U Anand1,2, Y Korchev2, P Anand1. 1. Peripheral Neuropathy Unit, Centre for Clinical Translation, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK. 2. Nanomedicine Research Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
Peripheral neuropathy affects 65% of patients with chronic kidney disease
(CKD),[1,2] presenting as a
symmetrical length-dependent process with predominant sensory involvement.[3-7] Lower limbs are affected to a
greater extent than upper limbs, with pain and paraesthesia progressing over several
months, and motor involvement, leading to weakness and compromised quality of life.[7] Uremic polyneuropathy affects men more than women, and clinical signs include
symmetric muscle weaknesss, areflexia and sensory loss of all modalities especially
pin prick and vibration, with elevation of vibration threshold being an early
sign.[6,8] At the
microscopic level, neuropathological lesions include destruction of myelin and axons
with Wallerian degeneration.[4,9,10]The severity of neuropathy is strongly correlated with uraemia and associated with
abnormalities of nerve conduction and excitability, including reduced sensory nerve
action potentials; there is only partial and temporary improvement after haemodialysis.[1] Up to 90 uremic retention solutes or uremic toxins have been identified,
which may interact negatively with biologic functions due to the progressive
retention of solutes that would otherwise be excreted by healthy kidneys.[11] Of these, several predisposing factors to uremic neuropathy have been
identified including elevated serum K+ which affects motor axons more
than sensory axons.[12] TNFα levels were also found to be significantly elevated in dialysis patients
with neuropathy and left ventricular hypertrophy and considered to contribute to the
development or maintenance of some neurologic and cardiac complications of uremic syndrome.[13]Renal transplantation improves the clinical and electrophysiological signs even in
severe uremic neuropathy and is recommended to be the only treatment for uremic
neuropathy, indicating the role of a uremic toxin in the development of the
neuropathy.[5,10] As the mechanism of development of the neuropathy is not clear,
and serum urea concentration is correlated with pre-dialysis nerve excitability parameters,[1] we examined the effect of treating cultured dorsal root ganglion (DRG)
neurons with urea at concentrations described in cases of uremic neuropathy, i.e.
higher than the normal range. Serum/plasma urea concentrations in patients with
renal dysfunction can range from being mildly to severely increased, depending on
the severity of the disease, with levels in patients undergoing dialysis for CKD
exceeding 50 mMol/L.[10] The normal range in human blood is between 2.5 and 6.7 mMol/L, though
age-related increases in plasma urea levels of 14.3–17.8 mmol/L are also observed in
healthy elderly individuals with no loss of renal function, due to decreased
fractional urea excretion.[14]
Materials and methods
Neuron culture
Bilateral DRG from cervical, thoracic, lumbar and sacral levels of adult female
Wistar rats (Charles River UK Ltd, Margate, Kent, UK) were microdissected,
collected in Ham’s F12 medium and enzyme digested in Ham’s F12 nutrient medium
containing 0.2% collagenase and 0.5% dispase for 3 h at 37°C, as previously
described.[15,16] Enzyme digested tissue was triturated in BSF2 medium
(containing 2% HIFCS, 0.1 mg/mL transferrin, 60 ng/mL progesterone, 0.16 μg/mL
sodium selenite, 3 mg/mL bovine serum albumin (BSA), penicillin/streptomycin
100 μg/mL each, 16 μg/mL putrescine, 10 μg/mL insulin), soybean trypsin
inhibitor and DNAse to obtain a neuronal suspension. One rat was used for each
experiment, and the neuron suspension was plated on several poly-l-lysine and
laminin (20 μg/ml each) coated glass bottom MatTek dishes (MatTek Corp,USA) at
1000 neurons per dish for immunofluorescence studies, and 8000 neurons per dish
for calcium imaging studies. BSF2 (2 ml) medium supplemented with 100 ng/ml of
nerve growth factor (NGF) and 50 ng/ml glial cell line-derived neurotrophic
factor (GDNF) and neurotrophin 3 (NT3) were added to all culture dishes and
incubated at 37°C in a humidified environment of 5% CO2 in air, until
further study.Urea was freshly prepared by dissolving in Ham’s F12 culture medium at 100× final
concentration, filter sterilized and added to the neuron cultures at 10 and 50
mmol/L, 24 h after plating, for immunofluorescence studies. Vehicle-treated
controls had equivalent volume of medium added. Forty-eight hours after adding
the urea, cultures were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 15 min.
