Literature DB >> 31548818

Patient-reported outcomes in Alberta: rationale, scope, and design of a database initiative.

C A Cuthbert1, L Watson2, Y Xu3, D J Boyne3, B R Hemmelgarn3, W Y Cheung1,3.   

Abstract

Background: The collection of patient reported outcomes (pros) is a standard of care in many cancer organizations. In Alberta, pros have been integrated into routine clinical practice since 2012. This longitudinal collection of pros provides a wealth of data and a unique research opportunity to improve cancer care. The goal of this pro data initiative is to establish a robust repository of information for ongoing clinical care and research focused on pros. In this paper, we describe the rationale, scope, and design of this initiative. Implementation: The initiative consists of pros and other administrative health data from the province of Alberta. Retrieval of health data from a variety of provincially governed sources will create a platform of information on pros, health outcomes, cancer data, other health conditions, and demographics. The aims of the initiative are to use the data to inform best practices at the point of care; to conduct health services research, particularly clinical epidemiology studies; and to evaluate a variety of pro-related outcomes. Discussion: Because this effort represents our first to integrate routinely collected pros with other administrative health data, a unique and robust data repository will be created. The ability to integrate various types of data will provide a comprehensive mechanism to evaluate a variety of outcomes. Because cancer care in Alberta is governed by a single health care system, the data linkages will include population health and psychosocial cancer data. We anticipate that research related to this initiative will ultimately help to inform more patient-centred care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient-reported outcomes; administrative health data; health services research; patient-centred care; pros

Year:  2019        PMID: 31548818      PMCID: PMC6726254          DOI: 10.3747/co.26.4919

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  21 in total

1.  Age and gender differences in symptom intensity and symptom clusters among patients with metastatic cancer.

Authors:  Winson Y Cheung; Lisa W Le; Lucia Gagliese; Camilla Zimmermann
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System 25 Years Later: Past, Present, and Future Developments.

Authors:  David Hui; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 3.  The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System: a 15-year retrospective review of validation studies (1991--2006).

Authors:  Cheryl Nekolaichuk; Sharon Watanabe; Crystal Beaumont
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.762

4.  Overall Survival Results of a Trial Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes for Symptom Monitoring During Routine Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Allison M Deal; Amylou C Dueck; Howard I Scher; Mark G Kris; Clifford Hudis; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Neil K Aaronson; Ali K Choucair; Thomas E Elliott; Joanne Greenhalgh; Michele Y Halyard; Rachel Hess; Deborah M Miller; Bryce B Reeve; Maria Santana
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Implementing screening for distress, the 6th vital sign: a Canadian strategy for changing practice.

Authors:  Barry D Bultz; Shannon L Groff; Margaret Fitch; Marie Claude Blais; Janice Howes; Karen Levy; Carole Mayer
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  The Edmonton symptom assessment system--what do patients think?

Authors:  Sharon Watanabe; Cheryl Nekolaichuk; Crystal Beaumont; Asifa Mawani
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  A Canadian survey of cancer patients' experiences: are their needs being met?

Authors:  F D Ashbury; H Findlay; B Reynolds; K McKerracher
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 9.  New frontiers in patient-reported outcomes: adverse event reporting, comparative effectiveness, and quality assessment.

Authors:  Ethan Basch
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 13.739

Review 10.  A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting.

Authors:  Jack Chen; Lixin Ou; Stephanie J Hollis
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  4 in total

1.  Diagnostic timelines and self-reported symptoms of patients with lung and gastrointestinal cancers undergoing radiation therapy. Retrospective case control study.

Authors:  Demetra Yannitsos; Lisa Barbera; Abdulla Al-Rashdan; Petra Grendarova
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 3.359

2.  Examining the Development of Information Needs Assessment Questionnaires in Oncology: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

Authors:  Maclean Thiessen; Daranne Harris; Patricia Tang; Shelley Raffin Bouchal; Shane Sinclair
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-09-01

3.  Virtual Cancer Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Alberta: Evidence From a Mixed Methods Evaluation and Key Learnings.

Authors:  Linda Watson; Siwei Qi; Andrea Delure; Claire Link; Eclair Photitai; Lindsi Chmielewski; April Hildebrand; Dean Ruether; Krista Rawson
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-08-05

4.  Symptom Burden and Complexity in the Last 12 Months of Life among Cancer Patients Choosing Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) in Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Linda Watson; Claire Link; Siwei Qi; Andrea DeIure; K Brooke Russell; Fiona Schulte; Caitlin Forbes; James Silvius; Brian Kelly; Barry D Bultz
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 3.677

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.