J-R Chen1, H-Z Xu1, Y Yao1, Z-Y Qin1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene amplification and the EGFRvIII mutation may have prognostic value in patients with glioblastoma. This meta-analysis was to determine whether EGFR gene amplification or the EGFRvIII mutation are predictors of survival in patients with glioblastoma and anaplastic astrocytoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched until July 31, 2014. Studies were selected for inclusion in the analysis if they included patients with anaplastic astrocytoma and/or glioblastoma, EGFR and/or EGFRvIII mutation status was reported, and overall survival (OS) data were reported. RESULTS: Of 113 articles initially identified, only eight contained data with respect to the outcome of interest and were included in the meta-analysis. The number of cases ranged from 14 to 268, and the majority of patients were 60 or more years of age. There was no significant difference in OS between EGFR amplification-positive and EGFR amplification-negative glioblastoma patients (pooled hazard ratio [HR] = 1.101, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.845, 1.434, P = 0.475) or anaplastic astrocytoma patients (pooled HR = 1.455, 95% CI 0.852, 2.482, P = 0.169). There was no significant difference in OS between EGFRvIII-positive and EGFRvIII-negative glioblastoma patients (pooled HR = 1.321, 95% CI: 0.881-1.981, P = 0.178). Significant heterogeneity existed between the studies, and the significance changed when the analysis was performed with studies removed in turn. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence that either EGFR amplification or the EGFRvIII mutation has prognostic value in patients with glioblastoma.
OBJECTIVES:Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene amplification and the EGFRvIII mutation may have prognostic value in patients with glioblastoma. This meta-analysis was to determine whether EGFR gene amplification or the EGFRvIII mutation are predictors of survival in patients with glioblastoma and anaplastic astrocytoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched until July 31, 2014. Studies were selected for inclusion in the analysis if they included patients with anaplastic astrocytoma and/or glioblastoma, EGFR and/or EGFRvIII mutation status was reported, and overall survival (OS) data were reported. RESULTS: Of 113 articles initially identified, only eight contained data with respect to the outcome of interest and were included in the meta-analysis. The number of cases ranged from 14 to 268, and the majority of patients were 60 or more years of age. There was no significant difference in OS between EGFR amplification-positive and EGFR amplification-negative glioblastomapatients (pooled hazard ratio [HR] = 1.101, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.845, 1.434, P = 0.475) or anaplastic astrocytomapatients (pooled HR = 1.455, 95% CI 0.852, 2.482, P = 0.169). There was no significant difference in OS between EGFRvIII-positive and EGFRvIII-negative glioblastomapatients (pooled HR = 1.321, 95% CI: 0.881-1.981, P = 0.178). Significant heterogeneity existed between the studies, and the significance changed when the analysis was performed with studies removed in turn. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence that either EGFR amplification or the EGFRvIII mutation has prognostic value in patients with glioblastoma.
Authors: Tejus A Bale; Justin T Jordan; Otto Rapalino; Nisha Ramamurthy; Nicholas Jessop; John C DeWitt; Valentina Nardi; Maria Martinez-Lage Alvarez; Matthew Frosch; Tracy T Batchelor; David N Louis; A John Iafrate; Daniel P Cahill; Jochen K Lennerz Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2019-05-06 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Daniel I Hoffman; Kalil G Abdullah; Makayla McCoskey; Zev A Binder; Donald M O'Rourke; Arati S Desai; MacLean P Nasrallah; Ashkan Bigdeli; Jennifer J D Morrissette; Steven Brem; Stephen J Bagley Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2019-09-21 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: David A Reardon; Andrew B Lassman; Martin van den Bent; Priya Kumthekar; Ryan Merrell; Andrew M Scott; Lisa Fichtel; Erik P Sulman; Erica Gomez; JuDee Fischer; Ho-Jin Lee; Wijith Munasinghe; Hao Xiong; Helen Mandich; Lisa Roberts-Rapp; Peter Ansell; Kyle D Holen; Hui K Gan Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 12.300