Literature DB >> 31535746

Non-invasively quantified changes in left ventricular activation predict outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Daniel J Friedman1,2, Kasper Emerek2,3, Steen Møller Hansen4, Christoffer Polcwiartek2,5, Peter L Sørensen6, Zak Loring2, Joanne Sutter2, Peter Søgaard4,5, Joseph Kisslo2, Claus Graff6, Brett D Atwater1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Changes in left ventricular (LV) activation after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) influence survival but are difficult to quantify noninvasively. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We studied 527 CRT patients to assess whether noninvasive quantification of changes in LV activation, defined by change (Δ) in QRS area (QRSA), can predict outcomes after CRT. The study outcome was time until LV assist device(LVAD), cardiac transplant, or death. The three-dimensional QRSA was measured from clinical 12 lead ECGs which were transformed into vectorcardiograms using the Kors method. QRSA was calculated as (QRSx2  + QRSy2  + QRSz2 )1/2 ; ΔQRSA was calculated as post-QRSA minus pre-QRSA, where a negative value represents a reduction in LV activation delay. Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to relate ΔQRSA area with outcomes after stratifying the population into quartiles of ΔQRSA. The median baseline QRSA of 93.6 µVs decreased to 59.7 µVs after CRT. Progressive reductions in QRSA with CRT were associated with a lower rate of LVAD, transplant, or death across patient quartiles (P < .001). In Cox regression analyses, ΔQRSA was associated with outcomes independent of QRS morphology and other clinical variables (Q1[greatest decrease] vs Q4[smallest change=reference], HR 0.45, CI, 0.30-0.70, P < .001). There was no interaction between ΔQRSA and QRS morphology.
CONCLUSIONS: CRT induced ΔQRSA was associated with clinically meaningful changes in event-free survival. ΔQRSA may be a novel target to guide lead implantation and device optimization.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac resynchronization therapy; dyssynchrony; electrocardiography; heart failure; outcomes; vectorcardiography

Year:  2019        PMID: 31535746      PMCID: PMC6818967          DOI: 10.1111/jce.14192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  31 in total

1.  Effects of cardiac resynchronization on disease progression in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, an indication for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, and mildly symptomatic chronic heart failure.

Authors:  William T Abraham; James B Young; Angel R León; Stuart Adler; Alan J Bank; Shelley A Hall; Randy Lieberman; L Bing Liem; John B O'Connell; John S Schroeder; Kevin R Wheelan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-10-25       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  The anatomic and electrical location of the left ventricular lead predicts ventricular arrhythmia in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Daniel J Friedman; Gaurav A Upadhyay; Robert K Altman; Mary Orencole; Conor D Barrett; Theofanie Mela; E Kevin Heist; Jagmeet P Singh
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 6.343

3.  Meta-Analysis of the Usefulness of Change in QRS Width to Predict Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  Panagiotis Korantzopoulos; Zhiwei Zhang; Guangping Li; Nikolaos Fragakis; Tong Liu
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  The role of interventricular conduction delay to predict clinical response with cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Michael R Gold; Yinghong Yu; Nicholas Wold; John D Day
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 6.343

5.  Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by QRS Morphology in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT).

Authors:  Wojciech Zareba; Helmut Klein; Iwona Cygankiewicz; W Jackson Hall; Scott McNitt; Mary Brown; David Cannom; James P Daubert; Michael Eldar; Michael R Gold; Jeffrey J Goldberger; Ilan Goldenberg; Edgar Lichstein; Heinz Pitschner; Mayer Rashtian; Scott Solomon; Sami Viskin; Paul Wang; Arthur J Moss
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Vectorcardiographic QRS area as a novel predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Caroline J M van Deursen; Kevin Vernooy; Elton Dudink; Lennart Bergfeldt; Harry J G M Crijns; Frits W Prinzen; Liliane Wecke
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 1.438

7.  Association Between a Prolonged PR Interval and Outcomes of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Report From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Authors:  Daniel J Friedman; Haikun Bao; Erica S Spatz; Jeptha P Curtis; James P Daubert; Sana M Al-Khatib
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Effect of QRS duration and morphology on cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes in mild heart failure: results from the Resynchronization Reverses Remodeling in Systolic Left Ventricular Dysfunction (REVERSE) study.

Authors:  Michael R Gold; Christophe Thébault; Cecilia Linde; William T Abraham; Bart Gerritse; Stefano Ghio; Martin St John Sutton; Jean-Claude Daubert
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Left ventricular lead electrical delay predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Jagmeet P Singh; Dali Fan; E Kevin Heist; Chrisfouad R Alabiad; Cynthia Taub; Vivek Reddy; Moussa Mansour; Michael H Picard; Jeremy N Ruskin; Theofanie Mela
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 6.343

10.  Vectorcardiographic QRS area identifies delayed left ventricular lateral wall activation determined by electroanatomic mapping in candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Masih Mafi Rad; Gilbert W M Wijntjens; Elien B Engels; Yuri Blaauw; Justin G L M Luermans; Laurent Pison; Harry J Crijns; Frits W Prinzen; Kevin Vernooy
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 6.343

View more
  5 in total

1.  Concomitant changes in ventricular depolarization and repolarization and long-term outcomes of biventricular pacing.

Authors:  Christoffer Polcwiartek; Daniel J Friedman; Kasper Emerek; Claus Graff; Peter L Sørensen; Joseph Kisslo; Zak Loring; Steen M Hansen; Kristian Kragholm; Bhupendar Tayal; Svend E Jensen; Peter Søgaard; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Brett D Atwater
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-09-26       Impact factor: 1.976

2.  Reduction in the QRS area after cardiac resynchronization therapy is associated with survival and echocardiographic response.

Authors:  Mohammed A Ghossein; Antonius M W van Stipdonk; Filip Plesinger; Mariëlle Kloosterman; Philippe C Wouters; Odette A E Salden; Mathias Meine; Alexander H Maass; Frits W Prinzen; Kevin Vernooy
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-01-28

3.  Vectorcardiographic QRS area as a predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Mohammed A Ghossein; Antonius Mw van Stipdonk; Frits W Prinzen; Kevin Vernooy
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.327

4.  Left bundle-branch block is associated with asimilar dyssynchronous phenotype in heart failure patients with normal and reduced ejection fractions.

Authors:  Daniel J Friedman; Kasper Emerek; Joseph Kisslo; Peter Søgaard; Brett D Atwater
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Sex differences in left ventricular electrical dyssynchrony and outcomes with cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Daniel J Friedman; Kasper Emerek; Peter L Sørensen; Emily P Zeitler; Sarah A Goldstein; Sana M Al-Khatib; Peter Søgaard; Claus Graff; Brett D Atwater
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2020-08-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.