Immunofluorescence
PFA fixed cultures from four rats were rinsed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)
containing 0.01% sodium azide, permeabilized with methanol (−20°C, 3 min),
rinsed with PBS and incubated in primary antibodies rabbit anti PGP9.5
(UltraClone, Cambridge, UK, 1:1000), mouse anti βIII tubulin (Sigma, UK, 1:200),
rabbit anti TRPV1 (1:300, GSK, Harlow, UK), rabbit anti TRPM8 (1:300, GSK,
Harlow, UK), mouse monoclonal antibody to the neuronal marker Gap43 (1:200,
Sigma, UK), for 1 h at room temperature, followed by 3 PBS rinses. Neurons were
visualised by incubating in secondary antibodies, Alexa 546 (goat anti rabbit
1:400, Life Technologies, UK) and Alexa 488 (goat anti mouse 1:400, Life
Technologies, UK), for 45 min at room temperature, and rinsed in PBS. The glass
bottom was detached from the dish and mounted on a glass slide in glycerol
containing the antifade agent DABCO [1,4-diazobicyclo-(2,2,2)- octane], and
sealed with nail varnish. Tiff fluorescent images were acquired with a
Photometrics HQ2 Coolsnap CCD camera, using standard wide-field fluorescence
optics on a BX43 Olympus microscope with 20× and 60× oil objective lenses, and
Cellsense software (Olympus, Japan), for morphological analysis, after
confirming the absence of immunostaining in negative controls where the primary
antibody had been omitted. The number of neurons surviving were counted in each
experimental group in three experiments, averaged and normalized to
vehicle-treated neurons. Maximum neurite lengths were measured from Tiff images
of individual PGP9.5 immunofluorescent neurons in each group, averaged and
compared using Excel software. Numbers of TRPV1- and TRPM8-positive neurons were
counted and expressed as a proportion of total Gap43-positive neurons.
Functional studies
Calcium imaging was used to determine the effect of acute urea application on
the capsaicin sensitivity of DRG neurons in HEPES-buffered phenol-red free
Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution, containing 0.1% BSA as previously
described.[16,17] Responses to paired capsaicin stimuli were measured
in neurons loaded with 2 µMol/L Fura2 AM (Life Technologies, Paisley, UK) as
a change in the baseline 340/380 λex nm ratio before, during and after
addition. Experiments were conducted at 37°C in a humidified environment on
an inverted Nikon microscope (Diaphot 300; Nikon, UK Ltd, Kingston upon
Thames, Surrey, UK) and cultures were alternately excited at 340 and 380 nm
λex wavelengths. Responses to paired capsaicin stimuli in individual
neurons, with or without urea, were measured as the maximum change in the
340/380 λex nm ratio from baseline. Images of 15 to 20 neurons in each
experiment were captured every 2 s in each of three channels – brightfield,
340 and 380 nm λex/510 λem – and recordings of intracellular changes in
bound/unbound Ca2+ ratio were obtained before, during and after
the addition of capsaicin. This provided baseline recordings as well as
intracellular changes in Ca2+ levels in response to added
capsaicin. Cells were uniformly loaded with the dye and no intracellular
compartmentalization of the loaded dye was observed. Images were acquired
with a Hamamatsu Orca CCD Camera and analysed with AQM Advance Kinetic
imaging software. Individual cells under study were highlighted as regions
of interest for calculating the mean ratios of bound to unbound calcium
within the area of interest.In each experiment, neurons were exposed to capsaicin for a maximum of two
applications only, first to identify capsaicin sensitive neurons (using
200 nM capsaicin for 15 s), followed by washout and rest period of 45 min.
The second stimulus of 1 μM capsaicin was used to test the effect of the
added urea, mannitol or vehicle after the washout period. Only neurons
responding to 200 nM capsaicin with a rapid and sustained increase in
340/380 ratio more than 20% from the baseline were selected for study. The
second capsaicin stimulus of 1 μMol/L was applied after the baseline had
returned to normal.For calcium imaging experiments, urea was freshly dissolved in distilled
water at 100× final concentration. Capsaicin was dissolved in ethanol at 20
mmol/L concentration, aliquoted and stored at −20°C, and fresh aliquots were
made up to 500× final concentration prior to use. Osmolality of solutions
was confirmed using a vapour pressure osmometer. All chemicals were obtained
from Sigma-Aldrich UK unless otherwise stated. Responses from individual
neurons were averaged for individual rats in each group and Student’s
t test was used to compare between groups; data are
presented as mean ± S.E.M., *P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically
significant (**P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001). ‘n’ indicates the number of
animals used for each group. SB705498 is a potent TRPV1 antagonist (gift
from GSK, UK). LY294002 is a PI3 kinase inhibitor (Tocris, UK), PD98059 is a
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor (Tocris, UK) and
AMTB is a TRPM8 inhibitor (Santacruz biotechnology, Germany).
Results
Morphological effects
Immunofluorescence for PGP9.5 in vehicle-treated neurons showed robust neurite
outgrowth, with uniform staining in the soma and neurites (Figure 1(a) and (b)). Neurons treated
with 10 mmol/L and 50 mmol/L urea for 48 h showed neurites with a beaded
appearance indicating degeneration; the immunofluorescence was very bright in
the cell soma but diminished in the neurites and terminals (Figure 1(c) and (f)).
Figure 1.
Examples of neurite degeneration in urea-treated neurons. PGP9.5
immunofluorescence showing vehicle-treated neurons with robust,
uniformly stained neurite outgrowth (a, b), while neurons treated with
10 mmol/L (c, d) or 50 mmol/L (e, f) urea show depleted staining in
degenerating neurites but increased staining intensity in the soma. Bar
in (a), (c) and (e) =100 μm; (b) = 20 μm; (d) and (f) = 50 μm.
