| Literature DB >> 31547444 |
Hao-Hsi Kao1,2, Chang-Yi Kuo3, Kuo-Su Chen4,5, Jyh-Ping Chen6,7,8,9.
Abstract
Mesothelial cells are specific epithelial cells that are lined in the serosal cavity and internal organs. Nonetheless, few studies have explored the possibility to culture mesothelial cells in a three-dimensional (3D) scaffold for tissue engineering applications. Towards this end, we fabricated macroporous scaffolds from gelatin and gelatin/hyaluronic acid (HA) by cryogelation, and elucidated the influence of HA on cryogel properties and the cellular phenotype of mesothelial cells cultured within the 3D scaffolds. The incorporation of HA was found not to significantly change the pore size, porosity, water uptake kinetics, and swelling ratios of the cryogel scaffolds, but led to a faster scaffold degradation in the collagenase solution. Adding 5% HA in the composite cryogels also decreased the ultimate compressive stress (strain) and toughness of the scaffold, but enhanced the elastic modulus. From the in vitro cell culture, rat mesothelial cells showed quantitative cell viability in gelatin (G) and gelatin/HA (GH) cryogels. Nonetheless, mesothelial cells cultured in GH cryogels showed a change in the cell morphology and cytoskeleton arrangement, reduced cell proliferation rate, and downregulation of the mesothelium specific maker gene expression. The production of key mesothelium proteins E-cadherin and calretinin were also reduced in the GH cryogels. Choosing the best G cryogels for in vivo studies, the cell/cryogel construct was used for the transplantation of allograft mesothelial cells for mesothelium reconstruction in rats. A mesothelium layer similar to the native mesothelium tissue could be obtained 21 days post-implantation, based on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemical staining.Entities:
Keywords: 3D cell culture; cryogel; gelatin; hyaluronic acid; mesothelial cells; scaffold; tissue engineering
Year: 2019 PMID: 31547444 PMCID: PMC6770111 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20184527
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1The SEM micrographs (A) and porosity (B) of gelatin (G) and gelatin/hyaluronic acid (GH) cryogels. Bar = 100 μm.
Figure 2The water uptake kinetics in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (A) and degradation kinetics in collagenase (B) of G and GH cryogels.
Figure 3The typical compressive stress–stain curves of the G and GH cryogels. The lines are fitted curves from Equation (5).
Mechanical properties of G and GH cryogels. Values are the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of five independent measurements.
| Mechanical Property | G | GH |
|---|---|---|
| Compressive elastic modulus at 10% strain (MPa) | 0.15 ± 0.05 | 0.22 ± 0.03 * |
| Compressive elastic modulus at 20% strain (MPa) | 0.31 ± 0.11 | 0.52 ± 0.04 * |
| Compressive elastic modulus at 30% strain (MPa) | 0.64 ± 0.23 | 1.26 ± 0.16 * |
| Compressive strain to failure (%) | 45.0 ± 4.9 | 32.8 ± 2.2 * |
| Compressive stress to failure (MPa) | 0.21 ± 0.04 | 0.17 ± 0.02 * |
| Toughness (kJ/m3) | 35.0 ± 2.6 | 22.5 ± 5.4 * |
| Compressive stiffness at 0.2 mm displacement (kN/m) | 4.45 ± 1.55 | 6.51 ± 0.67 * |
| Compressive stiffness at 0.4 mm displacement (kN/m) | 8.99 ± 3.08 | 14.54 ± 0.84 * |
| Compressive stiffness at 0.6 mm displacement (kN/m) | 18.20 ± 6.19 | 32.63 ± 3.68 * |
* p < 0.05 compared with G.
Figure 4The cell morphology from SEM observation (A) and cell proliferation from DNA assays (B) of mesothelial cells cultured in G and GH cryogels. Bar = 50 μm. * p < 0.05 compared with G.
Figure 5Confocal microscopy observation of mesothelial cells cultured in G and GH by live/dead (A) (bar = 150 μm) and nucleus/cytoskeleton staining (B) (bar = 30 μm). The live cells were stained green and the dead cells were stained red in (A), while the cell nuclei were stained blue by Hoechst 33342 and the actin cytoskeleton was stained red by rhodamine-phalloidin in (B). Both the merged top-view image and cross-sectional-view image are included in (A).
Figure 6Gene expression of the mesothelial cells cultured in G and GH from a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). * p < 0.05 compared with G.
Figure 7The immunofluorescence (IF) staining of calretinin and E-cadherin of the mesothelial cells cultured in G and GH for seven days. The protein was stained green by a fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated secondary antibody, while the nuclei were stained blue by Hoechst 33342. Bar = 30 μm.
Figure 8Gross view of the initial mesothelium wound and the transplanted cell/scaffold constructs at different time points post-implantation.
Figure 9Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of E-cadherin and calretinin of the cell/cryogel constructs 7- and 21-days post-implantation (bar = 20 μm). Native peritoneum tissue was used for comparison. The inserts are enlarged views on the surface of the specimen (bar = 10 μm).