW8 domain were classified as RNL, or RN if the leucine‐rich repeat domain was missing, while all other combinations (e.g. CNL + RPW8) were classified as OTHER.

SNP discovery

Single nucleotide polymorphisms were previously predicted by Hurgobin et al. (2018). SNPEff v4.3T (Cingolani et al., 2012) was used for the variant effect prediction. The SNP impacts were predicted as high (to have a high, disruptive impact in the protein, probably causing protein truncation, loss of function or triggering non‐sense‐mediated decay), moderate (a non‐disruptive variant that might change protein effectiveness) and low to be mostly harmless or unlikely to change protein behaviour. Since there were more core than variable genes and core genes were longer than variable genes (Hurgobin et al., 2018), the counts of low‐, moderate‐, and high‐impact SNPs were normalized by dividing by the total length of all exons per gene in order to account for very long and very short genes. Two‐way ANOVA as implemented in R v3.4.2 (R Core Team, 2016) was used to check whether the variation in low, moderate, high, and upstream and downstream variants could be explained by the presence/absence status or by the RGA class.

Physical clustering

Resistance gene analog clusters were determined by gene order on each chromosome (Holub, 2001; Meyers et al., 2003; Richly et al., 2002). RGA candidates were continuously merged into clusters if they were within 10 RGA or non‐RGA genes (makeRGeneClusterAnalysis.py). Physical clusters and presence/absence status were compared using Pearson's chi‐square test with Yates’ continuity correction as implemented in R v3.4.2 (R Core Team, 2016).

Linking known QTL and R‐genes

Known blackleg resistance‐linked QTL were collected from the literature (Delourme et al., 2004; Larkan et al., 2016; Leflon et al., 2007; Raman et al., 2012a,b; Tang and Zhao, 2015). The sequences of the markers, genes and primer pairs were downloaded from the collected literature. BLAST was used to assign positions for the forward and reverse primer sequences in the v8.1 B. napus Darmor‐bzh assembly.

Plots and graphs

The SNP and RGA density/distribution plots were generated using karyoploteR v1.4.2 (Gel and Serra, 2017). Waterfall plots were drawn using Variant Effect Predictor v88.13 (McLaren et al., 2016), GenVisR v1.11.3 (Skidmore et al., 2016), vcftools v0.1.15 (Danecek et al., 2011) and R 3.4.4 (R Core Team, 2016).

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in relation to this publication.

Author contributions

AD, PB, DE and JB conceived and designed the experiments. AD, PB, ST and BH performed the experiments and analysed the data. AD, PB, DE and JB wrote the paper. Figure S1 The absolute number of RGAs on the reference genomes. Figure S2 The distribution of stop codons (stop_gained, stop_lost and stop_retained_variant) across the 50 non‐synthetic (fodder (blue), swede (red), vegetable (green) and oilseed (grey)) and synthetic (black) lines on the reference genome, pangenome additional contigs and reference genome unplaced contigs. Figure S3 Physical clustering of NBS‐LRR genes on the chromosome of the A genome of B. napus. The colourful circles above (variable) and below (core) each chromosome (grey bars) are designated for NBS classes. Chromosome lengths are shown in megabase pairs on the scale at the top. Figure S4 Physical clustering of NBS‐LRR genes on the chromosome of the C genome of B. napus. The colourful circles above (variable) and below (core) each chromosome (grey bars) are designated for NBS classes. Chromosome lengths are shown in megabase pairs on the scale at the top. Figure S5 Physical clustering of TM‐LRR genes on the chromosome of the A genome of B. napus. The colourful circles above (variable) and below (core) each chromosome (grey bars) are designated for NBS classes. Chromosome lengths are shown in megabase pairs on the scale at the top. Figure S6 Physical clustering of TM‐LRR genes on the chromosome of the C genome of B. napus. The colourful circles above (variable) and below (core) each chromosome (grey bars) are designated for NBS classes. Chromosome lengths are shown in megabase pairs on the scale at the top. Figure S7 Rlm1, Rlm3, Rlm4, Rlm7 and Rlm9 QTL were combined into non‐redundant QTL regions by combining QTL length overlaps into single contiguous regions. Non‐QTL regions contain no QTL whatsoever. Click here for additional data file. Table S1 RGAs across the 50 lines on the A genome, C genome, pangenome additional contigs and reference genome unplaced contigs. Click here for additional data file. Table S2 Morphotype/lines that harbour at least one RGA of each class in the pangenome. Table S3 The number of lost genes in the pangenome additional contigs, reference genome and reference genome unplaced contigs. Table S4 The number of SNPs in core and variable genes in the reference genome, pangenome additional contigs and reference genome unplaced contigs. Table S5 The numbers of non‐synonymous, synonymous and total SNPs on core and variable R‐genes. Table S6 The numbers of non‐synonymous and synonymous SNPs, mis‐sense and non‐sense variants and other effects in different RGAs. Table S7 RGA candidates underlying reported QTL for blackleg in the Darmor v 8.1 assembly. Click here for additional data file.
  82 in total

