Literature DB >> 31548624

A characterization of personal care product use among undergraduate female college students in South Carolina, USA.

Leslie B Hart1, Joanna Walker2, Barbara Beckingham3, Ally Shelley2, Moriah Alten Flagg2, Kerry Wischusen4, Beth Sundstrom5.   

Abstract

Some chemicals used in personal care products (PCPs) are associated with endocrine disruption, developmental abnormalities, and reproductive impairment. Previous studies have evaluated product use among various populations; however, information on college women, a population with a unique lifestyle, is scarce. The proportion and frequency of product use were measured using a self-administered survey among 138 female undergraduates. Respondents were predominately Caucasian (80.4%, reflecting the college's student body), and represented all years of study (freshman: 24.6%; sophomore: 30.4%; junior: 18.8%; senior: 26.1%). All respondents reported use of at least two PCPs within 24 h prior to sampling (maximum = 17; median = 8; IQR = 6-11). Compared with studies of pregnant and postpartum women, adult men, and Latina adolescents, college women surveyed reported significantly higher use of deodorant, conditioner, perfume, liquid soap, hand/body lotion, sunscreen, nail polish, eyeshadow, and lip balm (Chi Square, p < 0.05). More study is needed to understand the magnitude and racial disparities of PCP chemical exposure, but given the potential effects on reproduction and fertility, our findings of abundant and frequent product use among these reproductive-aged women highlight opportunities for intervention and information on endocrine disrupting chemical (EDC)-free alternative products and behaviors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beauty products; Chemical exposure; University

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31548624     DOI: 10.1038/s41370-019-0170-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1559-0631            Impact factor:   5.563


  31 in total

Review 1.  Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: associated disorders and mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Sam De Coster; Nicolas van Larebeke
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2012-09-06

2.  Women's exposure to phthalates in relation to use of personal care products.

Authors:  Lauren E Parlett; Antonia M Calafat; Shanna H Swan
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 5.563

3.  Phthalates in cosmetic and personal care products: concentrations and possible dermal exposure.

Authors:  Diane Koniecki; Rong Wang; Richard P Moody; Jiping Zhu
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 6.498

4.  Usage pattern of personal care products in California households.

Authors:  Xiangmei May Wu; Deborah H Bennett; Beate Ritz; Diana L Cassady; Kiyoung Lee; Irva Hertz-Picciotto
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 6.023

5.  Widespread occurrence of benzophenone-type UV light filters in personal care products from China and the United States: an assessment of human exposure.

Authors:  Chunyang Liao; Kurunthachalam Kannan
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  A survey of phthalates and parabens in personal care products from the United States and its implications for human exposure.

Authors:  Ying Guo; Kurunthachalam Kannan
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Concentrations of parabens in human breast tumours.

Authors:  P D Darbre; A Aljarrah; W R Miller; N G Coldham; M J Sauer; G S Pope
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.446

8.  Personal care product use and urinary phthalate metabolite and paraben concentrations during pregnancy among women from a fertility clinic.

Authors:  Joe M Braun; Allan C Just; Paige L Williams; Kristen W Smith; Antonia M Calafat; Russ Hauser
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 5.563

9.  Endocrine disruptors and asthma-associated chemicals in consumer products.

Authors:  Robin E Dodson; Marcia Nishioka; Laurel J Standley; Laura J Perovich; Julia Green Brody; Ruthann A Rudel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and female cancer: Informing the patients.

Authors:  Dominik Rachoń
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.514

View more
  3 in total

1.  The importance of addressing early life environmental exposures in cancer epidemiology.

Authors:  Nicole M Niehoff; Mandy Goldberg; Alexandra J White
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2022-04-05

2.  Socioeconomic and racial/ethnic differences in use of endocrine-disrupting chemical-associated personal care product categories among pregnant women.

Authors:  Emma V Preston; Marissa Chan; Katerina Nozhenko; Andrea Bellavia; Marissa C Grenon; David E Cantonwine; Thomas F McElrath; Tamarra James-Todd
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 8.431

3.  Phthalate exposure among U.S. college-aged women: Biomonitoring in an undergraduate student cohort (2016-2017) and trends from the National Health and Examination Survey (NHANES, 2005-2016).

Authors:  Barbara A Beckingham; Kerry Wischusen; Joanna P Walker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.