Literature DB >> 31542863

Negative prognostic impact of epidermal growth factor receptor copy number gain in young adults with isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type glioblastoma.

Daniel I Hoffman1, Kalil G Abdullah2, Makayla McCoskey1, Zev A Binder2, Donald M O'Rourke2, Arati S Desai3, MacLean P Nasrallah4, Ashkan Bigdeli5, Jennifer J D Morrissette5, Steven Brem2, Stephen J Bagley6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Young adults with isocitrate-dehydrogenase wild-type (IDH-WT) glioblastoma (GBM) represent a rare, understudied population compared to pediatric high-grade glioma, IDH-mutant GBM, or IDH-WT GBM in older patients. We aimed to explore the prognostic impact of epidermal growth factor receptor copy number gain (EGFR CN gain), one of the most common genetic alterations in IDH-WT glioma, in young adults with IDH-WT GBM.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients 18-45 years old with newly diagnosed, IDH-WT GBM whose tumors underwent next-generation sequencing at our institution between 2014 and 2018. The impact of EGFR CN gain on time to tumor progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) was assessed. A validation cohort of patients 18-45 years old with IDH-WT GBM was analyzed from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA).
RESULTS: Ten of 28 patients (36%) from our institution had EGFR CN gain, which was associated with shorter TTP (median 6.5 vs. 11.9 months; p = 0.06) and OS (median 16.3 vs. 23.5 months; p = 0.047). The negative prognostic impact of EGFR CN gain on OS persisted in a multivariate model (HR 6.40, 95% CI 1.3-31.0, p = 0.02). In the TCGA cohort (N = 43), EGFR CN gain was associated with shorter TTP and worse OS, although these did not reach statistical significance (TTP, median 11.5 vs. 14.4 months, p = 0.18; OS, median 23.6 vs. 27.8 months; p = 0.18).
CONCLUSIONS: EGFR CN gain may be associated with inferior outcomes in young adults with newly diagnosed, IDH-WT GBM, suggesting a potential role for targeting EGFR in this population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidermal growth factor receptor; Glioblastoma; Next generation sequencing; Survival; isocitrate dehydrogenase

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31542863     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03298-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  47 in total

1.  Distinct demographic profile and molecular markers of primary CNS tumor in 1873 adolescent and young adult patient population.

Authors:  Rohit Vadgaonkar; Sridhar Epari; Girish Chinnaswamy; Rahul Krishnatry; Raees Tonse; Tejpal Gupta; Rakesh Jalali
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor amplification and EGFRvIII in glioblastoma: meta-analysis.

Authors:  J-R Chen; H-Z Xu; Y Yao; Z-Y Qin
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.209

3.  Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Extracellular Domain Mutations in Glioblastoma Present Opportunities for Clinical Imaging and Therapeutic Development.

Authors:  Zev A Binder; Amy Haseley Thorne; Spyridon Bakas; E Paul Wileyto; Michel Bilello; Hamed Akbari; Saima Rathore; Sung Min Ha; Logan Zhang; Cole J Ferguson; Sonika Dahiya; Wenya Linda Bi; David A Reardon; Ahmed Idbaih; Joerg Felsberg; Bettina Hentschel; Michael Weller; Stephen J Bagley; Jennifer J D Morrissette; MacLean P Nasrallah; Jianhui Ma; Ciro Zanca; Andrew M Scott; Laura Orellana; Christos Davatzikos; Frank B Furnari; Donald M O'Rourke
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 31.743

4.  First results on the DCVax phase III trial: raising more questions than providing answers.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wick; Martin J van den Bent
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  The prognostic relevance of molecular alterations in glioblastomas for patients age < 50 years.

Authors:  Andrey Korshunov; Regina Sycheva; Andrey Golanov
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  The definition of primary and secondary glioblastoma.

Authors:  Hiroko Ohgaki; Paul Kleihues
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Recursive partitioning analysis of prognostic factors in three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group malignant glioma trials.

Authors:  W J Curran; C B Scott; J Horton; J S Nelson; A S Weinstein; A J Fischbach; C H Chang; M Rotman; S O Asbell; R E Krisch
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-05-05       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Genetic pathways to glioblastoma: a population-based study.

Authors:  Hiroko Ohgaki; Pierre Dessen; Benjamin Jourde; Sonja Horstmann; Tomofumi Nishikawa; Pier-Luigi Di Patre; Christoph Burkhard; Danielle Schüler; Nicole M Probst-Hensch; Paulo César Maiorka; Nathalie Baeza; Paola Pisani; Yasuhiro Yonekawa; M Gazi Yasargil; Urs M Lütolf; Paul Kleihues
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Long-term survival in primary glioblastoma with versus without isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations.

Authors:  Christian Hartmann; Bettina Hentschel; Matthias Simon; Manfred Westphal; Gabriele Schackert; Jörg C Tonn; Markus Loeffler; Guido Reifenberger; Torsten Pietsch; Andreas von Deimling; Michael Weller
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 13.801

10.  Insulator dysfunction and oncogene activation in IDH mutant gliomas.

Authors:  William A Flavahan; Yotam Drier; Brian B Liau; Shawn M Gillespie; Andrew S Venteicher; Anat O Stemmer-Rachamimov; Mario L Suvà; Bradley E Bernstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  1 in total

1.  EGFR amplification is a real independent prognostic impact factor between young adults and adults over 45yo with wild-type glioblastoma?

Authors:  Daniele Armocida; Alessandro Pesce; Alessandro Frati; Antonio Santoro; Maurizio Salvati
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 4.130

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.