Review 1.  Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection.

Authors:  J L Dangl; J D Jones
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-06-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Tandem and segmental gene duplication and recombination in the evolution of plant disease resistance gene.

Authors:  Dario Leister
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  Genome-wide DNA polymorphisms in elite indica rice inbreds discovered by whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Gopala K Subbaiyan; Daniel L E Waters; Sanjay K Katiyar; Ajanahalli R Sadananda; Satyadev Vaddadi; Robert J Henry
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 9.803

4.  Genome-wide identification of NBS genes in japonica rice reveals significant expansion of divergent non-TIR NBS-LRR genes.

Authors:  T Zhou; Y Wang; J-Q Chen; H Araki; Z Jing; K Jiang; J Shen; D Tian
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 3.291

5.  Genome-wide identification and characterization of nucleotide binding site leucine-rich repeat genes in linseed reveal distinct patterns of gene structure.

Authors:  Sandip M Kale; Varsha C Pardeshi; Vitthal T Barvkar; Vidya S Gupta; Narendra Y Kadoo
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 2.166

6.  Identification of environmentally stable QTL for resistance against Leptosphaeria maculans in oilseed rape (Brassica napus).

Authors:  Y J Huang; C Jestin; S J Welham; G J King; M J Manzanares-Dauleux; B D L Fitt; R Delourme
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Variation in abundance of predicted resistance genes in the Brassica oleracea pangenome.

Authors:  Philipp E Bayer; Agnieszka A Golicz; Soodeh Tirnaz; Chon-Kit Kenneth Chan; David Edwards; Jacqueline Batley
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 9.803

8.  Detection, introgression and localization of genes conferring specific resistance to Leptosphaeria maculans from Brassica rapa into B. napus.

Authors:  M Leflon; H Brun; F Eber; R Delourme; M O Lucas; P Vallée; M Ermel; M H Balesdent; A M Chèvre
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 5.574

9.  The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor.

Authors:  William McLaren; Laurent Gil; Sarah E Hunt; Harpreet Singh Riat; Graham R S Ritchie; Anja Thormann; Paul Flicek; Fiona Cunningham
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Transcriptome and methylome profiling reveals relics of genome dominance in the mesopolyploid Brassica oleracea.

Authors:  Isobel A P Parkin; Chushin Koh; Haibao Tang; Stephen J Robinson; Sateesh Kagale; Wayne E Clarke; Chris D Town; John Nixon; Vivek Krishnakumar; Shelby L Bidwell; France Denoeud; Harry Belcram; Matthew G Links; Jérémy Just; Carling Clarke; Tricia Bender; Terry Huebert; Annaliese S Mason; J Chris Pires; Guy Barker; Jonathan Moore; Peter G Walley; Sahana Manoli; Jacqueline Batley; David Edwards; Matthew N Nelson; Xiyin Wang; Andrew H Paterson; Graham King; Ian Bancroft; Boulos Chalhoub; Andrew G Sharpe
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  26 in total

1.  Genomics-informed prebreeding unlocks the diversity in genebanks for wheat improvement.

Authors:  Albert W Schulthess; Sandip M Kale; Fang Liu; Yusheng Zhao; Norman Philipp; Maximilian Rembe; Yong Jiang; Ulrike Beukert; Albrecht Serfling; Axel Himmelbach; Jörg Fuchs; Markus Oppermann; Stephan Weise; Philipp H G Boeven; Johannes Schacht; C Friedrich H Longin; Sonja Kollers; Nina Pfeiffer; Viktor Korzun; Matthias Lange; Uwe Scholz; Nils Stein; Martin Mascher; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 41.307

