Xu Dai1, Yarong Yu2, Lihua Yu1, Lei Zhang2, Jiayin Zhang2. 1. Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China. 2. Department of Radiology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) combined with dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging (CT-MPI) and CCTA combined with CT fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) are both expected to be efficient one-stop shop imaging strategies to guide clinical management. The aim of the study is to determine which of these two methods has superiority in terms of guiding treatment in patients with intermediate to high pretest probability of coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: CT-PRECISION (Computed Tomography myocardial PeRfusion imaging vErsus Computed tomography derived fractional flow reServe: impact ON guiding treatment and prognosis in patients with intermediate to high pretest probability of CAD) is a multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized study to directly compare the clinical value of guiding treatment and prognostic discrimination of CCTA + dynamic CT-MPI strategy and CCTA + CT-FFR strategy in patients with intermediate to high pretest probability of CAD. Four hundred and twelve patients will be enrolled in this study and randomized to CCTA + dynamic CT-MPI arm and CCTA + CT-FFR arm. All patients will be followed up for at least 2 years. The primary endpoint is the rate of unnecessary invasive coronary angiography (ICA) within 90 days, which is defined as ICA without revascularization. The secondary endpoints will include: (I) a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE, defined as all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, rehospitalization due to aggravated angina symptoms, and late revascularization); (II) symptom change at 1 year; (III) the rate of late revascularization after CT examination; (IV) reclassification rate of CCTA + dynamic CT-MPI and CCTA + CT-FFR guided strategies compared with CCTA alone; (V) overall radiation dose, contrast media usage and medical cost. DISCUSSION: The study will provide valuable information about the optimal CT-based diagnostic strategy with regard to the clinical management of patients with intermediate to high pretest probability of CAD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) with the identifier number ChiCTR2000041102. The first enrollment is planned for January 2021. 2021 Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) combined with dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging (CT-MPI) and CCTA combined with CT fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) are both expected to be efficient one-stop shop imaging strategies to guide clinical management. The aim of the study is to determine which of these two methods has superiority in terms of guiding treatment in patients with intermediate to high pretest probability of coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: CT-PRECISION (Computed Tomography myocardial PeRfusion imaging vErsus Computed tomography derived fractional flow reServe: impact ON guiding treatment and prognosis in patients with intermediate to high pretest probability of CAD) is a multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized study to directly compare the clinical value of guiding treatment and prognostic discrimination of CCTA + dynamic CT-MPI strategy and CCTA + CT-FFR strategy in patients with intermediate to high pretest probability of CAD. Four hundred and twelve patients will be enrolled in this study and randomized to CCTA + dynamic CT-MPI arm and CCTA + CT-FFR arm. All patients will be followed up for at least 2 years. The primary endpoint is the rate of unnecessary invasive coronary angiography (ICA) within 90 days, which is defined as ICA without revascularization. The secondary endpoints will include: (I) a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE, defined as all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, rehospitalization due to aggravated angina symptoms, and late revascularization); (II) symptom change at 1 year; (III) the rate of late revascularization after CT examination; (IV) reclassification rate of CCTA + dynamic CT-MPI and CCTA + CT-FFR guided strategies compared with CCTA alone; (V) overall radiation dose, contrast media usage and medical cost. DISCUSSION: The study will provide valuable information about the optimal CT-based diagnostic strategy with regard to the clinical management of patients with intermediate to high pretest probability of CAD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) with the identifier number ChiCTR2000041102. The first enrollment is planned for January 2021. 2021 Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. All rights reserved.
Authors: Pamela S Douglas; Bernard De Bruyne; Gianluca Pontone; Manesh R Patel; Bjarne L Norgaard; Robert A Byrne; Nick Curzen; Ian Purcell; Matthias Gutberlet; Gilles Rioufol; Ulrich Hink; Herwig Walter Schuchlenz; Gudrun Feuchtner; Martine Gilard; Daniele Andreini; Jesper M Jensen; Martin Hadamitzky; Karen Chiswell; Derek Cyr; Alan Wilk; Furong Wang; Campbell Rogers; Mark A Hlatky Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2016-08-02 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Abdul Rahman Ihdayhid; Bjarne L Norgaard; Sara Gaur; Jonathan Leipsic; Nitesh Nerlekar; Kazuhiro Osawa; Toru Miyoshi; Jesper M Jensen; Takeshi Kimura; Hiroki Shiomi; Andrejs Erglis; Sanda Jegere; Keith G Oldroyd; Hans Erik Botker; Sujith K Seneviratne; Stephan Achenbach; Brian S Ko Journal: Radiology Date: 2019-06-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Juhani Knuuti; William Wijns; Antti Saraste; Davide Capodanno; Emanuele Barbato; Christian Funck-Brentano; Eva Prescott; Robert F Storey; Christi Deaton; Thomas Cuisset; Stefan Agewall; Kenneth Dickstein; Thor Edvardsen; Javier Escaned; Bernard J Gersh; Pavel Svitil; Martine Gilard; David Hasdai; Robert Hatala; Felix Mahfoud; Josep Masip; Claudio Muneretto; Marco Valgimigli; Stephan Achenbach; Jeroen J Bax Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2020-01-14 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Fabian Bamberg; Roy P Marcus; Alexander Becker; Kristof Hildebrandt; Kerstin Bauner; Florian Schwarz; Martin Greif; Franz von Ziegler; Bernhard Bischoff; Hans-Christoph Becker; Thorsten R Johnson; Maximilian F Reiser; Konstantin Nikolaou; Daniel Theisen Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-02-13
Authors: Christian Tesche; Carlo N De Cecco; Stefan Baumann; Matthias Renker; Tindal W McLaurin; Taylor M Duguay; Richard R Bayer; Daniel H Steinberg; Katharine L Grant; Christian Canstein; Chris Schwemmer; Max Schoebinger; Lucian M Itu; Saikiran Rapaka; Puneet Sharma; U Joseph Schoepf Journal: Radiology Date: 2018-04-10 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Bjarne L Nørgaard; Jonathon Leipsic; Sara Gaur; Sujith Seneviratne; Brian S Ko; Hiroshi Ito; Jesper M Jensen; Laura Mauri; Bernard De Bruyne; Hiram Bezerra; Kazuhiro Osawa; Mohamed Marwan; Christoph Naber; Andrejs Erglis; Seung-Jung Park; Evald H Christiansen; Anne Kaltoft; Jens F Lassen; Hans Erik Bøtker; Stephan Achenbach Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-01-30 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Pamela S Douglas; Gianluca Pontone; Mark A Hlatky; Manesh R Patel; Bjarne L Norgaard; Robert A Byrne; Nick Curzen; Ian Purcell; Matthias Gutberlet; Gilles Rioufol; Ulrich Hink; Herwig Walter Schuchlenz; Gudrun Feuchtner; Martine Gilard; Daniele Andreini; Jesper M Jensen; Martin Hadamitzky; Karen Chiswell; Derek Cyr; Alan Wilk; Furong Wang; Campbell Rogers; Bernard De Bruyne Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 29.983