| Literature DB >> 28825682 |
Nadia Halib1, Francesca Perrone2, Maja Cemazar3, Barbara Dapas4, Rossella Farra5, Michela Abrami6, Gianluca Chiarappa7, Giancarlo Forte8, Fabrizio Zanconati9, Gabriele Pozzato10, Luigi Murena11, Nicola Fiotti12, Romano Lapasin13, Laura Cansolino14, Gabriele Grassi15, Mario Grassi16.
Abstract
Because of its high biocompatibility, bio-degradability, low-cost and easy availability, cellulose finds application in disparate areas of research. Here we focus our attention on the most recent and attractive potential applications of cellulose in the biomedical field. We first describe the chemical/structural composition of cellulose fibers, the cellulose sources/features and cellulose chemical modifications employed to improve its properties. We then move to the description of cellulose potential applications in biomedicine. In this field, cellulose is most considered in recent research in the form of nano-sized particle, i.e., nanofiber cellulose (NFC) or cellulose nanocrystal (CNC). NFC is obtained from cellulose via chemical and mechanical methods. CNC can be obtained from macroscopic or microscopic forms of cellulose following strong acid hydrolysis. NFC and CNC are used for several reasons including the mechanical properties, the extended surface area and the low toxicity. Here we present some potential applications of nano-sized cellulose in the fields of wound healing, bone-cartilage regeneration, dental application and different human diseases including cancer. To witness the close proximity of nano-sized cellulose to the practical biomedical use, examples of recent clinical trials are also reported. Altogether, the described examples strongly support the enormous application potential of nano-sized cellulose in the biomedical field.Entities:
Keywords: bone-cartilage regeneration; cellulose; dental application; drug-cell delivery; siRNA; wound healing
Year: 2017 PMID: 28825682 PMCID: PMC5578343 DOI: 10.3390/ma10080977
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Cellobiose unit (redrawn from [9]).
Figure 2Chemical structure of cellulose (adapted from [11], with permission from © 2010 American Chemical Society).
Figure 3Glucose residues polymerized into individual chain and further assemble into microfibrils and macrofibrils or bundles (redrawn from [9]).
Figure 4Schematic model of bacterial cellulose (BC) microfibrils (right) drawn in comparison with the ‘fringed micelles’ of plant cellulose fibrils (left) (adapted from [18], with permission from © 2000 Springer).
Figure 5Scheme for the formation of bacterial cellulose (adapted from [4], with permission from © 1998 Elsevier).
Typical geometrical characteristics for cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) originating from different cellulose sources and obtained via different procedures.
| Sources of Cellulose | Hydrolysis Procedure | Nanocellulose Dimension | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rice husk fibers | 10.0 mol L−1 of sulphuric acid (pre-heated) at 50 °C for 40 min under continuous stirring. | TEM micrograph Diameter and aspect ratio in the range of 15–20 nm and 10–15 respectively | Johari et al. [ |
| 60 wt % H2SO4 solution at 45 °C for 45 min. | TEM micrograph Length from 50 to 400 nm, with an average value around 200 nm. | Sheltami et al. [ | |
| Coconut husk fiber | 64%brt H2SO4 solution at 45 °C for 30 min under continuous stirring. | TEM micrograph Average length 172.34 ± 8.4 nm. | Ahmad and Ahmad [ |
| kenaf bast fibers | 65 wt % H2SO4 120 min | TEM micrograph Average length 124.3 ± 45.3 Average diameter 11.3 ± 2.6 (nm) | Kargarzade et al. [ |
| waste sugarcane bagasse | 60% (w/v) sulfuric acid (fiber to liquor ratio of 1:20) for 5 h at 50 °C under strong agitation. | TEM micrograph Length and diameter: 170 nm × 35 nm. | Mandal and Chakrabart [ |
| Sisal fibers | 60 wt % sulphuric acid solution at 45 °C, 30 min under continuous agitation. | AFM micrographs Diameter, average size of 30.9 ± 12.5 nm | Mora´n et al. [ |
| 47 wt % sulfuric acid with fiber to solution ratio of 1:20 by refluxing for 3 h at 60 °C under strong agitation. | TEM micrograph | Reddy and Rhim [ | |
| Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch Fiber | 64 wt % sulfuric acid solution under strong agitation at 45 °C for 45 min | TEM micrograph | Lani et al. [ |
| banana pseudostems fibers ( | 50.0 mL of 64% (w/w) sulfuric acid at 45 °C and stirred for 70 min | TEM micrograph | Pereira et al. [ |
| Raw cotton linter | Sulfuric acid (60%, w/w) with a Teflon© bar dispersing element, at 45 °C, for 60 min. | TEM micrograph | Morais et al. [ |
| Ushar ( | 64 wt % sulfuric acid solution with fiber to acid ratio of 1:20 at 50 °C for 75 min with strong agitation | Diameter of 14–24 nm and length of 140–260 nm. | Oun and Rhim [ |
| Micro crystalline cellulose | Enzymatic degradation (Clostridium and Coccobacillus–cellulase producing organisms) | AFM micrograph smaller particles 43 ± 13 nm bigger particles 119 ± 9 nm | Satyamurth and Vigneshwaran [ |
Figure 6(A) The wound causes the formation of the clot (dark red area) and the recruitment of macrophages (blue) and neutrophils (round blue); (B) Fibroblasts (white) are also recruited to the wound site to fill it via collagen production (light brown); (C) Collagen and fibroblats rebuilt the tissue inducing endothelial cells proliferation and vessel generation; (D) Skin stem cells generate mature skin cells obtain the wound closing.
