Urinary bisphenol A and serum lipids: a meta-analysis of six NHANES examination cycles (2003-2014).

BACKGROUND: Mounting evidence from both experimental and epidemiological studies suggest that exposure to the endocrine disruptor bisphenol A (BPA) has a role in metabolic disorders. The aim of the present study was to assess whether urinary BPA concentrations were associated with dyslipidaemia in children (≤17 years old) and adults (≥18 years old) by performing a meta-analysis of data from six cycles (2003-2014) in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).
METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis of data from 4604 children and 10 989 adult participants who were part of a substudy of urinary BPA measurements from six NHANES cycles from 2003 to 2014. Linear regression models conducted in each cycle were used to perform a meta-analysis to investigate associations between urinary BPA and serum levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG) and apolipoprotein B (ApoB).
RESULTS: The meta-analysis did not disclose any significant associations between urinary BPA concentrations and LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG and ApoB in children. In adults, the meta-analysis revealed negative regression coefficients for all five lipid variables. However, no associations were significant following Bonferroni correction for multiple tests.
CONCLUSIONS: In the present meta-analysis of cross-sectional data from NHANES, no associations were found between urinary BPA and the five different lipid variables when investigated in both children and adults. However, considering the cross-sectional nature of the present study, results should be clarified in carefully designed longitudinal cohort studies with repeated BPA measurements. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Introduction

The ‘obesogen hypothesis’ and ‘metabolism-disrupting hypothesis’ suggest that exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) found in the environment may predispose some individuals to the development of obesity and associated health conditions, such as type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Bisphenol A (BPA) is one of the most commonly reported obesogens and metabolism-disrupting chemicals.1 2

BPA is a high-volume chemical extensively used in epoxy resins lining in food and beverage containers and as a monomer in polycarbonate plastics in many consumer products. Its use is still abundant and environmental contamination is apparent in waters, sediments, soil, air, wildlife and humans.3 Exposure to BPA, primarily via food, but also through dental sealants, thermal paper (receipts and tickets), dermal exposure and inhalation of household dust, is evident from the detectable levels of urinary BPA in humans.4–8 BPA has also been detected in adipose tissue,9 and urinary BPA concentrations do not decline rapidly with fasting time, implying that BPA partly accumulates in adipose tissue and other tissue compartments.10 11

BPA can interfere with multiple hormone actions,12 including the activity of membrane and nuclear receptors (eg, oestrogen receptors), thyroid hormone receptor, androgen receptor and orphan receptors (eg, aryl hydrocarbon receptor). The diversity of plausible mechanisms of BPA, in addition to the dose in relation to exposure during sensitive windows, may be an explanation for the effects of low-dose BPA exposure on endocrine systems.13

In humans, BPA exposure has been associated with the metabolic syndrome14 and its components hypertension,15 diabetes mellitus,16 17 insulin resistance18 and obesity.19 20 Especially troublesome is that associations between BPA exposure and metabolic diseases are observed also in children,20–23 indicating that metabolic disturbances due to BPA exposure start at a young age.

Because of the intense focus on BPA, several studies using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data to address the link between BPA and metabolic disorders such as obesity and diabetes already exist. However, to our knowledge, studies investigating the relation between BPA exposure and dyslipidaemia are limited.16 23 Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate potential associations between urinary BPA concentrations and dyslipidaemia in US children and adults by performing a meta-analysis of data from six NHANES cycles from 2003 to 2014. We hypothesised that urinary BPA, as a surrogate biomarker for BPA exposure, is associated with a disturbed lipid metabolism.

Methods

Study population

NHANES is a continuous cross-sectional surveillance programme administered by the National Center for Health Statistics, which is part of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The aim of NHANES is to assess the health and nutritional status of the general US population for both children and adults. A detailed description of the NHANES study design and methods is available elsewhere.24 Results in the present study are based on data from the following six NHANES cycles containing BPA measurements: NHANES 2003–2004, 2005–2006, 2007–2008, 2009–2010, 2011–2012 and 2013–2014. Data from the demographics, dietary, questionnaire, laboratory and physical examination components of each NHANES cycle were downloaded from the NHANES website https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/index.htm. For the present study, 4604 children, aged 6–17 years, and 10 989 adults, aged 18 years or older, with BPA measurement data in urine, were eligible.

