Literature DB >> 31551296

A systems mechanism for KRAS mutant allele-specific responses to targeted therapy.

Thomas McFall1, Jolene K Diedrich2,3, Meron Mengistu4, Stacy L Littlechild1, Kendra V Paskvan1, Laura Sisk-Hackworth1, James J Moresco2, Andrey S Shaw4, Edward C Stites5.   

Abstract

Cancer treatment decisions are increasingly guided by which specific genes are mutated within each patient's tumor. For example, agents inhibiting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) benefit many colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, with the general exception of those whose tumor includes a KRAS mutation. However, among the various KRAS mutations, that which encodes the G13D mutant protein (KRASG13D) behaves differently; for unknown reasons, KRASG13D CRC patients benefit from the EGFR-blocking antibody cetuximab. Controversy surrounds this observation, because it contradicts the well-established mechanisms of EGFR signaling with regard to RAS mutations. Here, we identified a systems-level, mechanistic explanation for why KRASG13D cancers respond to EGFR inhibition. A computational model of RAS signaling revealed that the biophysical differences between the three most common KRAS mutants were sufficient to generate different sensitivities to EGFR inhibition. Integrated computation with experimentation then revealed a nonintuitive, mutant-specific dependency of wild-type RAS activation by EGFR that is determined by the interaction strength between KRAS and the tumor suppressor neurofibromin (NF1). KRAS mutants that strongly interacted with and competitively inhibited NF1 drove wild-type RAS activation in an EGFR-independent manner, whereas KRASG13D weakly interacted with and could not competitively inhibit NF1 and, thus, KRASG13D cells remained dependent on EGFR for wild-type RAS activity. Overall, our work demonstrates how systems approaches enable mechanism-based inference in genomic medicine and can help identify patients for selective therapeutic strategies.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31551296      PMCID: PMC6864030          DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.aaw8288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Signal        ISSN: 1945-0877            Impact factor:   8.192


  43 in total

Review 1.  GTPase activating proteins: critical regulators of intracellular signaling.

Authors:  Shane Donovan; Kevin M Shannon; Gideon Bollag
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2002-03-14

2.  Modeling membrane localization: case study of a Ras signaling model.

Authors:  Edward C Stites
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Hurdles and complexities of codon 13 KRAS mutations.

Authors:  Maria Pia Morelli; Scott Kopetz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Receptor tyrosine kinases exert dominant control over PI3K signaling in human KRAS mutant colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Hiromichi Ebi; Ryan B Corcoran; Anurag Singh; Zhao Chen; Youngchul Song; Eugene Lifshits; David P Ryan; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Cyril Benes; Jeffrey Settleman; Kwok-Kin Wong; Lewis C Cantley; Jeffrey A Engelman
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Critical binding and regulatory interactions between Ras and Raf occur through a small, stable N-terminal domain of Raf and specific Ras effector residues.

Authors:  E Chuang; D Barnard; L Hettich; X F Zhang; J Avruch; M S Marshall
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Thermodynamics of Ras/effector and Cdc42/effector interactions probed by isothermal titration calorimetry.

Authors:  M G Rudolph; T Linnemann; P Grunewald; A Wittinghofer; I R Vetter; C Herrmann
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-04-05       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Wild-type H- and N-Ras promote mutant K-Ras-driven tumorigenesis by modulating the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Elda Grabocka; Yuliya Pylayeva-Gupta; Mathew J K Jones; Veronica Lubkov; Eyoel Yemanaberhan; Laura Taylor; Hao Hsuan Jeng; Dafna Bar-Sagi
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 31.743

8.  K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Christos S Karapetis; Shirin Khambata-Ford; Derek J Jonker; Chris J O'Callaghan; Dongsheng Tu; Niall C Tebbutt; R John Simes; Haji Chalchal; Jeremy D Shapiro; Sonia Robitaille; Timothy J Price; Lois Shepherd; Heather-Jane Au; Christiane Langer; Malcolm J Moore; John R Zalcberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Mutant KRAS codon 12 and 13 alleles in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: assessment as prognostic and predictive biomarkers of response to panitumumab.

