| Literature DB >> 35030968 |
Jia Xin Yap1, C P Leo1, Nazlina Haiza Mohd Yasin2, Pau Loke Show3, Dinh-Toi Chu4, Vijai Singh5, C J C Derek1.
Abstract
Traditionally existing 2D culture scaffold has been inappropriately validated due to the failure in generating the precise therapeutic response. Therefore, this leads to the fabrication of 3D culture scaffold resolving the limitations in the in vivo environment. In recent years, tissue engineering played an important role in the field of bio-medical engineering. Biopolymer material, a novel natural material with excellent properties of nontoxic and biodegradable merits can be served as culture scaffold. This review summarizes the modifications of natural biopolymeric culture scaffold with different crosslinkers and their application. In addition, this review provides the recent progress of natural biopolymeric culture scaffold mainly focusing on their properties, synthesizing and modification and application.Entities:
Keywords: Biopolymer; agarose; cell culture; cellulosic; chitosan; collagen; culture scaffold; gelatin; silk fibroin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35030968 PMCID: PMC8974151 DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2021.2024322
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioengineered ISSN: 2165-5979 Impact factor: 3.269
Examples of commercial 3D culture scaffolds
| Commercial 3D Culture Scaffold | Price | Manufacturer | Main composition of scaffold | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alvetex™ 3D Cell Growth Plates | $ 247.62 – $ 287.67 | Thermo Scientific | Synthetic polystyrene scaffold. | [ |
| Cellusponge-Collagen | $ 1852.74 | Sigma | Plates coated with inert hydroxypropyl cellulose covered with collagen. | [ |
| Nanofiber cell culture dish | $ 41.87 | Sigma | Nanofiber cell culture dish, with aligned nanofibers. | [ |
| PureCoat™ Amine 100 mm Dish | $ 144.60 | Corning | A cell culture flask coated with fibronectin peptide. | [ |
Recent reviews on culture scaffolds
| Recent review papers | Authors and Year |
|---|---|
| Fabrication techniques of biomimetic scaffolds in three-dimensional cell culture: A review | [ |
| Recent advances in ice templating: From biomimetic composites to cell culture scaffolds and tissue engineering | [ |
| Colloidal systems toward 3D cell culture scaffolds | [ |
| Scaffold-free 3-D cell sheet technique bridges the gap between 2-D cell culture and animal models | [ |
| Scaffolds for 3D Cell Culture and Cellular Agriculture Applications Derived From Non-animal Sources | [ |
| Graphene inks for the 3D printing of cell culture scaffolds and related molecular arrays | [ |
| Bioreactor synergy with 3D scaffolds: New era for stem cells culture | [ |
| Paper as a scaffold for cell cultures: Teaching an old material new tricks | [ |
| Future of spermatogonial stem cell culture: Application of nanofiber scaffolds | [ |
| Macroporous Hydrogel Scaffolds for Three-Dimensional Cell Culture and Tissue Engineering | [ |
| Scaffolds for 3D in vitro culture of neural lineage cells | [ |
Collagen culture scaffold
| Crosslinkers | Mechanical properties | Porosity | Pore size | Type of cultured cells | Medium used | Maximum growth rate | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylamino-propyl) carbodiimide (EDC) and N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) | 6.71 ± 3.2 kPA and 6.73 ± 1.7 kPA for collagen-only and collagen- chondroitin sulfate scaffolds | N/A | 9.48 ± 4.7 µm | Primary porcine trabecular meshwork cells | DMEM with 10% FBS and 1% pen/strep | Fluorescent imaging with 90% or more of the top surface of the collagen scaffold was covered with cells | [ |
| EDC | N/A | N/A | N/A | Multipotent human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) | Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), α-minimum essential medium (α-MEM) | 2.4 × 106 cells/cm3 | [ |
| Gradient crosslinked | N/A | N/A | 1.6 × 108 pores/cm2 | human small intestinal monolayers | expansion medium (EM) | Protein expression are more than 5 pmol/mg | [ |
