| Literature DB >> 31547222 |
Takako Nishimura1, Yukari Shinonaga2, Chikoto Nagaishi3, Rie Imataki4, Michiko Takemura5, Keiichi Kagami6, Yoko Abe7, Kyoko Harada8, Kenji Arita9.
Abstract
In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of the addition of powdery cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) on the mechanical properties of glass ionomer cement (GIC) without negatively affecting its chemical properties. Commercial GIC was reinforced with powdery CNFs (2-8 wt.%) and characterized in terms of flexural strength, compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, and fluoride-ion release properties. Powdery CNFs and samples subjected to flexural strength testing were observed via scanning electron microscopy. CNF incorporation was found to significantly improve the flexural, compressive, and diametral tensile strengths of GIC, and the corresponding composite was shown to contain fibrillar aggregates of nanofibers interspersed in the GIC matrix. No significant differences in fluoride-ion release properties were observed between the control GIC and the CNF-GIC composite. Thus, powdery CNFs were concluded to be a promising GIC reinforcement agent.Entities:
Keywords: cellulose nanofiber; compressive strength; diametral tensile strength; flexural strength; fluoride-ion release; glass ionomer cement
Year: 2019 PMID: 31547222 PMCID: PMC6803938 DOI: 10.3390/ma12193077
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Results of flexural strength, compressive strength, and diametral tensile strength tests.
| Group | Flexural Strength (MPa) | Compressive Strength (MPa) | Diametral Tensile Strength (MPa) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (S.D.) |
| Mean (S.D.) |
| Mean (S.D.) |
| |
| Control | 16.36 (3.12) | – | 102.26 (9.40) | – | 10.61 (1.39) | – |
| +2%STAR | 21.46 (3.84) | * | 111.24 (10.34) | NS | 11.36 (1.43) | NS |
| +4%STAR | 24.13 (2.07) | *** | 119.59 (7.54) | *** | 12.28 (1.79) | NS |
| +6%STAR | 23.72 (2.37) | *** | 114.43 (7.55) | * | 13.59 (0.72) | *** |
| +8%STAR | 20.60 (2.19) | * | 117.26 (3.52) | * | 12.58 (1.18) | * |
1t—test for control group. NS: no significant difference, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 1SEM images of STAR ((A) ×500 and (D) ×2500), control GIC ((B) ×1000 and (E) ×2500) and 8% STAR-containing GIC ((C) ×1000 and (F) ×2500) samples.
Figure 2Amounts of fluoride ions released from control and STAR-containing GICs. There are no significant differences between all group at each period (ANOVA/Tukey; p > 0.05).