| Literature DB >> 31549564 |
Chike C Nwabuo1, Meredith Duncan2,3, Vanessa Xanthakis4,5,6, Linda R Peterson7, Gary F Mitchell8, David McManus9,10, Susan Cheng11, Ramachandran S Vasan4,5,6.
Abstract
Background A higher circulating plasma ceramide ratio (C16:0/C24:0) is associated with an increased risk of heart failure, even after accounting for standard risk factors including lipid markers. However, the pathobiological mechanisms that underlie this association are incompletely understood. We tested the hypothesis that plasma ceramide ratio (C16:0/C24:0) is associated with adverse cardiac remodeling in the community. Methods and Results We evaluated 2652 Framingham Offspring Study participants (mean age, 66±9 years; 55% women) who attended their eighth examination cycle and underwent routine echocardiography and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based assays for circulating ceramide concentrations. We used multivariable linear regression models to relate C16:0/C24:0 (independent variable) to the following echocardiographic measures (dependent variables; separate models for each): left ventricular mass, left ventricular ejection fraction, left atrial emptying fraction, left atrial end-systolic volume, E/e' (a measure of left ventricular diastolic function), and left ventricular global circumferential and longitudinal strain by speckle-tracking echocardiography. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, higher C16:0/C24:0 per standard deviation increment was associated with lower left ventricular ejection fraction (0.991-fold change in left ventricular ejection fraction; P=0.0004), worse global circumferential strain (β=0.34, P=0.004), higher left atrial end-systolic volume (β=2.48, p<0.0001), and lower left atrial emptying fraction (0.99-fold change; P<0.0001). The C16:0/C24:0 ratio was not associated with either E/e' or global longitudinal strain, and the association with higher left ventricular mass was rendered statistically nonsignificant upon correction for multiple comparisons. Conclusions Our cross-sectional observations in a large community-based sample are consistent with a potential detrimental impact of higher ceramide ratio (C16:0/24:0) on cardiac remodeling traits, which may partly explain the associations of these molecular species with clinical heart failure.Entities:
Keywords: cardiac function; cardiac remodeling; ceramides; left atrium; left ventricle; lipids and lipoproteins
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31549564 PMCID: PMC6806035 DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Heart Assoc ISSN: 2047-9980 Impact factor: 5.501
Characteristics of Study Sample
| Characteristics | N=2652 |
|---|---|
| Age, y | 66±9 |
| Men, % | 44.8 |
| Height, cm | 166.9±10 |
| Weight, kg | 78.8±18 |
| Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg | 128±17 |
| Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg | 74±10 |
| Use of antihypertensive medication, % | 47.5 |
| Heart rate, bpm | 59.6±10 |
| Diabetes mellitus, % | 3.1 |
| Current smoking, % | 9.1 |
| LDL‐C, mg/dL | 105.8±31 |
| HDL‐C, mg/dL | 57.7±18 |
| Triglycerides, mg/dL | 117.5±69 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 186.6±37 |
| Lipid lowering medication use, % | 42.1 |
| eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 | 77.8±16 |
| Prior heart failure, % | 2.38 |
| Plasma ceramide concentrations | |
| Plasma C16:0 ceramide, μg/mL | 0.2±0.04 |
| Plasma C24:0 ceramide, μg/mL | 2.3±0.7 |
| Plasma C16/24 ceramide, μg/mL | 0.08±0.02 |
| Echocardiographic measures | |
| LV mass index, g | 162.2 (134.5, 162.6) |
| LV ejection fraction, % | 67.3 (62.9, 71.7) |
| Left atrial emptying fraction, % | 48 (46, 50) |
| Left atrial end‐systolic volume, mL | 56.8±19.3 |
| LV global longitudinal strain, % | −20.6±3 |
| LV global circumferential strain, % | −31.9±6 |
| E/e′ | 6.6 (5.5, 8.1) |
Values are mean±standard deviation, median (Q1, Q3), or percentage. E/e′ indicates mitral inflow velocity to early diastolic mitral annular velocity; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL‐C, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL‐C, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; LV, left ventricular.
Ceramide Ratio (C16:0/24:0) and Cardiac Structure and Function
| Echocardiography Indices | Beta Estimate (Standard Error) |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| LV ejection fraction | −0.009 (0.002) | 0.991 | 0.0004 |
| LV global circumferential strain | 0.34 (0.12) | NA | 0.004 |
| LV global longitudinal strain | 0.07 (0.06) | NA | 0.26 |
| E/e′ | 0.006 (0.005) | 1.006 | 0.26 |
| Left atrial emptying fraction | −0.008 (0.002) | 0.992 | <0.0001 |
| Left atrial end‐systolic volume | 2.48 (0.4) | NA | <0.0001 |
| LV mass | 0.009 (0.004) | 1.009 | 0.02 |
Multivariable linear regression showing the relation between C16:0/C24:0 and echocardiographic measures (dependent variable). Beta estimates represent change in echocardiography variable per 1 SD increment in ceramide ratio. Models were adjusted for age, sex, heart rate, height, weight, diabetes mellitus, systolic blood pressure, antihypertensive medication use, current smoking, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and the ratio of total to high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol. E/e′ indicates mitral inflow velocity to early diastolic mitral annular velocity; LV, left ventricular; NA, not applicable.
These dependent variables were natural logarithmically transformed to satisfy the normality assumption of linear regression models. In these models represents the fold change in Y per standard deviation increase in C16:0/C24:0. More positive global strain values signify worse LV systolic function.
Denotes associations that retain statistical significance following a Bonferroni correction for multiple testing.
Figure 1Restricted cubic splines plots showing the relations between ceramide ratio and LVEF, LAEF, global circumferential strain, and LV mass. Shaded areas represent the 95% CIs. The reference value in each panel is set to the median C16:0/C24:0 ratio of 0.07. The yellow hashed line serves as a reference line of “no association.” LAEF indicates left atrial emptying fraction; LV, left ventricular; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.