| Literature DB >> 31541150 |
A Fawad1, P M Nilsson1, J Struck2, A Bergmann2,3, O Melander1,4,5, L Bennet6,7.
Abstract
The prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) has increased dramatically in Middle Eastern populations that represent the largest non-European immigrant group in Sweden today. As proneurotensin predicts T2D, the aim of this study was to investigate differences in proneurotensin levels across populations of Middle Eastern and Caucasian origin and to study its associations with indices of glucose regulation. Participants in the age 30 to 75 years, living in Malmö, Sweden, and born in Iraq or Sweden, were recruited from the census register. Anthropometrics and fasting samples were collected and oral glucose tolerance tests conducted assessing insulin secretion (DIo) as well as insulin sensitivity (ISI). A total of 2155 individuals participated in the study, 1398 were Iraqi-born and 757 were Swedish-born participants. Higher fasting proneurotensin levels were observed in Iraqi- compared to Swedish-born participants (137.5 vs. 119.8 pmol/L; p < 0.001) data adjusted for age, sex and body mass index. In Iraqi participants only, plasma proneurotensin was associated with impaired glucose regulation assessed as ISI, DIo and HbA1c, and significant interactions between country of birth and proneurotensin were observed (Pinteraction ISI = 0.048; Pinteraction DIo = 0.014; PinteractionHbA1c = 0.029). We report higher levels of proneurotensin in the general Middle Eastern population. The finding that Middle Eastern origin modifies the relationship of proneurotensin with indices of glucose regulation suggests that proneurotensin may be a stronger determinant of T2D in Middle Eastern as compared to Caucasian populations. These findings may explain part of the excess T2D risk in the Middle Eastern population but needs to be explored further.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31541150 PMCID: PMC6754414 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-50040-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Risk of T2D in relation to country of birth and tertiles of proneurotensin (tertiles) assessed by logistic regression presenting odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI’s).
| Total study population | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | |||
| Age, years per 1 SD |
|
|
| |
| Male sex |
|
|
| |
| BMI kg/m2, per 1 SD |
|
|
| |
| Family History of diabetes |
|
|
| |
| Proneurotensin | ||||
| - First tertile | Born in Sweden | Reference | ||
| Born in Iraq |
|
|
| |
| - Second tertile | Born in Sweden | 0.61 | 0.17 | 2.15 |
| Born in Iraq |
|
|
| |
| - Third tertile | Born in Sweden |
|
|
|
| Born in Iraq |
|
|
| |
No significant interactions were observed between proneurotensin and country of birth or between proneurotensin and gender in the model.
Characteristics of participants in the MEDIM study, born in Iraq or in Sweden.
| Born in Iraq | Born in Sweden |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 46.2 (9.6) | 49.5 (11.2) | <0.001 |
| Male sex, | 819 (58.6) | 378 (49.9) | 0.010 |
| Proneurotensin, pmol/La | 137.5 (111.1–164.7) | 119.8 (99.9–145.3) | <0.001 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 29.3 (4.5) | 27.3 (4.7) | <0.001 |
| Waist circumference in men, cm | 99.3 (10.6) | 93.1 (10.9) | 0.002 |
| Waist circumference in women, cm | 97.8 (11.7) | 89.2 (14.1) | <0.001 |
| Systolic Blood Pressure, mmHgb | 127 (15.6) | 134 (19.1) | <0.001 |
| Diastolic Blood Pressure, mmHgb | 77 (9.8) | 80 (11.4) | <0.001 |
| HbA1c mmol/mol | 37.9 (9.9) | 36.3 (8.1) | <0.001 |
| HbA1c% | 4.6 (0.9) | 4.5 (0.8) | <0.001 |
| Plasma Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol, mmol/Lc | 3.2 (0.8) | 3.4 (0.9) | <0.001 |
| Plasma Triglycerides, mmol/Lc | 1.6 (1.0) | 1.2 (0.8) | <0.001 |
| Insulin Sensitivity Indexa | 76.9 (58.4–101.1) | 102.3 (77.7–133.0) | <0.001 |
| Corrected Insulin Responsea,d | 167.8 (116.0–237.4) | 140.1 (100.1–196.7) | <0.001 |
| Disposition Indexa,d | 12413.3 (8316.3–18692.7) | 13805.9 (9560.7–20150.4) | 0.028 |
| Type 2 diabetes, % | 162 (11.6) | 44 (5.8) | <0.001 |
| Cardiovascular Disease, % | 54 (3.9) | 41 (5.4) | 0.058 |
| Family History of type 2 diabetes, % | 716 (51.2) | 200 (26.4) | <0.001 |
Data are presented as mean (standard deviations, SD), numbers (%) or mediansa (inter-quartile range, IQR).
bIncluding participants without blood pressure lowering medication
cIncluding participants without lipid lowering medication
dCases where the glucose level at 30 min was > 4.44 mmol/l, and greater than the fasting glucose level, were included in the analysis[21].
