| Literature DB >> 31551489 |
Letícia de Castro Martins Ferreira1, Mário Círio Nogueira2, Ricardo Vela de Britto Pereira3, William Cossich Marcial de Farias4, Moreno Magalhaes de Souza Rodrigues5, Maria Teresa Bustamante Teixeira2, Marilia Sá Carvalho6.
Abstract
Ambient temperature may lead to decompensation of cardiovascular diseases and deaths by acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Little is known about this relationship in South American countries located in regions of a hot climate. This study aims to investigate the effects of ambient temperature on mortality due to AMI in six Brazilian micro-regions, which present different climates. We analyzed daily records of deaths by AMI between 1996 and 2013. We estimated the accumulate relative and attributable risks with lags of up to 14 days, using distributed non-linear lag model. Micro-regions that were closest to the equator did not show an association between temperature and mortality. The lowest risk temperatures varied between 22 °C and 28 °C, in the Southern region of Brazil and the Midwest region, respectively. Low temperatures associated with the highest mortality risk were observed in the same areas, varying between 5 °C and 15 °C. The number of deaths attributed to cold temperatures varied from 176/year in Brasilia to 661/year in São Paulo and those deaths attributed to hot temperatures in Rio de Janeiro amounted to 115/year. We showed the relative risk and the attributable risk of warmer and colder days in tropical regions. The estimate of the number of deaths due to climate, varying according to each area, is a way of bringing information to those responsible for health policies based on easily-understood measurements.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31551489 PMCID: PMC6760184 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-50235-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Distribution of daily data on mortality due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the Brazilian regions included in the analysis, 1996–2013.
| Variables | Regions | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manaus | Recife | Brasília | Rio de Janeiro | São Paulo | Porto Alegre | |
| Populationa | 1769561 | 3125395 | 2292056 | 11050795 | 13194129 | 3548338 |
|
| ||||||
| Total number | 4547 | 33523 | 7937 | 118898 | 131394 | 33797 |
| Average annual number | 253 | 1862 | 441 | 6605 | 7300 | 1878 |
| Average annual rateb | 14.28 | 59.59 | 19.24 | 59.77 | 55.33 | 52.92 |
|
| ||||||
| Minimum value | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 |
| 25th Percentile | 0 | 3 | 0 | 15 | 16 | 3 |
| Median | 0 | 5 | 1 | 18 | 19 | 5 |
| Average | 1 | 5 | 1 | 18 | 20 | 5 |
| 75th Percentile | 1 | 7 | 2 | 21 | 23 | 7 |
| Maximum value | 6 | 18 | 7 | 45 | 49 | 18 |
| Average daily rate | 0.04 | 0.16 | 0.05 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.15 |
aPopulation average in the period.
bRates by 100000 inhabitants.
Figure 1Distribution of data on mortality by acute myocardial infarction and average temperature, with superimposed time spline, for each region, 1996–2013.
Distribution of daily data on average temperature (in °C) and minimum mortality temperature (MMT) in Brazilian regions included in the analysis, 1996–2013.
| Distribution | Regions | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manaus | Recife | Brasília | Rio de Janeiro | São Paulo | Porto Alegre | |
| Minimum value | 22.0 | 21.8 | 15.3 | 13.8 | 8.4 | 4.9 |
| 1st Percentile | 24.1 | 22.7 | 18.5 | 16.8 | 12.6 | 7.9 |
| 2.5th Percentile | 24.4 | 23.0 | 19.2 | 17.7 | 13.7 | 9.4 |
| 10th Percentile | 25.1 | 23.7 | 20.4 | 19.5 | 16.1 | 12.5 |
| 25th Percentile | 25.6 | 24.4 | 21.5 | 21.1 | 18.3 | 15.7 |
| Median | 26.4 | 25.5 | 22.6 | 23.3 | 20.7 | 19.7 |
| Average | 26.5 | 25.4 | 22.8 | 23.3 | 20.5 | 19.1 |
| 75th Percentile | 27.2 | 26.3 | 24.0 | 25.6 | 22.9 | 22.9 |
| 90th Percentile | 28.0 | 26.9 | 25.5 | 27.2 | 24.4 | 24.8 |
| 97.5th Percentile | 29.1 | 27.4 | 27.0 | 28.4 | 25.8 | 26.4 |
| 99th Percentile | 29.6 | 27.8 | 27.8 | 29.1 | 26.6 | 27.3 |
| Maximum value | 31.3 | 28.5 | 29.7 | 31.3 | 29.0 | 31.9 |
| Minimum Mortality Temperature (MMT) | 25.9 | 24.8 | 27.8 | 26.1 | 23.4 | 21.9 |
Relative risks (with 95% confidence intervals) of death by acute myocardial infarction due to exposure to an average temperature in some regions, with each region’s minimum mortality temperature (MMT) as a reference.
