Literature DB >> 31538799

Competence in using the arthroscopy stack system: a national survey of orthopaedic trainees in the UK.

G Manoharan1, N Sharma1, P Gallacher1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Surgeons are required to have a sound knowledge regarding all operating theatre equipment they wish to use. This is important to ensure patient safety and theatre efficiency. Arthroscopy forms a significant part of all orthopaedic subspecialty practice. Proficiency in performing arthroscopic procedures is assessed during registrar training. The aim of this survey was to determine the competence of orthopaedic trainee registrars in setting up the arthroscopy stack system and managing intraoperative problems.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic survey forms were sent to all orthopaedic training programme directors in the UK to be forwarded to trainees in their deanery. The electronic survey contained 13 questions aimed at determining trainee experience and competence level with working with the arthroscopy stack system.
RESULTS: A total of 138 responses were received from 14 deaneries in the UK. Almost all registrars had experienced intraoperative delays because of equipment malfunction that required addressing by more competent staff. However, 82% of respondents had not received any formal training for operating the arthroscopy stack system. Some 82% of registrars of ST7 grade or above, who had performed over 50 arthroscopic procedures and achieved a level 4 PBA competence, were unable to set up the stack system and successfully address these delays.
CONCLUSIONS: Inadequate training is delivered to orthopaedic registrars from both the training programme and arthroscopy-themed courses with regards to set-up and operation of the arthroscopy tower system. This training should be part of the curriculum to ensure patient safety and efficient theatre practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroscopy stack system; Competence; Orthopaedic training programme; Survey

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31538799      PMCID: PMC6996438          DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  8 in total

1.  Role of simulation in arthroscopy training.

Authors:  Simerjit Singh Madan; Dinker R Pai
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.929

2.  Minimally invasive orthopedic surgery: arthroscopy.

Authors:  R Treuting
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2000-07

Review 3.  Use of an Irrigation Pump System in Arthroscopic Procedures.

Authors:  Mark S Hsiao; Nicholas Kusnezov; Ryan N Sieg; Brett D Owens; Joshua P Herzog
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 1.390

4.  Treating the boxer's fracture in Wales: a postal survey.

Authors:  Rhidian Jones; Sadie Burdett; Matthew Jefferies; Abhijit R Guha
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  A survey of post-intake orthopaedic trauma meetings in England.

Authors:  Iain R McNamara; John R Crawford; Dennis J Edwards
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Surgical skills simulation in trauma and orthopaedic training.

Authors:  Euan R B Stirling; Thomas L Lewis; Nicholas A Ferran
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Update on the risks of complications after knee arthroscopy.

Authors:  Katarina Friberger Pajalic; Aleksandra Turkiewicz; Martin Englund
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Arthroscopic proficiency: methods in evaluating competency.

Authors:  Justin L Hodgins; Christian Veillette
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.463

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.