Literature DB >> 31536414

Public Health Research Priorities to Address Female Genital Mutilation or Cutting in the United States.

Holly G Atkinson1, Deborah Ottenheimer1, Ranit Mishori1.   

Abstract

Female genital mutilation or cutting (FGM/C), an age-old tradition that is still widely practiced around the world, is gaining recognition as an important public health issue in the United States. Increasingly, because of migration, women and girls affected by FGM/C have become members of host communities where the practice is not culturally acceptable.According to recent conservative estimates, more than 513 000 immigrant women and girls living in the United States have undergone or are at risk for FGM/C, a significant increase from the 1990 estimate of 168 000. The arrests of physicians in Michigan in 2017 for performing FGM/C on minors underscores the fact that cutting is happening in the United States.We have identified numerous gaps in our understanding of the magnitude of the problem in the United States and in the availability of scientific data informing a variety of interventions (preventive, clinical, educational, legal). We catalog these major gaps and propose a research agenda that can help public health experts, researchers, clinicians, and other stakeholders to establish priorities as we confront FGM/C as an important health issue affecting hundreds of thousands of women and girls in the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31536414      PMCID: PMC6775906          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  11 in total

1.  Female genital alteration: a compromise solution.

Authors:  Kavita Shah Arora; Allan J Jacobs
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  A survey of honor-related practices among US obstetricians and gynecologists.

Authors:  Amirhossein Moaddab; Laurence B McCullough; Frank A Chervenak; Lauren Stark; Jay Schulkin; Gary A Dildy; Susan P Raine; Alireza A Shamshirsaz
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.561

3.  Moral Hypocrisy or Intellectual Inconsistency?: A Historical Perspective on Our Habit of Placing Male and Female Genital Cutting in Separate Ethical Boxes.

Authors:  Robert Darby
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  2016-06

Review 4.  A mixed-method synthesis of knowledge, experiences and attitudes of health professionals to Female Genital Mutilation.

Authors:  María Reig-Alcaraz; José Siles-González; Carmen Solano-Ruiz
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.187

5.  Missed opportunities for diagnosis of female genital mutilation.

Authors:  Jasmine Abdulcadir; Adeline Dugerdil; Michel Boulvain; Michal Yaron; Christiane Margairaz; Olivier Irion; Patrick Petignat
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.561

6.  The practice of female genital mutilation across the world: Data availability and approaches to measurement.

Authors:  Claudia Cappa; Luk Van Baelen; Els Leye
Journal:  Glob Public Health       Date:  2019-02-06

7.  The issue of reinfibulation.

Authors:  Gamal I Serour
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 3.561

Review 8.  What do we know about assessing healthcare students and professionals' knowledge, attitude and practice regarding female genital mutilation? A systematic review.

Authors:  Jasmine Abdulcadir; Lale Say; Christina Pallitto
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.223

9.  Female Genital Mutilation: A Visual Reference and Learning Tool for Health Care Professionals.

Authors:  Jasmine Abdulcadir; Lucrezia Catania; Michelle Jane Hindin; Lale Say; Patrick Petignat; Omar Abdulcadir
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Secular trends in the prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting among girls: a systematic analysis.

Authors:  Ngianga-Bakwin Kandala; Martinsixtus C Ezejimofor; Olalekan A Uthman; Paul Komba
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2018-11-06
View more
  3 in total

1.  Addressing Female Genital Cutting among service providers in New York.

Authors:  Adeyinka M Akinsulure-Smith; Tracy Wong; Moonkyung Min
Journal:  Prof Psychol Res Pr       Date:  2021-05-20

2.  Assessing the reliability and validity of attitudes and confidence scales for the care of women and girls affected by female genital mutilation/cutting.

Authors:  Christina X Marea; Nicole Warren; Nancy Glass; Crista Johnson-Agbakwu; Nancy Perrin
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 3.  Review of Web-Based Toolkits for Health Care Practitioners Working With Women and Girls Affected by or at Risk of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting.

Authors:  Hina Shaikh; Karen A McDonnell
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.