Examples of neurite degeneration in urea-treated neurons. PGP9.5
immunofluorescence showing vehicle-treated neurons with robust,
uniformly stained neurite outgrowth (a, b), while neurons treated with
10 mmol/L (c, d) or 50 mmol/L (e, f) urea show depleted staining in
degenerating neurites but increased staining intensity in the soma. Bar
in (a), (c) and (e) =100 μm; (b) = 20 μm; (d) and (f) = 50 μm.Neurite tips of vehicle-treated neurons terminated in typical growth cones that
were spread out with fine filopodia extensions (Figure 2(a) to (c)). The growth cones in
urea-treated neurons had retracted and were present as swollen end bulbs, with
loss of filopodia (Figure 2(d)
to (f)). These effects were evident in the 10 mmol/L-treated neurons
and were more pronounced in the 50 mmol/L urea-treated cultures, which also
showed vesiculated neurites.
Figure 2.
Growth cone morphology. Images of PGP9.5 immunofluoresence in adult rat
DRG neurons show growth cones in vehicle-treated neurons with multiple
fine filopodia (arrows in (a), (b) and (c)), while neurons treated with
urea for 48 h have swollen retracted growth cones with loss of filopodia
((d), (e) and (f)).
Growth cone morphology. Images of PGP9.5 immunofluoresence in adult rat
DRG neurons show growth cones in vehicle-treated neurons with multiple
fine filopodia (arrows in (a), (b) and (c)), while neurons treated with
urea for 48 h have swollen retracted growth cones with loss of filopodia
((d), (e) and (f)).Double immunofluorescence in vehicle-treated neurons showed uniformly and
diffusely distributed PGP9.5 co-localized with βIII tubulin (Figures 3 and 4).
Figure 3.
βIII tubulin and PGP9.5 expression in growth cones. Widefield
immunofluorescence showing growth cones of vehicle-treated neurons with
uniformly distributed βIII tubulin (arrow in a, green), appearing yellow
in the merged image (b) and overlapping the PGP9.5 expression (c, red).
After 48 h 10 mmol/L urea treatment, neurons show growth cones
containing distinct thickened βIII tubulin-positive fibres (d, green),
with the merged image in (e), and pale depleted PGP9.5 expression (f,
red). Similarly, 50 mmol/L urea-treated neurons show thickened
individual βIII tubulin-positive fibres in the growth cone (g, green),
merged image (i, yellow) and pale depleted PGP9.5 (h, red). Vesiculated
remnants of the degenerating growth cone contain βIII tubulin (j,
green), merged image (k, yellow) and PGP9.5 (l, red). Bar (a) to
(f) = 5 µm, (g) to (l) = 2 µm.
Figure 4.
Similar to Figure 3. Higher magnification images of βIII tubulin and
PGP9.5 expression in growth cones. Wide-field immunofluorescence showing
growth cones of vehicle-treated neurons with uniformly distributed βIII
tubulin (a, green), appearing yellow in the merged image (b, yellow),
co-expressed with PGP9.5 (c, red). After 48 h 10 mMol/L urea treatment,
neurons show growth cones containing distinct thickened βIII
tubulin-positive fibres (arrows in d, green), the merged image (e) and
pale depleted PGP9.5 expression (f, red). Similarly, 50 mMol/L
urea-treated neurons show thickened individual βIII tubulin-positive
fibres in the growth cone (arrows in g, green), merged image (h, yellow)
and patchy PGP9.5 (i, red). Bar = 2 µm.
βIII tubulin and PGP9.5 expression in growth cones. Widefield
immunofluorescence showing growth cones of vehicle-treated neurons with
uniformly distributed βIII tubulin (arrow in a, green), appearing yellow
in the merged image (b) and overlapping the PGP9.5 expression (c, red).
After 48 h 10 mmol/L urea treatment, neurons show growth cones
containing distinct thickened βIII tubulin-positive fibres (d, green),
with the merged image in (e), and pale depleted PGP9.5 expression (f,
red). Similarly, 50 mmol/L urea-treated neurons show thickened
individual βIII tubulin-positive fibres in the growth cone (g, green),
merged image (i, yellow) and pale depleted PGP9.5 (h, red). Vesiculated
remnants of the degenerating growth cone contain βIII tubulin (j,
green), merged image (k, yellow) and PGP9.5 (l, red). Bar (a) to
(f) = 5 µm, (g) to (l) = 2 µm.Similar to Figure 3. Higher magnification images of βIII tubulin and
PGP9.5 expression in growth cones. Wide-field immunofluorescence showing
growth cones of vehicle-treated neurons with uniformly distributed βIII
tubulin (a, green), appearing yellow in the merged image (b, yellow),
co-expressed with PGP9.5 (c, red). After 48 h 10 mMol/L urea treatment,
neurons show growth cones containing distinct thickened βIII
tubulin-positive fibres (arrows in d, green), the merged image (e) and
pale depleted PGP9.5 expression (f, red). Similarly, 50 mMol/L
urea-treated neurons show thickened individual βIII tubulin-positive
fibres in the growth cone (arrows in g, green), merged image (h, yellow)
and patchy PGP9.5 (i, red). Bar = 2 µm.Neurons treated with urea showed pale, diminished and patchy PGP9.5 expression,
with fibrillar aggregates of βIII tubulin especially in the growth cones (Figures 3 and 4). Neurons in advanced
stages of degeneration had vesiculated growth cones.TRPM8-positive neurons (Figure
5(a) to (c)) were smaller than TRPV1-positive neurons (Figure 5(d) to (f)).
