| Literature DB >> 31547553 |
Jipeng Jin1, Liping Zhang2, Jianlei Jia3,4, Qian Chen5, Zan Yuan6, Xiaoyan Zhang7, Weibo Sun8, Cunming Ma9, Fafang Xu10, Shoujun Zhan11, Limin Ma12, Guihua Zhou13.
Abstract
The jejunum is the primary organ for digestion and nutrient absorption in mammals. The development of the jejunum in suckling piglets directly affects their growth performance post-weaning. The jejunum microbiome plays an important role in proliferation, metabolism, apoptosis, immune, and homeostasis of the epithelial cells within the organ. The composition and diversity of the gut microbiome is susceptible to the protein composition of the diet. Therefore, the effects of maternal low-protein diets on piglets' intestinal microbial structure and function have become a hot topic of study. Herein, a maternal low-protein diet was formulated to explore the effects on jejunum microbiome composition and metabolic profiles in Bamei suckling piglets. Using 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) sequencing in conjunction with bioinformatics analysis, 21 phyla and 297 genera were identified within the gut microflora. The top 10 phyla and 10 genera are within the gut bacteria. Next, KEGG analysis showed that the low-protein diet significantly increased the gut microbial composition, transport and catabolism, immune system, global and overview maps, amino acid metabolism, metabolism of cofactors and vitamins, endocrine system, biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites, signal transduction, environmental adaptation, and cell motility. Taken together, low-protein diets do not appear to affect the reproductive performance of Bamei sows but improved the gut microbiome of the suckling piglets as well as reduced the probability of diarrhea. The data presented here provide new insights on the dietary protein requirements to support the Huzhu Bamei pig industry.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA; bioinformatics; jejunum microbiota; maternal low-protein diet; suckling piglets
Year: 2019 PMID: 31547553 PMCID: PMC6826398 DOI: 10.3390/ani9100713
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Composition and nutrient levels of diets (DM basis).
| Item | Content (%) a | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| VLP | LP | NP | |
| Ingredient composition | |||
| Corn | 56.14 | 50.60 | 44.90 |
| Soybean meal | 0.70 | 4.50 | 9.80 |
| Rapeseed Meal | 0.00 | 2.50 | 2.70 |
| Wheat bran | 38.36 | 37.78 | 38.14 |
| Lys | 0.45 | 0.34 | 0.20 |
| Met | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.05 |
| Thr | 0.21 | 0.15 | 0.10 |
| Trp | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| Val | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.10 |
| 4% premix b | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
| Nutrient levels | |||
| DE (MJ/kg) | 11.71 | 11.72 | 11.73 |
| CP | 10.00 | 12.04 | 14.00 |
| Lys | 0.80 | 0.81 | 0.80 |
| Met+Cys | 0.31 | 0.33 | 0.31 |
| Thr | 0.36 | 0.35 | 0.35 |
| Trp | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| Val | 0.25 | 0.26 | 0.23 |
| Total Ca | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.62 |
| Total P | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.54 |
| Salt | 3.20 | 3.20 | 3.20 |
Note: NP = normal protein; LP = low-protein; VLP = very low-protein; DE = digestible energy; CP = crude protein; b The premix during pregnancy provided the following per kilogram of diets: vitamin A: 3.52 kIU; vitamin E: 20 kIU; vitamin D3: 0.76 kIU; vitamin K3: 2.6 mg; vitamin B2: 9.52 mg; vitamin B3: 24 mg; vitamin B5: 45 mg; Cu: 4 mg; Fe: 10 mg; Zn: 40 mg; Mn: 16 mg; Ca: 15%; Total P: 1.8%; NaCl: 8%; Water: 10%.
Effect of protein level on litter sizes in Huzhu Bamei sows.
| Item | NP | LP | VLP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Litter size | 11.80 ± 0.61 b | 13.40 ± 0.52 a | 12.40 ± 0.40 ab |
| Live litter rate (%) | 87.47 ± 4.45 | 85.64 ± 4.82 | 86.09 ± 2.72 |
| Birth weight (kg) | 0.91 ± 0.20 a | 0.84 ± 0.20 b | 0.90 ± 0.19 a |
| Diarrhea rate (%) | 30.93 ± 13.56 a | 20.43 ± 7.27 b | 19.90 ± 4.88 b |
Noe: In the same row, values with no letter or the same letter superscripts mean no significant difference (p > 0.05), while with different small letter superscripts mean significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Venn diagram of shared operational taxonomic units (OTUs). The number of overlapping parts is the total number of OTUs among the groups, while the number of non-overlapping parts is the unique number of OTUs among the groups. NP = normal protein; LP = low-protein; VLP = very low-protein.
Figure 2Taxonomic profiles of the gut bacteria in NP, LP, and VLP piglets from 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The relative abundance of the top 10 phylum (A) and the top 10 genus (B) of gut bacteria present in NP, LP and VLP piglets. NP = normal protein; LP = low-protein; VLP = very low-protein.
Figure 3Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test analysis histogram. The bacterial phyla (A), genera (B), and qPCR (C) among NP, LP, and VLP. Bacterial taxa with mean relative abundance greater than 0.1% in least one group are included. Values are expressed as mean ± SE. The symbols represent significant difference among NP, LP, and VLP, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, NP = normal protein; LP = low-protein; VLP = very low-protein.
Figure 4Comparison of gut bacterial community among NP, LP, and VLP. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plot (A), UPGMA tree (B), all revealing significant differences among NP, LP, and VLP piglets based on the weighted unifrac distances of OTU community. NP = normal protein; LP = low-protein; VLP = very low-protein.