INTRODUCTION: There is no standardised treatment for fifth metacarpal neck fractures. Treatment of this common fracture can vary from immediate mobilisation to immobilisation in a plaster cast for 3 weeks. There is no literature identifying current practice amongst surgeons. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This survey's aim was to reveal current practice in Wales by means of a postal questionnaire sent to all Welsh orthopaedic consultants. RESULTS: The questionnaire had a 60% response rate. Results demonstrated varied opinion regarding the degree of displacement warranting reduction. Overall, 10% of surgeons reduce the fracture at 30 masculine of displacement, 29% at 40 masculine, 18% at 50 masculine and 20% at 60 masculine of displacement. The treatment was also very varied. Most surgeons preferred to treat these fractures with neighbour strapping (43%,) while others preferred plaster immobilisation (39%) or immediate mobilisation (10%.) Only 22% of surgeons discharge these patients back to the community after their first visit to out-patients while 13% offer two follow-up appointments. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment being offered for this common fracture in Wales is inconsistent. There is a need to develop evidence-based best practice guidelines which should standardise the treatment of this common injury. Perhaps, a large multicentre outcome study may enable this to be drawn up in the future.
INTRODUCTION: There is no standardised treatment for fifth metacarpal neck fractures. Treatment of this common fracture can vary from immediate mobilisation to immobilisation in a plaster cast for 3 weeks. There is no literature identifying current practice amongst surgeons. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This survey's aim was to reveal current practice in Wales by means of a postal questionnaire sent to all Welsh orthopaedic consultants. RESULTS: The questionnaire had a 60% response rate. Results demonstrated varied opinion regarding the degree of displacement warranting reduction. Overall, 10% of surgeons reduce the fracture at 30 masculine of displacement, 29% at 40 masculine, 18% at 50 masculine and 20% at 60 masculine of displacement. The treatment was also very varied. Most surgeons preferred to treat these fractures with neighbour strapping (43%,) while others preferred plaster immobilisation (39%) or immediate mobilisation (10%.) Only 22% of surgeons discharge these patients back to the community after their first visit to out-patients while 13% offer two follow-up appointments. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment being offered for this common fracture in Wales is inconsistent. There is a need to develop evidence-based best practice guidelines which should standardise the treatment of this common injury. Perhaps, a large multicentre outcome study may enable this to be drawn up in the future.
Authors: Markwin G Statius Muller; Rudolf W Poolman; M Julie van Hoogstraten; E Philip Steller Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2003-08-28 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: Thomas Hoffelner; Herbert Resch; Philipp Moroder; Gundobert Korn; Felix Steinhauer; Jörg Atzwanger; Bernd Minnich; Mark Tauber Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2012-05-29 Impact factor: 2.199