Literature DB >> 31548822

Active treatment in low-risk prostate cancer: a population-based study.

S Roy1,2, M E Hyndman3,4, B Danielson5,6, A Fairey7, R Lee-Ying1,2, W Y Cheung1,2, A R Afzal1, Y Xu8, T Abedin1, H C Quon1,2.   

Abstract

Background: Active surveillance instead of active treatment (at) is preferred for patients with low-risk prostate cancer (lr-pca), but practice varies widely. We conducted a population-based study to assess the proportion of patients who underwent at between January 2011 and December 2014, and to evaluate factors associated with at.
Methods: The provincial cancer registry was linked to administrative health datasets to identify patients with lr-pca and to acquire demographic, tumour, and treatment data. The primary outcome was receipt of at during the first 12 months after diagnosis, defined as any receipt of external-beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, radical prostatectomy, cryotherapy, or androgen deprivation. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the correlation between patient and tumour factors and at.
Results: Of 1565 patients with lr-pca, 554 (35.4%) underwent at within 12 months of diagnosis. Radical prostatectomy was the most common treatment (58%), followed by brachytherapy (29.6%). Younger age [odds ratio (or) 0.92; 95% confidence interval (ci): 0.91 to 0.94], lower score (≥3) on the Charlson comorbidity index (OR: 0.36; 95% ci: 0.19 to 0.68), T2 stage (or: 3.05; 95% ci: 2.03 to 4.58), higher prostate-specific antigen (psa) at diagnosis (or: 1.13; 95% ci: 1.06 to 1.21), radiation oncologist consultation (or: 3.35; 95% ci: 2.55 to 4.39), and earlier diagnosis year (2012 or: 0.46; 95% ci: 0.34 to 0.63; 2013 or: 0.45; 95% ci: 0.32 to 0.63; 2014 or: 0.33; 95% ci: 0.23 to 0.47) were associated with a higher probability of at. Conclusions: This contemporary population-based study demonstrates that approximately one third of patients with lr-pca undergo at. Patients of younger age, with less comorbidity, a higher tumour stage, higher psa, earlier year of diagnosis, and radiation oncologist consultation were more likely to undergo at. Further investigation is needed to identify strategies that could minimize overtreatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prostate cancer, low-risk; active surveillance; active treatment; brachytherapy; radical prostatectomy; radiotherapy

Year:  2019        PMID: 31548822      PMCID: PMC6726256          DOI: 10.3747/co.26.4953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  30 in total

Review 1.  Overdiagnosis in cancer.

Authors:  H Gilbert Welch; William C Black
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Contemporary use of initial active surveillance among men in Michigan with low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Paul R Womble; James E Montie; Zaojun Ye; Susan M Linsell; Brian R Lane; David C Miller
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Prostate cancer screening: Canadian guidelines 2011.

Authors:  Jonathan I Izawa; Laurence Klotz; D Robert Siemens; Wassim Kassouf; Alan So; John Jordan; Michael Chetner; Alla E Iansavichene
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Trends in Management for Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer, 1990-2013.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Use of Conservative Management for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer in the Veterans Affairs Integrated Health Care System From 2005-2015.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Nataliya Byrne; Danil V Makarov; Herbert Lepor; Dawn Walter
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Active surveillance program for prostate cancer: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Bruce J Trock; Patricia Landis; Zhaoyong Feng; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Time trends and local variation in primary treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg; Jeanette M Broering; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Outcomes in localized prostate cancer: National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden follow-up study.

Authors:  Pär Stattin; Erik Holmberg; Jan-Erik Johansson; Lars Holmberg; Jan Adolfsson; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 9.  Prostate cancer overdiagnosis and overtreatment.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.243

10.  Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz; Liying Zhang; Adam Lam; Robert Nam; Alexandre Mamedov; Andrew Loblaw
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  1 in total

1.  PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN (PSA) VALUES IN PATIENTS WITH LOW- AND HIGH-RISK PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA.

Authors:  Silvija Mašić; Ivan Pezelj; Božo Krušlin
Journal:  Acta Clin Croat       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 0.780

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.