BACKGROUND & AIMS: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is suspected to confer an increased risk for developing type 2 diabetes (DM). However, only a few prospective studies evaluated NAFLD as a predictor for DM, most did not adjust for the full range of potential cofounders and none used an objectively quantified degree of steatosis. Our aim was to evaluate the independent role of NAFLD in predicting the development of pre-DM in a 7-year prospective follow-up of healthy volunteers. METHODS: A prospective cohort of a subsample of the Israeli National Health Survey evaluated at baseline and after 7 years by identical protocols. Metabolic parameters and ultrasonographic evidence of NAFLD were evaluated in 213 subjects, without known liver disease or history of alcohol abuse. Exclusion criteria were pre-DM at the baseline survey. Steatosis was quantified by ultrasound with the hepato-renal ultrasound index (HRI). RESULTS: The study included 141 volunteers (mean age 48.78 ± 9.68, 24.82% with NAFLD) without pre-DM/DM at baseline. Both NAFLD on regular US (OR=2.93, 1.02-8.41 95%CI) and HRI (OR=7.87, 1.83-33.82) were independent predictors for the development of pre-DM, adjusting for age, gender, BMI, family history of DM, baseline insulin, adiponectin and glucose. Further adjustment for physical activity and dietary intake did not weaken the association. Furthermore, NAFLD was a stronger predictor for pre-DM than the metabolic syndrome. Subjects with both NAFLD and glucose ≥89 had 93.3% incidence rate of pre-DM. CONCLUSION: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is a strong and independent risk factor for pre-DM in the general adult population; thus, NAFLD patients should be classified as a population at risk.
BACKGROUND & AIMS:Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is suspected to confer an increased risk for developing type 2 diabetes (DM). However, only a few prospective studies evaluated NAFLD as a predictor for DM, most did not adjust for the full range of potential cofounders and none used an objectively quantified degree of steatosis. Our aim was to evaluate the independent role of NAFLD in predicting the development of pre-DM in a 7-year prospective follow-up of healthy volunteers. METHODS: A prospective cohort of a subsample of the Israeli National Health Survey evaluated at baseline and after 7 years by identical protocols. Metabolic parameters and ultrasonographic evidence of NAFLD were evaluated in 213 subjects, without known liver disease or history of alcohol abuse. Exclusion criteria were pre-DM at the baseline survey. Steatosis was quantified by ultrasound with the hepato-renal ultrasound index (HRI). RESULTS: The study included 141 volunteers (mean age 48.78 ± 9.68, 24.82% with NAFLD) without pre-DM/DM at baseline. Both NAFLD on regular US (OR=2.93, 1.02-8.41 95%CI) and HRI (OR=7.87, 1.83-33.82) were independent predictors for the development of pre-DM, adjusting for age, gender, BMI, family history of DM, baseline insulin, adiponectin and glucose. Further adjustment for physical activity and dietary intake did not weaken the association. Furthermore, NAFLD was a stronger predictor for pre-DM than the metabolic syndrome. Subjects with both NAFLD and glucose ≥89 had 93.3% incidence rate of pre-DM. CONCLUSION:Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is a strong and independent risk factor for pre-DM in the general adult population; thus, NAFLD patients should be classified as a population at risk.
Authors: Maria Del Ben; Licia Polimeni; Francesco Baratta; Daniele Pastori; Lorenzo Loffredo; Francesco Angelico Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-07-14 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Juan P Arab; Roberto Candia; Rodrigo Zapata; Cristián Muñoz; Juan P Arancibia; Jaime Poniachik; Alejandro Soza; Francisco Fuster; Javier Brahm; Edgar Sanhueza; Jorge Contreras; M Carolina Cuellar; Marco Arrese; Arnoldo Riquelme Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-09-14 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Galit Weinstein; Shira Zelber-Sagi; Sarah R Preis; Alexa S Beiser; Charles DeCarli; Elizabeth K Speliotes; Claudia L Satizabal; Ramachandran S Vasan; Sudha Seshadri Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Till Ittermann; Henry Völzke; Muhammad Naeem; Robin Bülow; Sabine Schipf; Nicole Werner; Marcus Dörr; Markus M Lerch; Jens-Peter Kühn; Wolfgang Rathmann; Matthias Nauck; Marcello Ricardo Paulista Markus Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-06-24 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: P León-Mimila; H Villamil-Ramírez; X S Li; D M Shih; S T Hui; E Ocampo-Medina; B López-Contreras; S Morán-Ramos; M Olivares-Arevalo; P Grandini-Rosales; L Macías-Kauffer; I González-González; R Hernández-Pando; F Gómez-Pérez; F Campos-Pérez; C Aguilar-Salinas; E Larrieta-Carrasco; T Villarreal-Molina; Z Wang; A J Lusis; S L Hazen; A Huertas-Vazquez; S Canizales-Quinteros Journal: Diabetes Metab Date: 2020-08-10 Impact factor: 6.041