N Lightfoot1, L MacEwan2, L Tufford2, D L Holness3, C Mayer4, D M Kramer5. 1. School of Rural and Northern Health, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON. 2. School of Social Work, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON. 3. Dalla Lana School of Public Health and Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, and Division of Occupational Medicine and Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON. 4. Supportive Care Oncology Research Unit, Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON. 5. School of Occupational and Public Health, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON.
Abstract
Background: In the present study, we investigated the emotional, physical, financial, occupational, practical, and quality-of-life impacts on caregivers of patients with mining-related lung cancer. Methods: This concurrent, embedded, mixed-methods study used individual in-depth qualitative interviews and the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (version 2: RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, U.S.A.) quality-of-life measure with 8 caregivers of patients with suspected mining-related lung cancer who had worked in Sudbury or Elliot Lake (or both), and sometimes elsewhere. Individuals who assist workers in filing compensation claims were also interviewed in Sudbury and Elliot Lake. Interviews (n = 11) were transcribed and analyzed thematically. Results: Caregiver themes focused on the long time to, and the shock of, diagnosis and dealing with lung cancer; not much of a life for caregivers; strong views about potential cancer causes; concerns about financial impacts; compensation experiences and long time to compensation; and suggestions for additional support. Quality-of-life scores were below the norm for most measures. Individuals who assist workers in preparing claims were passionate about challenges in the compensation journey; the requirement for more and better family support; the need to focus on compensation compared with cost control; the need for better exposure monitoring, controls, resources, and research; and job challenges, barriers, and satisfaction. Conclusions: Caregivers expressed a need for more education about the compensation process and for greater support. Worker representatives required persistence, additional workplace monitoring and controls, additional research, and a focus on compensation compared with cost control. They also emphasized the need for more family support.
Background: In the present study, we investigated the emotional, physical, financial, occupational, practical, and quality-of-life impacts on caregivers of patients with mining-related lung cancer. Methods: This concurrent, embedded, mixed-methods study used individual in-depth qualitative interviews and the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (version 2: RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, U.S.A.) quality-of-life measure with 8 caregivers of patients with suspected mining-related lung cancer who had worked in Sudbury or Elliot Lake (or both), and sometimes elsewhere. Individuals who assist workers in filing compensation claims were also interviewed in Sudbury and Elliot Lake. Interviews (n = 11) were transcribed and analyzed thematically. Results: Caregiver themes focused on the long time to, and the shock of, diagnosis and dealing with lung cancer; not much of a life for caregivers; strong views about potential cancer causes; concerns about financial impacts; compensation experiences and long time to compensation; and suggestions for additional support. Quality-of-life scores were below the norm for most measures. Individuals who assist workers in preparing claims were passionate about challenges in the compensation journey; the requirement for more and better family support; the need to focus on compensation compared with cost control; the need for better exposure monitoring, controls, resources, and research; and job challenges, barriers, and satisfaction. Conclusions: Caregivers expressed a need for more education about the compensation process and for greater support. Worker representatives required persistence, additional workplace monitoring and controls, additional research, and a focus on compensation compared with cost control. They also emphasized the need for more family support.
Entities:
Keywords:
Lung cancer; cancer impacts; caregivers; mixed-methods research
Authors: James K H Jung; Saul G Feinstein; Luis Palma Lazgare; Jill S Macleod; Victoria H Arrandale; Christopher B McLeod; Alice Peter; Paul A Demers Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2018-05-07 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Garthika Navaranjan; Colin Berriault; Minh Do; Paul J Villeneuve; Paul A Demers Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2016-09-20 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Susan F Lee; Margaret M O'Connor; Ysanne Chapman; Vicki Hamilton; Karen Francis Journal: Rural Remote Health Date: 2009-08-25 Impact factor: 1.759
Authors: Catherine E Mosher; Victoria L Champion; Christopher G Azzoli; Nasser Hanna; Shadia I Jalal; Achilles J Fakiris; Thomas J Birdas; Ikenna C Okereke; Kenneth A Kesler; Lawrence H Einhorn; Patrick O Monahan; Jamie S Ostroff Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2012-09-04 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Lori L DuBenske; David H Gustafson; Kang Namkoong; Robert P Hawkins; Amy K Atwood; Roger L Brown; Ming-Yuan Chih; Fiona McTavish; Cindy L Carmack; Mary K Buss; Ramaswamy Govindan; James F Cleary Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2013-11-18 Impact factor: 4.267