Authors:  Marc Peeters; Jean-Yves Douillard; Eric Van Cutsem; Salvatore Siena; Kathy Zhang; Richard Williams; Jeffrey Wiezorek
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Absolute Quantification of Endogenous Ras Isoform Abundance.

Authors:  Craig J Mageean; John R Griffiths; Duncan L Smith; Michael J Clague; Ian A Prior
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  16 in total

1.  Ras-mutant cancers are sensitive to small molecule inhibition of V-type ATPases in mice.

Authors:  Bhairavi Tolani; Anna Celli; Yanmin Yao; Yong Zi Tan; Richard Fetter; Christina R Liem; Adam J de Smith; Thamiya Vasanthakumar; Paola Bisignano; Adam D Cotton; Ian B Seiple; John L Rubinstein; Marco Jost; Jonathan S Weissman
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 68.164

2.  Mex3a marks drug-tolerant persister colorectal cancer cells that mediate relapse after chemotherapy.

Authors:  Adrián Álvarez-Varela; Laura Novellasdemunt; Francisco M Barriga; Xavier Hernando-Momblona; Adrià Cañellas-Socias; Sara Cano-Crespo; Marta Sevillano; Carme Cortina; Diana Stork; Clara Morral; Gemma Turon; Felipe Slebe; Laura Jiménez-Gracia; Ginevra Caratù; Peter Jung; Giorgio Stassi; Holger Heyn; Daniele V F Tauriello; Lidia Mateo; Sabine Tejpar; Elena Sancho; Camille Stephan-Otto Attolini; Eduard Batlle
Journal:  Nat Cancer       Date:  2022-06-30

3.  Classification of KRAS-Activating Mutations and the Implications for Therapeutic Intervention.

Authors:  Christian Johnson; Deborah L Burkhart; Kevin M Haigis
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 38.272

4.  Ex vivo organotypic cultures for synergistic therapy prioritization identify patient-specific responses to combined MEK and Src inhibition in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nancy Gavert; Yaara Zwang; Roi Weiser; Orli Greenberg; Sharon Halperin; Oded Jacobi; Giuseppe Mallel; Oded Sandler; Adi Jacob Berger; Erez Stossel; Daniil Rotin; Albert Grinshpun; Iris Kamer; Jair Bar; Guy Pines; Daniel Saidian; Ilan Bar; Shay Golan; Eli Rosenbaum; Andrei Nadu; Eytan Ben-Ami; Rony Weitzen; Hovav Nechushtan; Talia Golan; Baruch Brenner; Aviram Nissan; Ofer Margalit; Dov Hershkovitz; Guy Lahat; Ravid Straussman
Journal:  Nat Cancer       Date:  2022-02-10

Review 5.  RAS, wanted dead or alive: Advances in targeting RAS mutant cancers.

Authors:  Clint A Stalnecker; Channing J Der
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 8.192

6.  Mathematical Modeling to Study KRAS Mutant-Specific Responses to Pathway Inhibition.

Authors:  Edward C Stites
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

Review 7.  The Role of Wild-Type RAS in Oncogenic RAS Transformation.

Authors:  Erin Sheffels; Robert L Kortum
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  A Structure is Worth a Thousand Words: New Insights for RAS and RAF Regulation.

Authors:  Dhirendra K Simanshu; Deborah K Morrison
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 39.397

9.  Oncogenic KRAS creates an aspartate metabolism signature in colorectal cancer cells.

Authors:  Peter F Doubleday; Luca Fornelli; Ioanna Ntai; Neil L Kelleher
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 5.542

10.  An In Vivo Kras Allelic Series Reveals Distinct Phenotypes of Common Oncogenic Variants.

Authors:  Maria Paz Zafra; Marie J Parsons; Jangkyung Kim; Direna Alonso-Curbelo; Sukanya Goswami; Emma M Schatoff; Teng Han; Alyna Katti; Maria Teresa Calvo Fernandez; John E Wilkinson; Elena Piskounova; Lukas E Dow
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 38.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.