| Literature DB >> 31541311 |
Frank Petzke1, Matthias Karst2, Knud Gastmeier3, Lukas Radbruch4, Eva Steffen5, Winfried Häuser6.
Abstract
Since March 2017, the prescription of medical cannabis at the expense of the statutory health insurance is possible after approval by the respective medical services. Chronic pain is the most common indication, as health claims data and the accompanying survey show. From the point of view of the law, a prescription is indicated in cases of serious illness, missing or not indicated established therapeutic approaches and a not entirely remote prospect of improvement of the illness or its symptoms. This describes a broader indication spectrum than can currently be based on randomised controlled clinical trials. There is weak evidence of low efficacy for neuropathic pain. For pain related to spasticity and cancer-related pain there is evidence of improvements in quality of life, but effects on pain are of little relevance. For all other indications, only an individual therapeutic trial can be justified based on the available external evidence. However, this usually corresponds to the demand of "a not entirely remote prospect" of a noticeably positive effect of medical cannabis. It is also problematic that almost no long-term studies for the application and efficacy of flowers and extracts are available.Current knowledge on the use of cannabis-based drugs and, more clearly, medical cannabis for chronic pain is insufficient. The increase in the number of countries with marketing authorisations or exemptions for medicinal cannabis or cannabis-based drugs for chronic pain will also pave the way for larger empirical and population-based studies that will further improve the evidence base of research and clinical use.Entities:
Keywords: Cannabis-bases medicines; Chronic pain; Clinical recommendations; Medical cannabis; Neuropathic
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31541311 DOI: 10.1007/s00482-019-00407-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Schmerz ISSN: 0932-433X Impact factor: 1.107