| Average | Regions | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manaus | Recife | Brasília | Rio de Janeiro | São Paulo | Porto Alegre | |
| Extreme cold | 1.04 (0.65, 1.67) | 1.20 (0.97, 1.48) | 1.91 (1.27–2.88) | 1.33 (1.24, 1.44) | 1.50 (1.39, 1.63) | 1.78 (1.55, 2.06) |
| Moderate cold | 1.04 (0.71, 1.52) | 1.11 (0.95, 1.29) | 1.90 (1.31–2.76) | 1.20 (1.13, 1.29) | 1.28 (1.19, 1.37) | 1.48 (1.31, 1.67) |
| Moderate heat | 1.08 (0.80, 1.47) | 1.09 (0.96, 1.24) | — | 1.05 (1.03, 1.08) | 1.01 (0.99, 1.03) | 1.05 (0.94, 1.17) |
| Extreme heat | 1.07 (0.73, 1.56) | 1.14 (0.97, 1.33) | — | 1.24 (1.16, 1.32) | 1.07 (1.00, 1.15) | 1.05 (0.92, 1.20) |
Extreme cold: 2.5th percentile of average temperature.
Moderate cold: 10th percentile of average temperature.
Moderate heat: 90th percentile of average temperature.
Extreme heat: 97.5th percentile of average temperature.
Fractions and numbers of deaths per year (with 95% confidence intervals) by acute myocardial infarction attributable to exposure to an average temperature in some regions, 1996–2013.
| Variable | Average Temperature | Regions | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brasília | Rio de Janeiro | São Paulo | Porto Alegre | ||
| Attributable fraction (%) | Extreme cold | 1.3 (0.3; 1.7) | 0.7 (0.5; 0.9) | 1.1 (0.9; 1.3) | 1.6 (1.3; 1.8) |
| Moderate cold | 3.7 (1.8; 5.0) | 1.7 (1.2; 2.1) | 2.2 (1.8; 2.6) | 3.4 (2.6; 4.1) | |
| Mild cold | 35.0 (14.3; 49.7) | 4.8 (2.0; 7.4) | 5.7 (3.0; 8.6) | 11.1 (6.8; 14.6) | |
| Mild heat | — | 0.2 (0.1; 0.2) | — | — | |
| Moderate heat | — | 0.8 (0.6; 1.0) | — | — | |
| Extreme heat | — | 0.8 (0.6; 1.0) | — | — | |
| Total | 40.0 (16.4; 56.4) | 9.0 (5.0; 12.6) | 9.0 (5.7; 12.5) | 16.1 (10.7; 20.5) | |
| Preventable deaths per year | Extreme cold | 6 (2; 8) | 49 (36; 60) | 83 (67; 96) | 30 (24; 35) |
| Moderate cold | 16 (8; 22) | 111 (82; 138) | 162 (130; 191) | 64 (51; 77) | |
| Mild cold | 154 (64; 217) | 319 (118; 513) | 416 (199; 630) | 208 (129; 280) | |
| Mild heat | — | 10 (3; 16) | — | — | |
| Moderate heat | — | 52 (37; 67) | — | — | |
| Extreme heat | — | 53 (39; 64) | — | — | |
| Total | 176 (74; 247) | 594 (315; 858) | 661 (396; 917) | 302 (204; 392) | |
Extreme cold: minimum to 2.5th percentiles of average temperature.
Moderate cold: 2.5th to 10th percentile of average temperature.
Mild cold: 10th percentile to minimum mortality temperature (MMT).
Mild heat: MMT to 90th percentile of average temperature.
Moderate heat: 90th to 97.5th percentile of average temperature.
Extreme heat: 97.5th percentile to maximum of average temperature.
Figure 2Accumulated relative risks by temperature for each region, with indications of minimal mortality temperature -MMT (solid vertical line).
Figure 3Relative risks of up to lag 14 for each region, by 2.5th and 10th percentiles of temperature (extreme and moderate cold).
Figure 4Relative risks of up to lag 14 for each region, by 90th and 97.5th percentiles of temperature (moderate and extreme heat).