| Literature DB >> 31547459 |
Xue Zhang1,2,3, Congcong Lin4,5, Waikei Chan6, Kanglun Liu7, Aiping Lu8,9, Ge Lin10, Rong Hu11,12, Hongcan Shi13,14, Hongqi Zhang15, Zhijun Yang16,17.
Abstract
Liposomal nanotechnology has a great potential to overcome the current major problems of chemotherapy. However, the lack of penetrability and targetability retards the successful delivery of liposomal carriers. Previously, we showed that BR2 peptide modification endowed cantharidin-loaded liposomes with intracellular penetration that enhanced the drug cytotoxic effects. Here, we aimed to improve the targeting delivery of drugs into cancer cells via highly expressed carbonic anhydrase IX (CA IX) receptors by modifying our previous catharidin-loaded BR2-liposomes with anti-CA IX antibody. A higher cellular uptake of dual-functional liposomes (DF-Lp) than other treatments was observed. Induction of CA IX over-expressing resulted in a higher cellular binding of DF-Lp; subsequently, blocking with excess antibodies resulted in a decreased cancer-cell association, indicating a specific targeting property of our liposomes towards CA IX expressed cells. After 3h tracking, most of the liposomes were located around the nucleus which confirmed the involvement of targeting intracellular delivery. Cantharidin loaded DF-Lp exhibited enhanced cytotoxicity in vitro and was most effective in controlling tumor growth in vivo in an orthotopic hepatocellular carcinoma model compared to other groups. Collectively, our results presented the advantage of the BR2 peptide and CA IX antibody combination to elevate the therapeutic potential of cantharidin loaded DF-liposomes.Entities:
Keywords: BR2 peptide; cantharidin; carbonic anhydrase IX; dual-functionalized liposomes; hepatocellular carcinoma
Year: 2019 PMID: 31547459 PMCID: PMC6767275 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24183332
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Schematic illustrations of DSPE-PEG-anti-CA IX Ab conjugation and the verification of the reduced antibody conjugation to micelles or liposomes by SDS-PAGE analysis with Coomassie blue staining.
Characterization of different liposome formulations (mean ± SD).
| Liposome Type | Liposome Component (Molar Ratio) | Particle Size (nm) | PDI |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA IX-Lp/CTD | SPC/DSPE-PEG/DSPE-PEG-Mal (95.8:3.8:0.4) | 75.7 ± 1.5 | 0.135 ± 0.006 |
| BR2-Lp/CTD | SPC/DSPE-PEG/DSPE-PEG-BR2 (96:2.0:2.0) | 92.4 ± 1.2 | 0.261 ± 0.022 |
| DF-Lp/CTD | SPC/DSPE-PEG/DSPE-PEG-BR2/DSPE-PEG-Mal (95.2:1.9:2.0:0.87) | 98.3 ± 1.8 | 0.256 ± 0.003 |
Figure 2Cell association of NBD-DPPE labeled DF-liposomes compared to BR2-Lp and CA IX-Lp were imaged by CLSM after 3 h incubation with HepG2 cells. Scale bar = 25 μm. NBD-DPPE labeled liposomes showed green, and nuclei stained with Hoechst 33342 showed blue.
Figure 3(A) Western blot analysis of CA IX expression in hypoxic and normoxic HepG2 cells. (B) Fluorescent images of CA IX positive HepG2 under hypoxic and CA IX negative HepG2 under normoxic conditions after treatment with DF-Lp formulation. Scale bar = 50 μm. (C) In vitro competition assay to detect targeting of CA IX by DF-Lp in hypoxic HepG2 cells. Cells were pre-incubated with (+) or without (−) anti-CA IX Ab for 15 min and then incubated with DF-Lp for an additional 30 min. Liposomes are shown by green fluorescence of NBD-DPPE by fluorescent microscopy. Scale bar = 100 μm. (D) In vitro competition assay to detect specific targeting of CA IX by DF-Lp in hypoxic HepG2 cells. Cells were pre-incubated with (+) anti-CA IX Ab or with (+) unspecific Ab for 15 min and then incubated with DF-Lp for additional 30 min. Liposomes are shown by green fluorescence of NBD-DPPE by fluorescent microscopy. Scale bar = 75 μm.
Figure 4Colocalization of NBD-DPPE labeled dual-modified liposomes (DF-Lp, green) and endosomes/lysosomes (red). Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue). Scale bar = 25 μm.
Figure 5Cell viability assay of different liposomal formulations. HepG2-red-Fluc cells grown in black or transparent 96-well plate were treated with different CTD-liposomal formulations with CTD concentration at 1 µM, 10 µM, and 25 µM for 24 h. Then the bioluminescent intensity were tested by IVIS imaging systems (A) and the relative cell inhibitory effects were determined by MTT assay (B), respectively. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 6(A) In vitro imaging analysis of luciferase activity of HepG2-red-Fluc cells. (B) The photon flux plot as a function of increasing number of HepG2-red-Fluc cells obtained from IVIS each well (n = 3). (C) Representative in vivo imaging of the HCC orthotopic mice bearing luciferase-expressing tumors derived from HepG2-red-Fluc cells following i.v. injection of DF-Lp/DiR using the IVIS imaging system.
Figure 7In vivo anticancer efficacy of DF-Lp/CTD on HepG2-red-Fluc orthotopic HCC tumors. (A) Scheme of HepG2-red-Fluc tumor inoculation and treatment at CTD dosage of 0.4 mg/kg. (B) Representative live IVIS images of HepG2-red-Fluc cell-bearing tumors with administration of D-luciferin with saline-treated mice served as a control. (C) Quantitative measures of luminescence (mean ± SEM) of the total flux of the tumors in the mice (n = 5). Arrows indicate drug administration time. * p < 0.05. (D) Bodyweight profiles of mice in different groups (n = 5, mean ± SEM).