Literature DB >> 31550069

A prospective, iterative, adaptive trial of carfilzomib-based desensitization.

Simon Tremblay1, James J Driscoll1,2, Adele Rike-Shields1,3, David A Hildeman4, Rita R Alloway5, Alin L Girnita1,6, Paul A Brailey6, E Steve Woodle1.   

Abstract

Proteasome inhibitor-based strategies hold promise in transplant but have yielded varying results. Carfilzomib, a second-generation proteasome inhibitor, may possess advantages over bortezomib, the first-generation proteasome inhibitors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, toxicity, and preliminary efficacy of carfilzomib in highly HLA-sensitized kidney transplant candidates. Renal transplant candidates received escalating doses of carfilzomib followed by plasmapheresis (group A) or an identical regimen with additional plasmapheresis once weekly before carfilzomib dosing. Thirteen participants received carfilzomib, which was well tolerated with most adverse events classified as low grade. The safety profile was similar to bortezomib desensitization; however, neurotoxicity was not observed with carfilzomib. Toxicity resulted in permanent dose reduction in 1 participant but caused no withdrawals or deaths. HLA antibodies were substantially reduced with carfilzomib alone, and median maximal immunodominant antibody reduction was 72.8% (69.8% for group A, P = .031, 80.1% for group B, P = .938). After depletion, rebound occurred rapidly and antibody levels returned to baseline between days 81 and 141. Bone marrow studies revealed that approximately 69.2% of plasma cells were depleted after carfilzomib monotherapy. Carfilzomib monotherapy-based desensitization provides an acceptable safety and toxicity profile while leading to significant bone marrow plasma cell depletion and anti-HLA antibody reduction.
© 2019 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alloantibody; clinical research/practice; clinical trial; desensitization; histocompatibility; immunosuppression/immune modulation; kidney transplantation/nephrology; panel reactive antibody (PRA); plasma cells; translational research/science

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31550069      PMCID: PMC7872208          DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  24 in total

Review 1.  The impact of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies on late kidney allograft failure.

Authors:  Alexandre Loupy; Gary S Hill; Stanley C Jordan
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 2.  Regulation of plasma-cell development.

Authors:  Miriam Shapiro-Shelef; Kathryn Calame
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 53.106

3.  Infusion of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin fails to lower the strength of human leukocyte antigen antibodies in highly sensitized patients.

Authors:  Nada Alachkar; Bonnie E Lonze; Andrea A Zachary; Mary J Holechek; Karl Schillinger; Andrew M Cameron; Niraj M Desai; Nabil N Dagher; Dorry L Segev; Robert A Montgomery; Andrew L Singer
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  OPTN/SRTR 2016 Annual Data Report: Kidney.

Authors:  A Hart; J M Smith; M A Skeans; S K Gustafson; A R Wilk; A Robinson; J L Wainright; C R Haynes; J J Snyder; B L Kasiske; A K Israni
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Lack of effect in desensitization with intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab in highly sensitized patients.

Authors:  Kwaku Marfo; Ming Ling; Yi Bao; Brant Calder; Bin Ye; Nicole Hayde; Stuart Greenstein; Javier Chapochnick-Friedman; Daniel Glicklich; Graciela de Boccardo; Milan Kinkhabwala; Enver Akalin
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Humoral Compensation after Bortezomib Treatment of Allosensitized Recipients.

Authors:  Jean Kwun; Christopher Burghuber; Miriam Manook; Neal Iwakoshi; Adriana Gibby; Jung Joo Hong; Stuart Knechtle
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 10.121

7.  Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  A Keith Stewart; S Vincent Rajkumar; Meletios A Dimopoulos; Tamás Masszi; Ivan Špička; Albert Oriol; Roman Hájek; Laura Rosiñol; David S Siegel; Georgi G Mihaylov; Vesselina Goranova-Marinova; Péter Rajnics; Aleksandr Suvorov; Ruben Niesvizky; Andrzej J Jakubowiak; Jesus F San-Miguel; Heinz Ludwig; Michael Wang; Vladimír Maisnar; Jiri Minarik; William I Bensinger; Maria-Victoria Mateos; Dina Ben-Yehuda; Vishal Kukreti; Naseem Zojwalla; Margaret E Tonda; Xinqun Yang; Biao Xing; Philippe Moreau; Antonio Palumbo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Prospective evaluation of the toxicity profile of proteasome inhibitor-based therapy in renal transplant candidates and recipients.

Authors:  Nicole Schmidt; Rita R Alloway; R Carlin Walsh; Basma Sadaka; Adele R Shields; Alin L Girnita; Dennis J Hanseman; E Steve Woodle
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Bortezomib provides effective therapy for antibody- and cell-mediated acute rejection.

Authors:  Matthew J Everly; Jason J Everly; Brian Susskind; Paul Brailey; Lois J Arend; Rita R Alloway; Prabir Roy-Chaudhury; Amit Govil; Gautham Mogilishetty; Adele H Rike; Michael Cardi; George Wadih; Amit Tevar; E Steve Woodle
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2008-12-27       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 10.  The proteasome and proteasome inhibitors in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Sara Gandolfi; Jacob P Laubach; Teru Hideshima; Dharminder Chauhan; Kenneth C Anderson; Paul G Richardson
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 9.264

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  From bench to bedside: reversing established antibody responses and desensitization.

Authors:  Anita S Chong; Marlena V Habal
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 2.269

Review 2.  Experimental modeling of desensitization: What have we learned about preventing AMR?

Authors:  Jean Kwun; Stuart Knechtle
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 3.  Therapies for Chronic Allograft Rejection.

Authors:  Min Young Kim; Daniel C Brennan
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 4.  New Perspectives on Desensitization in the Current Era - An Overview.

Authors:  Vineeta Kumar; Jayme E Locke
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 5.  Recent Research Progress of Chiral Small Molecular Antitumor-Targeted Drugs Approved by the FDA From 2011 to 2019.

Authors:  Xuetong Chu; Yizhi Bu; Xiaoping Yang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 6.  Current Desensitization Strategies in Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  Marlena V Habal
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 7.  Innovative immunosuppression in kidney transplantation: A challenge for unmet needs.

Authors:  Maurizio Salvadori; Aris Tsalouchos
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2022-03-18

Review 8.  HLA Desensitization in Solid Organ Transplantation: Anti-CD38 to Across the Immunological Barriers.

Authors:  Nizar Joher; Marie Matignon; Philippe Grimbert
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 9.  Plasma cell biology: Foundations for targeted therapeutic development in transplantation.

Authors:  Amy P Rossi; Rita R Alloway; David Hildeman; E Steve Woodle
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 10.983

Review 10.  Emerging New Approaches in Desensitization: Targeted Therapies for HLA Sensitization.

Authors:  Ashley Y Choi; Miriam Manook; Danae Olaso; Brian Ezekian; Jaeberm Park; Kyle Freischlag; Annette Jackson; Stuart Knechtle; Jean Kwun
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.