Literature DB >> 31547798

Stent Design, Restenosis and Recurrent Stroke After Carotid Artery Stenting in the International Carotid Stenting Study.

Mandy D Müller1, John Gregson2, Dominick J H McCabe3,4, Paul J Nederkoorn5, H Bart van der Worp6, Gert J de Borst7, Trevor Cleveland8, Thomas Wolff9, Stefan T Engelter1,10, Philippe A Lyrer1, Martin M Brown, Leo H Bonati1,11.   

Abstract

Background and Purpose- Open-cell carotid artery stents are associated with a higher peri-procedural stroke risk than closed-cell stents. However, the effect of stent design on long-term durability of carotid artery stenting (CAS) is unknown. We compared the medium- to long-term risk of restenosis and ipsilateral stroke between patients treated with open-cell stents versus closed-cell stents in the ICSS (International Carotid Stenting Study). Methods- Patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis were randomized to CAS or endarterectomy and followed with duplex ultrasound for a median of 4.0 years. We analyzed data from patients with completed CAS procedures, known stent design, and available ultrasound follow-up. The primary outcome, moderate or higher restenosis (≥50%) was defined as a peak systolic velocity of >1.3 m/s on ultrasound or occlusion of the treated internal carotid artery and analyzed with interval-censored models. Results- Eight hundred fifty-five patients were allocated to CAS. Seven hundred fourteen patients with completed CAS and known stent design were included in the current analysis. Of these, 352 were treated with open-cell and 362 with closed-cell stents. Moderate or higher restenosis occurred significantly less frequently in patients treated with open-cell (n=113) than closed-cell stents (n=154; 5-year risks were 35.5% versus 46.0%; unadjusted hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53-0.88). There was no significant difference in the risk of severe restenosis (≥70%) after open-cell stenting (n=27) versus closed-cell stenting (n=43; 5-year risks, 8.6% versus 12.7%; unadjusted hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.37-1.05). The risk of ipsilateral stroke beyond 30 days after treatment was similar with open-cell and closed-cell stents (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.35-1.75). Conclusions- Moderate or higher restenosis after CAS occurred less frequently in patients treated with open-cell stents than closed-cell stents. However, both stent designs were equally effective at preventing recurrent stroke during follow-up. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.isrctn.com/. Unique identifier: ISRCTN25337470.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carotid artery; carotid stenosis; endarterectomy; stents; stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31547798     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  8 in total

1.  Prognostic value of color Doppler ultrasound, D-dimer, and Lp-PLA2 levels in carotid atherosclerotic stenosis.

Authors:  Yu Kong; Ying Kong; Yunyi Dai; Jianping Zhang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  Comparison of Restenosis Risk in Single-Layer versus Dual-Layer Carotid Stents: A Duplex Ultrasound Evaluation.

Authors:  Ján Sýkora; Kamil Zeleňák; Martin Vorčák; Martin Števík; Martina Sýkorová; Jozef Sivák; Marek Rovňák; Jana Zapletalová; Juraj Mužík; Igor Šinák; Egon Kurča; Lukas Meyer; Jens Fiehler
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 2.797

3.  Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Early Clinical Outcome and Stent Restenosis after Carotid Artery Stenting.

Authors:  Alexandru Achim; Dávid Lackó; Artúr Hüttl; Csaba Csobay-Novák; Ádám Csavajda; Péter Sótonyi; Béla Merkely; Balázs Nemes; Zoltán Ruzsa
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.061

4.  Carotid endarterectomy with stent removal for recurring in-stent restenosis: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Yuichi Takahashi; Tetsuhiro Higashida; Takanori Uchida; Saiko Watanabe; Ryuzaburo Kanazawa
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2022-05-06

5.  Risk Factors for Residual Stenosis After Carotid Artery Stenting.

Authors:  Yunlu Tao; Yang Hua; Lingyun Jia; Liqun Jiao; Beibei Liu
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 6.  Current status and outlook of biodegradable metals in neuroscience and their potential applications as cerebral vascular stent materials.

Authors:  Ming Li; Miaowen Jiang; Yuan Gao; Yufeng Zheng; Zhi Liu; Chen Zhou; Tao Huang; Xuenan Gu; Ang Li; Jiancheng Fang; Xunming Ji
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-10-11

Review 7.  Clinical Outcomes of Second- versus First-Generation Carotid Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Adam Mazurek; Krzysztof Malinowski; Kenneth Rosenfield; Laura Capoccia; Francesco Speziale; Gianmarco de Donato; Carlo Setacci; Christian Wissgott; Pasqualino Sirignano; Lukasz Tekieli; Andrey Karpenko; Waclaw Kuczmik; Eugenio Stabile; David Christopher Metzger; Max Amor; Adnan H Siddiqui; Antonio Micari; Piotr Pieniążek; Alberto Cremonesi; Joachim Schofer; Andrej Schmidt; Piotr Musialek
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  Casper Versus Precise Stent for the Treatment of Patients with Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Authors:  Nebiyat F Belachew; Severin Baschung; William Almiri; Ruben Encinas; Johannes Kaesmacher; Tomas Dobrocky; Christoph J Schankin; Mathias Abegg; Eike I Piechowiak; Andreas Raabe; Jan Gralla; Pasquale Mordasini
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.649

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.