Neurite lengths were reduced in neurons treated with urea for 48 h, compared
with the average maximum neurite length from vehicle-treated control neurons
being 476 ± 55 µm (n = 4, 99 neurons), reduced to 286 ± 12 µm (n = 4, 166
neurons **P < 0.01) after 10 mmol/L urea treatment, and to 268 ± 16 µm
(n = 4, 152 neurons, **P < 0.01) after 50 mmol/L urea treatment (Figure 5(g)).
Figure 5.
Effect of urea treatment on neurite length, neuron number and expression
of TRPV1 and TRPM8 in cultured DRG neurons. Sample images of neurons
showing double immunofluorescence for Gap43 in the soma and neurites
(green, a) and TRPM8 in the soma (red, b), and merged image in (c)
Bar = 20 µm. Similar Gap43 (green, d) and TRPV1 (red, e), with merged
image in (f) Bar = 50 µm. Graph showing reduced neurite lengths of
neurons treated with 10 or 50 mmol/L urea normalized to vehicle-treated
control (0) (g). Graph showing reduced number of surviving neurons after
10 and 50 mmol/L urea normalized to control (h). Graph of percent
neurons expressing TRPV1 (black bars), and TRPM8 (clear bars), double
labelled with Gap43 (i).
Effect of urea treatment on neurite length, neuron number and expression
of TRPV1 and TRPM8 in cultured DRG neurons. Sample images of neurons
showing double immunofluorescence for Gap43 in the soma and neurites
(green, a) and TRPM8 in the soma (red, b), and merged image in (c)
Bar = 20 µm. Similar Gap43 (green, d) and TRPV1 (red, e), with merged
image in (f) Bar = 50 µm. Graph showing reduced neurite lengths of
neurons treated with 10 or 50 mmol/L urea normalized to vehicle-treated
control (0) (g). Graph showing reduced number of surviving neurons after
10 and 50 mmol/L urea normalized to control (h). Graph of percent
neurons expressing TRPV1 (black bars), and TRPM8 (clear bars), double
labelled with Gap43 (i).Significantly reduced numbers of neurons were observed to survive after treatment
with urea, compared with vehicle treatment. The proportion of surviving neurons
after 48 h incubation with 10 mmol/L urea was reduced to 70.08 ± 13.3% (n = 3,
total 930 neurons, *P < 0.05, Student’s paired t test) and
to 61.49 ± 7.4% after 50 mmol/L treatment (n = 3, total 816 neurons,
**P < 0.01 Student’s paired t test), compared with
vehicle-treated neurons (100 ± 1.6%, n = 3, total 1327 neurons) (Figure 5(h)).Double immunofluorescence for TRPV1 and Gap43 in neurons treated with urea or
vehicle for 24 h showed that 67.7 ± 3.2% neurons were double labelled for Gap43
and TRPV1 in vehicle-treated controls, while 66.2 ± 2.3% were TRPV1 positive
after 10 mmol/L, and reduced to 53.8 ± 12.4% after 50 mmol/L urea for 24 h.
Similarly, double labelling for TRPM8 and Gap43 showed 11.6 ± 4.8% neurons
positive for TRPM8 in control neurons, while 19.6 ± 2.9% were TRPM8 positive
after 10 mmol/L urea and 23 ± 5.5% were TRPM8 positive after 50 mmol/L urea
treatment (Figure
5(i)).
Functional effects
Calcium imaging showed that vehicle-treated neurons demonstrated a robust
response to 200 nMol/L capsaicin (Figure 6(a)), with a smaller second
response to 1 µMol/L capsaicin after the 45-min washout and rest period (Figure 6(b)). Neurons
treated with 10 or 50 mmol/L urea for 10 min, between the two capsaicin stimuli,
showed an increased second response, compared with the first, indicating
sensitization (Figure 6(c) to
(f)). In addition, neurons treated with urea for 48 h showed
sluggish, smaller responses to 200 nMol/L capsaicin than vehicle-treated
neurons, and previously unresponsive or weakly responsive neurons responded
robustly to 1 μMol/L capsaicin after acute urea application (Figure 6(g) and (h), data
not quantified). Neurons treated with 10 or 50 mmol/L mannitol did not
demonstrate sensitization of capsaicin responses.
Figure 6.
