| Literature DB >> 31538036 |
Derik L Davis1, Mohit N Gilotra2, James Paul Hovis3, Ranyah Almardawi1, S Ashfaq Hasan2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The impact of rotator cuff (RC) tear pattern on intramuscular fatty infiltration (FI) is not well understood. The purpose of our study is to determine if differing RC tear patterns are associated with discordant presentations of intramuscular FI.Entities:
Keywords: Intramuscular fatty infiltration; Magnetic resonance imaging; Rotator cuff tear; Shoulder; Tear pattern
Year: 2019 PMID: 31538036 PMCID: PMC6737444 DOI: 10.25259/JCIS_36_2019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Imaging Sci ISSN: 2156-5597
Figure 1:Illustrations demonstrating tear patterns of the posterosuperior rotator cuff, as viewed from above. (a) Intact rotator cuff. (b) L-shaped tear involving the supraspinatus tendon. (c) Crescent-shaped tear involving the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons. (d) U-shaped tear involving the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons. (e) Complete tear and retraction of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons.
Figure 2:A 70-year-old woman with chronic shoulder pain. (a) Oblique sagittal magnetic resonance image shows Goutallier Grade 0 for the supraspinatus (gold outline) and infraspinatus (blue outline) muscles. A 53-year-old man unable to lift objects due to his shoulder. (b) Oblique sagittal magnetic resonance image shows Goutallier Grade 1 for the supraspinatus muscle (arrow). A 65-year- old man with shoulder dysfunction. (c) Oblique sagittal magnetic resonance image shows Goutallier Grade 2 for the supraspinatus muscle (black arrow) and Goutallier Grade 4 for the infraspinatus muscle (white arrow). A 53-year-old man with instability and shoulder pain. (d) Oblique sagittal magnetic resonance image shows Goutallier Grade 3 for the infraspinatus muscle (arrow).
Characteristics of the study population by cohort.
| L-shaped tear ( | Crescent-/U-shaped tear ( | Complete tear ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 57.80±9.25A | 54.67±11.42 | 53.07±9.97 | 0.748 |
| Male, % | 37.9% | 55.5% | 76.9% | 0.062 |
| Tear size | <0.001 | |||
| <1 cm | 11 | 3 | ||
| >1–<3 cm | 18 | 3 | ||
| >3–<5 cm | 3 | 9 | ||
| ≥5 cm | 4 | |||
| Documented trauma | 0.002 | |||
| Yes | 6 | 5 | 10 | |
| No | 23 | 4 | 3 | |
| Documented symptomsB ≤4 weeks | 0.172 | |||
| Yes | 3 | 2 | 3 | |
| No | 26 | 7 | 10 | |
| Goutallier grade, supraspinatus | 0.99±0.68 | 1.07±1.12 | 1.54±0.89 | 0.370 |
| Goutallier grade, infraspinatus | 1.30±0.85 | 1.48±1.44 | 2.23±0.86 | 0.024 |
AMean±standard deviation, BShoulder pain, weakness, instability, and/or decreased range of motion
Correlation of L-shaped tear cohort characteristics with supraspinatus and infraspinatus mean Goutallier grade.
| Supraspinatus | Infraspinatus | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs | rs | |||
| Age, years | 0.267 | 0.161 | 0.349 | 0.063 |
| Male, % | 0.344 | 0.068 | 0.532 | 0.003 |
| Tear size | 0.206 | 0.283 | 0.346 | 0.066 |
| Documented trauma | −0.285 | 0.134 | −0.019 | 0.922 |
Correlation of crescent-/U-shaped tear cohort characteristics with supraspinatus and infraspinatus mean Goutallier grade.
| Supraspinatus | Infraspinatus | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs | rs | |||
| Age, years | 0.712 | 0.031 | 0.720 | 0.029 |
| Male, % | 0.498 | 0.173 | 0.545 | 0.129 |
| Tear size | 0.523 | 0.148 | 0.525 | 0.146 |
| Documented trauma | 0.429 | 0.250 | 0.518 | 0.154 |
Correlation of posterosuperior complete tear cohort characteristics with supraspinatus and infraspinatus mean Goutallier grade.
| Supraspinatus | Infraspinatus | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs | rs | |||||||||||
| Age, years | 0.272 | 0.368 | 0.229 | 0.452 | ||||||||
| Male, % | −0.100 | 0.746 | −0.223 | 0.463 | ||||||||
| Tear size | 0.796 | 0.001 | 0.793 | 0.001 | ||||||||
| Documented trauma | −0.101 | 0.743 | −0.233 | 0.444 | ||||||||