Literature DB >> 31548816

The patient experience of ambulatory cancer treatment: a descriptive study.

E Bridge1, L Gotlib Conn1,2, S Dhanju1, S Singh1,2,3, L Moody1.   

Abstract

Background: Patient experience is often measured quantitatively, but that approach has limitations for understanding the entire experience. Qualitative methods can help to understand more complex issues most important to patients and their families. The purpose of the present work was to use a qualitative analysis examining the patient experience of ambulatory cancer care in Ontario to generate a deeper understanding of the patient experience and to lead to solutions for improvement.
Methods: Data from the Ambulatory Oncology Patient Satisfaction Survey (aopss) for 2013-2015 were used to conduct a qualitative content analysis. The aopss is a retrospective paper-based survey, mailed to patients who are currently receiving cancer treatment or who have received cancer treatment within the preceding 6 months, that is designed to capture their experiences. Patients who were surveyed were asked, "Is there anything else you would like to tell us about your cancer care services?" The National Research Corporation Canada's patient-centred care framework was used to guide the analysis.
Results: From the 5391 patients who responded, 7328 coded responses were generated, of which 3658 (49.9%) were related to the patient-centred care framework. New subthemes were identified: diagnosis sensitivity; emotional support resources; care delivery with care, compassion, and comfort; continuity of care between departments and in the community; access to cancer centre personnel; patient-health care provider communication; confidence in the health care provider; wait times; health care provider and treatment coordination; and parking. Conclusions: The results identify facilitators and barriers to the patient experience in the ambulatory cancer treatment setting from the patient perspective and identify opportunities to improve the patient experience.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Person-centred care; patient experiences; qualitative analyses; survey research

Year:  2019        PMID: 31548816      PMCID: PMC6726280          DOI: 10.3747/co.26.4191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  31 in total

1.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

2.  Bridging the divide between families and health professionals' perspectives on family-centred care.

Authors:  Gail L MacKean; Wilfreda E Thurston; Catherine M Scott
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Health services research related to performance indicators and benchmarking in Europe.

Authors:  Niek Klazinga; Claudia Fischer; Augustinus ten Asbroek
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2011-07

4.  Developing physician communication skills for patient-centered care.

Authors:  Wendy Levinson; Cara S Lesser; Ronald M Epstein
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Experiencing patient-experience surveys: a qualitative study of the accounts of GPs.

Authors:  Adrian Edwards; Richard Evans; Paul White; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Patient-centred care and nurses' health: the role of nurses' caring orientation.

Authors:  Anat Drach-Zahavy
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 3.187

7.  Patient centered experiences in breast cancer: predicting long-term adherence to tamoxifen use.

Authors:  Katherine L Kahn; Eric C Schneider; Jennifer L Malin; John L Adams; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease.

Authors:  S H Kaplan; S Greenfield; J E Ware
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs).

Authors:  Theresa Weldring; Sheree M S Smith
Journal:  Health Serv Insights       Date:  2013-08-04

10.  Insights into the experiences of patients with cancer in London: framework analysis of free-text data from the National Cancer Patient Experience Survey 2012/2013 from the two London Integrated Cancer Systems.

Authors:  Theresa Wiseman; Grace Lucas; Amrit Sangha; Anuska Randolph; Sarah Stapleton; Natalie Pattison; Geraldine O'Gara; Katherine Harris; Kathy Pritchard-Jones; Shelley Dolan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  5 in total

1.  Patients' cancer care perceptions conceptualized through the Cancer Experience Measurement Framework.

Authors:  Michaela A Bourque; Carmen G Loiselle
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 2.908

2.  Cancer Survivors in Saint Lucia Deeply Value Social Support: Considerations for Cancer Control in Under-Resourced Communities.

Authors:  Aviane Auguste; Shania Cox; JoAnn S Oliver; Dorothy Phillip; Owen Gabriel; James St Catherine; Carlene Radix; Danièle Luce; Christine Barul
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Assessment of Parking Fees at National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Treatment Centers.

Authors:  Anna Lee; Kanan Shah; Fumiko Chino
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 4.  Factors influencing cancer patients' experiences of care in the USA, United Kingdom, and Canada: A systematic review.

Authors:  Saleh A Alessy; Mohammed Alhajji; Janette Rawlinson; Matthew Baker; Elizabeth A Davies
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-04-21

5.  Computer-assisted textual analysis of free-text comments in the Swiss Cancer Patient Experiences (SCAPE) survey.

Authors:  Chantal Arditi; Diana Walther; Ingrid Gilles; Saphir Lesage; Anne-Claude Griesser; Christine Bienvenu; Manuela Eicher; Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.