2.  Genome structural evolution in Brassica crops.

Authors:  Zhesi He; Ruiqin Ji; Lenka Havlickova; Lihong Wang; Yi Li; Huey Tyng Lee; Jiaming Song; Chushin Koh; Jinghua Yang; Mingfang Zhang; Isobel A P Parkin; Xiaowu Wang; David Edwards; Graham J King; Jun Zou; Kede Liu; Rod J Snowdon; Surinder S Banga; Ivana Machackova; Ian Bancroft
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 15.793

3.  Genome Size Variation and Comparative Genomics Reveal Intraspecific Diversity in Brassica rapa.

Authors:  Julien Boutte; Loeiz Maillet; Thomas Chaussepied; Sébastien Letort; Jean-Marc Aury; Caroline Belser; Franz Boideau; Anael Brunet; Olivier Coriton; Gwenaëlle Deniot; Cyril Falentin; Virginie Huteau; Maryse Lodé-Taburel; Jérôme Morice; Gwenn Trotoux; Anne-Marie Chèvre; Mathieu Rousseau-Gueutin; Julie Ferreira de Carvalho
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  Long-read assembly of the Brassica napus reference genome Darmor-bzh.

Authors:  Mathieu Rousseau-Gueutin; Caroline Belser; Corinne Da Silva; Gautier Richard; Benjamin Istace; Corinne Cruaud; Cyril Falentin; Franz Boideau; Julien Boutte; Regine Delourme; Gwenaëlle Deniot; Stefan Engelen; Julie Ferreira de Carvalho; Arnaud Lemainque; Loeiz Maillet; Jérôme Morice; Patrick Wincker; France Denoeud; Anne-Marie Chèvre; Jean-Marc Aury
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 6.524

Review 5.  Recent Findings Unravel Genes and Genetic Factors Underlying Leptosphaeria maculans Resistance in Brassica napus and Its Relatives.

Authors:  Aldrin Y Cantila; Nur Shuhadah Mohd Saad; Junrey C Amas; David Edwards; Jacqueline Batley
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Frontiers in Dissecting and Managing Brassica Diseases: From Reference-Based RGA Candidate Identification to Building Pan-RGAomes.

Authors:  Yueqi Zhang; William Thomas; Philipp E Bayer; David Edwards; Jacqueline Batley
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Sorghum Pan-Genome Explores the Functional Utility for Genomic-Assisted Breeding to Accelerate the Genetic Gain.

Authors:  Pradeep Ruperao; Nepolean Thirunavukkarasu; Prasad Gandham; Sivasubramani Selvanayagam; Mahalingam Govindaraj; Baloua Nebie; Eric Manyasa; Rajeev Gupta; Roma Rani Das; Damaris A Odeny; Harish Gandhi; David Edwards; Santosh P Deshpande; Abhishek Rathore
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Introgressing the Aegilops tauschii genome into wheat as a basis for cereal improvement.

Authors:  Yun Zhou; Shenglong Bai; Hao Li; Guiling Sun; Dale Zhang; Feifei Ma; Xinpeng Zhao; Fang Nie; Jingyao Li; Liyang Chen; Linlin Lv; Lele Zhu; Ruixiao Fan; Yifan Ge; Aaqib Shaheen; Guanghui Guo; Zhen Zhang; Jianchao Ma; Huihui Liang; Xiaolong Qiu; Jiamin Hu; Ting Sun; Jingyi Hou; Hongxing Xu; Shulin Xue; Wenkai Jiang; Jinling Huang; Suoping Li; Changsong Zou; Chun-Peng Song
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 15.793

9.  Amborella gene presence/absence variation is associated with abiotic stress responses that may contribute to environmental adaptation.

Authors:  Haifei Hu; Armin Scheben; Brent Verpaalen; Soodeh Tirnaz; Philipp E Bayer; Richard G J Hodel; Jacqueline Batley; Douglas E Soltis; Pamela S Soltis; David Edwards
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 10.323

Review 10.  The Use of Genetic and Gene Technologies in Shaping Modern Rapeseed Cultivars (Brassica napus L.).

Authors:  Linh Bao Ton; Ting Xiang Neik; Jacqueline Batley
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.