Effects of urea on capsaicin sensitivity. Sample trace of calcium influx
in response to 200 nMol/L capsaicin (arrow, a). Following washout and
rest period of 45 min, a second application of capsaicin (1 µMol/L,
double arrowhead, b) results in a smaller response, in a vehicle-treated
neuron. The first response to 200 nM capsaicin in a different neuron
(arrow, c), followed by 10 mmol/L urea applied for 10 min, at the end of
the washout and 45-min rest period, results in enhanced calcium influx
in response to 1 µMol/L capsaicin (double arrowhead, d). Similar traces
showing the first response to 200 nM capsaicin in a different neuron
(arrow, e), and the enhanced response to 1 µMol/L capsaicin (double
arrowhead, f), in the presence of 50 mmol/L urea. Responses to 200 nMol
capsaicin in neurons after 48 h incubation with 50 mmol/L urea (g), and
previously unresponsive neurons showing robust responses after acute
application of 50 mmol/L urea (h). Scale bars indicate time in seconds
on the X axis, and change in mean 340/380 intensity ratio on the Y
axis.
Effects of urea on capsaicin sensitivity. Sample trace of calcium influx
in response to 200 nMol/L capsaicin (arrow, a). Following washout and
rest period of 45 min, a second application of capsaicin (1 µMol/L,
double arrowhead, b) results in a smaller response, in a vehicle-treated
neuron. The first response to 200 nM capsaicin in a different neuron
(arrow, c), followed by 10 mmol/L urea applied for 10 min, at the end of
the washout and 45-min rest period, results in enhanced calcium influx
in response to 1 µMol/L capsaicin (double arrowhead, d). Similar traces
showing the first response to 200 nM capsaicin in a different neuron
(arrow, e), and the enhanced response to 1 µMol/L capsaicin (double
arrowhead, f), in the presence of 50 mmol/L urea. Responses to 200 nMol
capsaicin in neurons after 48 h incubation with 50 mmol/L urea (g), and
previously unresponsive neurons showing robust responses after acute
application of 50 mmol/L urea (h). Scale bars indicate time in seconds
on the X axis, and change in mean 340/380 intensity ratio on the Y
axis.The percentage change in the second response compared with the first response for
each neuron was averaged for each experiment for the different groups and
normalized to vehicle-treated neurons (Figure 7(a), bar 1, 100 ± 4.2%, n = 7, 33
neurons).
Figure 7.
(a) Graph showing capsaicin responses in vehicle-treated neurons (1st
bar, black), and equivalent responses after 10 mmol/L mannitol (bar 2,
n.s.), and after 50 mmol/L mannitol incubation (bar 3). Urea-mediated
sensitization was preserved after thapsigargin (TG) treatment (bar 4,
**P < 0.01), but not in calcium- and magnesium-free extracellular
medium (CMF) (bar 5). (b) Acute effect of urea on capsaicin sensitivity
in cultured DRG neurons. Capsaicin responses in vehicle-treated neurons
(first bar, black); capsaicin sensitivity was significantly increased
after acute application of 10 mmol/L urea (bar 2), which was inhibited
in the presence of inhibitors of TRPM8
N-(3-Aminopropyl)-2-[(3-methylphenyl)methoxy]-N-(2-thienylmethyl)benzamide
(AMTB hydrochloride) (bar 3), MAP kinase PD98059 (bar 4), and PI3 kinase
LY294002 (bar 5). Dose-related sensitization in the presence of 50
mmol/L urea (bar 6) was diminished by the TRPV1 inhibitor SB705498 (bar
7, ***P<0.001).
(a) Graph showing capsaicin responses in vehicle-treated neurons (1st
bar, black), and equivalent responses after 10 mmol/L mannitol (bar 2,
n.s.), and after 50 mmol/L mannitol incubation (bar 3). Urea-mediated
sensitization was preserved after thapsigargin (TG) treatment (bar 4,
**P < 0.01), but not in calcium- and magnesium-free extracellular
medium (CMF) (bar 5). (b) Acute effect of urea on capsaicin sensitivity
in cultured DRG neurons. Capsaicin responses in vehicle-treated neurons
(first bar, black); capsaicin sensitivity was significantly increased
after acute application of 10 mmol/L urea (bar 2), which was inhibited
in the presence of inhibitors of TRPM8N-(3-Aminopropyl)-2-[(3-methylphenyl)methoxy]-N-(2-thienylmethyl)benzamide
(AMTB hydrochloride) (bar 3), MAP kinase PD98059 (bar 4), and PI3 kinase
LY294002 (bar 5). Dose-related sensitization in the presence of 50
mmol/L urea (bar 6) was diminished by the TRPV1 inhibitor SB705498 (bar
7, ***P<0.001).Capsaicin responses in the presence of 10 mmol/L mannitol were similar to vehicle
control (Figure 7(a),
bar 2, 100.8 ± 7%, n = 7, 31 neurons, n.s.) and reduced with 50 mmol/L mannitol
(Figure 7(a), bar 3,
76.6 ± 6.7, n = 3, 29 neurons). Sensitization of capsaicin responses was
maintained in the presence of 10 mmol/L urea applied after incubation with 3
µMol/L thapsigargin (smooth endoplasmic reticulum calcium pump inhibitor) (Figure 7(a), bar 4,
135.8 ± 8.6%, n = 4, 11 neurons, **P < 0.01). Moreover, 10 mmol/L urea
applied in calcium- and magnesium-free extracellular medium reduced capsaicin
responses in DRG neurons (Figure 7(a), bar 5, 68.4 ± 15.6%, n = 3, 21 neurons, n.s. compared
with vehicle-treated controls and **P < 0.01 compared with 10 mmol/L urea in
