Literature DB >> 31549943

Detection of Hemodynamically Significant Coronary Stenosis: CT Myocardial Perfusion versus Machine Learning CT Fractional Flow Reserve.

Yuehua Li1, Mengmeng Yu1, Xu Dai1, Zhigang Lu1, Chengxing Shen1, Yining Wang1, Bin Lu1, Jiayin Zhang1.   

Abstract

Background Direct intraindividual comparison of dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and machine learning (ML)-based CT fractional flow reserve (FFR) has not been explored for diagnosing hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease. Purpose To investigate the diagnostic performance of dynamic CT MPI and ML-based CT FFR for functional assessment of coronary stenosis. Materials and Methods Between January 2, 2017, and October 17, 2018, consecutive participants with stable angina were prospectively enrolled. All participants underwent dynamic CT MPI coronary CT angiography and invasive conventional coronary angiography (CCA) FFR within 2 weeks. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess diagnostic performance. Results Eighty-six participants (mean age, 67 years ± 12 [standard deviation]; 67 men) with 157 target vessels were included for final analysis. The mean radiation doses for dynamic CT MPI and coronary CT angiography were 3.6 mSv ± 1.1 and 2.7 mSv ± 0.8, respectively. Myocardial blood flow (MBF) was lower in ischemic segments compared with nonischemic segments and reference segments (defined as the territory of vessels without stenosis) (75 mL/100 mL/min ± 20 vs 148 mL/100 mL/min ± 22 and 169 mL/100 mL/min ± 34, respectively, both P < .001). Similarly, CT FFR was also lower for hemodynamically significant lesions than for hemodynamically nonsignificant lesions (0.68 ± 0.1 vs 0.83 ± 0.1, respectively, P < .001). MBF had the largest area under the ROC curve (AUC) (using 99 mL/100 mL/min as a cutoff) among all parameters, outperforming ML-based CT FFR (AUC = 0.97 vs 0.85, P < .001). The vessel-based specificity and diagnostic accuracy of MBF were higher than those of ML-based CT FFR (93% vs 68%, P < .001 and 94% vs 78%, respectively, P = .04) whereas the sensitivity of both methods was similar (96% vs 88%, respectively, P = .11). Conclusion Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging was able to help accurately evaluate the hemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis using a reduced amount of radiation. In addition, the myocardial blood flow derived from dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging outperformed machine learning-based CT fractional flow reserve for identifying lesions causing ischemia. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article.See also the editorial by Loewe in this issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31549943     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019190098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  15 in total

Review 1.  Extraction of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaques From Computed Tomography Imaging: A Review of Recent Methods.

Authors:  Haipeng Liu; Aleksandra Wingert; Jian'an Wang; Jucheng Zhang; Xinhong Wang; Jianzhong Sun; Fei Chen; Syed Ghufran Khalid; Jun Jiang; Dingchang Zheng
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-02-10

Review 2.  Functional cardiac CT-Going beyond Anatomical Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease with Cine CT, CT-FFR, CT Perfusion and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Joyce Peper; Dominika Suchá; Martin Swaans; Tim Leiner
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Prognostic value of CT-derived myocardial blood flow, CT fractional flow reserve and high-risk plaque features for predicting major adverse cardiac events.

Authors:  Lihua Yu; Zhigang Lu; Xu Dai; Chengxing Shen; Lei Zhang; Jiayin Zhang
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-08

Review 4.  The Role of Cardiac Computed Tomography in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Spencer S Kitchin; Venkat Sanjay Manubolu; Sion K Roy; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2022-05-19

Review 5.  [Beyond Coronary CT Angiography: CT Fractional Flow Reserve and Perfusion].

Authors:  Moon Young Kim; Dong Hyun Yang; Ki Seok Choo; Whal Lee
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2022-01-21

6.  Design and rationale of randomized CT-PRECISION study.

Authors:  Xu Dai; Yarong Yu; Lihua Yu; Lei Zhang; Jiayin Zhang
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

7.  The use of lesion-specific calcium morphology to guide the appropriate use of dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging and CT fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Xu Dai; Zhigang Lu; Yarong Yu; Lihua Yu; Hao Xu; Jiayin Zhang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-02

Review 8.  Computed tomographic evaluation of myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  Yuki Tanabe; Akira Kurata; Takuya Matsuda; Kazuki Yoshida; Dhiraj Baruah; Teruhito Kido; Teruhito Mochizuki; Prabhakar Rajiah
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 2.374

9.  Clinical and imaging predictors of impaired myocardial perfusion in symptomatic patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Haiyan Ma; Xu Dai; Xiaojun Yang; Xihui Zhao; Rongpin Wang; Jiayin Zhang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-07

10.  Dynamic CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow according to Varied Heart Rate Increments after Stress.

Authors:  Lihua Yu; Xiaofeng Tao; Xu Dai; Ting Liu; Jiayin Zhang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.