Summary of the nano cellulose-based materials tested in wound healing.
| Type of Cellulose | Material Realesed | In Vitro Tests | In Vivo Tests | Molecular Effects | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLGA/CNC/CMCS | Cur and ANG | HUVEC cells | Skin full-thickness burn Rat model | Increase of ANG expression, improving wound healing | Mo et al. [ |
| Cur/GMs/Col-CNC scaffold | Curcumin | Skin full-thickness burn rat model in which the dorsal skin was artificially burned and infected with | in vitro: antimicrobial activity; | Guo et al. [ | |
| NFC- PEOx-PPOy-PEOx | Octenidine | Vertical diffusion cells and antimicrobial tests | Down regulation of bacterial infection | Alkhatib et al. [ | |
| NFC | Zinc oxide (ZnO) | Skin burn mice model | Enhanced wound healing and tissue regeneration activity | Khalid et al. [ | |
| NFC-X | hASC cells | The cells adhere, migrate and proliferate properly | Mertaniemi et al [ |
PLGA/CNC/CMCS = poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)/cellulose nanocrystals/carboxymethyl chitosan; Cur = curcumin; ANG = angiogenin; Cur/GMs/Col-CNC = Curcumin/gelatin microspheres/collagen/cellulose nanocrystal; NFC- PEOx-PPOy-PEOx = nanofibrillar bacterial cellulose/polyethylene oxide (PEO)/polypropylene oxide (PPO) arranged in a triblock structure; NFC-X = nanofibrillar cellulose with glutaraldehyde cross-links; hASC = human adipose mesenchymal stem cells.
Figure 7Schematic illustration of reparation of PEI-CMCS/pDNA complex nanoparticles, and assembly with Cur, CNC and PLGA; electrospinning was used to deliver the composite nanofibers to rat wounded skin. Redrawn for ref [70]. ANG = Angiogenin; CMCS = carboxymethyl chitosan; Cur = curcumin; pDNA = plasmid DNA; PEI = polyethyleneimine; PLGA = poly(d,l-lactic-co-glycolic acid).
Figure 8Schematic preparation of nanofibrillar cellulose with glutaraldehyde cross-links (NFC-X) threads and their cross-linking with glutaraldehyde for NFC-X threads. Following preparation, NFC-X threads were loaded with human adipose mesenchymal stem cells (hASC); cells could properly, adhere, migrate and proliferate on the NFC-X. Redrawn from ref [79].
Figure 9Bone formation: growth factors induce stem cells to differentiate in osteo-progenitors. These cells, in turn, differentiate into osteoblasts that attach to bone. In addition, endothelial cells (ECs) play an important role in the bone formation promoting its vascularization.
Summary of the nano cellulose-based materials tested in bone regeneration.
| Type of Cellulose | Material Realesed | In Vitro Tests | In Vivo Tests | Molecular Effects | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF/CMC | hMSCs | Uniform deposition and nucleation of Ca/P over the surface of the scaffold. The SF/CMC improved osteoblastic differentiation of hMSCs | Singh et al. [ | ||
| Zr-CS-CMC | Cefazolin | Murine OB-6 cell line | Promotion of osteogenic cell proliferation | Gaire et al. [ | |
| Cotton cellulose | Nano-Ha | HDFCs | Improved HDFCs adherence and proliferation on the scaffold | Ao et al. [ | |
| CA-P-STMP | Saos-2 | Formation of new bone and capillaries | Atila et al. [ | ||
| HPMC-CaP | Calcium | PDECs | Rat bone defect model | In vitro: promotion of the VEGF expression (vasculogenesis); | Oliveira et al. [ |
SF/CMC = silk fibroin/Carboxymethylcellulose; hMSCs = human mesenchymal stem cells; Zr-CS-CMC = Zirconium-chitosan- Carboxymethylcellulose; Zr-CS-CMC-P1 = Zirconium-chitosan- Carboxymethylcellulose prepared 1; Zr-CS-CMC-P2 = Zirconium-chitosan- Carboxymethylcellulose prepared 2; nano-Ha = nano-hydroxyapatite; HDFCs = primary human dental follicle cells; CA-P-STMP = Cellulose acetate- Pullulan- trisodium trimetaphosphate; Saos-2 = human Osteogenic Sarcoma Cell Line; HPMC-CaP = Hydroxypropyl)methyl cellulose-calcium phosphate; PDECs = human progenitor-derived endothelial cells.