medium containing calcium and magnesium).Quantitation of data in the graph (Figure 7(b)) shows that capsaicin
sensitivity was increased after acute treatment with 10 mmol/L urea, to
115.29 ± 3.4% (bar 2, n = 6, 45 neurons, **P < 0.01), that was reduced to
66.1 ± 3.5% in the presence of 30 µMol/L TRPM8 inhibitor AMTB (bar 3, n = 3, 24
neurons, ***P < 0.001), reduced to 55.7 ± 7.5% in the presence of 1 µMol/L
MEK inhibitor PD98059 (bar 4, n = 3, 17 neurons, ***P < 0.001), and reduced
to 51 ± 9.9% in the presence of 1 µMol/L PI3 kinase inhibitor LY294002 (bar 5,
n = 3, 26 neurons, ***P < 0.001).Dose-related sensitization of capsaicin responses was observed after acute
application of 50 mMol/L urea to 125.3 ± 4.2% (Figure 7(b), bar 6, n = 4, 30 neurons,
**P < 0.01) that was reduced to 56.2 ± 9.5% in the presence of the TRPV1
inhibitor SB705498 (Figure
7(b), bar 7, n = 4, 21 neurons, ***P < 0.001).
Discussion
As elevated serum urea is the prominent underlying feature of progressive decline in
kidney function, leading to CKD and consequent uremic neuropathy, we sought to
determine the effects of urea treatment on cultured sensory neurons from adult rats.
The urea concentrations used in our study are based on clinical reports, where the
normal range in human blood is 2.5 to 6.7 mMol/L. Higher serum concentrations have
been previously reported with Cmax= 4.6 g/L,[11] which equates to 152.25 mMol/L, and blood ureanitrogen of 157 mg/dl/L,[10] equal to 58.87 mMol/L, which are higher than the concentrations used in our
study. We tested the effect of urea on the morphology and function of sensory
neurons, and our observations indicate that sensory neurons exposed to urea at
levels observed in conditions of uremic neuropathy, above the normal blood urea
levels, demonstrate hypersensitivity followed by neurite degeneration.Previous studies have described the pathology of uremic neuropathy, with axonal
dying-back and demyelination as predominant and consistent features in patients with
CKD. These morphological changes are concomitant with functional changes in nerve
conduction, reduced action potentials and loss of tendon reflexes, features that are
common in peripheral neuropathy. Our morphological findings, of neurite degeneration
characterized by swollen degenerating growth cones with loss of filopodia in
urea-treated neurons, provide a mechanistic basis for this this condition. The
neurotoxic action of high levels of urea compromises neuronal structure and
function. Structural integrity was compromised by the loss of filopodia, which are
fine, dynamic, actin and myosin-rich finger-like structures in the growth cones at
the tips of growing neurites. Filopodia have a sensory function and respond to
guidance cues in their environment, essential for neurite growth, synapse formation
and maintenance, under the regulation of a number of different proteins.[18] The pattern of loss of filopodia, combined with neurite and growth cone
degeneration, may be attributed to generalized toxic effects, with the potential to
affect other types of neurons, including motoneurons. This may underlie features
such as the acute partial denervation and loss of motor units in weak muscles
observed in uremic neuropathy.[8]Intracellular effects of urea treatment were apparent with double immunofluorescence
using specific antibodies for the neuronal marker PGP9.5, a member of the ubiquitin
C-terminal hydroxylase family, which showed diffuse distribution and co-expression
with βIII tubulin in control neurons. The depletion of PGP9.5 in the neurites of
urea-treated neurons and concentration in the cell soma suggests impaired axonal
transport mechanism or depletion from the neurite tips towards the cell body. While
the βIII tubulin was uniformly distributed in vehicle-treated neurons, it appeared
as bundles or aggregated distinct fibrillar structures, progressing to degenerating
vesicles replacing the growth cones of urea-treated neurons. βIII tubulin is a major
constituent of microtubules, and mutations in βIII tubulin are associated with
peripheral neuropathy, due to loss of axons and disruption of axon transport of
Rab3A, a synaptic vesicle associated small GTPase.[19] The importance of microtubules in maintaining growth cone structure was
demonstrated in cultured DRG neurons treated with the microtubule disrupting agent
nocodazole, which resulted in the loss of growth cones and formation of retraction bulbs.[20] Growth cones of normal DRG neurons cultured with low-dose NGF contain βIII
tubulin-positive microtubules associated with kinesin.[21] However, we observed microtubule bundles in urea-treated neurons, whereas
control neurons showed diffuse and co-localized distribution of βIII tubulin and
PGP9.5. The presence of GDNF in addition to NGF is reported to significantly
increase the thickness and size of neurite terminals[22] and our observation of microtubule bundles in urea-treated neurons may be due
to thinning of the plasma membrane, or to inactivation of the neurotrophic factors
by the proteolytic action of urea, as described below. In our previous study, the