Urinary BPA

A spot urine sample was collected from a one-third random subset of participants of each NHANES cycle that were then analysed for BPA concentration. Total urinary BPA (free and conjugated; nanograms per millilitre) concentrations were measured using online solid-phase extraction coupled to high performance liquid chromatography-isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometry at the Division of Environmental Health Laboratory Sciences (National Center for Environmental Health, CDC). Comprehensive quality assurance and quality control was performed to ensure that samples were not contaminated during handling, storage and analysis.4 Urinary creatinine was included in all multivariate models to correct for urinary dilution of BPA, as done in previous publications.4 25

Lipid measures

Total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) were analysed enzymatically in serum using spectrophotometric measurement of the colour of a reaction byproduct. The colour intensity is directly proportional to the concentration of the respective lipid. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were calculated from measured values of TC, TG and HDL-C based on the Friedwald equation ([LDL-C]=[TC]−[HDL-C]−[TG/5]), which is valid for individuals with TC levels <400 mg/dL.26 Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) was measured with an immunochemical light spectrometry method. Details of analyte extraction and measurement are available under each of the six different cycles under ‘Laboratory Methods’ at the NHANES website: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/index.htm.

Demographic and lifestyle factors

Information on demographic and lifestyle factors of study participants was collected using standardised questionnaires. Potential confounders were identified in the current literature20 22 23 27 28 and included after theoretical structured ordering of factors by use of directed acyclic graphs (online supplementary figure 1). Since obesity could have a big impact on lipid levels, we assumed the causal pathway to be: BPA exposure->obesity->dyslipidaemia. We therefore did not adjust for BMI or other markers of obesity, since we regard obesity to be on the casual pathway between BPA and lipid disturbances, that is, obesity is regarded as an intermediate in the present study. Sex was categorised as male or female. Race/ethnicity was categorised into five groups: Mexican American, other Hispanic, non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black and other. Self-reported education/caregiver educational attainment was categorised into four levels: <9th grade, 9–11th grade, high school or general educational development and some college. Smoking was characterised using serum cotinine, a major metabolite of nicotine that is used as a marker for both active smoking and as an index of environmental tobacco smoke exposure or ‘passive smoking’. Income-to-poverty ratio is a continuous measure calculated using the Department of Health and Human Services poverty guidelines. For children, physical activity was characterised as the number of times per week the participant play or exercise hard. For adults, physical activity was categorised as having performed vigorous activity during the past 30 days or not. Statins was characterised as currently taking prescribed medicine (adults only). Alcohol intake was characterised as how often the participants (adults only) have drunk alcohol over past 12 months. Energy intake was obtained as mean total caloric intake (kcal) per day.

Statistical analysis

Separate analyses were performed for adults (≥18 years old) and children (≤17 years old), which is the most commonly used approach in this type of study. The reason for this is that the children were likely more or less exposed even before birth, while the adults at different ages would be very heterogeneous in that respect.

Due to a right-skewed distribution, urinary BPA concentrations, TG and urinary creatinine were log-transformed. Linear regression analysis was performed with the lipid variables (LDL-C, HDL-C, TC, TG and ApoB) as dependent variables in separate models for each lipid variable and with BPA as the main independent variable.

In the first set of models, adjustment was performed for age, sex, urinary creatinine and race. In the second set of models, we also included other a priori chosen confounders because of their biological relevance to both the exposure and outcome: education/caregiver education, smoking (serum cotinine), income-to-poverty ratio, physical activity, alcohol intake (adults only), caloric intake, statins (adults only) and pregnancy (adults only). In a third set of models, an interaction term between sex and BPA was included to evaluate possible sex differences. In a fourth set of models, a squared term was included for BPA to evaluate possible non-linear relationships.

Missing data on education, alcohol intake, smoking (serum cotinine), statin use, physical activity and energy intake were imputed by using multiple imputation (Markov-Chain Monte Carlo) with 20 imputations. Each examination cycle was analysed separately and the results from all examination cycles were meta-analysed using the inverse-variance weighted fixed effect technique.

A sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding all individuals taking statins. A Bonferroni adjustment was used to account for multiple testing (critical level of significance (0.05/10)=0.005). STATA V.15 was used for calculations.

