| Literature DB >> 31543936 |
Dalia Ahmed Abd El Daym1, Mostafa Esam Gheith2, Nadia Ahmed Abbas3, Laila Ahmed Rashed4, Zeinab A Abd El Aziz5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Titanium alloys are widely used in dental applications as they have good mechanical and biological properties. Implant failure is more likely to occur in inflammatory diseases related to acidic pH. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of erbium chromium-doped yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet 2780 nm laser surface treatment on the electrochemical behavior of titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) at acidic pH.Entities:
Keywords: Corrosion; Ti–6Al–4V; electrochemical; laser therapy
Year: 2019 PMID: 31543936 PMCID: PMC6749859
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dent Res J (Isfahan) ISSN: 1735-3327
Figure 1Titanium disc irradiated and hand guided at constant distance of 0.5–1 mm with the laser system.
The composition of Hank’s solution (g/l: gram/liter)
| Reagent | Composition (g/l) |
|---|---|
| NaCl | 8.00 |
| KCl | 0.40 |
| NaHCO3 | 0.35 |
| CaCl2 | 0.14 |
| MgCl2 6H2O | 0.10 |
| Na2HPO42H2O | 0.06 |
| KH2PO4 | 0.06 |
| MgSO4.7H2O | 0.06 |
| C6H12O6 | 1.00 |
The mean corrosion parameters for Tafel analysis of laser treated and untreated Ti-6Al-4V at various time intervals
| Laser treatment | pH | Immersion time (H) | Ecorr (V) + OCP | Icorr (A/cm2) | Rp (Ω) | ba (V/dec) | bc (V/dec) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Untreated sample | 5.2 | 192 | −0.24 | 8.19E-07 | 117250 | 0.09 | 0.18 |
| 360 | −0.20 | 1.26E-06 | 72447.5 | 0.10 | 0.15 | ||
| 696 | −0.19 | 6.69E-06 | 14667.5 | 0.11 | 0.16 | ||
| 864 | −0.19 | 1E-05 | 10439 | 0.11 | 0.17 | ||
| Treated sample | 5.2 | 192 | −0.20 | 7.77E-7 | 59470 | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| 360 | −0.20 | 1.03E-6 | 45985 | 0.07 | 0.06 | ||
| 696 | −0.18 | 1.15E-6 | 49750 | 0.08 | 0.07 | ||
| 864 | −0.17 | 1.24E-6 | 129000 | 0.14 | 0.42 |
Ecorr: Corrosion potential; Icorr: Corrosion current density; Rp: Polarization resistance; ba: Slope of anode branch; bc: Slope of cathode branch; OCP: Open circuit potential
Values of fitting parameters of laser treated and untreated Ti-6Al-4V at different pH for various time intervals at room temperature
| Laser treatment | pH | Immersion time (H) | Rs | Rp | Rb | Cp | Cb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Untreated sample | 5.2 | 192 | 4.13E+02 | 3.53E+03 | 1.15E+04 | 1.01E-04 | 9.30E-04 |
| 360 | 1.20E+02 | 1.77E+03 | 1.08E+04 | 6.03E-05 | 7.74E-05 | ||
| 696 | 4.88E+02 | 4.35E+02 | 3.49E+03 | 2.11E-04 | 5.15E-04 | ||
| 864 | 1.95E+02 | 5.49E+02 | 3.03E+02 | 4.67E-04 | 3.58E-04 | ||
| Treated sample | 5.2 | 192 | 7.67E+02 | 1.24E+04 | 3.02E+04 | 2.30E-05 | 1.63E-04 |
| 360 | 1.81E+04 | 9.32E+04 | 8.74E+04 | 4.57E-06 | 2.86E-06 | ||
| 696 | 1.64E+03 | 7.24E+03 | 6.09E+02 | 1.91E-06 | 1.91E-06 | ||
| 864 | 7.57E+03 | 6.40E+04 | 6.06E+04 | 1.08E-05 | 7.96E-06 |
Rs: Solution resistance; Rp: Porous layer resistance; Rb: Barrier layer resistance; Cp: Porous layer capacitance; Cb: Barrier layer capacitance
Figure 2The equivalent electrical circuit used to fit the impedance spectra.