| N/A | Mechanical performance of the brain tissue: 6.9 kPa | N/A | N/A | Human neural stem cells, astrocytes, and microglia | N/A | cell viability of 84% | [ |
| PFA, glutaraldehyde and osmium tetroxide 4 wt.% | Young’s modulus: 33 ± 12 kPa, Ultimate tensile Stress: 33 ± 6 kPa and Strain at failure: 105 ± 28% | N/A | 25 to 95 µm | Normal Human Dermal Fibroblasts (NHDFs) and C2C12 murine myoblasts | low glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) | The cells show high proliferation rate under fluorescent microscopy | [ |
| N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | MLO-Y4 osteocytes | Minimum Essential Medium-α modification (α-MEM) | Fraction of dead cells of 0.0276 ± 0.0040 | [ |
| N/A | N/A | N/A | 50 to 150 μm | human adipose-derived stem cells | DMEM | Quantification of differentiation rate of 75% | [ |
| Glutaraldehyde | N/A | 81 ± 3.9% | 259.2 ± 45.2 µm | Hepatocyte (HepG2), liver cell cultivation | DMEM/high glucose | Cell proliferation with CCK-8 assay results of 2.7 at 450 nm absorbance, cell counting up to 5.8 × 105 cells per piece | [ |
| N/A | Young’s Modulus: | N/A | N/A | Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) and osteoblasts | Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium | Cell proliferation assay by CCK-8 analysis for 21 days: 800% | [ |
| EDC/NHS | Tensile Modulus: 31 ± 4.4 MPa | 92.18 ± 2.05% | 138.06 ± 59.40 µm | Human umbilical vein endothelial cells | Endothelial Cell Growth Medium 2 | Percentage of EdU-positive cells 24 h after seeding: 27% | [ |
| N/A | Max elevation: 0.05 mm | N/A | N/A | Human dermal fibroblast cell | Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium | Cell viability (LDH assay): 53 U/L | [ |
Figure 1.Fluorescent photomicrographs of trabecular meshwork cells seeded on the surface of collagen only and collagen-chondroitin sulfate scaffolds cells scaffold. The cells were labeled with DAPI (blue) and glutaraldehyde fixation (green). 100,000 cells were seeded on each scaffold. In the z-stack images, the top surface of the scaffold is at the bottom of the image. Scale bars represent 50 µm [25].
Chitosan Culture Scaffold
| Crosslinkers | Mechanical properties | Porosity | Swelling degree | Type of cultured cells | Medium used | Maximum growth rate | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Tensile strength: 1.33 ± 0.26 MPa | 86.69 ± 1.97% | N/A | dental pulp stem cells | minimum essential medium Eagle | Cell number: 5 × 105 cells/scaffold | [ |
| N/A | Young’s modulus of 27.7 kPa for 8% chitosan-hyaluronic acid | >90% | N/A | human glioblastoma cells (U-87 MG) | minimum essential medium | Cell number: 2.0 × 105 at day 9 | [ |
| Form of hydrogel | N/A | N/A | N/A | Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells | High glucose Dulbecco’s modi fied eagle’s medium | N/A | [ |
| Form of hydrogel | Tensile strength: 4.1 MPa | N/A | 50% | Mesenchymal stem cells | AmnioGrow, DMEM and KSFM | N/A | [ |
| 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylamino-propyl)carbodiimide (EDC) and N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) | N/A | N/A | N/A | Hepatocyte (Human liver cells) | Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Hight Glucose) | Cell proliferation (CCK8 assay at 450 nm): 2.3 | [ |
| N/A | Stress at 50% compression: 12 kPa | 68% | N/A | Osteoblast/Osteoclast (Bone cells) | alpha minimum essential medium | 3.2 × 105 cells per scaffold | [ |
Figure 2.Gene expression and morphology of cells cultured on different substrates. (a) Relative expression displaying increased drug resistance and invasion specific genes in 3D scaffolds by U87-MG RFP cells after 12 days of culture (n = 3). Error bars represent standard error of mean. Scanning electron micrographs of GBM cells in (b) 2% Chitosan and hyaluronic acid (CHA), (c) 4% CHA, and (d) 8% CHA where tumor spheroid size increases with increasing stiffness. Histological staining (H&E) of tumor spheroids on (e) 2% CHA, (f) 4% CHA, and (g) 8% CHA scaffolds. Scale bars represent 100 μm (b-d) and 50 μm (e-g) [37].