Results

During the study period (2003–2014), 25 172 children (<18 years of age) and 35 915 adults (>18 years of age) participated in NHANES. Our analytic sample comprised the 4604 children and 10 989 adult participants randomly selected for measurement of urinary BPA concentrations. Tables 1 and 2 present descriptive basic characteristics for children and adults of each of the six different NHANES cycles from 2003 to 2014. Over the whole study period, the mean levels of urinary BPA varied from 2.21 ng/mL to 6.10 ng/mL in children and from 2.97 ng/mL to 4.89 ng/mL in adults. For children, mean urinary BPA levels were highest in the 2003–2004 examination cycle and then decreased over time, with the lowest mean value for the 2013–2014 cycle. For adults, no such pattern was seen.

In children, the meta-analysis showed negative associations between urinary BPA concentrations and ApoB, LDL-C and HDL-C, and positive associations for TC and TG, in models adjusting for age, sex, race and urinary creatinine (table 3). In adults, the meta-analysis showed negative associations between urinary BPA concentrations and all five evaluated lipid variables (figure 1, table 3). However, none of the investigated associations were significant following Bonferroni adjustment (p>0.005), either in children or in adults. Following further adjustment for systolic blood pressure and fasting glucose to the standard adjusted model in adults the relationships between BPA and lipids were generally attenuated, as can be seen in online supplemental table 1.

Table 3

Meta-analysis results of associations between urinary BPA and five different lipids in children and adults, when analysing women and men together using linear regression models

	Standard adjusted model*			Fully adjusted model†
	β	95% CI	P value	β	95% CI	P value
Children
LDL-C	−0.005	−0.05 to 0.05	0.98	0.003	−0.05 to 0.05	0.91
HDL-C	−0.01	−0.02 to 0.002	0.09	−0.01	−0.02 to 0.002	0.10
TC	0.008	−0.03 to 0.05	0.70	0.01	−0.03 to 0.05	0.62
TG	0.01	−0.02 to 0.05	0.51	0.01	−0.02 to 0.05	0.48
ApoB	−0.48	−2.1 to 1.2	0.57	−0.54	−2.3 to 1.2	0.54
Adults
LDL-C	−0.02	−0.05 to 0.01	0.22	−0.02	−0.05 to 0.01	0.23
HDL-C	−0.01	−0.02 to 0.001	0.025	−0.006	−0.01 to 0.003	0.18
TC	−0.02	−0.04 to 0.004	0.11	−0.02	−0.01 to 0.003	0.09
TG	−0.01	−0.03 to 0.006	0.19	−0.02	−0.03 to 0.0002	0.053
ApoB	−0.89	−1.8 to 0.06	0.066	−0.91	−1.8-(−0.02)	0.044

*Adjusted for urinary creatinine, age, sex and race.

†Adjusted for urinary creatinine, sex, age, race, education/caregiver education, smoking (serum cotinine), income to poverty ratio, physical activity, alcohol intake (adults only), caloric intake, statins (adults only) and pregnancy (adults only).

ApoB, apolipoprotein B; BPA, bisphenol A; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides.

Figure 1

Results of the meta-analysis of the relationship between urinary BPA and five different lipid variables in adult participants in models adjusting for age, sex, race and urinary creatinine. The estimates and 95% CI are given (right side of each figure) for each of the six NHANES examination cycles (specified in the left side of each figure) together with a summarised estimate. ApoB was not measured in the first two NHANES examination cycles. ApoB, apolipoprotein B; BPA, bisphenol A; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Further adjustment for lifestyle factors changed the above-mentioned associations only marginally (table 3). However, again, none of the associations were significant following Bonferroni adjustment (p>0.005). Including a squared term for BPA in the models did not disclose any significant non-linear relationships, either in children or in adults. Neither did the sensitivity analysis, by excluding individuals taking statins, result in any significant relationships.

Including an interaction term between sex and BPA in the models, to evaluate possible sex differences, did not disclose any sex interactions with a statistical value of p<0.005 for any of the lipids in either children or adults (table 4).