Figure 10The SF/CMC composite scaffold was able to fix Ca2+ via chelation and to favor the homogeneous deposition and nucleation of the calcium/phosphate (Ca/PO4) crystals on the grafting matrix. Moreover, when loaded by hMSCs, the scaffold allowed hMCs differentiation towards osteoblastic cells. Redrawn from ref [81].
Summary of the nano cellulose-based materials tested in cartilage regeneration.
| Type of Cellulose | Material Realesed | In Vitro Tests | In Vivo Tests | Molecular Effects | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NFC/A | hBMSCs and hNC cells | 6-weeks-old nude female mice | Cartilage reconstruction and chondrocytes proliferation | Moller et al. [ | |
| Bacterial NFC bilayer | hNC (in vitro) hNC and MNC (in vivo) | NC cell culture with BCN-bilayer | Nude mice | Chondrogenesis promotion | Martinez et al. [ |
NFC/A = nanofibrillated cellulose/alginate; hBMSCs = human bone marrow–derived stem cells; hNC = human nasal chondrocytes; MNC = bone marrow mononuclear cells.
Summary of the cellulose-based materials tested in dental applications.
| Type of Cellulose | Characteristics | Applications | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| GIC with NFC from eucalyptus pulp | length (L) and diameter (D) of the isolated nanocellulose were determined to be 145 ± 25 nm and 6 ± 1.5 nm, respectively, with an aspect ratio (L/D) of 24. | reinforcing agent in dental restorative material | Silva et al. [ |
| Ramie fiber | extracted from the phloem tissue of the plant | reinforcing agent for denture base resin with higher flexural modulus, but weak interfacial adhesion | Xua et al. [ |
| Collagen and polylactic acid | Resorbable membrane barriers | disallowing of fast-growing gum tissue from getting into the regenerative site | Fassman, A. et al. [ |
| Ethyl cellulose | Non resorbable membrane barriers | disallowing of fast-growing gum tissue from getting into the regenerative site | Fassman, A. et al. [ |
| MP containing cellulose | co-polymer of cellulose acetate and nitrocellulose | uniform and enhanced cell migration in bone regeneration | Takata, T. et al. [ |
| Polylactic-acid membrane | Less uniform and enhanced cell migration in bone regeneration than MP | Takata, T. et al. [ | |
| otolith/collagen/bacterial cellulose nanocomposites | Cellulose from bacteria | Good scaffold for bone and tissue regeneration | Olyveira, G. et al. [ |
MP = Millipore filter; GIC = Glass ionomer cement.
Summary of the nano cellulose-based materials tested in “other applications”.
| Type of Cellulose | Material Realesed | In Vitro Tests | In Vivo Tests | Molecular Effects | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NFC | Bendamustine | Swelling tests at different pH | Rat model | Good drug loading and release | Bhandari et al. [ |
| NFC/RS/P | Methotrexate | In vitro: good delivery and permanence in the colon mucosa | Meneguin et al. [ | ||
| NFC | Metformin | B16F10 cells | Reduction of the migration, invasion and ashesion of B16F10 cells | Nurani et al. [ | |
| Si-HPMC | hASCs | Rat model | Colonic biological conditions improving in rats with colon damage | Moussa et al. [ | |
| CNC-PEI | siRNA | C2C12 murine myoblastic cells | Decrease of the cells growth (anti-proliferative) | Ndong Ntoutoume et al. [ | |
| HEC-PEG | siRNA | Muco-adhesive properties | Furst et al. [ | ||
| CMC/β-C/AA | Acyclovir | Swelling tests at different pH | Basic pH favors the maximal swelling of the CMC/β-C/AA releasing acyclovir in the small intestine | Malik et al. [ |
NFC = Cellulose in form of nanofibers; Si-HPMC = silane-hydroxyl-propylmethyl cellulose; hASC = human adipose mesenchymal stem cells; NFC/RS/P = cellulose nanofibrils/resistant starch/pectin; CMC/β-C/AA = CMC/β-cyclodextrin/acrylic acid; EC-MC = ethyl cellulose-methyl cellulose; CNC-PEI = cellulose nanocrystals-Polyethylenimine; HEC-PEG = hydroxyethyl cellulose-polyethylene glycol; siRNA = small interference RNA.
Figure 11General procedure for the synthesis of CNCs-PEI-siRNA complexes and siRNA targeting in cells. Redrawn from ref [126].
Summary of the nano-cellulose-based material tested in clinical trials.
| Type of Cellulose | Strategy | Effect | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| EC-MC | Delivery α-mangostin compound | Anti-acne effect | Pan-In et al. [ |
| HA-CMC | HA-CMC soaked with Gelfoam | Hearing improvement without significant collateral effects | Ahn et al. [ |
| HA-CMC | Artificial tears composed of hyaluronate 0.1% and CMC 0.5% | Improvement of the tear-film in eyes after cataract surgery | Mencucci et al. [ |
| HPMC | Delivery oxymetazoline compound | Improvement of mucosal barrier in allergic rhinitis | Valerieva et al. [ |
EC-MC: ethyl cellulose-methyl cellulose; HA-CMC: sodium hyaluronate (HA) and CMC; HPMC: hydroxypropylmethylcellulose.