neurodegenerative effects of the Mycobacterium Ulcerans toxin
mycolactone in cultured DRG neurons included loss of βIII tubulin accompanied by
TRPV1 desensitization,[23] while this study shows the opposite effect, of βIII tubulin aggregation
accompanied by neuronal sensitization, suggesting a common pathway influencing TRPV1
receptor activation and tubulin stability that requires elucidation.Our results from immunofluorescence studies on neurite length and number show that
significant neurite and neuron loss can occur at the lower dose of 10 mmol/L urea,
and the effects were slightly increased at the higher dose of 50 mmol/L, consistent
with the pathology of uremic neuropathy.Previous studies have provided a range of values for the proportion of DRG neurons
expressing TRPV1: 46.9 ± 1.6%,[24] 46.8 ± 2.2%,[25] 42 ± 6%,[26] 58 ± 2%,[27] and 42 ± 7%[28] and TRPM8: 4.7%[29] 5%–10%,[30,31] 12.9%,[32] and 22.8%.[24] Our TRPV1-positive neuron numbers were higher, as observed in animal models
of inflammation[33,34] and in clinical conditions of chronic pain,[35-37] also reflecting the effect of
added neurotrophic factors in culture.[17] Our study also showed a dose-related loss of TRPV1-positive neurons in the
urea-treated group (n.s.), indicating susceptibility of TRPV1 expressing neurons to
urea, and a small relative increase (n.s.) in TRPM8-positive neurons, possibly
reflecting the loss of TRPV1 neurons.The functional effect of neuronal sensitization was apparent after acute incubation
with urea and preceded the morphological effects of neurite degeneration observed
after 48 h incubation with urea. Sensitization of capsaicin responses is the
opposite of the expected reduction in the second response due to tachyphylaxis,
which normally provides a protective mechanism, allowing neurons a period of
recovery after stimulation and calcium influx. Thus, the sensitization shown by
increased intracellular calcium on capsaicin stimulation indicates increased
neuronal excitability due to increased calcium influx or release from intracellular
stores, or both; our findings of the absence of sensitization in calcium-free
medium, and its persistence in the presence of thapsigargin, indicate increased
calcium influx in the presence of urea, rather than calcium release from
intracellular stores. We used capsaicin to study activation of TRPV1, the neuronal
receptor involved in sensing noxious stimuli leading to the perception of pain,[38] to mimic endogenous agonists of this receptor that are likely to have similar
effects, especially in inflammatory conditions. The resulting increase in
intracellular calcium levels in urea-treated neurons and loss of calcium homeostasis
would be expected to lead to altered sensitivity and structural degeneration
characteristic of uremic neuropathy. In a previous study, exposure of humanneuroblastoma cells to urea at clinically relevant concentrations (40–200 mg/dl)
resulted in the expression of heat shock proteins and protein carbamylation but not
after exposure to equivalent concentrations of mannitol, creatinine, or glycerol,
suggesting neurotoxicity of urea.[39] Contrary to the findings of Liu et al.,[40] we did not observe sensitization of neurons to capsaicin in hypertonic medium
(containing 10 mmol/L or 50 mmol/L mannitol), though, similar to their findings, we
observed absence of calcium influx in response to hypertonic stimuli and elimination
of sensitization by the PI3K inhibitor. In addition, we have demonstrated the
efficacy of the TRPM8 inhibitor and the MEK kinase inhibitor in eliminating
urea-mediated neuronal sensitization. It is likely that the differences in our
results are due to different temperatures at which experiments were conducted and
the neuronal population under study, as Liu et al.[40] performed their study on trigeminal neurons at 22°C to 24°C, while our
experiments were conducted on DRG neurons at 37°C.Urea is one of many components including TNFα that are increased in the plasma of
individuals with CKD,[11] which may have a synergistic effect. Sensitization in the presence of urea
may be due to a change in osmolality, but is unlikely, as solutes such as urea
equilibrate across the cell membrane and do not cause cellular dehydration.[41] Quallo et al.[29] reported that hyperosmolality evoked calcium influx in TRPM8 expressing DRG,
Trigeminal ganglia (TG) and TRPM8 transfected cells, which were temperature
sensitive and observed at lower temperatures than used in our study, with a low
threshold of activation (27°C) and having decreasing response amplitude with
temperature increasing to 37°C. Our experiments were conducted at 37°C, and we did
not observe calcium influx in response to urea or mannitol application at the
concentrations and temperature conditions used. Thus, TRPM8 may be activated by
hyperosmolality and play a predominant role where the physiological temperature is
appropriate for TRPM8 activation as in corneal afferents, shown by Quallo et al.[29] The inhibitory effect of the TRPM8 inhibitor AMTB in our study indicates a