Table 4

Standard adjusted meta-analysis of associations between urinary BPA and different lipids in children and adults, when analysing women and men separately using linear regression models

	Female			Male			Interaction term
	β	95% CI	P value	β	95% CI	P value	P value
Children
LDL-C	0.04	−0.04 to 0.11	0.32	−0.03	−0.09 to 0.04	0.40	0.36
HDL-C	−0.01	−0.03 to 0.007	0.22	−0.01	−0.03 to 0.003	0.10	0.57
TC	−0.02	−0.08 to 0.04	0.49	0.02	−0.04 to 0.07	0.55	0.38
TG	−0.02	−0.07 to 0.03	0.44	0.04	−0.003 to 0.09	0.07	0.13
ApoB	−0.18	−2.9 to 2.6	0.90	−0.72	−2.8 to 1.4	0.50	0.90
Adults
LDL-C	−0.01	−0.05 to 0.03	0.56	−0.02	−0.07 to 0.02	0.27	0.27
HDL-C	−0.01	−0.03 to 0.0002	0.053	−0.008	−0.02 to 0.004	0.18	0.061
TC	−0.02	−0.05 to 0.02	0.30	−0.02	−0.05 to 0.01	0.23	0.12
TG	−0.01	−0.04 to 0.01	0.37	−0.01	−0.04 to 0.02	0.46	0.37
ApoB	−0.98	−2.3 to 0.4	0.16	−0.66	−1.9 to 0.6	0.32	0.79

ApoB, apolipoprotein B; BPA, bisphenol A; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides.

Discussion

In the present study, we aimed to assess whether urinary BPA concentrations were associated with dyslipidaemia by performing a meta-analysis of data on children and adults that participated in the 2003–2014 NHANES, as we have previously reported altered blood lipids after developmental exposure to BPA in rats.29 The present study did not reveal any major associations between urinary BPA levels and dyslipidaemia in children or adults despite the large sample sizes achieved by the meta-analysis performed using several examination cycles of NHANES data. In adults, we found a consistent pattern of an inverse relationship between BPA and all five investigated lipids, but none of the associations were significant following Bonferroni adjustment.

Two previous studies have used NHANES data to investigate the relationship between BPA exposure and lipid levels. In a study of adults, no significant relationships between urinary BPA and serum LDL-C or TG were found.16 However, that study used only the first (2003–2004) examination cycle and might therefore have limited power to detect any significant associations. In another study performed in children, no significant relationships between urinary BPA and serum TC, HDL-C, LDL-C or TG were observed.23 That study used pooled data from all NHANES examinations performed from 2003 to 2010. Our data are in agreement with those two studies, but in our case, we had better power to detect any potential relationships. Especially in the adults (n>10 000), we had the power to detect relationships for which the variation in BPA levels explained <0.05% of the variation in lipid levels. Such relationships would be statistically significant but would be of doubtful clinical significance.

Several previous studies that have used data from some NHANES cycles have found a positive association between BPA exposure and obesity in both children20 23 30 and adults,19 and diabetes in adults,17 31 whereas we did not find any associations between BPA and dyslipidaemia in the present meta-analysis. However, the earlier studies have only used some NHANES cycles compared with our meta-analysis where we have included six NHANES cycles, which of course result in a larger investigated population. It could be that only a few cycles stand out and drive the positive associations found in the earlier studies. BPA is a confirmed endocrine disrupting chemical, and it is quite evident from the literature that it can also disturb lipid metabolism, especially from experimental animal studies; therefore, we believe that there is a true association between BPA and obesity, diabetes and dyslipidaemia, but there is a need for better well-planned cohort studies in order to truly confirm these associations. In addition, when it comes to the relation between BPA exposure and obesity in particular, it is not possible to rule out the possibility that obese individuals ingest food with higher BPA content or have greater adipose stores of BPA.

A review evaluating epidemiological studies on BPA and cardiometabolic health outcomes showed that nearly all used a cross-sectional design and relied on a single measure of BPA exposure, which may result in serious exposure misclassification. In addition, the result of the review could conclude that for all outcomes, results across studies were inconsistent.32 Factors underlying the differing results observed among studies are multifactorial and likely the result of differences in study protocol, unaccounted for confounding factors or reverse causality (eg, individuals who are obese have a different dietary pattern that increases their exposure risk).

Previous studies conducted on data from NHANES often use pooled data from different survey cycles. It has been shown, in the context of correlation analysis, that pooling can generate false-positive findings and also that effects that do exist within the subgroups can be concealed.33 In the present study, we chose to handle each cycle as a different study population and thereafter performing a meta-analysis to avoid those pitfalls.

