| Literature DB >> 31540323 |
Dmitry Tsvetkov1, Ivan Ivanov2, Dmitry Malyshkin2,3, Vladimir Sereda2,3, Andrey Zuev2.
Abstract
BaZr0.9Y0.1O3-δ (BZY10), a promising proton conducting material, exhibits p-type conduction under oxidative conditions. Holes in BZY10 are of the small polaron type. However, there is no clear understanding at which places in the lattice they are localized. The main objectives of this work were, therefore, to discuss the nature of electronic defects in BZY10 on the basis of the combined measurements of the thermo-EMF and conductivity. Total electrical conductivity and Seebeck coefficient of BZY10 were simultaneously studied depending on partial pressures of oxygen (pO2), water (pH2O) and temperature (T). The model equation for total conductivity and Seebeck coefficient derived on the basis of the proposed defect chemical approach was successfully fitted to the experimental data. Transference numbers of all the charge carriers in BZY10 were calculated. The heat of transport of oxide ions was found to be about one half the activation energy of their mobility, while that of protons was almost equal to the activation energy of their mobility. The results of the Seebeck coefficient modeling indicate that cation impurities, rather than oxygen sites, should be considered as a place of hole localization.Entities:
Keywords: BaZr0.9Y0.1O2.95; conductivity; hydration; proton conductor; seebeck coefficient
Year: 2019 PMID: 31540323 PMCID: PMC6780644 DOI: 10.3390/membranes9090120
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Membranes (Basel) ISSN: 2077-0375
Figure 1Rietveld refined XRD pattern of BZY10 sample slowly (~100 °C/h) cooled from 1500 °C to room temperature in dry air (log(pH2O/atm) = −4.0): Observed X-ray diffraction intensity (points) and calculated curve (line). The bottom curve is the difference of patterns, yobs-ycal, and the small bars indicate the angular positions of the allowed Bragg reflections
Figure 2Total conductivity (a) and Seebeck coefficient (b) of BZY10 measured at log(pH2O/atm) = –1.73 as a function of T and pO2. Points-experimental results, solid lines-calculation according to Equation (4) with parameters given in Table 1.
Fitted parameters of Equation (4)
| Charge Carrier | Pre-Exponential Factor 1, S·cm−1 | Activation Energy 1, eV |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Oxide ion | 25.43 ± 13.00 | 1.42 ± 0.01 | 0.997 |
| Hole | 10.42 ± 3.00 | 0.73 ± 0.05 | |
| Proton | (1.47 ± 0.60)·10−3 | 0.02 ± 0.09 |
1 Uncertainties are given as two standard deviations as obtained by fitting procedure.
Figure 3The results of fitting for BZY10 total conductivity at (a) 1038 °C and (b) 838 °C. Points-experimental data, surface-results of calculation according to Equation (4) with fitted parameters given in Table 1.
Fitted parameters of Equation (5).
| Charge Carrier | Heat of Transport, eV * |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oxide ion | 0.73 ± 0.03 | 34.6 ± 1.4 ( | 0.74 ± 0.04 | 0.990 |
| Hole | 0 ** | 6.5 ± 1.4 ( | ||
| Proton | 0.43 ± 0.10 | −12.3 ± 1.4 ( |
* Uncertainties are given as two standard deviations as obtained by fitting procedure.
** was arbitrarily set equal to zero (please, see the explanation in the text)
Figure 4Transference numbers of charge carriers in BZY10 depending on pO2 and pH2O at 1038 °C.
Figure 5Normalized Seebeck coefficient of BZY10 vs. pO2 at log(pH2O/atm) = −1.73. Points-experimental data, lines-result of the fit of Equation (5).
Fitted parameters of Equation (A3).
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| −79 ± 2 | −91 ± 2 | 0.992 |
* Uncertainties are given as two standard deviations as obtained by fitting procedure.