common pathway in TRPV1 and TRPM8 activation, reflecting co-expression of these two
receptors in DRG neurons. Our study examined the effect of urea at the
concentrations observed in conditions of uremic neuropathy and its potential effects
on TRPV1 to understand the mechanistic basis of the associated pain and
paraesthesia. Whether urea has similar sensitizing effects on other ion channels
involved in nociception remains to be determined.One of the mechanisms influencing neuronal sensitization involves TRPV1
phosphorylation by elevated cAMP,[42,43] with the activation of protein
kinase A and other kinases in nociceptive afferents, resulting in
hyperalgesia.[44-46] Urea appears
to have a synergistic effect in this pathway, as the sensitizing effect mediated by
urea was eliminated by the MEK inhibitor PD 98059 and the PI3 kinase inhibitor LY
294002. Partial inhibition by the high concentration of the TRPM8 inhibitor AMTB
likely demonstrates its effect on TRPV1 and TRPM8 co-expressing neurons, as
co-expression is reported to occur in the presence of NGF,[47] as in our study. Although TRPM8 and TRPV1 expression was initially reported
in non-overlapping subsets of DRG neurons,[24] others have described their co-expression in a subpopulation of
neurons.[32,48] The MEK inhibitor PD98059 and the PI3 kinase inhibitor LY294002
inhibited urea-mediated sensitization to a greater extent at low doses, as did the
TRPV1 inhibitor SB705498. Thus, reversal of elevated cAMP by MEK/PI3 kinase
inhibitors, TRPV1 antagonists, or maintenance of plasma osmolality below 10 mmol/L
may provide effective strategies in preventing urea-mediated neuronal sensitization
and degeneration.The neurodegenerative effects of urea may be explained by its chaotropic property,
which renders it useful as a protein denaturing agent for studies of protein
analysis, by protein unfolding, due to unravelling the tertiary structure by
destabilizing internal, non-covalent bonds. Protein denaturation by urea can also
proceed via direct interaction of urea by forming hydrogen bonds with polarized
areas of charge, such as peptide groups, weakening intermolecular bonds, and the
overall secondary and tertiary structure, although this has been described at molar concentrations.[49] Urea diffuses easily due to its small molecular size aiding its distribution
in total body water and also acts as a humectant by absorbing water. These
properties form the basis of commercially available topical formulations as
keratolytic agents. While our findings describe the direct effects of elevated urea
on DRG neurons, significant autonomic and central nervous system effects are also
associated with uremia. Uremic encephalopathy occurs in patients with renal failure
due to the accumulation of urea in the brain.[50,51] Atrophy of the striatum is
characteristic of Huntington’s disease (HD) pathology, where localized accumulation
of urea is considered to be the primary biochemical basis for initiating neuropathogenesis.[52] Widespread elevation of urea has been described in Alzheimer’s disease brain tissue[53] and in brain tissue of patients with HD, indicating a role for dysregulated
urea metabolism in neurodegeneration.[54]Our study provides a disease-related model of uremic neuropathy, offering insight
into the pathogenesis of the condition, and the opportunity to test novel agents to
alleviate hypersensitivity and promote nerve regeneration.
Authors: Raymond Vanholder; Rita De Smet; Griet Glorieux; Angel Argilés; Ulrich Baurmeister; Philippe Brunet; William Clark; Gerald Cohen; Peter Paul De Deyn; Reinhold Deppisch; Beatrice Descamps-Latscha; Thomas Henle; Achim Jörres; Horst Dieter Lemke; Ziad A Massy; Jutta Passlick-Deetjen; Mariano Rodriguez; Bernd Stegmayr; Peter Stenvinkel; Ciro Tetta; Christoph Wanner; Walter Zidek Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Andrea M Peier; Aziz Moqrich; Anne C Hergarden; Alison J Reeve; David A Andersson; Gina M Story; Taryn J Earley; Ilaria Dragoni; Peter McIntyre; Stuart Bevan; Ardem Patapoutian Journal: Cell Date: 2002-03-08 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Uma Anand; William R Otto; Daniel Sanchez-Herrera; Paul Facer; Yiangos Yiangou; Yuri Korchev; Rolfe Birch; Christopher Benham; Chas Bountra; Iain P Chessell; Praveen Anand Journal: Pain Date: 2008-08-09 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Gina M Story; Andrea M Peier; Alison J Reeve; Samer R Eid; Johannes Mosbacher; Todd R Hricik; Taryn J Earley; Anne C Hergarden; David A Andersson; Sun Wook Hwang; Peter McIntyre; Tim Jegla; Stuart Bevan; Ardem Patapoutian Journal: Cell Date: 2003-03-21 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Andreas Klusch; Christian Gorzelanny; Peter W Reeh; Martin Schmelz; Marlen Petersen; Susanne K Sauer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-09-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Hayley Worth; Daniel V O'Hara; Neeru Agarwal; David Collister; Frank Brennan; Brendan Smyth Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2022-01-05 Impact factor: 10.614