Silk fibroin culture scaffold
| Crosslinkers | Mechanical properties | Porosity | Pore size | Swelling degree | Type of cultured cells | Medium used | Maximum growth rate | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Interfacial strength: 57.3 ± 0.9 kPa | N/A | N/A | N/A | osteoblast and macrophage | Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium | Bone formation: 70% | [ |
| N/A | N/A | 71 ± 2% | 130 ± 23 μm | 95.8 ± 1% | apical papilla stem cells | Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium | DNA concentration: 120 ng/µl | [ |
| N/A | N/A | 42.06 ± 4.83% | 100 µm to approximately 200 µm | N/A | Osteoblast | Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium | Cell adhesion rate: 95% | [ |
| N/A | Young’s modulus: 0.5 ± 0.6 MPa | N/A | N/A | N/A | bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells | Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium | Cell viability: OD405 value 19.289 to 35.174 | [ |
| N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | mesenchymal stem cells | Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium | DNA quantification: 0.6 sGAG/DNA | [ |
| N/A | N/A | 82.2 ± 1.3% | 3 to 212 µm | 255% | mesenchymal stem cells | Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium | Cell density: 900 cells/mm2 | [ |
| N/A | N/A | 86 to 90% | 100.93 ± 1.36 μm | N/A | Human mesenchymal stem cells | Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium | Cell distribution: 550 ± 42 cell/mm2 | [ |
| N/A | N/A | >96% | 150–170 µm | N/A | Articular chondrocytes and adipose-derived human mesenchymal stem cells | Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium | DNA content: 7500 ng/g of scaffold | [ |
| PAMAM dendrimers (0.5% EDC and 1% NHS) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | L929 fibroblast cells | McCoy’s 5 A medium | Cell viability: 110% | [ |
| N/A | Stress: 680 kPa | 88.8% | 300 um | 758.9% | Stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED) | α-modified Eagle’s medium | Albumin secreted: 1.4 g/dL | [ |
Figure 3.Confocal microscopy images of chondrogenic differentiated hMSCs on (a and c) SF/CS-Gl-Ch scaffolds and (b and d) pellet culture, where red represents immunofluorescence of Col II in a-b and Acan in c-d. Green fluorescence represents β-actin stained by phalloidin and blue corresponds to nucleus stained by Hoechst 33258 [47].
Gelatin culture scaffold
| Crosslinkers | Mechanical properties | Porosity | Pore size | Type of cultured cells | Medium used | Maximum growth rate | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Into hydrogel form | N/A | 2.99% | 4 to 6 µm | HeLa cells (immortalized human cervical cancer cells) | Dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (DMEM) | Cell viability of 95% | [ |
| N/A | 1.26 ± 0.16 MPa | close to 90% | 102.7 ± 39.9 µm | Mesothelial Cells and Mesothelium Tissue | Dulbecco’s Modified Eagles Medium (DMEM) and fetal bovine serum (FBS) | DNA content of cells: 1.38 µg | [ |
| Ethylene dichloride (EDC)/N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) | N/A | N/A | N/A | Cornea epithelial cells | Dulbecco’s Modified Eagles Medium | Cell number: 2.8 × 104 to 3.8 × 104 cells | [ |
| EDC/NHS | 4 MPa | N/A | N/A | Endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells | Fetal calf | Increased significantly in HE staining results | [ |
Figure 4.3D culture in porous structures of gelatin-methacrylate hydrogel scaffolds. (a) Representative scanning electron micrographs showing porous structures of gelatin-methacrylate hydrogel scaffolds fabricated with no porogen (left) and 15% (w/v) of gelatin porogen (right). (b) Bar graph presenting porosity measured in the gelatin-methacrylate scaffolds shown in (A). Error bars represent standard deviation. (c) Optical micrograph showing a HeLa cell-seeded gelatin-methacrylate scaffold at seeding density of 5 × 106 cell/ml. White dotted squares (center and border) indicate regions of interest for estimation of cell viability as presented in (d) and (e). (D) Fluorescence micrographs showing live (green) and dead (red) cells at the center (top) and border (bottom) in gelatin-methacrylate scaffolds fabricated with no porogen (left) and 15% (w/v) of gelatin porogen (right). (E) Bar graph displaying cell viability at the center (white) and border (gray) in gelatin-methacrylate scaffolds fabricated with no porogen and 15% (w/v) of gelatin porogen [51].
Cellulosic culture scaffold
| Type of cellulose | Mechanical properties | Porosity | Pore size | Type of cultured cells | Medium used | Maximum growth rate | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacterial cellulose | Tensile strength: 157.90 ± 23 MPa | N/A | N/A | Epidermal cells cultivation | Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium | Cell area: 83.3 µm2 | [ |
| Cellulose acetate | Elongation at break: 247.00 ± 47.27% | 91.83 ± 14.62% | N/A | Bacteria cells | Nutrient agar | Reduced bacteria inhibition | [ |
| Bacterial cellulose | N/A | N/A | N/A | Human dermal fibroblast cultivation | Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium | Antibacterial rates: 96.6 ± 0.5% against | [ |
| Bacterial cellulose | N/A | N/A | N/A | U251 Human glioblastoma cancer cell line | Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium | Cell viability: 110% | [ |
Figure 5.Schematic diagram of BC based scaffolds [59].
Agarose culture scaffolds
| Crosslinkers | Mechanical properties | Porosity | Pore size | Type of cultured cells | Medium used | Maximum growth rate | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | neuron cells for neuroregeneration | Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium | Cell viability: 1.1 | [ |
| N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Corneal epithelial cells | Dulbecco modifid Eagle medium | Wound healing surface area: 25 mm2 | [ |
| N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Human dermal fibroblasts | Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium | Cell growth rate:182% at day 7 | [ |