In our standard model, we adjusted for age, sex, race and urinary creatinine. Further adjustment for systolic blood pressure and fasting glucose generally attenuated the relationships between BPA and the lipids in the adults (online supplementary table 1). Both blood pressure and glucose are related to lipid levels, but it is not known if these two major risk factors could affect BPA levels by means of changing the metabolism or absorption of BPA. Therefore, it is not clear if blood pressure or glucose are confounders or mediators in the BPA versus lipid relationship, as BPA has been linked to diabetes and hypertension.15–17

The major strength of this study is the large meta-analysis of a nationally representative sample with high-quality measurements of BPA. Moreover, the use of rigorous study methods to collect the data and the availability of extensive data on confounders further strengthen the study. However, given the cross-sectional design, it is not possible to rule out reverse causality. Another major limitation is the reliance of a single spot urine sample to characterise BPA exposure and the unavailability of BPA measurements on children younger than 6 years of age. It is especially important to acquire repeated measures of EDCs with a short half-life, such as bisphenols. Thus, in future studies, BPA levels need to be measured at more than one time point to truly reflect BPA exposure. Also, in epidemiological studies, it is difficult to assess associations between low exposure levels and outcomes. Instead, it is increasing levels that are investigated with regard to different association outcomes. In addition, epidemiological studies fail to consider exposure relative to critical periods of differentiation (susceptibility windows), which has been identified as especially important for EDCs. Another limitation of the study is that Tanner stage was not assessed for children enrolled in NHANES. Therefore, we were unable to account for the potential impact of puberty on lipid concentrations in our analyses. However, all regression models were adjusted for children’s age, which is a significant predictor of onset of puberty.

Conclusions

Despite the large sample size of the present meta-analysis and the thorough statistical analysis performed, no associations were found between urinary BPA levels and the five different lipid variables investigated in children and adults. However, considering the cross-sectional nature of the present study and earlier studies showing associations between BPA and obesity and diabetes, these results should be clarified in carefully designed longitudinal cohort studies with repeated BPA measurements. It is especially important to acquire repeated measures of endocrine disrupting chemicals with a short half-life, such as bisphenols.

It has become evident from experimental animal studies that the endocrine disrupting chemical bisphenol A (BPA) also can act as a metabolism disrupting chemical, that is, that it can interfere with different metabolic processes that can increase the individual’s susceptibility to metabolic disease. This is, however, not as clear from reports from epidemiological studies, where both negative and positive associations have been reported between urinary BPA and metabolic diseases, mainly obesity.

In the present study, we have performed a comprehensive meta-analysis using data from six National Health and Nutrition Examination (NHANES) cycles (children: n=4604 and adults: n=10 989) to investigate associations between urinary BPA exposure and serum lipids. Our hypothesis was that urinary BPA would be associated with dyslipidaemia since previous studies using NHANES data have reported associations between urinary BPA and obesity and diabetes. Despite these earlier reported associations, we could not find any associations between BPA and dyslipidaemia in the present meta-analysis of this particular cohort. However, the earlier studies have only used some NHANES cycles compared with our meta-analysis where we have included six NHANES cycles which, of course, result in a larger investigated population. It could be that only a few cycles stand out and drive the positive associations found in the earlier studies. BPA is a confirmed endocrine-disrupting chemical, and it is quite evident from the literature that it can also disturb lipid metabolism, especially from experimental animal studies; therefore, we believe that there is a true association between BPA and obesity, diabetes and dyslipidaemia, but there is a need for better well-planned cohort studies in order to truly confirm these associations. Our conclusion is therefore that despite the large sample size of the present meta-analysis and the thorough statistical analysis performed, there are no associations between BPA and dyslipidaemia in the particular cohort investigated (NHANES). It is important that the design of future studies are longitudinal and include several BPA measurements in order to make the exposure more representative of the real life scenario. It is especially important to acquire repeated measures of endocrine disrupting chemicals with a short half-life, such as bisphenols.

