Anna Maria Frezza1, Tarek Assi2, Salvatore Lo Vullo3, Eytan Ben-Ami4, Armelle Dufresne5, Kan Yonemori6, Emi Noguchi6, Brittany Siontis7, Richard Ferraro8, Pawel Teterycz9, Florence Duffaud10, Vinod Ravi11, Bruno Vincenzi12, Hans Gelderblom13, Maria A Pantaleo14, Giacomo G Baldi15, Ingrid Desar16, Alexander Fedenko17, Robert G Maki18, Robin L Jones19, Robert S Benjamin11, Jean Yves Blay5, Akira Kawai6, Mrinal Gounder8, Alessandro Gronchi20, Axel Le Cesne2, Olivier Mir2, Anna M Czarnecka9, Scott Schuetze7, Andrew J Wagner4, Julien Adam21, Marta Barisella22, Marta Sbaraglia23, Jason L Hornick24, Alexandra Meurgey25, Luigi Mariani3, Paolo G Casali1,26, Katherine Thornton4, Silvia Stacchiotti1. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy. 2. Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France. 3. Unit of Clinical Epidemiology and Trial Organization, IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy. 4. Center for Sarcoma and Bone Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard & Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France. 6. Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. 7. Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 8. Department of Medicine, Sarcoma Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York. 9. Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute-Oncology Center, Warsaw, Poland. 10. Department of Medical Oncology, La Timone University Hospital, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France. 11. Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 12. Department of Medical Oncology, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy. 13. Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands. 14. Department of Specialized, Experimental and Diagnostic Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. 15. Department of Medical Oncology, Nuovo Ospedale "S. Stefano,", Prato, Italy. 16. Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. 17. Department of Medical Oncology, N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research, Moscow, Russian Federation. 18. Medical Oncology, Northwell Cancer Institute and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Long Island, New York. 19. Sarcoma Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom. 20. Sarcoma Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy. 21. Department of Pathology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France. 22. Department of Diagnostic Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. 23. Department of Pathology, Treviso Regional Hospital, Italy. 24. Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 25. Department of Biopathology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France. 26. Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intimal sarcoma (InS) is an exceedingly rare neoplasm with an unfavorable prognosis, for which new potentially active treatments are under development. We report on the activity of anthracycline-based regimens, gemcitabine-based regimens, and pazopanib in patients with InS. METHODS: Seventeen sarcoma reference centers in Europe, the United States, and Japan contributed data to this retrospective analysis. Patients with MDM2-positive InS who were treated with anthracycline-based regimens, gemcitabine-based regimens, or pazopanib between October 2001 and January 2018 were selected. Local pathological review was performed to confirm diagnosis. Response was assessed by RECIST1.1. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were computed by Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were included (66 anthracycline-based regimens; 26 gemcitabine-based regimens; 12 pazopanib). In the anthracycline-based group, 24 (36%) patients were treated for localized disease, and 42 (64%) patients were treated for advanced disease. The real-world overall response rate (rwORR) was 38%. For patients with localized disease, the median RFS was 14.6 months. For patients with advanced disease, the median PFS was 7.7 months. No anthracycline-related cardiac toxicity was reported in patients with cardiac InS (n = 26). For gemcitabine and pazopanib, the rwORR was 8%, and the median PFS was 3.2 and 3.7 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: This retrospective series shows the activity of anthracycline-based regimens in InS. Of note, anthracyclines were used in patients with cardiac InS with no significant cardiac toxicity. The prognosis in patients with InS remains poor, and new active drugs and treatment strategies are needed.
BACKGROUND: Intimal sarcoma (InS) is an exceedingly rare neoplasm with an unfavorable prognosis, for which new potentially active treatments are under development. We report on the activity of anthracycline-based regimens, gemcitabine-based regimens, and pazopanib in patients with InS. METHODS: Seventeen sarcoma reference centers in Europe, the United States, and Japan contributed data to this retrospective analysis. Patients with MDM2-positive InS who were treated with anthracycline-based regimens, gemcitabine-based regimens, or pazopanib between October 2001 and January 2018 were selected. Local pathological review was performed to confirm diagnosis. Response was assessed by RECIST1.1. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were computed by Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were included (66 anthracycline-based regimens; 26 gemcitabine-based regimens; 12 pazopanib). In the anthracycline-based group, 24 (36%) patients were treated for localized disease, and 42 (64%) patients were treated for advanced disease. The real-world overall response rate (rwORR) was 38%. For patients with localized disease, the median RFS was 14.6 months. For patients with advanced disease, the median PFS was 7.7 months. No anthracycline-related cardiac toxicity was reported in patients with cardiac InS (n = 26). For gemcitabine and pazopanib, the rwORR was 8%, and the median PFS was 3.2 and 3.7 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: This retrospective series shows the activity of anthracycline-based regimens in InS. Of note, anthracyclines were used in patients with cardiac InS with no significant cardiac toxicity. The prognosis in patients with InS remains poor, and new active drugs and treatment strategies are needed.
Authors: Ian Judson; Jaap Verweij; Hans Gelderblom; Jörg T Hartmann; Patrick Schöffski; Jean-Yves Blay; J Martijn Kerst; Josef Sufliarsky; Jeremy Whelan; Peter Hohenberger; Anders Krarup-Hansen; Thierry Alcindor; Sandrine Marreaud; Saskia Litière; Catherine Hermans; Cyril Fisher; Pancras C W Hogendoorn; A Paolo dei Tos; Winette T A van der Graaf Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2014-03-05 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: A Kollár; R L Jones; S Stacchiotti; H Gelderblom; M Guida; G Grignani; N Steeghs; A Safwat; D Katz; F Duffaud; S Sleijfer; W T van der Graaf; N Touati; S Litière; S Marreaud; A Gronchi; B Kasper Journal: Acta Oncol Date: 2016-11-14 Impact factor: 4.089
Authors: S Stacchiotti; E Palassini; R Sanfilippo; B Vincenzi; M G Arena; A M Bochicchio; P De Rosa; A Nuzzo; S Turano; C Morosi; A P Dei Tos; S Pilotti; P G Casali Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2011-04-04 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Agnès Neuville; Françoise Collin; Patrick Bruneval; Marie Parrens; Françoise Thivolet; Anne Gomez-Brouchet; Philippe Terrier; Vincent Thomas de Montpreville; François Le Gall; Isabelle Hostein; Pauline Lagarde; Frédéric Chibon; Jean-Michel Coindre Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: S Secondino; V Grazioli; F Valentino; M Pin; A Pagani; A Sciortino; C Klersy; M G Callegari; P Morbini; R Dore; M Paulli; P Pedrazzoli; A M D'armini Journal: Sarcoma Date: 2017-08-20
Authors: Andreas von Deimling; Gunhild Mechtersheimer; Christian Koelsche; Jamal K Benhamida; Felix K F Kommoss; Damian Stichel; David T W Jones; Stefan M Pfister; Christoph E Heilig; Stefan Fröhling; Albrecht Stenzinger; Rolf Buslei; Thomas Mentzel; Daniel Baumhoer; Marc Ladanyi; Cristina R Antonescu; Uta Flucke; Joost van Gorp; Beata Bode-Lesniewska Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2021-07-26 Impact factor: 7.842