| Literature DB >> 31540284 |
Felix A Blyakhman1,2, Sergey Yu Sokolov3,4, Alexander P Safronov5,6, Olga A Dinislamova7, Tatyana F Shklyar8,9, Andrey Yu Zubarev10,11, Galina V Kurlyandskaya12,13.
Abstract
Ferrogels (FG) are magnetic composites that are widely used in the area of biomedical engineering and biosensing. In this work, ferrogels with different concentrations of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) were synthesized by the radical polymerization of acrylamide in stabilized aqueous ferrofluid. FG samples were prepared in various shapes that are suitable for different characterization techniques. Thin cylindrical samples were used to simulate the case of targeted drug delivery test through blood vessels. Samples of larger size that were in the shape of cylindrical plates were used for the evaluation of the FG applicability as substitutes for damaged structures, such as bone or cartilage tissues. Regardless of the shape of the samples and the conditions of their location, the boundaries of FG were confidently visualized over the entire range of concentrations of MNPs while using medical ultrasound. The amplitude of the reflected echo signal was higher for the higher concentration of MNPs in the gel. This result was not related to the influence of the MNPs on the intensity of the reflected echo signal directly, since the wavelength of the ultrasonic effect used is much larger than the particle size. Qualitative theoretical model for the understanding of the experimental results was proposed while taking into account the concept that at the acoustic oscillations of the hydrogel, the macromolecular net, and water in the gel porous structure experience the viscous Stocks-like interaction.Entities:
Keywords: biomedical applications; ferrogels; magnetic nanoparticles; medical ultrasound; sonography
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31540284 PMCID: PMC6767681 DOI: 10.3390/s19183959
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of laser target evaporation (LTE) iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) used for ferrogel synthesis (a). General view of gel and ferrogel samples from batch #1 (b) and batch #2 (c). See explanation in the text.
Figure 2Scheme of the experimental setup to determine the echogenic properties of gels/ferrogels: 1—ultrasonic apparatus; 2—personal computer; 3—sensor of ultrasonic apparatus; 4—silicone tube with water; 5—sample of the gel/ferrogel; 6—soft pad; and, 7—cuvette with water. See also explanation in the text.
Figure 3Magnetic hysteresis loop of air-dry nanoparticles measured at room temperature; inset shows thermomagnetic zero field cool–field cool curve (ZFC-FC) curve (a). Hysteresis loops for FG1-0, FG1-1, FG1-2, and FG1-3 samples measured at room temperature (b); inset shows diamagnetic response of the blank gel.
Figure 4Example of the ‘stress-strain’ relationship for gels of batch #1 (a) and the dependence of Young’s modulus on the MNPs concentration in gels of batch #1 (b). Vertical bars reflect the confidence interval with p = 0.05. Following fit parameters were obtained for stress (σ). For concentration 0.00%: σ = 20.2ε − 0.2, R2 = 0.995. For concentration 0.33%: σ = 28.9ε − 0.3, R2 = 0.994. For concentration 0.64: σ = 36.4ε − 0.3, R2 = 0.997. For concentration 1.34: σ = 39.2ε − 0.1, R2 = 0.998.
Figure 5Examples of ferrogels samples visualization at the bottom of water cuvette (a) and inside a silicone tube filled with water (b). The distance from sensor to objects is about 20 mm. 1—soft pad (a) and wall of silicone tube (b); 2—water in cuvette (a) and in tube (b); 3—upper boundary of gel/water; 4—gel body.
Figure 6Dependences of maximal (1) and average brightness (2) at gel/water boundary on the MNPs concentration for samples of batch #1 (a). Vertical bars reflect the confidence interval with p = 0.05. Dependences of maximum (1) and average brightness (2) at gel/water boundary on Young’s modulus for samples of batch #1 (b). Vertical and horizontal bars reflect the confidence interval of relevant parameter with p = 0.05.
Figure 7Dependences of maximum (1) and average brightness (2) at gel/water boundary on the MNPs concentration for samples of batch #2. Vertical bars reflect the confidence interval with p = 0.05.