Differences in means between groups were studied using linear regression models adjusted for age and sex while differences in proportion of males between groups were studied using the chi-square test. Differences in proportions between groups were studied using logistic regression adjusted for age and sex. All tests were two-sided and a p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Associations between insulin action (insulin sensitivity index), insulin secretion (disposition index) and HbA1c as dependent variables and proneurotensin as the independent variable.
| Proneurotensina |
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dependent variable | Model | Total study population | Born in Iraq | Born in Sweden | ||||
| β | 95% CI | β | 95% CI | β | 95% CI | |||
| Insulin Sensitivity Indexa | ||||||||
| Model I |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Model II |
|
| 0.057 | |||||
| Model III |
|
|
|
| −0.004 | −0.021 to 0.012 | ||
| Model IV |
|
|
| |||||
| Model V |
|
|
|
| −0.010 | −0.026 to 0.006 | ||
| Model VI |
|
|
| |||||
| Disposition Indexa,b | ||||||||
| Model I | −0.014 | −0.033 to 0.005 |
|
| 0.019 | −0.011 to 0.049 | ||
| Model II | −0.014 | −0.033 to 0.004 |
| |||||
| Model III | −0.013 | −0.031 to 0.005 |
|
| 0.020 | −0.009 to 0.050 | ||
| Model IV | −0.013 | −0.032 to 0.005 |
| |||||
| Model V | −0.015 | −0.033 to 0.004 |
|
| 0.018 | −0.013 to 0.048 | ||
| Model VI | −0.015 | −0.033 to 0.004 |
| |||||
| HbA1c | ||||||||
| Model I |
|
|
|
| 0.112 | −0.366 to 0.589 | ||
| Model II |
|
|
| |||||
| Model III |
|
|
|
| 0.071 | −0.397 to 0.539 | ||
| Model IV |
|
|
| |||||
| Model V |
|
|
|
| 0.194 | −0.274 to 0.662 | ||
| Model VI |
|
|
| |||||
Data was adjusted for anthropometrics and country of birth, Model I to Model VI. Associations are presented as beta-coefficients (β) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Significant associations are bolded. There were no significant interactions between proneurotensin and gender in the model (data not shown).
Model I: Proneurotensina,c, agec and sex.
Model II: Proneurotensina,c, agec, sex and country of birth.
Model III: Proneurotensina,c, agec, sex and BMIc.
Model IV: Proneurotensina,c, agec, sex, BMIc and country of birth.
Model V: Proneurotensina,c, agec, sex, BMIc and Fatty Liver Index (FLI).
Model VI: Proneurotensina,c, agec, sex, BMIc, FLI and country of birth.
Continuous independent variables were standardized in the strata of country of birth and sex (z-scores).
aBase 10 logarithm; bCIR and DIo only included cases where the glucose level at 30 min was >4.44 mmol/l and was greater than the fasting glucose level[21]. cRegression coefficients (β and odds ratios respectively) for continuous independent variables in Model I to IV were standardized to a unit variance (per 1 standard deviation) in the strata of ethnicity and sex (z-scores).
Associations between T2D and proneurotensin, with data adjusted for anthropometrics and lifestyle-related risk factors, Model I to Model IV.
| Proneurotensina | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dependent variable | Model | Total study population | Born in Iraq | Born in Sweden | ||||
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | |||
| T2D | ||||||||
| Model I |
| 1.253 to 1.750 |
|
|
|
| ||
| Model II |
| 1.254 to 1.755 | NS | |||||
| Model III |
| 1.298 to 1.788 |
|
|
|
| ||
| Model IV |
| 1.241 to 1.741 | NS | |||||
| Model V |
| 1.282 to 1.835 |
|
|
|
| ||
| Model VI |
| 1.278 to 1.835 | NS | |||||
Associations presented as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Significant associations are bolded.
Figure 1Scatter dot diagram with regression lines showing level of insulin action (insulin sensitivity index ISI) in relation to proneurotensin and country of birth. P < 0.001.
Figure 3Scatter dot diagram with regression lines showing level of HbA1C in relation to proneurotensin and country of birth. P = 0.036.
Figure 2Scatter dot diagram with regression lines showing association between Disposition Index (DIo) in relation to proneurotensin and country of birth. P = 0.015.