Table 1

Study population (children) characteristics for the six different NHANES cycles from 2003 to 2014

Cycle	NHANES2003–2004		NHANES2005–2006		NHANES2007–2008		NHANES2009–2010		NHANES2011–2012		NHANES2013–2014
Characteristic	N	Mean (SD)	N	Mean (SD)	N	Mean (SD)	N	Mean (SD)	N	Mean (SD)	N	Mean (SD)
Age	852	12.33 (3.4)	896	12.13 (3.41)	690	11.25 (3.35)	727	11.09 (3.40)	689	11.02 (3.37)	750	11.2 (3.5)
Sex
Female	424	49.8%	429	47.9%	336	48.7%	349	48.0%	348	50.5%	375	50.0%
Male	428	50.2%	467	52.1%	354	51.3%	378	52.0%	341	49.5%	375	50.0%
Race/ethnicity
Mexican American	262	30.8%	307	34.3%	180	26.1%	199	27.4%	146	21.2%	180	24.0%
Other Hispanic	21	2.5%	21	2.3%	98	14.2%	95	13.1%	69	10.0%	75	10.0%
Non-Hispanic white	231	27.1%	246	27.5%	189	27.4%	236	32.4%	168	24.4%	191	25.5%
Non-Hispanic black	302	35.4%	268	29.9%	197	28.5%	146	20.1%	195	28.3%	191	25.5%
Other	36	4.2%	54	6.0%	26	3.8%	51	7.0%	111	16.1%	113	15.0%
Caregiver education
<9th grade	102	12.3%	112	13.0%	83	12.5%	78	11.0%	72	10.8%	75	10.3%
9–11th grade	177	21.4%	158	18.4%	138	20.9%	123	17.4%	118	17.7%	112	15.4%
High school or GED	197	23.9%	195	22.7%	157	23.7%	170	24.0%	150	22.6%	166	22.8%
Some college	227	27.5%	246	28.7%	176	26.6%	198	28.0%	177	26.6%	229	31.4%
College graduate or above	123	14.9%	148	17.2%	108	16.3%	139	19.6%	148	22.3%	147	20.1%
Smoking (serum cotinine (ng/mL))	778	6.7 (36.9)	780	9.0 (49.5)	597	3.9 (23.5)	628	3.6 (24.1)	585	3.9 (28.4)	643	1.95 (15.9)
No. of times/week you play or exercise hard	314	6.5 (5.8)	355	5.7 (2.9)	340	5.5 (2.3)	414	6.0 (1.9)	395	5.9 (1.8)	638	5.0 (2.3)
Caloric intake (kcal)	813	2190.2 (928.1)	843	2174.3 (1077.9)	660	1933.4 (778.7)	703	1965.9 (797.5)	639	1936.4 (734.1)	657	1944.7 (838.1)
Urinary BPA (ng/mL)	852	6.10 (9.06)	896	4.38 (7.59)	690	4.18 (9.01)	727	3.67 (10.36)	689	3.38 (9.89)	750	2.21 (2.85)
Urinary creatinine (µmol/L)	850	12 293.8 (7841.2)	896	12 543.3 (7236.3)	690	10 845.1 (6562.0)	727	10 564.4 (6521.3)	688	10 068.7 (6718.6)	750	10 780.4 (6822.6)
LDL-C (mmol/L)	350	2.31 (0.65)	239	2.20 (0.60)	112	2.29 (0.63)	128	2.36 (0.67)	146	2.22 (0.65)	149	2.17 (0.69)
HDL-C (mmol/L)	778	1.41 (0.33)	778	1.41 (0.33)	602	1.35 (0.33)	628	1.36 (0.34)	582	1.38 (0.31)	644	1.39 (0.34)
TC (mmol/L)	501	4.17 (0.77)	487	4.15 (0.71)	270	4.11 (0.76)	285	4.14 (0.76)	268	3.95 (0.75)	297	4.05 (0.77)
TG (mmol/L)	350	0.93 (0.50)	239	0.91 (0.44)	112	0.94 (0.49)	128	0.93 (0.53)	146	0.93 (0.59)	150	0.89 (0.64)
Apolipoprotein B (mg/dL)	NA	NA	241	72.9 (17.4)	112	69.6 (18.5)	128	71.2 (19.4)	147	65.7 (17.9)	150	65.9 (18.2)

BPA, bisphenol A; GED, general educational development; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides.

Table 2

Study population (adults) characteristics for the six different NHANES cycles from 2003 to 2014

Cycle	NHANES2003–2004		NHANES2005–2006		NHANES2007–2008		NHANES2009–2010		NHANES2011–2012		NHANES2013–2014
Characteristic	N	Mean (SD)	N	Mean (SD)	N	Mean (SD)	N	Mean (SD)	N	Mean (SD)	N	Mean (SD)
Age	1665	46.8 (20.7)	1652	44.8 (19.8)	1914	48.74 (18.6)	2022	47.18 (18.7)	1800	46.65 (18.5)	1936	47.62 (18.6)
Sex
Female	864	51.9%	849	51.4%	974	50.9%	1001	49.5%	882	49.0%	1026	53.0%
Male	801	48.1%	803	48.6%	940	49.1%	1021	50.5%	918	51.0%	910	47.0%
Race/ethnicity
Mexican American	351	21.1%	330	20.0	351	18.3%	367	18.1%	170	9.5%	258	13.3%
Other Hispanic	61	3.7%	51	3.1	204	10.7%	198	9.8%	186	10.3%	177	9.1%
Non-Hispanic white	844	50.7%	792	47.9	888	46.4%	970	48.0%	645	35.8%	797	41.2%
Non-Hispanic black	333	20.0%	410	24.8	400	20.9%	370	18.3%	470	26.1%	418	21.6%
Other	76	4.5%	69	4.2	71	3.7%	117	5.8%	329	18.3%	286	14.8%
Education
<9th grade	215	14.5%	165	11.1%	237	13.1%	239	12.5%	169	9.9%	144	8.0%
9-11th grade	219	14.7%	226	15.2%	302	16.6%	307	16.1%	234	13.8%	287	15.8%
High school or GED	362	24.4%	365	24.5%	468	25.8%	459	24.0%	336	19.7%	408	22.5%
Some college	397	26.7%	428	28.8%	464	25.6%	508	26.6%	518	30.4%	534	29.4%
College graduate or above	292	19.7%	304	20.4%	343	18.9%	397	20.8%	446	26.2%	440	24.3%
Smoking (serum cotinine (ng/mL))	1581	56.4 (133.6)	1561	60.1 (129.4)	1811	64.0 (137.8)	1925	58.3 (123.6)	1694	49.7 (122.3)	1870	57.6 (127.0)
Vigorous activity over past 30 days
Yes	489	29.4%	600	36.3%	403	21.1%	407	20.1%	435	24.2%	437	22.6%
No	1176	70.6%	1052	63.7%	1511	78.9%	1615	79.9%	1365	75.8%	1499	77.4%
Caloric intake (kcal)	1584	2199.5 (1021.0)	1591	2194.5 (1009.5)	1824	2064.0 (1057.9)	1934	2125.7 (994.3)	1642	2169.0 (1026.8)	1766	2121.5 (1068.2)
Now taking statins
Yes	212	12.7%	212	12.8%	342	17.9%	350	17.3%	330	18.3%	372	19.2%
No	1453	87.3%	1440	87.2%	1572	82.1%	1672	82.7%	1470	81.7%	1564	80.8%
Urinary BPA (ng/mL)	1665	4.69 (6.72)	1652	4.03 (12.70)	1914	3.67 (6.73)	2022	4.89 (30.01)	1800	3.10 (7.76)	1936	2.97 (18.94)
Urinary creatinine (µmol/L)	1664	11 953.7 (7527.5)	1652	134.38 (81.11)	1914	124.72 (78.07)	2022	111 263.0 (7039.9)	1799	10 694.6 (7209.9)	1934	11 451.0 (7389.3)
LDL-C (mmol/L)	733	2.98 (0.94)	732	2.88 (0.96)	862	2.89 (0.86)	920	2.91 (0.87)	808	2.95 (0.90)	920	2.84 (0.93)
HDL-C (mmol/L)	1583	1.41 (0.43)	1561	1.43 (0.43)	1811	1.34 (0.41)	1922	1.35 (0.41)	1687	1.36 (0.38)	1868	1.36 (0.41)
TC (mmol/L)	1572	5.19 (1.15)	1554	5.09 (1.15)	1803	5.06 (1.07)	1919	4.95 (1.06)	1681	4.89 (1.05)	1863	4.89 (1.06)
TG (mmol/L)	752	1.67 (1.38)	749	1.59 (1.39)	875	1.49 (1.19)	937	1.47 (1.17)	823	1.39 (1.08)	930	1.32 (0.90)
Apolipoprotein B (mg/dL)	NA	NA	752	99.5 (29.3)	874	91.2 (24.0)	937	90.1 (24.1)	823	88.6 (24.6)	930	89.3 (25.8)

ApoB, apolipoprotein B; BPA, bisphenol A;GED, general educational development; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol;NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides.